Guns, Grenades, and Ipads for NSmen

[Sideswipe]

its heavy, cumbersome and awkward. Not the kind of weapon i want to take when excuting a fire movement, remember if it is easy and focus to shoot at your enemies, they are also finding it easy to focus and shoot at you. Targets at ranges do not fire back, mats north and south of us do.

point taken. I admit I use SAR21 to shoot at ranges only.

from Wikipedia, the standard SAR21 is 300g or less heavier than standard M16. SAR21 is hard to handle with add-ons attached?

 

[sleaguepunter]

why?
SAR21 bulleye and night laser not bad, easier to focus and shoot.

what work well on the range dont made it a good battlefield weapon. SA21 is too heavy, the laser thingy made the front of the rifle heavy, need a battery to work (which may not be available in war time). So in the end, u could end up with a heavy rifle with a simple 4x scope. I think the sharpshooter scope which work just as well plus M16A1 still lighter than the SAR21. A good battlefield weapon must be light, durable, simple to use, not many parts and should not have electronic gadgets mounted. i think the iron sight on the SAR21 is a joke, if both laser plus mounted scope become out of action, then SAR21 is as good as junk.

A M16A1 with an M203 attachment is about 500gm heavier, and i find M16A1 with M203 attachment is totally balance when firing live ammo. I collected $200 for my ORD shoot with a M203, the M16 barrel dun jump due to weight of the M203, so less time wasted in finding target 12 down range. While it a handicap when going 300m run down compare to other M16s firers but i wont trade it for other weapons.

 

[sleaguepunter]

point taken. I admit I use SAR21 to shoot at ranges only.

from Wikipedia, the standard SAR21 is 300g or less heavier than standard M16. SAR21 is hard to handle with add-ons attached?

only 300g, i think not. A M16 unloaded about 3kg while the SAR21 should be ard 4kg+.

 

[erection2015]

these are useful for the maids accompanying the NS men carrying their stuff.

Actually SAF needs the Kotex Sanitary Pads more urgently.

Known as FAD in SAF:

 

[red amoeba]

what work well on the range dont made it a good battlefield weapon. SA21 is too heavy, the laser thingy made the front of the rifle heavy, need a battery to work (which may not be available in war time). So in the end, u could end up with a heavy rifle with a simple 4x scope. I think the sharpshooter scope which work just as well plus M16A1 still lighter than the SAR21. A good battlefield weapon must be light, durable, simple to use, not many parts and should not have electronic gadgets mounted. i think the iron sight on the SAR21 is a joke, if both laser plus mounted scope become out of action, then SAR21 is as good as junk.

A M16A1 with an M203 attachment is about 500gm heavier, and i find M16A1 with M203 attachment is totally balance when firing live ammo. I collected $200 for my ORD shoot with a M203, the M16 barrel dun jump due to weight of the M203, so less time wasted in finding target 12 down range. While it a handicap when going 300m run down compare to other M16s firers but i wont trade it for other weapons.

==

AK the best...thats why its around for so long. hardy and powerful - yes, its aim is torrid but given our army boys, a few rounds exploding around will scare your balls off and keep ur heads down, simi lan jiao SAR21, laser aiming also boh yong....its the psychological impact...

 

[singveld]

wow that mean that malaysian army can pinpoint our soldier by the wifi ping the ipad send out.

actually do you know that the ipad can save the soldier from small calibrate weapon if the bullet hit the ipad at the strongest part - the battery.

 

[cooleo]

Not so distant future.....all soldiers will be given this....

 

[singveld]

i rather they attached one maid for each singapore soldier.

 

[uncleyap]

The United States did not lose the war in Vietnam. The South Vietnamese Govt collapsed after the U.S. Congress cut off funding. The South Vietnamese ran out of fuel, ammunition and other supplies because of a lack of support from Congress while the North Vietnamese were very well supplied by China and the Soviet Union.

The fall of Saigon happened 30 April 1975, two years after the American military left Vietnam. U.S. President Richard Nixon started planning troop withdrawals after Tet 68, which was a major military defeat for the Vietcong. The American military did not lose a battle of any major consequence in Vietnam.

Because USA is known as Superpower that's why all these are considered as defeats in war, they are not like us Little Red Dot. They should have power to sweep away North + South Vietnam & North + South Korea & Iraq & Afghanistan all alone, and without any allies.

 

[uncleyap]

Database Error Sucks!