-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
GVGT! @johntan mecedes will masuk Loong Kang because his engine is build manually by ALL AH NEHs in India! Manually Assembled. Cock Up gurrentied!
- Thread starter condom_loong
- Start date
Quality same as Roti Prata!
10 Least Reliable Cars
Consumer Reports' annual survey exposes the models with the greatest risks of problems
By Consumer Reports
Last updated: October 19, 2017
3.1K SHARES
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('facebook');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('twitter');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('pinterest');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:void(0);
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:window.print();
One of the main reasons people buy a brand-new car is the promise of a no-hassle ownership experience, free from the drip-drip-drip of service problems that set in as cars age. Nonetheless, our comprehensive annual auto reliability survey tells us that some buyers will be taking their brand-new car back to the dealer’s service department sooner and more often than other car buyers will.
The models featured here are the 10 least reliable vehicles based on our Annual Reliability Survey.
MORE ON CAR RELIABILITY
Cars That Go the Distance: Consumer Reports Car Reliability Survey 2017
Car Brands Reliability: How They Stack Up
10 Most Reliable Cars
Guide to Car Reliability
Our survey takes a deep dive into the numerous things that can go wrong with a vehicle. We study 17 trouble areas, from nuisances—such as squeaky brakes and broken interior trim—to major bummers, such as out-of-warranty transmission repairs or trouble with four-wheel-drive systems. We weight the severity of each type of problem to create a Predicted Reliability Score for each vehicle.
Based on that analysis, these models are the least reliable. They are presented in rank order, counting down to the least reliable model, the Tesla Model X.
For more details on the models’ reliability histories, click through to their respective model pages.
Chevrolet Camaro
Price as tested: $47,020
Trouble spots: Transmission (minor), in-car electronics, drive system
The Camaro possesses impressive handling agility and sharp steering. The optional magnetic ride suspension impressively keeps the car planted. The manual shifter has light, precise throws. Base models use a 275-hp turbo four-cylinder, and the new 3.6-liter V6 makes 335 hp. For the SS, Chevrolet dropped in the ferocious 6.2-liter V8 from the Corvette. All use a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic. The easy-to-use MyLink infotainment system is a plus, but the low dash vents tend to freeze your hand when it’s on the shifter. Visibility is atrocious, and rear-seat room is extremely tight. A performance ZL1 version is available, powered by a 650-hp, 6.2-liter V8 supercharged engine mated to the six-speed manual or an optional 10-speed automatic.
See the complete Chevrolet Camaro road test.
Mercedes-Benz GLC
Price as tested: $49,105
Trouble spots: Brakes, steering/suspension, power equipment
Based on the C-Class, the GLC is one of the best compact luxury SUVs on the market. Plush furnishings inside the quiet cabin prove appealing, although it also has Mercedes’ complex infotainment system. The front seats are very comfortable and supportive, but the rear is a bit snug. The 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder delivers ample power and is matched to a nine-speed automatic that works well. The GLC rides comfortably and handles with athleticism. Automatic braking is standard, but other safety gear, such as blind-spot monitoring and cross-traffic alert, comes in confusing option packages. A turbo V6 AMG GL43 and a coupelike SUV, the GLC Coupe, are also available.
See the complete Mercedes-Benz GLC road test.
Jaguar F-Pace
Price as tested: $53,895
Trouble spots: Drive system, in-car electronics, noises and leaks
Jaguar’s first SUV is based on a rear-wheel-drive platform shared with the XF and XE. The F-Pace is quick, thanks to its 340-hp, supercharged 3.0-liter V6, but the omnipresent engine drone quickly becomes tiring. The S uses a 380-hp version of this engine. A 2.0-liter turbo is now the base engine, and a diesel is also available. All versions come with a smooth eight-speed automatic and all-wheel drive. The taut and nimble F-Pace is one of the best-handling SUVs, contributing to the lively driving experience. However, the ride is stiff and choppy. The seats are comfortable, but interior quality isn’t as impeccable as in the German competitors. The infotainment system is behind the times, utilizing a slow and fussy touch screen. The air conditioning system isn’t always up to the task. Active safety features are available if you opt for the vision package.
See the complete Jaguar F-Pace road test.
GMC Acadia
Price as tested: $51,585
Trouble spots: In-car electronics, power equipment, drive system
The Acadia is a very pleasant three-row SUV, particularly in the Denali trim. The ride is steady and composed, and handling is responsive. The most appropriate engine is the smooth 3.6-liter V6 that returned 19 mpg in our tests, which isn’t a standout. A less powerful but still sound 2.5-liter four-cylinder is standard. This family-friendly three-row SUV is very quiet, the front seats are comfortable, and the infotainment system is easy to use. The outboard second-row seats can slide and tilt forward, even with a child seat in place. But many luxury features, such as four-way adjustable lumbar, a power sunroof shade, and auto-up windows, are missing even on our high-end Denali version. Available safety features include forward-collision warning with automatic braking, pedestrian detection, and blind-spot monitoring.
See the complete GMC Acadia road test.
Fiat 500
Price as tested: $18,600-$26,050
Trouble spots: Brakes, power equipment, in-car electronics
The 500’s alert handling, free-revving engine, and crisp-shifting manual make it engaging to drive. The base engine and manual returned 33 mpg overall, but it lacks low-end thrust. On all versions the ride is choppy and the cabin noisy. Headroom up front is good, but some will find the steering wheel to be too far away and the driving position awkward. The tight rear seats are difficult to access, and the cargo area is minuscule. The convertible top can be pulled back like a sunroof or fully dropped. The Abarth is quick and grips well, and the electric 500e is enjoyable for its silence and efficiency. The 500 scored a Poor in the IIHS small-overlap crash test.
See the complete Fiat 500 road test.
Ford Focus
Price as tested: $20,485-$40,990
Trouble spots: Transmission, drive system
Available as a sedan, a hatchback, and an electric version, the Focus feels solid and sophisticated, but it’s plagued by poor reliability and, at low speeds, a jerky transmission. The car is fun to drive, thanks to its agile handling and supple, controlled ride. The cabin is quiet, with good-quality materials for the class. But the driving position is narrow compared with newer competitors. A new 123-hp, 1.0-liter three-cylinder turbo, shared with the smaller Fiesta, is available, but it’s slow and returns the same 29 mpg overall as the 2.0-liter. Ford has replaced the problematic MyFord Touch infotainment system with the superior Sync 3 system. The sporty ST version is quick and fun, and sounds thrilling, and the new high-performance AWD RS comes with a 350-hp, turbo four-cylinder.
See the complete Ford Focus road test.
Ford Fiesta
Price as tested: $17,795-$24,985
Trouble spots: Transmission, climate system
This subcompact has agile handling that makes it fun to drive, as well as a supple, controlled ride. Interior fit and finish and equipment levels are among the best of the class, and the cabin is relatively quiet. But the rear seat is very cramped. Our tested 120-hp, 1.6-liter Fiesta with the five-speed manual delivered excellent fuel economy but felt sluggish. A six-speed automated manual tends to cause the car to stumble in stop-and-go traffic. The sporty Fiesta ST version is truly a treat to drive ... if your kidneys can handle the stiff ride. Sync 3 has replaced the MyFord Touch infotainment system.
See the complete Ford Fiesta road test.
Volvo XC90
Price as tested: $56,805
Trouble spots: In-car electronics, power equipment, electrical system
The XC90 is a competitive three-row SUV. Base models use a 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbo, offered with front- or all-wheel drive. Our tested T6, with its 316-hp turbocharged and supercharged version, delivered decent punch and returned 20 mpg overall, but it sounds raspy. A plug-in hybrid with an electric range of about 14 miles is available. All versions use an eight-speed automatic. Handling is commendable, but the ride is stiff though the optional air suspension makes it slightly better. The interior is quiet, plush, and modern, with super-comfortable seats. But audio, phone, and navigation functions are controlled through an unintuitive touch-screen infotainment system that’s frustrating to use. Many electronic safety features are available.
See the complete Volvo XC90 road test.
Cadillac Escalade
Price as tested: $87,360
Trouble spots: Power equipment, transmission (major), climate system
The Escalade falls down on the fundamentals as a luxury SUV; it rides too stiffly and can’t stop or handle with the grace of its peers. Despite casting a massive shadow, the Cadillac is not even that roomy inside. The second-row seats aren’t very comfortable, and the third row is cramped. For those who want more room, a longer ESV version that provides more cargo space is available. The Cue infotainment system is confounding. The real strength of the Escalade lies in its work abilities, with a powerful 420-hp V8 and impressive tow capacity. We consider a well-trimmed Chevrolet Suburban or GMC Yukon XL to be a smarter buy.
See the complete Cadillac Escalade road test.
Tesla Model X
Price as tested: $110,700
Trouble spots: Body hardware, paint and trim, climate system
The electric-powered Model X is more showy than practical. It features rear doors that open up and out of the way, giving easy access to the rear seats. But these massive doors take their time to open and close. The huge windshield extends up and over the front-seat occupants, making the cabin feel airy and futuristic. Buyers can opt for five-, six-, or seven-passenger seating configurations, but unlike every other SUV, the second row doesn’t fold if you have the two captain’s chairs, which compromises utility. Like the S, the Model X is very quick and handles well. Ride comfort and noise isolation aren’t as good as in the S, however. The 90-kWh version we tested had a realistic 230-mile range.
See the complete Tesla Model X road test.
Consumer Reports' annual survey exposes the models with the greatest risks of problems
By Consumer Reports
Last updated: October 19, 2017
3.1K SHARES
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('facebook');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('twitter');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('pinterest');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:void(0);
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:window.print();
One of the main reasons people buy a brand-new car is the promise of a no-hassle ownership experience, free from the drip-drip-drip of service problems that set in as cars age. Nonetheless, our comprehensive annual auto reliability survey tells us that some buyers will be taking their brand-new car back to the dealer’s service department sooner and more often than other car buyers will.
The models featured here are the 10 least reliable vehicles based on our Annual Reliability Survey.
MORE ON CAR RELIABILITY
Cars That Go the Distance: Consumer Reports Car Reliability Survey 2017
Car Brands Reliability: How They Stack Up
10 Most Reliable Cars
Guide to Car Reliability
Our survey takes a deep dive into the numerous things that can go wrong with a vehicle. We study 17 trouble areas, from nuisances—such as squeaky brakes and broken interior trim—to major bummers, such as out-of-warranty transmission repairs or trouble with four-wheel-drive systems. We weight the severity of each type of problem to create a Predicted Reliability Score for each vehicle.
Based on that analysis, these models are the least reliable. They are presented in rank order, counting down to the least reliable model, the Tesla Model X.
For more details on the models’ reliability histories, click through to their respective model pages.
Chevrolet Camaro
Price as tested: $47,020
Trouble spots: Transmission (minor), in-car electronics, drive system
The Camaro possesses impressive handling agility and sharp steering. The optional magnetic ride suspension impressively keeps the car planted. The manual shifter has light, precise throws. Base models use a 275-hp turbo four-cylinder, and the new 3.6-liter V6 makes 335 hp. For the SS, Chevrolet dropped in the ferocious 6.2-liter V8 from the Corvette. All use a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic. The easy-to-use MyLink infotainment system is a plus, but the low dash vents tend to freeze your hand when it’s on the shifter. Visibility is atrocious, and rear-seat room is extremely tight. A performance ZL1 version is available, powered by a 650-hp, 6.2-liter V8 supercharged engine mated to the six-speed manual or an optional 10-speed automatic.
See the complete Chevrolet Camaro road test.
Mercedes-Benz GLC
Price as tested: $49,105
Trouble spots: Brakes, steering/suspension, power equipment
Based on the C-Class, the GLC is one of the best compact luxury SUVs on the market. Plush furnishings inside the quiet cabin prove appealing, although it also has Mercedes’ complex infotainment system. The front seats are very comfortable and supportive, but the rear is a bit snug. The 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder delivers ample power and is matched to a nine-speed automatic that works well. The GLC rides comfortably and handles with athleticism. Automatic braking is standard, but other safety gear, such as blind-spot monitoring and cross-traffic alert, comes in confusing option packages. A turbo V6 AMG GL43 and a coupelike SUV, the GLC Coupe, are also available.
See the complete Mercedes-Benz GLC road test.
Jaguar F-Pace
Price as tested: $53,895
Trouble spots: Drive system, in-car electronics, noises and leaks
Jaguar’s first SUV is based on a rear-wheel-drive platform shared with the XF and XE. The F-Pace is quick, thanks to its 340-hp, supercharged 3.0-liter V6, but the omnipresent engine drone quickly becomes tiring. The S uses a 380-hp version of this engine. A 2.0-liter turbo is now the base engine, and a diesel is also available. All versions come with a smooth eight-speed automatic and all-wheel drive. The taut and nimble F-Pace is one of the best-handling SUVs, contributing to the lively driving experience. However, the ride is stiff and choppy. The seats are comfortable, but interior quality isn’t as impeccable as in the German competitors. The infotainment system is behind the times, utilizing a slow and fussy touch screen. The air conditioning system isn’t always up to the task. Active safety features are available if you opt for the vision package.
See the complete Jaguar F-Pace road test.
GMC Acadia
Price as tested: $51,585
Trouble spots: In-car electronics, power equipment, drive system
The Acadia is a very pleasant three-row SUV, particularly in the Denali trim. The ride is steady and composed, and handling is responsive. The most appropriate engine is the smooth 3.6-liter V6 that returned 19 mpg in our tests, which isn’t a standout. A less powerful but still sound 2.5-liter four-cylinder is standard. This family-friendly three-row SUV is very quiet, the front seats are comfortable, and the infotainment system is easy to use. The outboard second-row seats can slide and tilt forward, even with a child seat in place. But many luxury features, such as four-way adjustable lumbar, a power sunroof shade, and auto-up windows, are missing even on our high-end Denali version. Available safety features include forward-collision warning with automatic braking, pedestrian detection, and blind-spot monitoring.
See the complete GMC Acadia road test.
Fiat 500
Price as tested: $18,600-$26,050
Trouble spots: Brakes, power equipment, in-car electronics
The 500’s alert handling, free-revving engine, and crisp-shifting manual make it engaging to drive. The base engine and manual returned 33 mpg overall, but it lacks low-end thrust. On all versions the ride is choppy and the cabin noisy. Headroom up front is good, but some will find the steering wheel to be too far away and the driving position awkward. The tight rear seats are difficult to access, and the cargo area is minuscule. The convertible top can be pulled back like a sunroof or fully dropped. The Abarth is quick and grips well, and the electric 500e is enjoyable for its silence and efficiency. The 500 scored a Poor in the IIHS small-overlap crash test.
See the complete Fiat 500 road test.
Ford Focus
Price as tested: $20,485-$40,990
Trouble spots: Transmission, drive system
Available as a sedan, a hatchback, and an electric version, the Focus feels solid and sophisticated, but it’s plagued by poor reliability and, at low speeds, a jerky transmission. The car is fun to drive, thanks to its agile handling and supple, controlled ride. The cabin is quiet, with good-quality materials for the class. But the driving position is narrow compared with newer competitors. A new 123-hp, 1.0-liter three-cylinder turbo, shared with the smaller Fiesta, is available, but it’s slow and returns the same 29 mpg overall as the 2.0-liter. Ford has replaced the problematic MyFord Touch infotainment system with the superior Sync 3 system. The sporty ST version is quick and fun, and sounds thrilling, and the new high-performance AWD RS comes with a 350-hp, turbo four-cylinder.
See the complete Ford Focus road test.
