• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Iswaran on Govt's enabling initiatives.

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
25,134
Points
83
One day in the late 90s, I was talking to a partner of Shook Lin & Bock and he told me that he hired a lady to revamp their IT department. I asked him what sort of IT department that a large practice law firm needs. He told me that it was a whole bunch of new PCs that will be networked to printers, servers etc. What he told subsequently floored me. He told me that they are classified as SME by the Government and therefore are eligible for a grant and they got approval to replace their old PCs.

And I was talking to a partner who was reasonably expected to take home close to a $1m at least.


Govt can set table, but it’s up to businesses to succeed: Iswaran
Mr S Iswaran. TODAY file photo

BY
TAN WEIZHEN
[email protected]ISHED: 4:00 AM, MARCH 1, 2017UPDATED: 7:24 AM, MARCH 1, 2017
SINGAPORE — The Government can be an enabler for businesses, but it cannot make decisions for businesses, or pick winners, said Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S Iswaran in Parliament yesterday, as he reiterated the measures in place to support businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises.

Stressing that it is up to businesses to succeed, he said there is a plethora of support available for SMEs. Those who are prepared to go further will receive more support, said the minister, as he addressed concerns that not enough was being done to support businesses in this challenging economic climate.

While describing the Government as “an important enabler”, Mr Iswaran said: “We are in an inherently more uncertain environment, therefore the emphasis (is) on the broad range of capabilities I’ve outlined, and this broad scheme of measures that we have, are going to be the key platform to raise industries as a whole.”

“Sure, the companies that are prepared to go further and move faster, will receive more support, but that does not mean we are picking winners. The winners are picking themselves, and adapting to our schemes.”

Mr Iswaran was addressing a point in the speech made by Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Leon Perera, who felt that Budget 2017 was a “missed opportunity” in building up local enterprises as an engine of value creation alongside multi-national corporations.

Mr Perera had also suggested making support to companies more selective: Giving higher funding to companies with a track record of results, and scaling down that support if results are not delivered, or if it does not benefit Singapore.

Mr Iswaran, saying he was “surprised” by Mr Perera’s description of the Budget as a missed opportunity, noted that he had given a “complete, not exhaustive” list of various initiatives designed to help SMEs.

After the Budget was announced last week, the Singapore Business Federation had also said it was “disappointed” with Budget 2017’s short-term measures, mainly what they felt was inadequate short-term support to lower business and compliance costs.

However, Mr Iswaran yesterday outlined what he called “a plethora of support” available for SMEs. For instance, there is suite of loan programmes that will collectively catalyse S$5 billion in loans up to 2020.

To help businesses go global, S$400 million has been set aside in grants. In this Budget, the S$600 million International Partnership Fund has been set up to co-invest with firms to help them expand overseas, he said.

Mr Perera also suggested that people might not become entrepreneurs if they feel that the environment is not suitable. “There are many schemes ... but some of these schemes have limits. Some of these schemes might be phased out in the future. That may affect the willingness of people to become entrepreneurs,” said Mr Perera, adding that he wanted to know what the Government’s response to this “impediment to entrepreneurship” might be.

To that, Mr Iswaran said that anyone who wants to be an entrepreneur because of the Government’s schemes and support would have been on the “wrong starting point”.

“I think the starting point for any entrepreneur is really deciding that he or she has a strong value proposition, a passion to grow something, and then they go out there and make it happen,” said the minister. TAN WEIZHEN
 
I tried my best to build my on line sex hub into a thriving community of like minded individuals but the government has done nothing but put up roadblocks every step of the way.
 
Those who have entrepreneurial spirit and guile from the 90s onwards have moved to the property sector as it provides the biggest margin and allows considerable rest and break periods when govt introduces curbs and measures to cool the periodic overheating of the sector. They do not tell you they are in property but like to fashionably call themselves venture capitalist, equity investors etc. They have regular income from high rental properties and when the market is right its back to soft launches and flipping.

Risk taking, foraging a new path etc cannot be reasonably predicted but this Govt and its handling of the property sector is well known. You can right a book about it. Even the 3rd generation of property tycoons are in it. Interestingly their daughters are into high retail such as fashion and exotic designer jewellery and their stores are in the NY, London etc and the physical stores are owned by the male side of the family.




I tried my best to build my on line sex hub into a thriving community of like minded individuals but the government has done nothing but put up roadblocks every step of the way.
 
this Govt and its handling of the property sector is well known. You can right a book about it. Even the 3rd generation of property tycoons are in it.
So, does this means going into property is never wrong in Sinkie Land?
 
