RANK & APPOINTMENT must pass EXAMs & TESTS, from battle command skills and fitness and shooting etc. No Chiak Liao Bee! Hundreds of PLA Army Generals! Not including Navy Nor Air Force nor Rocket Army here.
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2019-03-26/doc-ihsxncvh5536874.shtml
我陆军将军们时隔9个月再模拟打仗 透露什么信号？
我陆军将军们时隔9个月再模拟打仗 透露什么信号？
724
首次！中国陆军200名将军上考场 成绩将与升职晋级挂钩
原标题：陆军将军们时隔9个月再模拟打仗，透露什么信号？
来源： 政知见
撰文 | 李岩
日前，陆军首次组织军职指挥员军事训练等级考评。陆军官方媒体指出，这是陆军继去年考核13个集团军军长后，对军职指挥员进行的又一次能力素质考核。
此次考评在全国7个考点同时展开，来自不同战位的200多名将军考生，依据作战想定，连续作业超过8个小时。这次考评成绩将进入档案，作为升职晋级、评功评奖的重要依据，央视同时曝光了考评细节。
更重要的是，政知见（微信ID：bqzhengzhijian）注意到，从这两场与众不同的考评中，我们可以读出军改所强调的“实战化训练”已经从沙场延伸至指挥部。
以基本战役军团指挥员身份作业
这场考评中，200多名将官面临着怎样的考题？央视《军事报道》曝光了相关细节。
政知见注意到，有近200名参考人员围绕想定作业、基础理论、影像判读课目展开等级考评，重点考核基础理论、基本技能、指挥能力和体能等4个方面的能力素质。“赶考”期间，考生必须独立手工完成作业，8个小时的应考时间、超大的作业量，对每名指挥员的脑力、体力都是不小的考验。
陆军参谋部作战局局长周秉毅介绍说，考核想定与使命任务紧密结合，针对不同战略方向担负的作战任务，编写不同课题的想定作业，立起了按实战要求施训练兵的鲜明导向。“指挥能力考核着重围绕各作战方向任务使命，以‘分析研判情况、确定作战企图、谋划力量使用、设计作战进程’等为重点，诱导受考人员以基本战役军团指挥员身份独立作业，依据想定条件拟制作战构想并标绘要图。”
在央视《军事报道》披露的画面中，政知见注意到，参考的军职指挥员或埋头独立绘图，或坐在电脑前操作，或身着训练服仰卧起坐，或在室外持枪射击。军报刊文披露称，这样做就是想要做到陆军的官兵人人参加训练，人人参加考核，人人都有训练等级。军事训练的等级考评工作就是想培养一批能打仗、打胜仗的虎将、猛将，从而整体提升陆军部队的备战打赢能力。
去年考的专、今年考的宽
上述考评内容丰富，手段多样。对比一年前13位陆军集团军军长的那场“大考”，两次考评又有什么异同？
去年6月，陆军所属13个集团军军长迎来了首次战役指挥能力大考。考核分六步进行：
反观今年的考评，受考人员不但要接受指挥能力考核，同时也要接受基础理论、基本技能、体能等方面的测试，是一次针对个人综合指挥能力、素质的评比。另外，除了考评内容更多，受考人员的范围也更宽泛。军报披露显示，陆军机关、院校、试验训练基地、战区陆军、新疆军区、西藏军区等单位的军职指挥员同步展开考核。“高级干部不论处在哪个岗位、分管哪方面工作，首先是指挥员、战斗员，要真钻打仗、真练指挥。”
“对症下药”，倒逼将军重视训练
不论考的专还是宽，锻炼提升高级指挥员带兵打胜仗的本领，立起练兵先练官、练官先练将的鲜明导向是上述两场考评同样的目的所在。
但练将与练兵不同，士兵的训练在沙场一线，强度可控、见效明显。但针对高级干部在指挥部中的训练、考核，如何才能不流于形式，让受考指挥员真正重视起来？
事实上，这是军队中面临的一道如何“破除形式主义”难题，政知见（微信ID：bqzhengzhiju）注意到，两场考评分别有着不同的方法。
作为一线部队领导，集团军军长、指挥队伍最在意什么？无疑是自己在军中官兵面前的威信。没有威信，何谈带兵打仗。去年的军长考评中，整个考试过程采取现场直播，受考军长们在各自部队的指挥所，通过视频，亮相于陆军主会场和24个分会场的3600余名官兵面前。可以说，各集团军指挥队伍有没有真本领，官兵一目了然。
而从军职领导个人角度出发，他们在意什么？政知见看来，个人升迁、前途抱负、更广阔的报国平台无需讳言。今年的考评中，陆军领导透露，考核成绩将进入档案、进入升职晋级考评、进入评功评奖，作为今后考察使用干部的重要依据。
同时，政知见（微信ID：bqzhengzhiju）注意到，两次考核都组成了专门的“监考”团队，确保考核专业、公正。今年的考评中，来自国防大学的专家教授和陆军纪委组成了监察小组，对考评全程实施督查。而去年的军长考评中，陆军机关组成了13个纪检监察组在考试现场全程监督，现场还启用手机信号屏蔽器、保密柜。
My army generals simulated the war after 9 months. What signal is revealed?
My army generals simulated the war after 9 months. What signal is revealed?
724
first! The 200 Chinese generals will go to the examination room. The results will be linked to the promotion.
Original title: Army generals simulated the war after 9 months, what signal is revealed?
Source: See you from politics
Author | Li Yan
A few days ago, the Army first organized a military training level evaluation of military commanders. The official media of the Army pointed out that this is another ability assessment of the military commanders after the Army examined the 13 group army commanders last year.
