• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LCB: Sporns Are Complaint Kings! What ARROGANCE, This CCB Old Farker!0 Sense of Guilt

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
MINISTER Mentor Lee Kuan Yew was interviewed by The Wall Street Journal last week on a range of issues, including the May 7 general election. The interview was carried on Tuesday. Here is an edited excerpt of his comments on the polls:

Wall Street Journal (WSJ): What do you think will be the key issues?

MM Lee: I think we will remain the strongest party. There may be a few seats for the opposition either as constituency or non-constituency members because we have introduced new rules so that up to nine of the best losers from the opposition will be in Parliament, so the opposition's voice is heard.

At the moment, there are two Members of Parliament from the opposition and only one non-constituency member, but the law has been changed to increase the number of opposition members to at least nine in the next Parliament.

WSJ: What do you think the main issues will be for voters in Singapore?

MM Lee: Cost of living, cost of housing for young couples. We are building many new HDB homes but they cost more because they are better designed and more elegant.

But Singaporeans do not like waiting. They blame the immigrants for pushing up prices of the homes. The immigrants who are not citizens cannot buy new flats directly from the government, but they can buy off the open market from owners who want to sell their HDB flats.

So there is some discomfort on this issue. We have got new permanent residents who have entered the market. But our birthrate or fertility rate is 1.16.

We need 2.1 to replace the existing population. 1.16 means we are halving our population. If we do not accept migrants, we will be an ageing and a declining population. It is a trade-off.

But our people feel discomforted seeing about one million foreign workers in our total population of 5.1 million. But most of these are people on two-year work permits, that can be extended but they have to go home eventually. They do the construction and the heavy work.

If we do not have them seen in the trains and on the buses, how are they going to get to their work? If they are not here, who will do this work? They are mostly from China, India and the region.

Our citizens want the best of all worlds. But in real life, we have to make trade-offs.

WSJ: You know politicians want the best for all citizens.

MM Lee: That is our job.

WSJ: Any other issues that you think will be defining in this particular campaign?

MM Lee: Not really. The economy is doing well, we have raised living standards, employment prospects, education for their children; schools, institutions, tertiary institutions. We have catered for both the top end and the lower end for those not academically inclined. We formed and created institutes of technical education.
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: LCB: Sporns Are Complaint Kings! What ARROGANCE, This CCB Old Farker!0 Sense of G

LKY created the aging population and dabbled in eugenics only to find that bad genes also exists closer to his home. By 1976, I believe the fertility rate had dropped to 1.76. But he either failed maths or could not care about the fertility rate of Singaporeans. LKY is instrumental to creating a dying Singapore. Because at 2.1, it would have been optimal and Singapore population would have been around 2 millionish
 

karmabear

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: LCB: Sporns Are Complaint Kings! What ARROGANCE, This CCB Old Farker!0 Sense of G

He only has contempt for the people that he purports to serve. So all his policies were/are perfect, it's only the material he had was not perfect. Lucky thing he studied law, engineer sure become a failure. How come the bridge fall? Oh the concrete and steel bar lousy, my design was perfect.
 

CPT (NS) BRANDON

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: LCB: Sporns Are Complaint Kings! What ARROGANCE, This CCB Old Farker!0 Sense of G

LKY created the aging population and dabbled in eugenics only to find that bad genes also exists closer to his home. By 1976, I believe the fertility rate had dropped to 1.76. But he either failed maths or could not care about the fertility rate of Singaporeans. LKY is instrumental to creating a dying Singapore. Because at 2.1, it would have been optimal and Singapore population would have been around 2 millionish

I don't really understand your argument.

Are you saying that LKY caused Singapore's population to decline?

Do you really think that Singaporeans stopped having babies overnight because he told them to stop at two?

There are other factors at play, such as more women entering the work force, etc.
 

karmabear

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: LCB: Sporns Are Complaint Kings! What ARROGANCE, This CCB Old Farker!0 Sense of G

How about having heavy penalties on family and 3rd child? More importantly, thank GCT for his asset enhancement policies. Try buying a flat on one income now... Not impossible but not within reach of many. So how go have kids without maids if you need to work?

We are in the movie Speed, cannot stop ler!
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: LCB: Sporns Are Complaint Kings! What ARROGANCE, This CCB Old Farker!0 Sense of G

Lawyers are bad in maths and businesses. They overcharged their clients and very often lied in courts becos of free impunities given and the British legal system sucks. In British system their law is blind, justice is expensive.

LKY created the aging population and dabbled in eugenics only to find that bad genes also exists closer to his home. By 1976, I believe the fertility rate had dropped to 1.76. But he either failed maths or could not care about the fertility rate of Singaporeans. LKY is instrumental to creating a dying Singapore. Because at 2.1, it would have been optimal and Singapore population would have been around 2 millionish
 
Last edited:

boman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: LCB: Sporns Are Complaint Kings! What ARROGANCE, This CCB Old Farker!0 Sense of G

I agree with you that there are other factors at work with regards to Singaporeans having less children during the 70s and 80s. But there were strong PAP government "disincentives" to have more children. Go to:

http://countrystudies.us/singapore/14.htm

Scroll down to "Population Control Policies"

Also google for "Stop at 2" and "Singapore" and you can read more.

I don't really understand your argument.

Are you saying that LKY caused Singapore's population to decline?

Do you really think that Singaporeans stopped having babies overnight because he told them to stop at two?

There are other factors at play, such as more women entering the work force, etc.
 

fukyuman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: LCB: Sporns Are Complaint Kings! What ARROGANCE, This CCB Old Farker!0 Sense of G

Its a great shame until a future leader of Singapore apologized for women who are voluntarily forced to have their fallopian tubes cut due to their low education which is the indisputable sign of mental retardation according to the state.

I don't really understand your argument.

Are you saying that LKY caused Singapore's population to decline?

Do you really think that Singaporeans stopped having babies overnight because he told them to stop at two?

There are other factors at play, such as more women entering the work force, etc.
 
Top