More than 99% of firms are SMEs - any company with not more than 200 employees or turnover not more than $100 million

Law firms are all SMEs, even if partners live in GCBs and their sons try to avoid NS
 
More than 99% of firms are SMEs - any company with not more than 200 employees or turnover not more than $100 million

Law firms are all SMEs, even if partners live in GCBs and their sons try to avoid NS


Not familiar with the acronym "GCB", what is it ?
 
" anyone who wants to be an entrepreneur because of the Government’s schemes and support would have been on the “wrong starting point"

How about anyone who wants to be a politician because of the highest salaries in the world?-is it right starting point or should be to serve the people.?
Might as well say Mt Everest is there-its up to you to conquer it.
A guy who has never done any business giving advice to businessmen!
 
The whole Lee family including extended family fiddled with Nassim Jade developed by a company where one of Old Man's brother was a board member. When the second son was bored with Singtel, he asked and got a major property player and the man who built the property portfolio having done the same for DBS left, another public listed company.

Watch all the tycoons and their scions, they are into property. Go check out the list of CCC chairmen , 65% are property developers.


So, does this means going into property is never wrong in Sinkie Land?
 
There are multimillionaires who have a plethora of companies and some of them qualify for grants as SMEs. Its a joke.

More than 99% of firms are SMEs - any company with not more than 200 employees or turnover not more than $100 million

Law firms are all SMEs, even if partners live in GCBs and their sons try to avoid NS
 
Foreigners cannot buy a GCB unless the commissioner of land approves and its must be supported by the Govt agency supporting the sector. All the PRC millionaires who were granted PR were given consent to buy GCB. Approval is based on the actual property and not principal. There is a heavy lobbying going to allow a portion of GCBs to be bought and sold on the open market which immediately raises their value significantly.

You however can rent out a GCB. There is one case of a civil servant who owns a GCB renting it our for $36K a month (not a year). It became public over a dispute.

GCBs locations are closely managed by the political leaders to protect their neighbourhood and their investment. When Old man told parliament that he wanted to buy Nassim Jade for retirement those in the know laughed. As he has massive land and house which he has rented out to Ang Mo near Botanic Gardens. Every knew the entire family was flipping and the daughter who writes campbell soup stories was the first to flip Ascot, with 60 days. Easy money.



Not familiar with the acronym "GCB", what is it ?
 
Watch all the tycoons and their scions, they are into property. Go check out the list of CCC chairmen , 65% are property developers.
All these are for big timers and with connections. No place for us ordinary man on the street, but can still go for small scale type like those with En-bloc potential. Tikam Tikam.
 
Those who have entrepreneurial spirit and guile from the 90s onwards have moved to the property sector as it provides the biggest margin and allows considerable rest and break periods when govt introduces curbs and measures to cool the periodic overheating of the sector. They do not tell you they are in property but like to fashionably call themselves venture capitalist, equity investors etc. They have regular income from high rental properties and when the market is right its back to soft launches and flipping.

Risk taking, foraging a new path etc cannot be reasonably predicted but this Govt and its handling of the property sector is well known. You can right a book about it. Even the 3rd generation of property tycoons are in it. Interestingly their daughters are into high retail such as fashion and exotic designer jewellery and their stores are in the NY, London etc and the physical stores are owned by the male side of the family.


Dug out this old thread I started in 2014: http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread....hru-property-not-innovation&highlight=richest

During LKY's Golden Period, thousands of employees became property agents in the hopes of making a quick buck. Now the drinking pond is drying up.

Now try to convince me again Uber and Grab will be banned in sinkieland....
 
Property agents are not entrepreneurs. We are talking about developers and those who buy and sell top end properties. Though they have agents working for them. There are no property agents who are CCC chairmen either. There is in fact an licensed Ah Long who is a CCC chairmen. Its reminds me of the time when office boys, clerks and housewives became seasoned stock market players during the bull run.



Dug out this old thread I started in 2014: http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread....hru-property-not-innovation&highlight=richest

During LKY's Golden Period, thousands of employees became property agents in the hopes of making a quick buck. Now the drinking pond is drying up.

Now try to convince me again Uber and Grab will be banned in sinkieland....
 
