I dun understand this - regarding Rev Mingyi case

[leetahbar]

in such a CBT case, who was the lead actor and who was the supporting actor? whoever it was, it was a criminal breach of trust committed and discovered. if it weren't discovered, would the crime stop there?

now that it was discovered, charged and verdicted, was the sentence appropriate?

botak was successful in his appeal based on his "charitable" works done while his personal aide's one was turned down.

the question now asked:

did botak abuse his authority when he has risen to his power status? were he a monk first or just another greedy botak hunger after th mundanes of human failings? if he were a monk first, then why was he obssessed in owning so many luxurious pte properties? what is going to happen to all his materialistic possession? how did he acquire it as a MONK? if monk is so rich, could the title MONK be still applicable to botak?

what is the difference between a super rich BUDDHIST MONK and a super rich layman?

 

[Debonerman]

Bob Sim Kheng Hwee of Blk 171 Mei Ling Street. Fuck you pondan arse lah! Stick to issues you know about! Why had you and your sisters got chased out of Changi Village carpark?:oIo::oIo::oIo:

 

[leetahbar]

to the TS, u are not the only one who does not understand this, i believe many cannot decipher the logic about the court sentencing.

usually, when one who is already ladened with guilt appeals, the sentencing is increased to a harsher one and a longer jail term.

chief justice yong pung how should ve resided over this case before retirement.

 

[leetahbar]

buddhist monk draws a line between material possession and his commitment to propagation of buddhism.

if one wanna propagate buddhism "part-time" that is still holding on worldly possesion, it would be more relevant to continue being a layman buddhist practitioner.

 

[Debonerman]

A pig in lipstick is still a pig! Hahahahaahaah. Fuck your Bangla fucked arse.:oIo:

 

[palden]

He got good and strong connections, definitely will get light sentence. Hopefully someone in prison will poke his arse. Guess he is going to enjoy prison life given his hobby. Can conduct mass gay orgies inside.

 

[leetahbar]

recall who were botak's powderful patrons when he performed his stuntpunkmonk act in tv. the clues are all there.

the news just reported that botak's followers even "wept" for him. botak thanked them for their support and apologised for "failing" them.

the supporters failed themselves for being attached to a wrong botak instead of the correct buddhist teaching in DETACHMENT.:(

 

[FuckSamLeong]

leetahbar long to go to prison. He loves having his arse poked.:p:p:p

 

[NancyKwan]

if one wanna propagate buddhism "part-time" that is still holding on worldly possesion, it would be more relevant to continue being a layman buddhist practitioner.

lanjiao sucking unemployed parasite old fart faggot fake monk PAP dog Bob Sim Kheng Hwee,

temple thief, swindler, fraudster, cheat, con-artist, liar, hypocrite, deceiver, betrayer, all rolled into one!

Illicit gay activities:

Penal Code Section 377A states, “Any male person who, in public or private, commits, or abets the commission of, or procures or attempts to procure the commission by any male person of, any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years.”

Cheating:

Whoever, by deceiving any person, fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to consent that any person shall retain any property, or intentionally induces the person so deceived to do or omit to do anything which he or she would not do or omit if he or she were not so deceived, and which act or omission causes or is likely to cause damage or harm to that person in body, mind, reputation or property, is said to "cheat". For example, A cheats if he intentionally deceives Z into a belief that A means to repay any money that Z may lend to him when A does not intend to repay it, and thereby dishonestly induces Z to lend him money. Cheating is punished with imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine, or both.

Father bashing:

Voluntarily causing hurt – A person causes hurt when he or she causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person. Whoever does any act with the intention of causing hurt to any person, or with the knowledge that he is likely to cause hurt to any person, and does cause hurt to any person, voluntarily causes hurt. The penalty for voluntarily causing hurt is imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine of up to S$1,000, or both.

Theft of Temple Funds:

Theft is committed when a person, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property in order to effect the taking. The penalty for theft is imprisonment of up to three years, or a fine, or both. It is more common, however, for offenders to be charged with committing theft in a building, tent or vessel, which is used as a human dwelling, or for the custody of property. The penalty for this more serious offense is imprisonment of up to seven years, and also a fine.

 

[Alamaking]

That fake monk serving his sentence at the monastry, what is this man, knn :oIo::oIo:

 

[hypercat75]

Such verdict is so predictable in Singapore PAP law. As such I have no respect for Singapore Kangaroo court because they judge a person by his connection and contribution and not by the seriousness of the crime. Such outcome will not have deterrence effect for similar crime to be repeated in future because others will take advantage of their "contribution" to influence the law here.

This is uniquely Singapore where Kangaroo Court = PAP court. Same crime, two different persons and two different charges. Where is law.

Then what the point of wasting money hiring lawyers? sigh....

 

[kensington]

Then what the point of wasting money hiring lawyers? sigh....

What's the point of building prison ?

 

[Ramseth]

What's the point of building prison ?

To imprison non-monks?

 

[kensington]

To imprison non-monks?

That ex-monk certainly has his jalan or was it Buddha's intervention ?

Vesak Day's present, it is certainly, hahaha.....

 

[shelltox]

you mean吃素(vegetarian)and not 吃斋（eating before noon and fasting till the next day)

 

[myfoot123]

Heard from news that he will serve his term in temple after two months. If a monk like him cannot take sufferings in "prison" than he should not preached about sufferings is a mortal things.

I am a buddhist, but I have no respect for him. To uphold the image of buddhism, he has to derobe. I also cannot stand the way court favour people who has committed huge mistake despite their little contributions. One country two systems are now so raw in the eyes of Singaporeans.

 

[leetahbar]

in that case ex-jailbird FATHER KANG should sue the gov for not giving him the choice to do prison time in a church.:p

 

[leetahbar]

there is certain criteria here that needs to be sorted out first.

would there be REN CI without botak? and would botak be able to possess a few condos without RENCI?

which come first?

 

[myfoot123]

there is certain criteria here that needs to be sorted out first.

would there be REN CI without botak? and would botak be able to possess a few condos without RENCI?

which come first?

He has Renci and Condo thru the exploitation of buddhist trust in him as fake religious leader. And worse still - to make use of actors/actress to shake tears for him for all his foolish act on stage - so that he has more donated monies to spend on branded goods.

 

[Alamaking]

He classic lah, he said:“我问心无愧” :oIo::oIo::oIo: