Organised loansharking involving vandalism first appeared in mid 1980s. 25 years, despite the numerous changes in laws and ratcheting up the penalties, it continues unabated.
Anyone has a clue why this seems to gone awry unlike the creation of CNB which had a significant impact on the drugs trade.
I can think of several reasons.
Firstly, it involves numbers. How many drug addicts compared to borrowers? More involved, more problems.
Secondly, access. Any Ah Beng with some money can open a 'stall' and become ah long. How many has the connections to deal in drugs?
Thirdly, punishment meted out. For CNB cases, long jail terms and even death penalty. It was only recently that ah long offences received draconian sentences - fine, jail, rottan.
Fourthly, education and publicity. When young, we were educated on consequences of drug trafficking and addiction. Hardly on ah longs.
Fifthly, response to problems (family, personal etc). When confronted with $$$ problems, we seek assistance from ah longs, not drug traffickers.
And there are many who need $$$ urgently, resulting from gambling habits.
Sixthly, nature of biz. Its COD for drug biz most of the time. No harassment needed. Ah long biz differs.