-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious Lawyer Sarbrinder Singh, 49, Charged . Also Charged , Shree Manish Kalra, 26.
- Thread starter Kee Chew
- Start date
first got to Pass Hurdles and traps set up by LawSoc . to clear those Red Tapes and nail Singh is really not that easy. Must salute that Whistle Blower.
Lawyers as usual. Scums of society. Charges an arm and leg for cookie cutter conveyancing and standard matters. Lol
why Sarbrinder Singh licence not suspended yet ???
look at his case. take more than 3 years for law society to Act.
(From left) Shaikh Farid, lawyer Sarbrinder Singh and Shaikh Shabana Bi leave the State Court on Nov 7, 2016.
Court convicts trio for misappropriating $875,133 from MBS casino (Nov 2016)
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...o-for-misappropriating-875133-from-mbs-casino
Lawyers as usual. Scums of society. Charges an arm and leg for cookie cutter conveyancing and standard matters. Lol
They still rank higher than certain highly-paid politicians!
(From left) Shaikh Farid, lawyer Sarbrinder Singh and Shaikh Shabana Bi leave the State Court on Nov 7, 2016.
Court convicts trio for misappropriating $875,133 from MBS casino (Nov 2016)
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...o-for-misappropriating-875133-from-mbs-casino
this Singh got multiple very serious Transgressions yet the ST writer manage to
paint them all under a very Nice article above.
Bravo . Salute to ST , k c Vijayan.
They still rank higher than certain highly-paid politicians!
agreed. just look at the Articles above.
Singh made to look like a Helpful Singh.
unbelivable.
Sarbrinder Singh Mr Sarbrinder Singh was called to the Bar in 1995 after graduating from University of Wales, U.K. with LLB Honours (2nd Class Upper).
He has been involved in litigation ranging from the Magistrate’s Courts, District Court, High Court, Syariah Court and the Court of Appeal.
Mr Singh also has experience in advising individuals and companies on a wide array of legal matters.
In one of the recent notable cases of PP v Shaik Farid, Shaik Shabana and others [2017] SGDC 23, Mr Singh represented 2 accused persons in relation to charges involving conspiracy to commit criminal misappropriation of monies from the Marina Bay Sands Casino.
After the trial that lasted more than 20 days, the 2 accused persons were sentenced to 26 months’ and 21 months’ imprisonment respectively.
Parties have appealed against their sentence and convictions and the matter is pending in the High Court.
In the case of PP v Bhahwatkar Nitin Vasant Rao [2015] SGDC 254, the accused was charged for dangerous driving under Section 64(1) of the Road Traffic Act.
The Prosecution sought a custodial sentence of 3 months’ imprisonment and a disqualification period of 12 months.
After the mitigation plea, the Court imposed a fine of $2,500.00 and disqualification of his driving licence for 12 months.
In PP v Kim Chaemin, the Prosecution sought a custodial sentence for an 18 year old South Korean who attacked a victim as part of an unlawful assembly.
Mr Singh successfully argued for fine of $6,000.00.
The case of FirstLink Investments Corp Ltd v GT Payment Pte Ltd and others [2014] SGHCR 12 concerned the applicable standard to determine the validity of an international arbitration agreement for the purposes of a stay pursuant to section 6 of the International Arbitration Act.
Mr Singh successfully argued for the Plaintiff’s action against the defendants to be stayed in favour of arbitration.
In Ang Boon Kim (t/a ABK Leasing) v Goh Meng Leong, a moneylender’s applied to make a debtor bankrupt pursuant to a $350,000.00 loan at an interest rate of 240 percent a year.
Mr Singh successfully argued that his client’s (the debtor’s) payment of $700,000.00 should be first used to pay of the principal sum followed by the interest.
The High Court accepted this argument and dismissed the Plaintiff’s bid to make the debtor bankrupt.
Mr Singh treats every case with equal importance and is known for his hard work and tenacity in litigation matters. He remains a formidable opponent in trials where he puts up a fight for all clients.
He has been involved in litigation ranging from the Magistrate’s Courts, District Court, High Court, Syariah Court and the Court of Appeal.
Mr Singh also has experience in advising individuals and companies on a wide array of legal matters.
In one of the recent notable cases of PP v Shaik Farid, Shaik Shabana and others [2017] SGDC 23, Mr Singh represented 2 accused persons in relation to charges involving conspiracy to commit criminal misappropriation of monies from the Marina Bay Sands Casino.
After the trial that lasted more than 20 days, the 2 accused persons were sentenced to 26 months’ and 21 months’ imprisonment respectively.
Parties have appealed against their sentence and convictions and the matter is pending in the High Court.
In the case of PP v Bhahwatkar Nitin Vasant Rao [2015] SGDC 254, the accused was charged for dangerous driving under Section 64(1) of the Road Traffic Act.
The Prosecution sought a custodial sentence of 3 months’ imprisonment and a disqualification period of 12 months.
After the mitigation plea, the Court imposed a fine of $2,500.00 and disqualification of his driving licence for 12 months.
In PP v Kim Chaemin, the Prosecution sought a custodial sentence for an 18 year old South Korean who attacked a victim as part of an unlawful assembly.
Mr Singh successfully argued for fine of $6,000.00.
The case of FirstLink Investments Corp Ltd v GT Payment Pte Ltd and others [2014] SGHCR 12 concerned the applicable standard to determine the validity of an international arbitration agreement for the purposes of a stay pursuant to section 6 of the International Arbitration Act.
Mr Singh successfully argued for the Plaintiff’s action against the defendants to be stayed in favour of arbitration.
In Ang Boon Kim (t/a ABK Leasing) v Goh Meng Leong, a moneylender’s applied to make a debtor bankrupt pursuant to a $350,000.00 loan at an interest rate of 240 percent a year.
Mr Singh successfully argued that his client’s (the debtor’s) payment of $700,000.00 should be first used to pay of the principal sum followed by the interest.
The High Court accepted this argument and dismissed the Plaintiff’s bid to make the debtor bankrupt.
Mr Singh treats every case with equal importance and is known for his hard work and tenacity in litigation matters. He remains a formidable opponent in trials where he puts up a fight for all clients.
Sounds so bullshitty. Never ever trust a lawyer, just like never trust insurance agent, property agent or durian sellers. They all have the same characteristics
Sounds so bullshitty. Never ever trust a lawyer, just like never trust insurance agent, property agent or durian sellers. They all have the same characteristics
Add prostitute and gins to the list. Lying sluts.
They are aryan race loke nazi germansNorth India Singh are whiter ???
aka Modern Singh ???
at least DS put on his Singature Black Turban
this S Singh wear no Turban .
Mr Singh has also been faced with a separate criminal charge in another case. He reportedly threatened to spread the explicit videos and photos of a female foreigner, thus injuring her reputation. The said female foreigner was reported to have worked for him as a paralegal, although she had no valid work pass. She is allegedly a Malaysian national. Under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act, the lawyer is alleged to have employed the female foreigner as a paralegal or administration official without a valid work pass between January 2016 and March 2016. The pass the woman possessed was a special pass, which is only given for special purposes, like helping with an investigation or a court case, or for stateless persons who stay in the country. Mr Singh is accused of criminal intimidation towards the woman on March 30, 2016.
Similar threads
