When oppositions doing their walkabout and reach out to the general public and you called that harass?
7 (including the cameraman) surrounding 2, would make you feel like Darren...![]()
![]()
Don't you hate it when you are eating, a group of stranger come up to you and interrupt your meal?:![]()
No no no.. you stupid ugly dick head. It's alright for you if they are PAP but not the opposition, right clone of RonRon aka Tan Kim Kim?Don't you hate it when you are eating, a group of stranger come up to you and interrupt your meal?:![]()
When oppositions doing their walkabout and reach out to the general public and you called that harass?
How low you PAP supporters going to stoop is amazing.![]()
Don't you hate it when you are eating, a group of stranger come up to you and interrupt your meal?:![]()
It's not a good pic for NSP. It does look like at least 7 (counting the photographer) surrounding and harrassing 2 diners in the middle of their meals. Look at the 2. They're not putting down their chopsticks and spoons, but Seb looked like keeping talking regardless and the rest of NSP look like NEA officers who won't go until the 2 give their ICs for summons.
When PAP does walkabouts in groups of >10, they casually breeze through, saying hello and shaking hands, passing brochures or cards etc. The point is to make themselves seen and known, look hardworking and caring. Surrounding 2 diners like that is unimaginable, even for WP outreaches.
Apparently you have lost the point here again.
If the people on the table is not interested in having a conversation, we will not have a conversation. Taking a photo like this also need time. It means that at the very least, the conversation has started for a while.
The other members are not chattering away, just standing by the side quietly. Thus, there is no such thing as "disturbances" from all around.
Just friendly chat, nothing wrong with that. You have not seen how PAP conducts their walkabout in hawker centres just yet.
Goh Meng Seng
I beg to differ.Apparently you have lost the point here again.
If the people on the table is not interested in having a conversation, we will not have a conversation. Taking a photo like this also need time. It means that at the very least, the conversation has started for a while.
The other members are not chattering away, just standing by the side quietly. Thus, there is no such thing as "disturbances" from all around.
Just friendly chat, nothing wrong with that. You have not seen how PAP conducts their walkabout in hawker centres just yet.
Goh Meng Seng
I beg to differ.
First of all, a hungry man is an angry man. And with food on the table, whatever someone is standing talking to you while he is sitting down eating. Do you think he can concentrate on what you are talking to him while standing. If I am eating, I have to lift my head up and see what you are talking.
The message is to talk to people, why not those who are walking outside the hawker centre after their meals and people are not in a hurry to finish their food. Or is sitting down the easiest target because these people have no way to run till they finish their food?
The other thing is will people be able to absorb what you said after they finished their food, in other words, will they actually be listening or you are wasting your breath?
If you change roles, the men in orange shirts to men in white shirts and pants while you are sitting on the table having your meal, do you still think its a nice picture?![]()
You have not seen how PAP conducts their walkabout in hawker centres just yet.![]()
That's a boastful and misguided statement to make against someone who was with Police and NTUC.
Don't you hate it when you are eating, a group of stranger come up to you and interrupt your meal?::mad::mad:[/QUOTE]
[COLOR="Blue"][B][SIZE="4"]I have been harassed by PAP all the time almost everday of our lives, even without seeing them. What worse can you get?[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]