- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 36,768
- Points
- 113
Leong is deceitful. His wife pretends to be unconscious and they both go into hiding to avoid PM Lee's lawyers. Cowards!
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Good PM Lee Sues Oppie Leong For Defamation! Guess How Much Damages Oppie Leong Must Pay?
- Thread starter JohnTan
- Start date
Leong is deceitful. His wife pretends to be unconscious and they both go into hiding to avoid PM Lee's lawyers. Cowards!
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 38,563
- Points
- 113
Has any one made a list of how many lawsuits Pinky has made?
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,200
- Points
- 113
it seems leong , wife and maid can run and can hide. but for how long ?
better to come out from hiding and face it.
otherwise how to ask for Donation ?
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,200
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 36,768
- Points
- 113
The authorities are keeping a keen lookout at the airport, land and sea borders. Oppie Leong can run, but he can't hide.
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,615
- Points
- 113
Anyhow share article la. Teach that bastard a lesson!
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 37,364
- Points
- 113
Can borrow that sampan? & make it Sampan 3.0?
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 37,364
- Points
- 113
A person that is afraid to see his or her refection in the mirror, that is pinky....is evil.
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,200
- Points
- 113
Apparently he came out of hiding and here is his side of the story :
http://theindependent.sg/blogger-le...bout-legal-proceedings-against-him-by-pm-lee/
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,200
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,200
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,200
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 36,768
- Points
- 113
Why Oppie Leong no balls to receive the writs in person? Why hide like a tortoise?
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 38,563
- Points
- 113
Clearly it's not your faithfully. More like "Yours, give the defemation money!"
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2018
- Messages
- 1,073
- Points
- 113
Good la so more will Google and read that news article
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2012
- Messages
- 979
- Points
- 43
Unable to sue Facebook and takes on a user is even more defaming and shameful.
Leong's post was shared 18 times before it was taken down...that's a small audience but Facebook held tight for many more.
Human Rights should force Facebook to make a stand on this since they own the Share button
Leong's post was shared 18 times before it was taken down...that's a small audience but Facebook held tight for many more.
Human Rights should force Facebook to make a stand on this since they own the Share button
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 6,837
- Points
- 113
Why the actual writer is not being sued?
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,200
- Points
- 113
look like it was a right thing to do.
where is Han H H , Roy N, C. Han n Wham ???
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,200
- Points
- 113
Stirring again
Roy Ngern has some valid points :
It's an excuse. "Secondly, what exactly constitutes defamation? Leong did not write the article. Nor did he promote the article with any of his own comments or opinions. In other words, it was a "blank" share. Is this really defamation? After all, he was in no position to verify the truth of the article. He also complied with the take down notice. The only thing he did not do was issue a public apology. A refusal to apologise is not defamation in itself. Has everyone who "shared" the article been similarly prosecuted? Not that I am advocating lawsuits but if it is indeed the case that only Leong is being singled out - then we have to ask why this is the case? Last but not least, I note that the Straits Times (ST) has printed a rather misleading headline. It's headline said "PM Lee sues financial adviser Leong Sze Hian for defamation". This is not entirely true. The ST headline makes it seem like it was Leong who was behind the offending article when in reality, he merely shared it. Is this not misrepresentation on the part of ST? Further, this article is in the "premium" section of ST which means that the general public may not be able to read beyond the misleading headline. Does this not make Leong seem like he is guilty of something that he isn't? Could this be tantamount to defamation on the part of ST as well? Arguably if Leong had the deep pockets to pursue a lawsuit, he could as well?"
Similar threads
