Serious Higgs boson, LIGO's Gravitational waves, etc.

[ChanRasjid]

Dear readers,

Every so often, there would be headline news around the world about great new scientific discoveries. One wonders what changes such "great" discoveries would bring to our everyday life.

In the good old days, great discoveries brought about great changes - good fortune or greater miseries to mankind; great things go global in influence. The Industrial Revolution stated about the time of Newton in the middle of the 1700's. Newton's law gave us better understanding of mechanics; Mendeleev's periodic tables gave us better understanding in creating better materials. So scientific breakthroughs brought with them the Industrial age, the Steam Age, the Electric Age, the Wireless Age. We see evidence of the great breakthrough discoveries getting into our mundane everyday life.

Then come the "Relativity Age" brought about when Einstein in 1905 wrote his seminal paper: "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" introducing the physics world to his Special Theory of Relativity. It brought "great" changes and many fabulous new physics - particle accelerators, quarks, bosons, muon, strong forces, weak forces, gravitational waves, etc. Many fabulous tales about the mysteries of the universe - and more tales.

What has the Relativity Age brought us? Tales. Not one new gadget comes from this relativity age - not one. This is because physics founded on Einstein's special relativity has nothing to do with the physical world - it is only a mathematical model making only mathematical predictions - like the theorems we learn in school.

I have written a short 5-page paper that explains simply why Einstein's special relativity is not a valid theory in physics. It could be downloaded as a pdf file from my website.

"The Lorentz Transformation Cannot Be Physical"
pages :5
http://www.emc2fails.com

Abstract. "The Lorentz transformation will always remain only as an abstract mathematical transformation that cannot be incorporated into any theory of physics. The reason being there is no natural principle that a mathematical transformation carries over association of physical units with real numbers from the domain space to the image space. Any application of the Lorentz transformation will only result in space and time that have no relation to our physical world. All physical theories founded on the Lorentz transformation are invalid. These include Einstein’s special relativity, particle physics, electromagnetism of the Maxwell-Heaviside equations."

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid.

 

[zhihau]

Excellent thread!

 

[frenchbriefs]

Agreed Einstein's relativity theory has brought us nothing,George Soros theory of reflexivity is a thousand times more useful.

 

[kryonlight]

Everything will be made clear when the other 2 fundamental physics forces are discovered.

 

[eatshitndie]

who says there's no product from the relativity age? there are 69,696 of them and counting.

 

[ChanRasjid]

There is the widespread believe that it was Einstein who first discovered the famous "atomic bomb" formula E=mc². There is controversy as to who contributed the most to the discovery of this formula which began as a mass energy equivalence principle. Also whether there was the formula, or not, the atomic bomb would still have been developed. It was enough to know that fission releases huge amount of energy - there was no need to know exactly how "huge".

So Einstein's relativity theory has not given us much knowledge in nuclear physics. It could even be argued that our knowledge of atomic and nuclear physics could have made greater advancement had not Einstein's relativity misled the physics world to spend resources and time focusing on a fictitious world of spacetime instead of our real world of absolute space and absolute universal time; we might by now have developed the use of fusion energy.

There is also the popular and widespread myths that our GPS would not have worked if not for Einstein's relativity theories. I would not engage in debates on this point as I myself have no actual knowledge about it. I have read the explanations by some others (who I have reasons to trust) that there is no such thing as "relativistic corrections" needed that is critical to the working of the GPS, etc. GPS is all about the ingenuity of our engineering - they don't use fictitious adjustments to add to real engineering quantities.

Also, we have to bear in mind that global positioning system technology has huge military significance and no one is going to teach you how to make things better for you to attack me. The Europeans, Russians, Indians, Chinese have their versions. It just cross my mind this very second - the Americans wanted the Chinese Beido system to use "relativistic adjustments" so that in the event when they wanted to shoot down the American GPS satellites, they of course would be "relativistically" calibrated to hit their own Beidou satellites and Xi Jingping's war cabinet would go into grand darkness.

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid.