..does anone know how his mother look like ?
Sounds like some chronic mental trauma due to,... ?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Liew Mun Leong Billion Dollars Temasek Reputation Has Been Rubbished
- Thread starter GUDANGARAM
- Start date
Sounds like some chronic mental trauma due to,... ?
Riche.
Her photo is in one of the earlier posts in this discussion thread
What is the situation and position on this matter?
Is the MOM and the Attorney General taking any steps with respect to the allegations against Liew Mun Leong and Karl Liew regarding their alleged violation of the MOM policies (that a domestic helper works at one household, and nit clean the homes of two households), and filing a false report with the police, providing false evidence?
Are people still buying the books written by him?
Mr. Liew claimed that it was his civic duty to file a police report when there is apparent doing by his domestic helper.
Is he filing a report with the police re his son, Karl Liew providing false evidence, and his filing a false report?
An individual may be financially wealthy, but could have talked to the domestic helper without filing a police report, or did Mr. Liew and his son, Karl Liew, filed the police report to intimidate the domestic helper to try to deter her from reporting to MOM.
Is the MOM and the Attorney General taking any steps with respect to the allegations against Liew Mun Leong and Karl Liew regarding their alleged violation of the MOM policies (that a domestic helper works at one household, and nit clean the homes of two households), and filing a false report with the police, providing false evidence?
Are people still buying the books written by him?
Mr. Liew claimed that it was his civic duty to file a police report when there is apparent doing by his domestic helper.
Is he filing a report with the police re his son, Karl Liew providing false evidence, and his filing a false report?
An individual may be financially wealthy, but could have talked to the domestic helper without filing a police report, or did Mr. Liew and his son, Karl Liew, filed the police report to intimidate the domestic helper to try to deter her from reporting to MOM.
Due to his unsound mind, acquitted with stern warning?
Singapore is a bully system. I have the money status and power. What u going to do ?
Ex-Changi Airport Group chairman’s son Karl Liew admits lying to judge in Parti Liyani case
Karl Liew pleaded guilty to one charge of giving false information to a public servant. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent
Mar 30, 2023
SINGAPORE - Karl Liew admitted to lying to a district judge in the case involving his family’s former maid, Ms Parti Liyani, who had been accused of stealing from his family.
The 45-year-old, who is the son of former Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong, pleaded guilty on Thursday to one charge of giving false information to a public servant.
The prosecution asked for a fine of $5,000 and the case has been adjourned to April 14.
After a trial, Ms Parti, an Indonesian, then 45, was initially convicted in 2019 of stealing $34,000 worth of items from the Liews.
She was acquitted after the High Court overturned her conviction on appeal in 2020.
Ms Parti, who began working for the Liew family in 2007, was asked in March 2016 to do chores at Karl Liew‘s home and clean his office at another location.
She was unhappy at being made to do extra work for him.
The Liew family terminated her employment in October 2016, and she was given two hours to pack her belongings into three boxes.
Ms Parti threatened to lodge a complaint with the Ministry of Manpower before returning to Indonesia.
She had asked Karl Liew to pay for the boxes to be shipped to her. The next day, the Liew family opened the boxes.
A police report was made claiming that some of the items she had packed in the boxes belonged to the Liew family.
Ms Parti was arrested when she returned to Singapore in December 2016, and was charged with four counts of theft in August 2017.
She claimed trial to the charges, was convicted and sentenced to two years and two months’ jail in 2019.
Ms Parti was acquitted after an appeal in 2020, in which the High Court ruled the original conviction was unsafe, highlighting the police’s handling of the evidence.
It had been reported in February 2022 that the two police officers who were involved in Ms Parti’s case had neglected their duties and had fallen short of expectations.
Both officers were fined, and the penalties were calculated through the number of months of salary increments foregone, said Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam on Feb 14, 2022.
He was giving Parliament an update into the internal investigations of the case.
Mr Shanmugam had said both the investigation officer (IO) and his supervisor had neglected their duties, resulting in three lapses.
The first was that the IO did not visit the crime scene to promptly carry out investigations and gather evidence, contributing to a break in the chain of custody for some exhibits.
The second was the IO did not properly verify some of the claims made by parties during the investigation.
The third lapse was the supervisor not providing sufficient guidance.
The minister said the officers had done their jobs under difficult circumstances, facing workload challenges due to a manpower shortage in the police force.
He said both officers faced penalties in the medium range.
It does not matter how apparently that they have been suxcessful in their career and life, or how financially wealthy they are, they did not treat Ms. Parti Liyani fairly and as a fellow human being, and they are despicable, dishonest and vengeful.
Based on this case, with respect, unfortunately, I believe that there may be more of such individuals in the establishment.
Based on this case, with respect, unfortunately, I believe that there may be more of such individuals in the establishment.
No worry! The penalty literally is just money.
But, look at the intangible "KARMA" penalty, the family will suffer Karma in very near future, 因果报应!
Last edited:
Karl Liew, son of CAG’s ex-chairman, sentenced to 2 weeks’ jail for lying to judge in Parti Liyani case
Karl Liew pleaded guilty to giving false information to a public servant in March. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent
Apr 14, 2023
SINGAPORE - Karl Liew, the son of Changi Airport Group’s former chairman Liew Mun Leong, was sentenced to two weeks’ jail on Friday for lying to a district judge in an earlier trial.
It involved the family’s former maid, Ms Parti Liyani, who had been accused of stealing from their household.