Ford Fiesta
Price as tested: $17,795-$24,985
Trouble spots: Transmission, climate system
This subcompact has agile handling that makes it fun to drive, as well as a supple, controlled ride. Interior fit and finish and equipment levels are among the best of the class, and the cabin is relatively quiet. But the rear seat is very cramped. Our tested 120-hp, 1.6-liter Fiesta with the five-speed manual delivered excellent fuel economy but felt sluggish. A six-speed automated manual tends to cause the car to stumble in stop-and-go traffic. The sporty Fiesta ST version is truly a treat to drive ... if your kidneys can handle the stiff ride. Sync 3 has replaced the MyFord Touch infotainment system.
See the complete Ford Fiesta road test.
Volvo XC90
Price as tested: $56,805
Trouble spots: In-car electronics, power equipment, electrical system
The XC90 is a competitive three-row SUV. Base models use a 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbo, offered with front- or all-wheel drive. Our tested T6, with its 316-hp turbocharged and supercharged version, delivered decent punch and returned 20 mpg overall, but it sounds raspy. A plug-in hybrid with an electric range of about 14 miles is available. All versions use an eight-speed automatic. Handling is commendable, but the ride is stiff though the optional air suspension makes it slightly better. The interior is quiet, plush, and modern, with super-comfortable seats. But audio, phone, and navigation functions are controlled through an unintuitive touch-screen infotainment system that’s frustrating to use. Many electronic safety features are available.
See the complete Volvo XC90 road test.
Cadillac Escalade
Price as tested: $87,360
Trouble spots: Power equipment, transmission (major), climate system
The Escalade falls down on the fundamentals as a luxury SUV; it rides too stiffly and can’t stop or handle with the grace of its peers. Despite casting a massive shadow, the Cadillac is not even that roomy inside. The second-row seats aren’t very comfortable, and the third row is cramped. For those who want more room, a longer ESV version that provides more cargo space is available. The Cue infotainment system is confounding. The real strength of the Escalade lies in its work abilities, with a powerful 420-hp V8 and impressive tow capacity. We consider a well-trimmed Chevrolet Suburban or GMC Yukon XL to be a smarter buy.
See the complete Cadillac Escalade road test.
Tesla Model X
Price as tested: $110,700
Trouble spots: Body hardware, paint and trim, climate system
The electric-powered Model X is more showy than practical. It features rear doors that open up and out of the way, giving easy access to the rear seats. But these massive doors take their time to open and close. The huge windshield extends up and over the front-seat occupants, making the cabin feel airy and futuristic. Buyers can opt for five-, six-, or seven-passenger seating configurations, but unlike every other SUV, the second row doesn’t fold if you have the two captain’s chairs, which compromises utility. Like the S, the Model X is very quick and handles well. Ride comfort and noise isolation aren’t as good as in the S, however. The 90-kWh version we tested had a realistic 230-mile range.
See the complete Tesla Model X road test.
10 Most Reliable Cars
Consumer Reports' massive annual survey reveals the models that shine for reliability
By Consumer Reports
Last updated: October 19, 2017
1.6K SHARES
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('facebook');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('twitter');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('pinterest');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:void(0);
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:window.print();
Purchasing a car is a long-term investment, with the expectation that the car will provide dependable transportation for the long haul. But as our surveys show, not all cars can fulfill that promise.
Based on our 2017 Annual Auto Survey, these models are the 10 most reliable cars today. We predict that these cars will give owners fewer problems than their competitors, based on data collected on 640,000 vehicles.
MORE ON CAR RELIABILITY
Cars That Go the Distance: Consumer Reports Car Reliability Survey 2017
Car Brands Reliability: How They Stack Up
10 Least Reliable Cars
Guide to Car Reliability
Our survey takes a deep dive into the numerous things that can go wrong with a vehicle.
We study 17 trouble areas, from nuisances—such as squeaky brakes and broken interior trim—to major bummers, like out-of-warranty transmission repairs or trouble with four-wheel-drive systems. We weight the severity of each type of problem to create a Predicted Reliability Score for each vehicle. (That score is then combined with data collected from our track testing, as well as our owner-satisfaction survey results and safety data, to calculate each test vehicle’s Overall Score.)
Based on that analysis, these models are the most reliable.
They are presented in rank order, starting with the most reliable. For more details on the models’ reliability predictions and history, click through to their respective model pages.
Kia Niro
Kia’s five-passenger Niro marries good fuel economy with cargo versatility. This front-wheel-drive hybrid uses a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine, which, in conjunction with the electric drive unit, puts out a combined 139 hp. This combo is mated to a six-speed dual-clutch transmission. Because the lithium-ion battery is located under the rear seat, that creates a flat cargo floor when the rear seats are folded. We got 43 mpg overall, which is good but not as good as the Hyundai Ioniq or Toyota Prius. The handling lacks agility, and the ride is a bit choppy. The optional power driver seat provides better support than the standard seats do. A suite of advanced safety features is available, including automatic emergency braking, smart cruise control, and blind-spot detection with rear cross-traffic alert, but that tends to push the price to above $30,000.
See the complete Kia Niro road test.
Price as tested: $26,805
Subaru BRZ/Toyota 86
Price as tested: $27,117/$25,025
Developed with Toyota, Subaru’s first rear-wheel-drive sports car features a 2.0-liter four-cylinder with a choice of a six-speed manual or an automatic. Handling is super-responsive, with cornering precision that makes the BRZ fun to drive. The car turns in promptly, with almost no body lean. The steering is quick and well-weighted. At its limits, the BRZ is slightly more forgiving than its mechanical sibling, the Toyota 86 (the old Scion FR-S). That difference makes the BRZ less prone to sliding its tail during spirited driving. The ride is also a bit more jittery than in the FR-S. The cabin is relatively plain, with well-bolstered sport seats, but the ride and elevated noise can be taxing.
See the complete Subaru BRZ and Toyota 86 road tests.
Lexus ES
Price as tested: $43,702-$44,017
The Lexus ES has sound handling but falls short of being engaging or fun. Uncharacteristic for Lexus, the ride is on the stiff side, and the optional 18-inch wheels make it worse. The powerful 3.5-liter V6 and six-speed automatic got a good 25 mpg overall. But we find the hybrid more appealing, thanks to its combination of size and fuel economy, returning a class-leading 36 mpg overall and 44 on the highway in our tests. Inside, the quiet cabin looks good at first, but some cheap touches are apparent. The mouselike infotainment interface is distracting and convoluted. Automatic emergency braking and lane-departure warning are standard.
See the complete Lexus ES road test.
Lexus GS
Price as tested: $58,858
The GS competes well, delivering a balanced combination of ride, handling, quietness, and roominess. Engaging to drive, the car’s good handling and taut yet supple ride compete well against German rivals. Its strong 3.5-liter V6 returned 21 mpg overall in our tests. Rear-drive versions get an eight-speed automatic, and AWD versions get a six-speed automatic. A hybrid with a continuously variable transmission is also available. Interior space is on par for the class, and the cabin is nicely furnished. A distracting mouselike controller works the infotainment systems. A high-performance GS F with a 467-hp V8 is available. 2016 brings a rear-drive 200t with a turbo four-cylinder. A blind-spot monitor with rear cross-traffic alert is standard.
See the complete Lexus GS road test.
Audi Q3
Price as tested: $40,125
A tidy, compact crossover, the Q3 competes with the BMW X1 and Mercedes-Benz GLA. Overall, it manages to deliver a premium driving experience similar to the Q5 but in a 10-inch-shorter package. The energetic 200-hp, 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder is mated to a conventional six-speed automatic and returned 22 mpg overall in our tests. This is a quiet SUV with a firm, comfortable ride and responsive handling. The cabin is a bit simplistic-looking, but it gives a sense of quality. Demerits include the tight quarters and cramped driving position. The controls are complicated at first, but they prove to be logical with some familiarity. Front- and all-wheel drive are available.
See the complete Audi Q3 road test.
Toyota RAV4
Price as tested: $29,014-$29,753
For years, the RAV4 has consistently been among the top-ranked small SUVs. The current RAV4’s cabin is quieter, the ride is smoother, it has a suite of advanced safety features, and it offers a frugal hybrid version. The energetic 2.5-liter four-cylinder and smooth six-speed automatic returned 24 mpg overall in our tests of an AWD version. The hybrid version gets a terrific 31 mpg overall. Handling is responsive and very secure. Inside, the controls are clear and intuitive. Though the XLE comes with automatic climate control and a sunroof, you must step up to the Limited trim to get adjustable lumbar support and the more comfortable faux-leather seats. Access is very easy, and the rear seat is roomy. Forward-collision warning and automatic emergency braking are standard.
See the complete Toyota RAV4 road test.
Lexus IS
Price as tested $48,149
In our tests, the IS came up short as a sports sedan. Handling is secure but not engaging enough to run with the best in the class. Ride comfort is neither tied down nor plush. Even the punchy IS 350 is underwhelming to drive. A 260-hp V6 powers the IS 300, which gives it more zip, but its fuel economy of 20 mpg overall is uncompetitive in the class. Still, the interior is extremely cramped, and getting in and out is an ungraceful chore. All-wheel-drive versions have a pronounced hump by the driver's right leg. Fit and finish is okay but not a standout, and the mouselike infotainment controller is distracting to use. A 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder is available, but only in rear-wheel drive.
See the complete Lexus IS road test.
Toyota Prius V
Price as tested: $28,217
This wagon version of the previous-generation Prius offers a very roomy rear seat and a generous cargo area. It’s about the size of the Ford C-Max, its main competitor. Despite its extra weight and a less aerodynamic shape, the V still got an excellent 41 mpg overall in our tests. The electric motor and engine have to work fairly hard, especially when the car is loaded with cargo. The ride is comfortable, but uneven pavement can cause an annoying side-to-side rocking. Handling is sound and secure but hardly inspiring. Rear visibility is better than in the standard Prius. A larger 4.1-inch dash-top screen for trip computer functions is also new. Forward-collision warning with automatic braking is available but not standard. 2018 is the final year for the Prius V.
See the complete Toyota Prius V road test.
Toyota Prius C
Price as tested: $20,850
This smaller, less expensive alternative to the regular Prius feels like a spartan subcompact, but with a hybrid powertrain. In the end, you pretty much get what you pay for, and it is no substitute for the real Prius. The C has a harsh ride, a noisy engine, and slow acceleration. The interior looks and feels cheap, the driving position and rear seats are cramped, and there’s little cargo space. However, its 37 mpg makes the Prius C one of the most frugal vehicles we’ve tested, and its 43 mpg overall is just 1 mpg less than the previous-generation Prius hatchback. Its tiny dimensions make it a natural for urban driving. Automatic emergency braking is standard. 2018 is the final year for the Prius C.
