Here is another onefrom full metal jacket stanley kubrick
from there we also got me love u long time
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
India V China : The Indians lost 20 But Killed 50 PLA Goons! The Chinese Cannot fight!
- Thread starter leeisphtui
- Start date
So why didn't the chinks use their guns? Instead, they let the kelings beat 50 of their PLA soldiers and 1 chink general to death.
you should also ask him why all the junk he posts from the PRC is in fact fake. Its hilarious that he actually believes any of the Chinese military stuff is real, I cant get enough
Do you believe Ah Nehs?
the latest situation shows the Chinese have packed up and left the disputed area. a humiliating loss for the tiongs. against indians somemore.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/dip...orcing-border-positions-satellite-images-show
China, India reinforcing border positions, satellite images show
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/dip...orcing-border-positions-satellite-images-show
China, India reinforcing border positions, satellite images show
Chinese army do not fight.
But if the fight is taken to China, Chinese army will end that fucking fight
so the chinese retreated = lost face
And
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...dollar-submarine-forgetting-close-hatch-55942
How to Sink a $3 Billion Dollar Submarine: Forgetting to Close a Hatch
Simple mistakes can lead to really big trouble.
“Arihant is the most important platform within India’s nuclear triad covering land-air-sea modes,” the Hindu reports. Well, it’s important if it works — and it probably helps to make your submarine watertight.
69,060
The modern submarine is not a simple machine. A loss of propulsion, unexpected flooding, or trouble with reactors or weapons can doom a sub crew to a watery grave.
Also, it’s a good idea to, like, close the hatches before you dive.
Call it a lesson learned for the Indian navy, which managed to put the country’s first nuclear-missile submarine, the $2.9 billion INS Arihant, out of commission in the most boneheaded way possible.The Hindu reported yesterday that the Arihant has been out of commission since suffering “major damage” some 10 months ago, due to what a navy source characterized as a “human error” — to wit: allowing water to flood to sub’s propulsion compartment after failing to secure one of the vessel’s external hatches.
Water “rushed in as a hatch on the rear side was left open by mistake while [the Arihant] was at harbor” in February 2017, shortly after the submarine’s launch, The Hindu reports. Since then, the sub “has been undergoing repairs and clean up,” according to the paper: “Besides other repair work, many pipes had to be cut open and replaced.”
AND THE FUCKING INDIANS WANT TO FIGHT WITH CHINA
the
The Chinese have terrible subs. They cant track the European or US subs at present.And
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...dollar-submarine-forgetting-close-hatch-55942
How to Sink a $3 Billion Dollar Submarine: Forgetting to Close a Hatch
Simple mistakes can lead to really big trouble.
“Arihant is the most important platform within India’s nuclear triad covering land-air-sea modes,” the Hindu reports. Well, it’s important if it works — and it probably helps to make your submarine watertight.
69,060
The modern submarine is not a simple machine. A loss of propulsion, unexpected flooding, or trouble with reactors or weapons can doom a sub crew to a watery grave.
Also, it’s a good idea to, like, close the hatches before you dive.
Call it a lesson learned for the Indian navy, which managed to put the country’s first nuclear-missile submarine, the $2.9 billion INS Arihant, out of commission in the most boneheaded way possible.The Hindu reported yesterday that the Arihant has been out of commission since suffering “major damage” some 10 months ago, due to what a navy source characterized as a “human error” — to wit: allowing water to flood to sub’s propulsion compartment after failing to secure one of the vessel’s external hatches.
Water “rushed in as a hatch on the rear side was left open by mistake while [the Arihant] was at harbor” in February 2017, shortly after the submarine’s launch, The Hindu reports. Since then, the sub “has been undergoing repairs and clean up,” according to the paper: “Besides other repair work, many pipes had to be cut open and replaced.”
AND THE FUCKING INDIANS WANT TO FIGHT WITH CHINA
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced
By MATTHEW HICKLEY
Last updated at 00:13 10 November 2007
Published: 10 November 2007
When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.
At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.
That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory.
AND THE CHINESE SUBS ARE MUCH MUCH BETTER NOW THAN IN 2007
Last edited:
irrelevant. the UK, French and US subs are better.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced
By MATTHEW HICKLEY
Last updated at 00:13 10 November 2007
Published: 10 November 2007
When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.
At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.
That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory.