The assessment was carried out at the same time in seven test sites across the country. More than 200 general candidates from different battles, based on the battle, continued to work for more than 8 hours. The results of this assessment will enter the archives. As an important basis for promotion and evaluation, CCTV also exposed the details of the assessment.
More importantly, the government knows (WeChat ID: bqzhengzhijian) notes that from these two different evaluations, we can read that the “combat training” emphasized by the military reform has extended from the battlefield to the command.
Working as a basic battle regiment commander
In this assessment, what questions are there for more than 200 officers? CCTV "Military Report" exposed relevant details.
Zhengzhi saw that nearly 200 reference personnel carried out grade assessments around the homework, basic theory, and image interpretation courses, focusing on the basic qualities, basic skills, command ability, and physical ability. During the "quick test", candidates must complete the work manually, 8 hours of test time, large amount of work, the test of each commander's brain power, physical strength is not small.
Zhou Bingyi, director of the Army's General Staff Combat Department, said that the assessment is closely related to the mission and tasks, and the operational tasks for different strategic directions, the assignment of different topics, and the clear guidance of training soldiers according to actual requirements. "The command capability assessment focuses on the missions of each operational direction, focusing on 'analysing and judging the situation, determining the operational attempt, planning the use of power, designing the operational process', etc., and inducing the examinee to operate independently as the commander of the basic battle regiment. Conditions are intended to create a war concept and plot the map."
In the CCTV "Military Report" disclosure, the government knows that the reference military commander is either drawing independently, sitting in front of the computer, or sitting in a training suit, or shooting outside. . The military newspaper published a statement saying that this is to do all the officers and men of the Army to participate in the training, everyone to participate in the assessment, everyone has a training level. The level of military training is to train a group of tigers and fierce players who can fight and win battles, thus improving the overall ability of the army to prepare for the battle.
Last year's exam, the year's exam is wide
The above assessments are rich in content and diverse in methods. Comparing the "big test" of the 13 Army Army commanders a year ago, what are the similarities and differences between the two evaluations?