See the complete Toyota Prius C road test.
Infiniti Q70
Price as tested: $53,825-$58,655
MORE ON CAR RELIABILITY
Cars That Go the Distance: Consumer Reports Car Reliability Survey 2017
Car Brands Reliability: How They Stack Up
10 Least Reliable Cars
Although long in the tooth, the Q70 is still competitive, with a lively 330-hp V6 and a smooth seven-speed automatic that returned 21 mpg overall in our tests. A V8 and a V6 hybrid are also available. Handling is quite agile, with communicative steering. The ride is firm and absorbs bumps well but trails the competition in terms of plushness. The Q70 is also behind the competition in terms of cabin quietness, partly because of the noticeable engine noise under high revs. Very good interior quality, a roomy rear seat, and easy-to-use controls are positives, although cabin ambience is austere. Blind-spot intervention is optional. An extended-length L version with a roomier rear seat is also available. The Q70 might lack some pizzazz, but it generally commands significantly lower prices than its competitors.
See the complete Infiniti Q70 road test.
Consumer Reports' massive annual survey reveals the models that shine for reliability
By Consumer Reports
Last updated: October 19, 2017
1.6K SHARES
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('facebook');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('twitter');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:social_sharing('pinterest');
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:void(0);
https://www.sammyboy.com/javascript:window.print();
Purchasing a car is a long-term investment, with the expectation that the car will provide dependable transportation for the long haul. But as our surveys show, not all cars can fulfill that promise.
Based on our 2017 Annual Auto Survey, these models are the 10 most reliable cars today. We predict that these cars will give owners fewer problems than their competitors, based on data collected on 640,000 vehicles.
MORE ON CAR RELIABILITY
Cars That Go the Distance: Consumer Reports Car Reliability Survey 2017
Car Brands Reliability: How They Stack Up
10 Least Reliable Cars
Guide to Car Reliability
Our survey takes a deep dive into the numerous things that can go wrong with a vehicle.
We study 17 trouble areas, from nuisances—such as squeaky brakes and broken interior trim—to major bummers, like out-of-warranty transmission repairs or trouble with four-wheel-drive systems. We weight the severity of each type of problem to create a Predicted Reliability Score for each vehicle. (That score is then combined with data collected from our track testing, as well as our owner-satisfaction survey results and safety data, to calculate each test vehicle’s Overall Score.)
Based on that analysis, these models are the most reliable.
They are presented in rank order, starting with the most reliable. For more details on the models’ reliability predictions and history, click through to their respective model pages.
Kia Niro
Kia’s five-passenger Niro marries good fuel economy with cargo versatility. This front-wheel-drive hybrid uses a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine, which, in conjunction with the electric drive unit, puts out a combined 139 hp. This combo is mated to a six-speed dual-clutch transmission. Because the lithium-ion battery is located under the rear seat, that creates a flat cargo floor when the rear seats are folded. We got 43 mpg overall, which is good but not as good as the Hyundai Ioniq or Toyota Prius. The handling lacks agility, and the ride is a bit choppy. The optional power driver seat provides better support than the standard seats do. A suite of advanced safety features is available, including automatic emergency braking, smart cruise control, and blind-spot detection with rear cross-traffic alert, but that tends to push the price to above $30,000.
See the complete Kia Niro road test.
Price as tested: $26,805
Subaru BRZ/Toyota 86
Price as tested: $27,117/$25,025
Developed with Toyota, Subaru’s first rear-wheel-drive sports car features a 2.0-liter four-cylinder with a choice of a six-speed manual or an automatic. Handling is super-responsive, with cornering precision that makes the BRZ fun to drive. The car turns in promptly, with almost no body lean. The steering is quick and well-weighted. At its limits, the BRZ is slightly more forgiving than its mechanical sibling, the Toyota 86 (the old Scion FR-S). That difference makes the BRZ less prone to sliding its tail during spirited driving. The ride is also a bit more jittery than in the FR-S. The cabin is relatively plain, with well-bolstered sport seats, but the ride and elevated noise can be taxing.
See the complete Subaru BRZ and Toyota 86 road tests.
Lexus ES
Price as tested: $43,702-$44,017
The Lexus ES has sound handling but falls short of being engaging or fun. Uncharacteristic for Lexus, the ride is on the stiff side, and the optional 18-inch wheels make it worse. The powerful 3.5-liter V6 and six-speed automatic got a good 25 mpg overall. But we find the hybrid more appealing, thanks to its combination of size and fuel economy, returning a class-leading 36 mpg overall and 44 on the highway in our tests. Inside, the quiet cabin looks good at first, but some cheap touches are apparent. The mouselike infotainment interface is distracting and convoluted. Automatic emergency braking and lane-departure warning are standard.
See the complete Lexus ES road test.
Lexus GS
Price as tested: $58,858
The GS competes well, delivering a balanced combination of ride, handling, quietness, and roominess. Engaging to drive, the car’s good handling and taut yet supple ride compete well against German rivals. Its strong 3.5-liter V6 returned 21 mpg overall in our tests. Rear-drive versions get an eight-speed automatic, and AWD versions get a six-speed automatic. A hybrid with a continuously variable transmission is also available. Interior space is on par for the class, and the cabin is nicely furnished. A distracting mouselike controller works the infotainment systems. A high-performance GS F with a 467-hp V8 is available. 2016 brings a rear-drive 200t with a turbo four-cylinder. A blind-spot monitor with rear cross-traffic alert is standard.
See the complete Lexus GS road test.
Audi Q3
Price as tested: $40,125
A tidy, compact crossover, the Q3 competes with the BMW X1 and Mercedes-Benz GLA. Overall, it manages to deliver a premium driving experience similar to the Q5 but in a 10-inch-shorter package. The energetic 200-hp, 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder is mated to a conventional six-speed automatic and returned 22 mpg overall in our tests. This is a quiet SUV with a firm, comfortable ride and responsive handling. The cabin is a bit simplistic-looking, but it gives a sense of quality. Demerits include the tight quarters and cramped driving position. The controls are complicated at first, but they prove to be logical with some familiarity. Front- and all-wheel drive are available.
See the complete Audi Q3 road test.
Toyota RAV4
Price as tested: $29,014-$29,753
For years, the RAV4 has consistently been among the top-ranked small SUVs. The current RAV4’s cabin is quieter, the ride is smoother, it has a suite of advanced safety features, and it offers a frugal hybrid version. The energetic 2.5-liter four-cylinder and smooth six-speed automatic returned 24 mpg overall in our tests of an AWD version. The hybrid version gets a terrific 31 mpg overall. Handling is responsive and very secure. Inside, the controls are clear and intuitive. Though the XLE comes with automatic climate control and a sunroof, you must step up to the Limited trim to get adjustable lumbar support and the more comfortable faux-leather seats. Access is very easy, and the rear seat is roomy. Forward-collision warning and automatic emergency braking are standard.
See the complete Toyota RAV4 road test.
Lexus IS
Price as tested $48,149
In our tests, the IS came up short as a sports sedan. Handling is secure but not engaging enough to run with the best in the class. Ride comfort is neither tied down nor plush. Even the punchy IS 350 is underwhelming to drive. A 260-hp V6 powers the IS 300, which gives it more zip, but its fuel economy of 20 mpg overall is uncompetitive in the class. Still, the interior is extremely cramped, and getting in and out is an ungraceful chore. All-wheel-drive versions have a pronounced hump by the driver's right leg. Fit and finish is okay but not a standout, and the mouselike infotainment controller is distracting to use. A 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder is available, but only in rear-wheel drive.
See the complete Lexus IS road test.
Toyota Prius V
Price as tested: $28,217
This wagon version of the previous-generation Prius offers a very roomy rear seat and a generous cargo area. It’s about the size of the Ford C-Max, its main competitor. Despite its extra weight and a less aerodynamic shape, the V still got an excellent 41 mpg overall in our tests. The electric motor and engine have to work fairly hard, especially when the car is loaded with cargo. The ride is comfortable, but uneven pavement can cause an annoying side-to-side rocking. Handling is sound and secure but hardly inspiring. Rear visibility is better than in the standard Prius. A larger 4.1-inch dash-top screen for trip computer functions is also new. Forward-collision warning with automatic braking is available but not standard. 2018 is the final year for the Prius V.
See the complete Toyota Prius V road test.
Toyota Prius C
Price as tested: $20,850
This smaller, less expensive alternative to the regular Prius feels like a spartan subcompact, but with a hybrid powertrain. In the end, you pretty much get what you pay for, and it is no substitute for the real Prius. The C has a harsh ride, a noisy engine, and slow acceleration. The interior looks and feels cheap, the driving position and rear seats are cramped, and there’s little cargo space. However, its 37 mpg makes the Prius C one of the most frugal vehicles we’ve tested, and its 43 mpg overall is just 1 mpg less than the previous-generation Prius hatchback. Its tiny dimensions make it a natural for urban driving. Automatic emergency braking is standard. 2018 is the final year for the Prius C.
See the complete Toyota Prius C road test.
Infiniti Q70
Price as tested: $53,825-$58,655
MORE ON CAR RELIABILITY
Cars That Go the Distance: Consumer Reports Car Reliability Survey 2017
Car Brands Reliability: How They Stack Up
10 Least Reliable Cars
Although long in the tooth, the Q70 is still competitive, with a lively 330-hp V6 and a smooth seven-speed automatic that returned 21 mpg overall in our tests. A V8 and a V6 hybrid are also available. Handling is quite agile, with communicative steering. The ride is firm and absorbs bumps well but trails the competition in terms of plushness. The Q70 is also behind the competition in terms of cabin quietness, partly because of the noticeable engine noise under high revs. Very good interior quality, a roomy rear seat, and easy-to-use controls are positives, although cabin ambience is austere. Blind-spot intervention is optional. An extended-length L version with a roomier rear seat is also available. The Q70 might lack some pizzazz, but it generally commands significantly lower prices than its competitors.
See the complete Infiniti Q70 road test.
After all these years. Ang mor cars r still crap
Hey boss Sam...wat kind of discriminatory posts is this? How come Ah Tiong land Cars not mentioned?
Tat why I still prefer Nip cars. N how come the Korean cars not listed?
