300,000 less Tg Pagar voter leh...................Tg Pagar no vote in 2011.........so about 170,000 + Sinkies that died and migrated..........
How about those 198K Singaporeans who was born in Singapore from 1992 to 1994?
300,000 less Tg Pagar voter leh...................Tg Pagar no vote in 2011.........so about 170,000 + Sinkies that died and migrated..........
That is not true. I attended several rallies but ultimately voted for the PAP.
Steal the elections? Most people I know are very happy with the results. A freak election results in PAP's favour is not a bad freak result to be upset about.
Now we know the typical opposition supporter is a big fat sore loser! Lose liao say not democratic! Go let dogs fuck la!
Only idiots like you love to be screwed by the PAP.
We have questioned the integrity of the vote all the time. How can there be a fair election when the Elections Department reports to the PM?
It's just basic statistics. Sampling is really this accurate and statisticians have known this for centuries.
I have no doubt in my mind that the PAP did not win the election. It was electoral fraud. How did the PAP do it?
300,000 new citizens ftom 2.11 mil eligible voters in 2011 to 2.47 mil eligible voters in 2015.,,,,
no need to cheat,,,,, all legit
The cut off date for new voters was Feb 1994. This means the majority of those born in 1994 were ineligible to vote in 2015.
Ong Swee Tian's calculation is really simple:
He never considered these:
1. He somehow missed out the 139,777 voters in Tanjong Pager who did not vote in 2011 but voted this time. He conveniently forgot to subtract this very large number. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singaporean_general_election,_2011
2. Number of true blue Singaporeans allowed to vote is NOT EQUAL to the current birth rate. It should be birth from 1991 to 1994. See table below. Total around 198,000 and not 120,000.
3. He has to add the number of deaths ( I cannot get the exact figures), but should be around 18,000 20,000 per year.
Source : http://www.singstat.gov.sg/statistics/visualising-data/charts/number-of-births-and-deaths
4. Number migrated overseas. Around 1200 yearly. Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/sin...poreans-citizenship-yearly-dpm-091548225.html
After considering 1 to 4 above, the New citizen numbers should be 144,481 and NOT 402,000!!
However my numbers still no good as I did not have the number
- for people who passed away in TP GRC (which is a double count).
- for new citizens who passed away from 2011 to 2014
- we are assuming that ALL new citizenship vote for PAP.
The cut off date for new voters was Feb 1994. This means the majority of those born in 1994 were ineligible to vote in 2015.
Ong Swee Tian's calculation is really simple:
He never considered these:
1. He somehow missed out the 139,777 voters in Tanjong Pager who did not vote in 2011 but voted this time. He conveniently forgot to subtract this very large number. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singaporean_general_election,_2011
2. Number of true blue Singaporeans allowed to vote is NOT EQUAL to the current birth rate. It should be birth from 1991 to 1994. See table below. Total around 198,000 and not 120,000.
3. He has to add the number of deaths ( I cannot get the exact figures), but should be around 18,000 20,000 per year.
Source : http://www.singstat.gov.sg/statistics/visualising-data/charts/number-of-births-and-deaths
4. Number migrated overseas. Around 1200 yearly. Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/sin...poreans-citizenship-yearly-dpm-091548225.html
After considering 1 to 4 above, the New citizen numbers should be 144,481 and NOT 402,000!!
However my numbers still no good as I did not have the number
- for people who passed away in TP GRC (which is a double count).
- for new citizens who passed away from 2011 to 2014
- we are assuming that ALL new citizenship vote for PAP.
the fact that there were 2.4m votes casted in 2015, how do you account for the difference of 400k between 2011 and 2015? that 400k number has to cum from constituencies that were walk-overs in 2011 plus net increase in new voters (subtract deaths and those who emigrated and gave up sg citizenship), which include those born and bred before 1994 and newly minted shitizens from the adult foreign population by means of naturalization which are trending 20k a year since 2008. roughly cums up to 400k.
Opposition supporters here must face the truth. pap didn't just win, it totally crushed the alternative parties. The number of new citizens cannot have done such a big swing. Middle voters preferred pap. Face the fact, only then can alternate parties learn from their mistake and come with better strategy to convince the voters next GE.
Only sampling done by Sinkapore's Elections Department is that accurate. All the global polling companies should seek their expertise.