In June last year, the 13 group army commanders of the Army ushered in the first test of the command capacity of the first battle. The assessment is divided into six steps:
24 hours before the assessment, pass the confidential system, and send the assessment to the examinee commander to determine the conditions;
The captain of the examination took 15 agencies and staff, relying on the field command site and the integrated platform for closed operations, and drafting a battle order and determination map;
The captain of the examination must complete the key points of the oral campaign within 40 minutes;
Through the automatic question-taking system, the captain of the examination randomly selected 2 questions related to the determination of the battle, and answered the scene;
The judges group consisting of 12 experts and professors will conduct on-the-spot evaluation and highlighting points on the points of the warlord’s determination and answer questions.
The expert group used the blind evaluation method to score the operating documents of the military commander and the unit, and then combined with the oral determination and answering the problem scores, and finally obtained the comprehensive results of the tested military commander.
Zheng Zhijian (WeChat ID: bqzhengzhiju) noticed that the examination questions of the two assessments were combined with the different mission backgrounds in actual combat, reflecting the actual combat training from the training of the sandfield to the headquarters. But the difference is that this year's assessment of the military commander as a basic battle army commander independent operation, and last year's military commander evaluation, the group army commander after receiving the assessment to determine the conditions, you need to bring 15 organs, relying on The field command site and the integrated platform are closed. It can be said that last year's military commander's assessment not only focused on the position of the commander, but also the command team in the headquarters of the group army. It was a special assessment for the group army to win.
In contrast to this year's assessment, the examinees not only have to accept the command ability assessment, but also accept the basic theory, basic skills, physical fitness and other aspects of testing, is a specific evaluation of individual comprehensive command ability and quality. In addition, in addition to more evaluation content, the scope of the examinee is also broader. The military newspaper disclosed that the military commanders of the army organs, colleges, experimental training bases, theater army, Xinjiang military region, and Tibet military region simultaneously launched assessments. "No matter which position a senior cadre is in, where he works, first of all, he is a commander and a combatant. You must really fight and fight."
"The right medicine", forced the general to attach importance to training
Regardless of whether the examination is specific or wide, the training of the senior commander to lead the troops to win the battle, the establishment of the training of the first training, the training of the first training will be the same purpose of the above two assessments.
However, the training will be different from the training of soldiers. The training of the soldiers is on the front line of the battlefield, and the intensity is controllable and effective. However, in view of the training and assessment of senior cadres in the command, how can they not be in the form and let the examinee commanders really pay attention to it?
In fact, this is a problem faced by the military in how to "break the formalism". The political knowledge (WeChat ID: bqzhengzhiju) notes that there are different methods for the two evaluations.
As the leader of the first-line army, what is the most concerned about the group army commander and command team? Undoubtedly, it is the prestige of the officers and men in the army. Without prestige, let’s talk about bringing troops to fight. In the evaluation of the military commander last year, the entire examination process was broadcast live. The commanded military commanders appeared in the headquarters of their respective units and appeared in front of more than 3,600 officers and men of the Army's main venue and 24 sub-districts. It can be said that the command troops of the various group army have no real skills, and the officers and men can see at a glance.
And what do they care about from the personal perspective of military leaders? Seeing from the political point of view, there is no need for rumors about personal promotion, ambition, and a broader platform for serving the country. In this year's assessment, the Army leaders revealed that the assessment results will enter the archives, enter the promotion and promotion evaluation, and enter the evaluation awards, as an important basis for the future inspection of the use of cadres.
At the same time, the government knows (WeChat ID: bqzhengzhiju) notes that the two assessments have formed a special "invigilation" team to ensure professional and fair assessment. In this year's assessment, experts and professors from the National Defense University and the Army Disciplinary Committee formed a monitoring team to conduct inspections throughout the evaluation. In the evaluation of the military commander last year, the army organs formed 13 discipline inspection and supervision teams to supervise the entire test site, and the mobile phone signal shielding device and security cabinet were also activated.