The Sydney Morning Herald
BUSINESSCONSUMER AFFAIRSRECALL
Subaru recalls more than 40,000 vehicles over potentially faulty brake
By Rachel Clun
1 October 2018 — 9:19am
More than 40,000 Subaru vehicles have been recalled over potential brake issues.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission issued a national recall for Subaru Liberty and Outback vehicles with the model years 2010-2014, due to possible defects to the electronic parking brake.
All Subaru Outback models with the model years 2010-2014 are part of the recall.
All Subaru Outback models with the model years 2010-2014 are part of the recall.
Photo: Supplied
"If the electronic parking brake (EPB) circuit board fractures, the warning light will illuminate and the EPB cannot be applied or released," the ACCC recall notice said.
"If this happens, the vehicle may be in breach of the Australian Design Rules (ADRs) for motor vehicles."
The ACCC warmed if the electronic parking brake could not be applied or released it could lead to an "increased risk of injury to the vehicle occupants and other road users".
RELATED ARTICLE
RECALL
Almost 2 million Aussie cars still have potentially deadly airbags
Affected vehicle owners will be contacted by mail and should return their vehicles to their local Subaru dealer to be fixed for free.
Subaru drivers who own either a Subaru Liberty or an Outback model from 2010-2014 can also check if their vehicle is subject to the recall via the Subaru website.
The recall comes amid a nationwide recall of vehicles fitted with potentially deadly Takata airbags.
Almost 2 million vehicles still had airbags that needed replacing in August, while more than 1 million had already had their airbags replaced.
At the time, ACCC chairwoman Delia Rickard said drivers should not delay getting their airbags replaced.
"The airbags degrade over time and can become lethal by misdeploying and firing metal shards at the car's occupants."
For concerned drivers, the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries has an online portal where vehicle owners can enter their vehicle's registration to see if it is affected by the airbag recall.
License this article
RECALL
ACCC
CARS
MOST VIEWED IN BUSINESS
ANALYSIS
Atlassian: the $30 billion tech giant nobody understands
House prices have biggest drop since GFC amid warnings of credit crunch
Subaru recalls more than 40,000 vehicles over potentially faulty brake
EXCLUSIVE
'Game over': Macquarie's German tax scandal
OPINION
Fears royal commission fallout could turbocharge property falls
Markets Live: AMP at 15-year low
The Sydney Morning Herald
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
OUR SITES
CLASSIFIEDS
THE SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
PRODUCTS & SERVICES
FAIRFAX MEDIA
Copyright © 2018
Fairfax Media
BUSINESSCONSUMER AFFAIRSRECALL
Subaru recalls more than 40,000 vehicles over potentially faulty brake
By Rachel Clun
1 October 2018 — 9:19am
More than 40,000 Subaru vehicles have been recalled over potential brake issues.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission issued a national recall for Subaru Liberty and Outback vehicles with the model years 2010-2014, due to possible defects to the electronic parking brake.
All Subaru Outback models with the model years 2010-2014 are part of the recall.
All Subaru Outback models with the model years 2010-2014 are part of the recall.
Photo: Supplied
"If the electronic parking brake (EPB) circuit board fractures, the warning light will illuminate and the EPB cannot be applied or released," the ACCC recall notice said.
"If this happens, the vehicle may be in breach of the Australian Design Rules (ADRs) for motor vehicles."
The ACCC warmed if the electronic parking brake could not be applied or released it could lead to an "increased risk of injury to the vehicle occupants and other road users".
RELATED ARTICLE
RECALL
Almost 2 million Aussie cars still have potentially deadly airbags
Affected vehicle owners will be contacted by mail and should return their vehicles to their local Subaru dealer to be fixed for free.
Subaru drivers who own either a Subaru Liberty or an Outback model from 2010-2014 can also check if their vehicle is subject to the recall via the Subaru website.
The recall comes amid a nationwide recall of vehicles fitted with potentially deadly Takata airbags.
Almost 2 million vehicles still had airbags that needed replacing in August, while more than 1 million had already had their airbags replaced.
At the time, ACCC chairwoman Delia Rickard said drivers should not delay getting their airbags replaced.
"The airbags degrade over time and can become lethal by misdeploying and firing metal shards at the car's occupants."
For concerned drivers, the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries has an online portal where vehicle owners can enter their vehicle's registration to see if it is affected by the airbag recall.
License this article
RECALL
ACCC
CARS
MOST VIEWED IN BUSINESS
ANALYSIS
Atlassian: the $30 billion tech giant nobody understands
House prices have biggest drop since GFC amid warnings of credit crunch
Subaru recalls more than 40,000 vehicles over potentially faulty brake
EXCLUSIVE
'Game over': Macquarie's German tax scandal
OPINION
Fears royal commission fallout could turbocharge property falls
Markets Live: AMP at 15-year low
The Sydney Morning Herald
OUR SITES
CLASSIFIEDS
THE SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
PRODUCTS & SERVICES
FAIRFAX MEDIA
Copyright © 2018
Fairfax Media
This is Jap product if chao US angmoh expect more failures on anything to wrong screw used....
The excuse is get Chinese to manufacture and blame Chinese easier and meanwhile market tgeir daughters cheebyee hole and tua lep neh neh no horse run...
And they are good at producing this...
The excuse is get Chinese to manufacture and blame Chinese easier and meanwhile market tgeir daughters cheebyee hole and tua lep neh neh no horse run...
And they are good at producing this...
Similar threads
