• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Hougang resident's By-election application dismissed by High Court Judge

valiant20

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE - A High Court Judge has dismissed a Hougang resident's application to declare that the Prime Minister does not have "unfettered discretion" over whether and when to call a by-election.

Madam Vellama Marie Muthu had also applied for a mandatory order for the by-election to be called in Hougang within three months or a reasonable time, after the seat was vacated.

Mdm Vellama, 42, a part-time cleaner, had filed her application on March 2, following the sacking of former Member of Parliament Yaw Shin Leong from the Workers' Party on Feb 15.

In his judgment released today, Justice Philip Pillai noted there was no requirement in the Constitution to call elections to fill elected Member vacancies. There being no such requirement, there arises no prescribed time within which such elections must be called, he added.

Under the Constitution, to call or not to call an election to fill an elected Member vacancy is a decision to be made by the Prime Minister, said Justice Pillai. Should the Prime Minister decide to call an election to fill an elected Member vacancy, he has a discretion as to when to call it, he added.

The Parliamentary Elections Act merely provides the mechanism to hold such an election should the Prime Minister decide to call one, said Justice Pillai. In the event that the Prime Minister decides to call an election to fill an elected Member vacancy, section 24 of the Parliamentary Elections Act requires that the President issue writs under the public seal to the Returning Officer to convene such election to supply vacancies caused by death, resignation or otherwise. "In so doing, the President is obliged to act in accordance with Article 21 of the Constitution," he added.

http://www.todayonline.com/Hotnews/...ion-application-dismissed-by-High-Court-Judge

Surprised no one started a thread on this..

At least Judge Pillai interpreted the constitution for us, as opposed to having different interpretations from different perspectives.

Now just waiting for an MP to raise an issue to change that bit of constitution.. if at all possible..
 

presssomemore

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is really anti climax. :(
"...there was no requirement in the Constitution to call elections to fill elected Member vacancies..."
If the answer and interpretation is so clear cut, why go through case at all?
 

Cestbon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is really anti climax. :(
"...there was no requirement in the Constitution to call elections to fill elected Member vacancies..."
If the answer and interpretation is so clear cut, why go through case at all?

If there no regulation require to replace MP in any case.
Then no need election. Let all MP die one by one until no more MP.
 

Cestbon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
There is no such law dear. You you claim so, please show us the statute

Most country have suck law. SG should follow democracy law hold by election if not please ask PM LHL called Sg is a dictator country.
 

tyudm

Alfrescian
Loyal
SINGAPORE -

In his judgment released today, Justice Philip Pillai noted there was no requirement in the Constitution to call elections to fill elected Member vacancies. There being no such requirement, there arises no prescribed time within which such elections must be called, he added.

Under the Constitution, to call or not to call an election to fill an elected Member vacancy is a decision to be made by the Prime Minister, said Justice Pillai. Should the Prime Minister decide to call an election to fill an elected Member vacancy, he has a discretion as to when to call it, he added.

Why did PM Lee called for one at Hougang?
Was he pressured?
Did he lose his balls?
Cheers to Hougang!
 

Extremist

Alfrescian
Loyal
Lawyer M Ravi responds to high court throwing out Hougang by-election lawsuit, saying judgment is "extremely disappointing" and "shocking to the conscience".

He says he's drafting a letter to the International Commission of Jurists, the International Bar Association, and the UN Rapporteur of Human Rights on the independence of judges and lawyers in S'pore.
 

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
Is there any doubt about the outcome??


SINGAPORE
- A High Court Judge has dismissed a Hougang resident's


application to declare that the Prime Minister does not have "unfettered discretion" over whether and when to call a by-election.

Madam Vellama Marie Muthu had also applied for a mandatory order for the by-election to be called in Hougang within three months or a reasonable time, after the seat was vacated.

Mdm Vellama, 42, a part-time cleaner, had filed her application on March 2, following the sacking of former Member of Parliament Yaw Shin Leong from the Workers' Party on Feb 15.

In his judgment released today, Justice Philip Pillai noted there was no requirement in the Constitution to call elections to fill elected Member vacancies. There being no such requirement, there arises no prescribed time within which such elections must be called, he added.

Under the Constitution, to call or not to call an election to fill an elected Member vacancy is a decision to be made by the Prime Minister, said Justice Pillai. Should the Prime Minister decide to call an election to fill an elected Member vacancy, he has a discretion as to when to call it, he added.

The Parliamentary Elections Act merely provides the mechanism to hold such an election should the Prime Minister decide to call one, said Justice Pillai. In the event that the Prime Minister decides to call an election to fill an elected Member vacancy, section 24 of the Parliamentary Elections Act requires that the President issue writs under the public seal to the Returning Officer to convene such election to supply vacancies caused by death, resignation or otherwise. "In so doing, the President is obliged to act in accordance with Article 21 of the Constitution," he added.

http://www.todayonline.com/Hotnews/...ion-application-dismissed-by-High-Court-Judge

Surprised no one started a thread on this..

At least Judge Pillai interpreted the constitution for us, as opposed to having different interpretations from different perspectives.

Now just waiting for an MP to raise an issue to change that bit of constitution.. if at all possible..
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
Lawyer M Ravi responds to high court throwing out Hougang by-election lawsuit, saying judgment is "extremely disappointing" and "shocking to the conscience".

He says he's drafting a letter to the International Commission of Jurists, the International Bar Association, and the UN Rapporteur of Human Rights on the independence of judges and lawyers in S'pore.


Why disapointed? You mean Ravi can't find anything in the constitution that backs him up? He had no case at all under the law?
 

DubLi

Alfrescian
Loyal
So it is confirmed now... there is no need to call a by-election at all!

We have true demoncracy as demonstrated in the constitution.
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
So it is confirmed now... there is no need to call a by-election at all!

We have true demoncracy as demonstrated in the constitution.

The judge is implying that he is held ransom by LHL and unless the people of Singapore voted out PAP, he has no other option other than toe the PAP line regardless how unjust and unfair the verdict was.
 
Top