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2019-03-26/doc-ihsxncvh5536874.shtml
我陆军将军们时隔9个月再模拟打仗 透露什么信号？
我陆军将军们时隔9个月再模拟打仗 透露什么信号？
724
首次！中国陆军200名将军上考场 成绩将与升职晋级挂钩
原标题：陆军将军们时隔9个月再模拟打仗，透露什么信号？
来源： 政知见
撰文 | 李岩
日前，陆军首次组织军职指挥员军事训练等级考评。陆军官方媒体指出，这是陆军继去年考核13个集团军军长后，对军职指挥员进行的又一次能力素质考核。
此次考评在全国7个考点同时展开，来自不同战位的200多名将军考生，依据作战想定，连续作业超过8个小时。这次考评成绩将进入档案，作为升职晋级、评功评奖的重要依据，央视同时曝光了考评细节。
更重要的是，政知见（微信ID：bqzhengzhijian）注意到，从这两场与众不同的考评中，我们可以读出军改所强调的“实战化训练”已经从沙场延伸至指挥部。
以基本战役军团指挥员身份作业
这场考评中，200多名将官面临着怎样的考题？央视《军事报道》曝光了相关细节。
政知见注意到，有近200名参考人员围绕想定作业、基础理论、影像判读课目展开等级考评，重点考核基础理论、基本技能、指挥能力和体能等4个方面的能力素质。“赶考”期间，考生必须独立手工完成作业，8个小时的应考时间、超大的作业量，对每名指挥员的脑力、体力都是不小的考验。
陆军参谋部作战局局长周秉毅介绍说，考核想定与使命任务紧密结合，针对不同战略方向担负的作战任务，编写不同课题的想定作业，立起了按实战要求施训练兵的鲜明导向。“指挥能力考核着重围绕各作战方向任务使命，以‘分析研判情况、确定作战企图、谋划力量使用、设计作战进程’等为重点，诱导受考人员以基本战役军团指挥员身份独立作业，依据想定条件拟制作战构想并标绘要图。”
在央视《军事报道》披露的画面中，政知见注意到，参考的军职指挥员或埋头独立绘图，或坐在电脑前操作，或身着训练服仰卧起坐，或在室外持枪射击。军报刊文披露称，这样做就是想要做到陆军的官兵人人参加训练，人人参加考核，人人都有训练等级。军事训练的等级考评工作就是想培养一批能打仗、打胜仗的虎将、猛将，从而整体提升陆军部队的备战打赢能力。
去年考的专、今年考的宽
上述考评内容丰富，手段多样。对比一年前13位陆军集团军军长的那场“大考”，两次考评又有什么异同？
去年6月，陆军所属13个集团军军长迎来了首次战役指挥能力大考。考核分六步进行：
- 考核前24小时通过机要系统，向受考军长下发考核想定条件；
- 受考军长带15名机关人员，依托野战指挥场所和一体化平台进行封闭作业，拟制形成战役命令和决心图；
- 受考军长必须在40分钟内，完成口述战役决心要点；
- 通过自动抽题系统，受考军长随机抽选2个与战役决心相关问题，现场回答；
- 由12名专家教授组成的评委组，对受考军长口述战役决心要点和回答问题情况，进行现场评判打分、亮分；
- 专家组采取盲评方式对受考军长和单位的作业文书进行评分，再与口述决心和回答问题得分进行综合，最后得出受考军长的综合成绩。
反观今年的考评，受考人员不但要接受指挥能力考核，同时也要接受基础理论、基本技能、体能等方面的测试，是一次针对个人综合指挥能力、素质的评比。另外，除了考评内容更多，受考人员的范围也更宽泛。军报披露显示，陆军机关、院校、试验训练基地、战区陆军、新疆军区、西藏军区等单位的军职指挥员同步展开考核。“高级干部不论处在哪个岗位、分管哪方面工作，首先是指挥员、战斗员，要真钻打仗、真练指挥。”
“对症下药”，倒逼将军重视训练
不论考的专还是宽，锻炼提升高级指挥员带兵打胜仗的本领，立起练兵先练官、练官先练将的鲜明导向是上述两场考评同样的目的所在。
但练将与练兵不同，士兵的训练在沙场一线，强度可控、见效明显。但针对高级干部在指挥部中的训练、考核，如何才能不流于形式，让受考指挥员真正重视起来？
事实上，这是军队中面临的一道如何“破除形式主义”难题，政知见（微信ID：bqzhengzhiju）注意到，两场考评分别有着不同的方法。
作为一线部队领导，集团军军长、指挥队伍最在意什么？无疑是自己在军中官兵面前的威信。没有威信，何谈带兵打仗。去年的军长考评中，整个考试过程采取现场直播，受考军长们在各自部队的指挥所，通过视频，亮相于陆军主会场和24个分会场的3600余名官兵面前。可以说，各集团军指挥队伍有没有真本领，官兵一目了然。
而从军职领导个人角度出发，他们在意什么？政知见看来，个人升迁、前途抱负、更广阔的报国平台无需讳言。今年的考评中，陆军领导透露，考核成绩将进入档案、进入升职晋级考评、进入评功评奖，作为今后考察使用干部的重要依据。
同时，政知见（微信ID：bqzhengzhiju）注意到，两次考核都组成了专门的“监考”团队，确保考核专业、公正。今年的考评中，来自国防大学的专家教授和陆军纪委组成了监察小组，对考评全程实施督查。而去年的军长考评中，陆军机关组成了13个纪检监察组在考试现场全程监督，现场还启用手机信号屏蔽器、保密柜。
My army generals simulated the war after 9 months. What signal is revealed?
My army generals simulated the war after 9 months. What signal is revealed?
724
first! The 200 Chinese generals will go to the examination room. The results will be linked to the promotion.
Original title: Army generals simulated the war after 9 months, what signal is revealed?
Source: See you from politics
Author | Li Yan
A few days ago, the Army first organized a military training level evaluation of military commanders. The official media of the Army pointed out that this is another ability assessment of the military commanders after the Army examined the 13 group army commanders last year.