Three weeks before testifying at her trial, Karl Liew was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease - a neurodegenerative disorder that leads to muscle tremors as well as difficulty in walking and balancing.
Karl Liew, 45, pleaded guilty on March 30 to giving false information to a public servant and could have been jailed for up two years, fined or both.
Ms Parti, 49, started working as a maid in his household in March 2007.
The Indonesian was asked in March 2016 to do chores at his home and clean his office at another location.
She was unhappy about being made to do extra work.
The Liew family terminated her employment in October 2016, and she was given two hours to pack her belongings into three boxes.
Ms Parti threatened to lodge a complaint with the Ministry of Manpower before returning to Indonesia.
She had asked Karl Liew to pay for the boxes to be shipped to her. The day after she left, the Liew family opened the boxes.
A police report was made, claiming that some of the items she had packed in the boxes belonged to the family.
Ms Parti was arrested when she returned to Singapore in December 2016 to find work.
She was later charged with multiple counts of theft and was tried before District Judge Olivia Low from April 2018 to March 2019.
One of these charges alleged that she had stolen items with a total value of $46,856. They included 120 pieces of clothing that were valued at $150 each.
These included a cream polo T-shirt and a red blouse.
Karl Liew was called as a prosecution witness during the trial and Ms Parti’s pro bono lawyer, Mr Anil Balchandani, cross-examined him.
On July 17, 2018, Karl Liew falsely testified that the cream polo T-shirt and the red blouse belonged to him.
Judge Low later amended the charge on March 20, 2019, removing from it five articles of clothing, including the T-shirt and the blouse. She found that the two garments did not belong to Karl Liew.
But Ms Parti was convicted of stealing more than $30,000 worth of items from the Liews and in 2019 was jailed for two years and two months.
She was acquitted after the High Court overturned her conviction on appeal in 2020.
The High Court ruled that the original conviction was unsafe, highlighting the police’s handling of the evidence.
In February 2022, the media reported that two police officers who were involved in Ms Parti’s case had neglected their duties and fallen short of expectations.
Both officers were fined, and the penalties were calculated through the number of months of salary increments forgone, said Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam on Feb 14, 2022.
He was giving Parliament an update on the internal investigations of the case.
Mr Shanmugam said both the investigation officer (IO) and his supervisor had neglected their duties, resulting in three lapses.
The first was the IO did not visit the crime scene to promptly carry out investigations and gather evidence, contributing to a break in the chain of custody of some exhibits.
The second was the IO did not properly verify some of the claims made by the parties during the investigation.
The third lapse was the supervisor not providing sufficient guidance.
The minister said the officers had done their jobs under difficult circumstances, facing workload challenges due to a manpower shortage in the police force.
He said both officers faced penalties in the medium range.
At first glance, it sounds like a perjury charge - charge that would surely appease the peasants.
However, this is the charge that was preferred against him:
Under section 182 of the Penal Code (Cap. 224, 2008 Rev Ed), it is an offence for a person to give any public servant any information he knows or believes to be false. An offender convicted of an offence under this section shall be punished with imprisonment of up to 2 years, or with fine, or with both.
The conclusion ? Karl has not been charged for perjury.
However, this is the charge that was preferred against him:
Under section 182 of the Penal Code (Cap. 224, 2008 Rev Ed), it is an offence for a person to give any public servant any information he knows or believes to be false. An offender convicted of an offence under this section shall be punished with imprisonment of up to 2 years, or with fine, or with both.
The conclusion ? Karl has not been charged for perjury.
very long drawn case... :(
Maid accused of stealing from ex-CAG chairman’s family said allegations affected her reputation
Ms Parti Liyani was convicted of theft in 2019, and acquitted in 2020 after the High Court overturned her conviction on appeal. PHOTO: ST FILE
Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent
Apr 14, 2023
SINGAPORE - In a statement on Friday issued via the Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (Home), Ms Parti Liyani, who had been accused of theft, said the allegations against her had affected her reputation.
The 49-year-old Indonesian had worked as a maid for the family of Changi Airport Group’s former chairman Liew Mun Leong before she was accused of committing the offence.
Ms Parti was later convicted of stealing more than $30,000 worth of items from the Liews, and in 2019, was sentenced to two years and two months’ jail.
She was acquitted in 2020 after the High Court overturned her conviction on appeal.
Mr Liew’s son, Karl Liew, 45, was sentenced to two weeks’ jail on Friday after admitting that he had lied to a judge during Ms Parti’s trial.
In her statement on Friday, Ms Parti said she was worried that her ageing mother would have read the reports on her, as her case had been covered by Indonesian media.
She added that several of her friends in Singapore had lost trust in her before her acquittal.
Ms Parti said she was unable to work in Singapore while the charges hung over her head, and she had to remain in the country while her case was pending.
She said she was grateful to those in Singapore who had donated over $28,000 through Home’s fund-raising campaign to assist her.
But she added that it was still less than what she would have earned if she had been working here.
Ms Parti also had some harsh words for the Liews.
She said: “Since the day Liew Mun Leong filed a report to the police to the... hearing at the State Courts..., never once (did) Karl (show) any seriousness in giving honest evidence.
“There had been no sign of remorse nor any apology from himself and his family after my acquittal. It took facing legal charges that finally made him admit (his) guilt.”
this chap stands to inherit from Daddy hundreds of millions...
live and let live...lets move on...:(
Similar threads
