- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
Source: Asiaone.com
THE police have responded to comments about public perception that they do not manage war relics found on private property.
This response came about after The Straits Times reported that a site manager was unable to get authorities to help remove a war relic from his premesis after calling the police.
Director of Operations, Assistant Commissioner of Police Lim Kok Thai issued the following statement:
"There has been a number of postings and media articles giving the impression that the Police do not manage war relics when it is found in private property. I would like to dispel this notion. Police make no distinction between private and public property. The fundamental issue is one of public safety.
"Let me elaborate. The Police are responsible for ensuring public safety wherever the threat may be found. When a suspected bomb is found, whether on public or private property, the Police should be informed immediately.
(Public Safety is public safety, regardless of source of safety threat. The police distinction between bomb relics and whether on public or private creates the impression that "private" bombs are not their problem, the Police's explanation notwithstanding).
In this particular case, the Police responded to the call, secured the site, and contacted the CBRE (SAF's Chemical Biological Radiological and Explosives Defence Group) for expert assistance.
"The Police does not have a bomb disposal capability (This is a worry - Home Minister Teo told us to be vigilant but if we find something suspicious, the circuitous process of passing around the bomb parcel could lead to the public being killed if there is a real threat). and relies on CBRE. When their expert assessment was that the relic did not pose an imminent threat to public safety and can be removed by specialist contractors, the Police conveyed this to the landlord.
"And when the landlord had difficulty securing the services of a contractor, the Police again approached CBRE for help and they sent a team to the scene and removed the relic. (It is ironic that the ST carried out a story about how citizens can have access to all government services at one stop. A bomb is a bomb, relic or live. It appears that administrative procedures took precedence over the safety of the public, not to mention the loss of productivity all round.
"I would like to share that this reliance on specialist contractors who are qualified and licensed for such disposal of relics, is a well-established practice. This has been the arrangement for relics found and assessed to be safe for removal, for instance, in construction sites in the course of soil work, excavation or dredging. In the last 6 months, there were over 20 cases where relics were handled in this manner.
"Whatever the arrangement, the Police will remain in charge of the scene to ensure that disposal is effected in a proper manner and that public safety is not, in any way or at any time, compromised."
(I beg to differ. Any delay in disposing the relic bomb did expose the public to additional danger, if it was not there. That the party involved had to make a call to the Home and Deputy Prime Minister reflects the desperation of the concerned citizen and the seriousness of the situation.
In the light of DPM Teo's call for greater heightened awareness following the jailing of a leading JI man in Indonesia, the manner of the police response would not help in instilling the importance of the Minister's message.
I hope that the Home Minister will clarify the situation, especially on the reports that if found in private property, it is not the business of the government, which the police response did not address.
THE police have responded to comments about public perception that they do not manage war relics found on private property.
This response came about after The Straits Times reported that a site manager was unable to get authorities to help remove a war relic from his premesis after calling the police.
Director of Operations, Assistant Commissioner of Police Lim Kok Thai issued the following statement:
"There has been a number of postings and media articles giving the impression that the Police do not manage war relics when it is found in private property. I would like to dispel this notion. Police make no distinction between private and public property. The fundamental issue is one of public safety.
"Let me elaborate. The Police are responsible for ensuring public safety wherever the threat may be found. When a suspected bomb is found, whether on public or private property, the Police should be informed immediately.
(Public Safety is public safety, regardless of source of safety threat. The police distinction between bomb relics and whether on public or private creates the impression that "private" bombs are not their problem, the Police's explanation notwithstanding).
In this particular case, the Police responded to the call, secured the site, and contacted the CBRE (SAF's Chemical Biological Radiological and Explosives Defence Group) for expert assistance.
"The Police does not have a bomb disposal capability (This is a worry - Home Minister Teo told us to be vigilant but if we find something suspicious, the circuitous process of passing around the bomb parcel could lead to the public being killed if there is a real threat). and relies on CBRE. When their expert assessment was that the relic did not pose an imminent threat to public safety and can be removed by specialist contractors, the Police conveyed this to the landlord.
"And when the landlord had difficulty securing the services of a contractor, the Police again approached CBRE for help and they sent a team to the scene and removed the relic. (It is ironic that the ST carried out a story about how citizens can have access to all government services at one stop. A bomb is a bomb, relic or live. It appears that administrative procedures took precedence over the safety of the public, not to mention the loss of productivity all round.
"I would like to share that this reliance on specialist contractors who are qualified and licensed for such disposal of relics, is a well-established practice. This has been the arrangement for relics found and assessed to be safe for removal, for instance, in construction sites in the course of soil work, excavation or dredging. In the last 6 months, there were over 20 cases where relics were handled in this manner.
"Whatever the arrangement, the Police will remain in charge of the scene to ensure that disposal is effected in a proper manner and that public safety is not, in any way or at any time, compromised."
(I beg to differ. Any delay in disposing the relic bomb did expose the public to additional danger, if it was not there. That the party involved had to make a call to the Home and Deputy Prime Minister reflects the desperation of the concerned citizen and the seriousness of the situation.
In the light of DPM Teo's call for greater heightened awareness following the jailing of a leading JI man in Indonesia, the manner of the police response would not help in instilling the importance of the Minister's message.
I hope that the Home Minister will clarify the situation, especially on the reports that if found in private property, it is not the business of the government, which the police response did not address.