The assessment was carried out at the same time in seven test sites across the country. More than 200 general candidates from different battles, based on the battle, continued to work for more than 8 hours. The results of this assessment will enter the archives. As an important basis for promotion and evaluation, CCTV also exposed the details of the assessment.
More importantly, the government knows (WeChat ID: bqzhengzhijian) notes that from these two different evaluations, we can read that the “combat training” emphasized by the military reform has extended from the battlefield to the command.
Working as a basic battle regiment commander
In this assessment, what questions are there for more than 200 officers? CCTV "Military Report" exposed relevant details.
Zhengzhi saw that nearly 200 reference personnel carried out grade assessments around the homework, basic theory, and image interpretation courses, focusing on the basic qualities, basic skills, command ability, and physical ability. During the "quick test", candidates must complete the work manually, 8 hours of test time, large amount of work, the test of each commander's brain power, physical strength is not small.
Zhou Bingyi, director of the Army's General Staff Combat Department, said that the assessment is closely related to the mission and tasks, and the operational tasks for different strategic directions, the assignment of different topics, and the clear guidance of training soldiers according to actual requirements. "The command capability assessment focuses on the missions of each operational direction, focusing on 'analysing and judging the situation, determining the operational attempt, planning the use of power, designing the operational process', etc., and inducing the examinee to operate independently as the commander of the basic battle regiment. Conditions are intended to create a war concept and plot the map."
In the CCTV "Military Report" disclosure, the government knows that the reference military commander is either drawing independently, sitting in front of the computer, or sitting in a training suit, or shooting outside. . The military newspaper published a statement saying that this is to do all the officers and men of the Army to participate in the training, everyone to participate in the assessment, everyone has a training level. The level of military training is to train a group of tigers and fierce players who can fight and win battles, thus improving the overall ability of the army to prepare for the battle.
Last year's exam, the year's exam is wide
The above assessments are rich in content and diverse in methods. Comparing the "big test" of the 13 Army Army commanders a year ago, what are the similarities and differences between the two evaluations?