Thats the point I am making - Iswaran and Heng are wasting their time. They created a sector when old man was PM and the wife, the doyen of the property market with such high returns and where cycles and govt interventions can be correctly predicted. Why would any entrepreneur even bother to innovate, develop and create new opportunities in areas outside the property sector.

There are vested interest in keeping the property sector in play. Look at Sentosa Development Corporation, a stat board whose only purpose is to develop Sentosa for tourists to visit. That changed in spirit while the letter remained intact. One board member who is a property developer was awarded the tender without offering to the public and he made a killing with Sentosa Cove. He is also a CCC Chairman. He resigned just before he got the tender,



All these are for big timers and with connections. No place for us ordinary man on the street, but can still go for small scale type like those with En-bloc potential. Tikam Tikam.
 
Still got people buying the government "perspective"? Seriously?

It is just a bloody wayang exercise to say: We government (or PAP to be exact) has done everything, so it must be your fault (Singaporeans, SMEs)!

Much of Singapore's SMEs have been destroyed by competition from GLCs (especially NTUC), go for the cheapest mindset, and allowing offshore non-Singaporean companies to get local contracts. All that has happened from early 90s onwards.

I know of people who did very well running their own SMEs (accounting, construction, etc). Alot of those people either banked out early (buy investments for passive income) or just went kaput with their collapsed business.

The most scarey bit is you have IE Singapore's officers spilling hatred on Singapore SMEs (yes go search on Linkedin and other discussion forums), say they cannot make it despite government help.

Fact is Singapore SMEs has been banged left and right in the local market even before mass globalisation took place. What is left is those low quality SMEs with used car sales men tactics and cheapest operation/labour costs strategy. This coupled with the FT policy from early 2000, ensured that none of the remaining SMEs have the strategy to be unique, to be high quality.

And this problem is not just affecting SME alone. Many of the larger companies (like Parkway and Raffles Medical Group) and even GLCs are using the cheapest operating model, compete on price. And worst is many of these management thought Singapore's brand is special, that 3rd world countries they want to penetrate are country bumpkins.

You see, companies from "third world countries" like China, India, Malaysia are trying to penetrate the Angmo "first world countries". Look at Singapore's GLCs and SMEs? Except for buying some brick and mortar business (hotels, properties), the rest is about trying to sell Singapore so call "expertise", most learn from angmo written text books, to sell to 3rd world country bumpkins.

I laugh everytime Singapore's news talk about the demise of HK, so HK CMI, HK people's English capability dropping. Do you know how many real private international companies are there in HK? Not only their brick and mortar businesses surpassed anything in Singapore (from hotels, property, retail, F&B), many of the supply chains are controlled by HK companies. For eg, do you know majority of your audio equipment (headphones, speakers, etc) are ODM by companies in HK? Yes, everyone from Bose, JBL, B&O. Do you know Johnson Electric, owned by a HK Chinese family, is the top 3 supplier of DC and AC rotors and engines (competing against the Germans and Japanese)?

I tell you why (from my experience as a service vendor). HK people are also Chinese, also kiam, also want value for money. But HK Chinese are dynamic. They target the world in their ambition. If you can articulate how your service or product help them tackle this market, make alot money, they will buy! Yes not alot of haggling. They will take the risks! In HK, you do not see their local large firms' IT department flooded by third worldlers like Indians or Pinoys. Because they know the importance of keeping the boat in shape to win the world.

It is all just lip service. Better think very hard how to get out of this cuntry soon.
 
You go to NUS Business School and ask them what they would like to do - create app, do start-up, set-up food stall, intern at Morgan and Stanley, join Temasek, join Admin Service, start early on passive income (code for rental property) etc.

The exceptions will be Malaysian students in NUS who plan to go back and start factory to manufacturing products, sell bait fish to Scandinavian countries, exports orchids to Europe, etc.
 
I tried my best to build my on line sex hub into a thriving community of like minded individuals but the government has done nothing but put up roadblocks every step of the way.

You have to think , out of "hub"....you go make donations to the people who are placing roadblocks, for example to "the SOTA..school of the art"..after all..SEX IS AN ART!.......make some donations here & there...
 
You have to think , out of "hub"....you go make donations to the people who are placing roadblocks, for example to "the SOTA..school of the art"..after all..SEX IS AN ART!.......make some donations here & there...

Sam so stupid forgot to become a Grasslooter. Join the men in white! Sex hub will be rebranded as Relaxation hub. Similar to how GLC owned shopping malls brand their tuition Centre renters as Education Hub.
 
Back
Top