AND THE CHINESE SUBS ARE MUCH MUCH BETTER NOW THAN IN 2007
they are too loud just junk
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced
By MATTHEW HICKLEY
Last updated at 00:13 10 November 2007
Published: 10 November 2007
When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.
At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.
That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory.
AND THE CHINESE SUBS ARE MUCH MUCH BETTER NOW THAN IN 2007
https://www.popularmechanics.com/mi...as-nuclear-subs-too-noisy-for-their-own-good/
Are China’s Nuclear Subs Too Noisy for Their Own Good?
An incident in the East China Sea has observers wondering if China’s nuke boats have a noise problem.
Earlier this month, a Chinese nuclear-powered attack submarine surfaced in the East China Sea. The submarine, flying a huge Chinese flag, surfaced after being followed by Japanese naval forces. The incident raises a question: Are Chinese nuclear submarines too loud for their own good?
China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy operates between six and thirteen Shang class nuclear attack submarines. Also known as the Type 093 class, the Shang boats are 361 feet long, displace 7,716 tons of water submerged, and can dive to up to 2,296 feet. The submarines are powered by two pressurized water nuclear reactors, allowing them to make 30 knots submerged, and have six 533-millimeter torpedo tubes for anti-ship and anti-submarine attacks and vertical launch silos for land attack cruise missiles.
On January 12th, a Shang-class submarine surfaced within the Exclusive Economic Zone around Japan’s Senkaku islands. (See image above.) The islands, which China claims and calls the Diaoyu islands, have been a bone of contention between the two countries since 2010. The two countries mostly enforce their competing claims by sailing coast guard vessels near the islands. This was the first time a submarine is known to have operated in the area.
MORE FROM POPULAR MECHANICS
Never Leave Your Bed Again
The South China Morning Post, in an article on the incident, states the Shang-class submarine involved in the incident had been followed for the previous two days by ships and aircraft of the Maritime Self Defense Force, Japan’s navy. The submarine operated submerged within 24 miles of the Senkaku islands, technically Japanese waters. It then moved out of Japanese waters, surfaced and proudly flew a large Chinese flag, and went home. The incident led the SCMP to ask whether the submarine surfaced because it had been detected or if the event was a publicity stunt on behalf of the Chinese government?
In the world of submarines, quietness is everything and can make the difference between being the hunter or the hunted. The Shang class, according to Chinese sources, is about as quiet as the improved Los Angeles class attack submarines, nuclear attack boats produced for the U.S. Navy between 1985 and 1996. The U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence estimates the Shang is noisier than the Russian Victor III class submarines, 25 of which were produced between 1977 and 1991. Only four remain in service today, replaced by quieter, more modern designs.
Being only twenty years behind U.S. subs may not sound like a bad place to be, especially for a rising power like China, but the U.S. made some major advances in submarine quieting technology during the late 1980s and 1990s. The latest Virginia class submarines are so quiet they’re described as “quieter at 25 knots than the Los Angeles class at pierside.”
A Chinese Navy submarine in Hong Kong in 2004, flying a much smaller and more typically sized national flag than the one recently flown in the East China Sea.
The SCMP’s experts are divided as to what caused the sub to surface, with some thinking it was intentional and others disagreeing. But clearly, if Japanese air and naval forces had been able to track the submarine for two days before the surfacing, the Shang class is too noisy. A more suitable question might be, was it the Chinese government’s intention for the submarine to surface, or was the submarine forced to surface due to technical problems?
Either is a possibility, as China’s military is prone to excessively displays—such as flying an unusually large flag the first time a nuclear-powered submarine sails near the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands—and China’s military equipment, particularly complex systems, often don’t meet Western standards for safety and quality. In 2003, all 70 Chinese sailors aboard a Chinese diesel electric submarine died during a training accident. The submarine reportedly drifted for days before a fishing boat came upon the lifeless vessel.
Regardless, the fact that Japanese forces were able to track China’s latest nuclear attack submarine continuously for two days does not exactly instill confidence in the submarine’s abilities. Still, a public failure like this does have an upside. As one SCMP expert pointed out, “It’s not so bad that they’ve been exposed, it could push the Chinese to work harder on making the submarines quieter.” And China, which is in the middle of an unprecedented military modernization, is undoubtedly working on a design to replace the Shang-class.
Similar threads