In June last year, the 13 group army commanders of the Army ushered in the first test of the command capacity of the first battle. The assessment is divided into six steps:
24 hours before the assessment, pass the confidential system, and send the assessment to the examinee commander to determine the conditions;
The captain of the examination took 15 agencies and staff, relying on the field command site and the integrated platform for closed operations, and drafting a battle order and determination map;
The captain of the examination must complete the key points of the oral campaign within 40 minutes;
Through the automatic question-taking system, the captain of the examination randomly selected 2 questions related to the determination of the battle, and answered the scene;
The judges group consisting of 12 experts and professors will conduct on-the-spot evaluation and highlighting points on the points of the warlord’s determination and answer questions.
The expert group used the blind evaluation method to score the operating documents of the military commander and the unit, and then combined with the oral determination and answering the problem scores, and finally obtained the comprehensive results of the tested military commander.
Zheng Zhijian (WeChat ID: bqzhengzhiju) noticed that the examination questions of the two assessments were combined with the different mission backgrounds in actual combat, reflecting the actual combat training from the training of the sandfield to the headquarters. But the difference is that this year's assessment of the military commander as a basic battle army commander independent operation, and last year's military commander evaluation, the group army commander after receiving the assessment to determine the conditions, you need to bring 15 organs, relying on The field command site and the integrated platform are closed. It can be said that last year's military commander's assessment not only focused on the position of the commander, but also the command team in the headquarters of the group army. It was a special assessment for the group army to win.
In contrast to this year's assessment, the examinees not only have to accept the command ability assessment, but also accept the basic theory, basic skills, physical fitness and other aspects of testing, is a specific evaluation of individual comprehensive command ability and quality. In addition, in addition to more evaluation content, the scope of the examinee is also broader. The military newspaper disclosed that the military commanders of the army organs, colleges, experimental training bases, theater army, Xinjiang military region, and Tibet military region simultaneously launched assessments. "No matter which position a senior cadre is in, where he works, first of all, he is a commander and a combatant. You must really fight and fight."
"The right medicine", forced the general to attach importance to training
Regardless of whether the examination is specific or wide, the training of the senior commander to lead the troops to win the battle, the establishment of the training of the first training, the training of the first training will be the same purpose of the above two assessments.
However, the training will be different from the training of soldiers. The training of the soldiers is on the front line of the battlefield, and the intensity is controllable and effective. However, in view of the training and assessment of senior cadres in the command, how can they not be in the form and let the examinee commanders really pay attention to it?
In fact, this is a problem faced by the military in how to "break the formalism". The political knowledge (WeChat ID: bqzhengzhiju) notes that there are different methods for the two evaluations.
As the leader of the first-line army, what is the most concerned about the group army commander and command team? Undoubtedly, it is the prestige of the officers and men in the army. Without prestige, let’s talk about bringing troops to fight. In the evaluation of the military commander last year, the entire examination process was broadcast live. The commanded military commanders appeared in the headquarters of their respective units and appeared in front of more than 3,600 officers and men of the Army's main venue and 24 sub-districts. It can be said that the command troops of the various group army have no real skills, and the officers and men can see at a glance.
And what do they care about from the personal perspective of military leaders? Seeing from the political point of view, there is no need for rumors about personal promotion, ambition, and a broader platform for serving the country. In this year's assessment, the Army leaders revealed that the assessment results will enter the archives, enter the promotion and promotion evaluation, and enter the evaluation awards, as an important basis for the future inspection of the use of cadres.
At the same time, the government knows (WeChat ID: bqzhengzhiju) notes that the two assessments have formed a special "invigilation" team to ensure professional and fair assessment. In this year's assessment, experts and professors from the National Defense University and the Army Disciplinary Committee formed a monitoring team to conduct inspections throughout the evaluation. In the evaluation of the military commander last year, the army organs formed 13 discipline inspection and supervision teams to supervise the entire test site, and the mobile phone signal shielding device and security cabinet were also activated.
