Serious Former CNA bureau chief said LHL threw tantrum when asked about Ho Ching's salary. She also asked when Loong will resign
- Thread starter Leepotism
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 28,012
- Points
- 113
Why need to ask? We can safely assume that she makes more than the CEO of Goldman Sachs.
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2017
- Messages
- 18,819
- Points
- 113
I remember her, she was the Indonesia correspondent always seen on CNA.
Seems like Pinky Loong has a nasty temper, are you sure Dhanabalan wasn't slapped by him?
It is a fact that all homos are bad tempered by nature due to their sexuality.....
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,736
- Points
- 113
you all actually believe words coming from an indian woman, later she cry rape...!
such lying instances are dime a dozen...
https://www.ndtv.com/indians-abroad...-jailed-for-forging-victims-statement-1974574
https://www.ndtv.com/indians-abroad...-about-being-forced-into-prostitution-2037763
such lying instances are dime a dozen...
https://www.ndtv.com/indians-abroad...-jailed-for-forging-victims-statement-1974574
https://www.ndtv.com/indians-abroad...-about-being-forced-into-prostitution-2037763
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 107,786
- Points
- 113
Yin-yang imbalance, they have a lot of turbulent emotions pent up inside them.
Just like the eunuchs in ancient China.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 38,563
- Points
- 113
Why he never sue her?
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2018
- Messages
- 30,857
- Points
- 113
I never knew gals school accept boys...wat gives?I can never be like Loong... I never attended Nanyang Girl's High School. It must have been a unique educational experience for him, moulding him into the person he is today.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 20,154
- Points
- 113
Don't distract and derailed this thread.
What has Indian prostitutions got to do with this thread.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 20,154
- Points
- 113
This is my impression of krafty cheesepie.Yin-yang imbalance, they have a lot of turbulent emotions pent up inside them.
Just like the eunuchs in ancient China.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2011
- Messages
- 4,480
- Points
- 113
Agree. Wrong comparison.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2011
- Messages
- 4,480
- Points
- 113
Ho Ching’s dual role as PM’s wife and CEO of Temasek should trump her desire for privacy if that is the reason for not divulging her earnings
The nagging question of Ho Ching’s salary as CEO of Temasek Holdings does not appear to be one that is about to disappear into the sunset. Indeed, it appears to be one that is raised periodically by opposition politicians, media outlets and the like. According to reports, it would seem that this is an issue that raises the heckles of her husband who is also our Prime Minister, Mr Lee Hsien Loong (PM Lee).
Attempting to address the issue in Parliament, Second Finance Minister Lawrence Wong has said that “the government has an ‘arms-length’ relationship with Temasek and GIC and that the government refrains from interfering with their Boards’ decisions, such as the appointment of Ho Ching as CEO of Temasek.”
He further added that “salaries at Temasek and GIC are decided respectively by independent boards.” In isolation, that may well be an acceptable answer but then, this isn’t a straightforward issue of a private company deciding the salaries of its employees. Rather, Temasek is a unique company that straddles between private and public.
While ostensibly a private company, it also manages state assets which are clearly of public interest. Not to mention the fact that its CEO is the wife of our current Prime Minister! This would mean that apart from Temasek’s affairs being arguably of public interest, there is also a potential argument for a case of conflict of interest!
Where are the checks and balances when state assets are managed by the wife of the man who holds the highest political office in the land? Lest we forget, Madam Ho is not a public servant which means that we may never know why or how decisions are made. What is there in place to prevent state assets being potentially used to keep her husband in power? In the first place, Madam Ho should never have been made CEO of Temasek. Not only was she made CEO but she has been a long standing one whose salary appears to be opaque. While I am not suggesting that any actual wrongdoing has taken place, the fact that this factual matrix exists means that it will always be a subject of contention, controversy and suspicion.
Added to the apparent murkiness is the seeming detraction whenever that question is indeed raised. No one ever answers directly. Why is it such a secret? Perhaps Madam Ho does not feel that she is compelled to disclose her personal income because she is not a public servant. However, even if she is not technically on the payroll of the state, she is still the wife of the most powerful man in Singapore who is at the helm of Singapore’s most powerful private/public company. With that in mind, isn’t she obligated to be more transparent and open?
The more her salary isn’t disclosed, the more there will be speculation that something untoward is happening even if that isn’t the case. In this case, I would think that her dual role as the de facto first lady and as the CEO of the powerful private / public hybrid company that is Temasek should trump her desire for privacy if that is the reason why she is not divulging her earnings.
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppLineWeChatTelegramRedditShare
The nagging question of Ho Ching’s salary as CEO of Temasek Holdings does not appear to be one that is about to disappear into the sunset. Indeed, it appears to be one that is raised periodically by opposition politicians, media outlets and the like. According to reports, it would seem that this is an issue that raises the heckles of her husband who is also our Prime Minister, Mr Lee Hsien Loong (PM Lee).
Attempting to address the issue in Parliament, Second Finance Minister Lawrence Wong has said that “the government has an ‘arms-length’ relationship with Temasek and GIC and that the government refrains from interfering with their Boards’ decisions, such as the appointment of Ho Ching as CEO of Temasek.”
He further added that “salaries at Temasek and GIC are decided respectively by independent boards.” In isolation, that may well be an acceptable answer but then, this isn’t a straightforward issue of a private company deciding the salaries of its employees. Rather, Temasek is a unique company that straddles between private and public.
While ostensibly a private company, it also manages state assets which are clearly of public interest. Not to mention the fact that its CEO is the wife of our current Prime Minister! This would mean that apart from Temasek’s affairs being arguably of public interest, there is also a potential argument for a case of conflict of interest!
Where are the checks and balances when state assets are managed by the wife of the man who holds the highest political office in the land? Lest we forget, Madam Ho is not a public servant which means that we may never know why or how decisions are made. What is there in place to prevent state assets being potentially used to keep her husband in power? In the first place, Madam Ho should never have been made CEO of Temasek. Not only was she made CEO but she has been a long standing one whose salary appears to be opaque. While I am not suggesting that any actual wrongdoing has taken place, the fact that this factual matrix exists means that it will always be a subject of contention, controversy and suspicion.
Added to the apparent murkiness is the seeming detraction whenever that question is indeed raised. No one ever answers directly. Why is it such a secret? Perhaps Madam Ho does not feel that she is compelled to disclose her personal income because she is not a public servant. However, even if she is not technically on the payroll of the state, she is still the wife of the most powerful man in Singapore who is at the helm of Singapore’s most powerful private/public company. With that in mind, isn’t she obligated to be more transparent and open?
The more her salary isn’t disclosed, the more there will be speculation that something untoward is happening even if that isn’t the case. In this case, I would think that her dual role as the de facto first lady and as the CEO of the powerful private / public hybrid company that is Temasek should trump her desire for privacy if that is the reason why she is not divulging her earnings.
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppLineWeChatTelegramRedditShare
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2008
- Messages
- 61,243
- Points
- 113
huat ah!
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,736
- Points
- 113
in another thread, i fell off my chair after you proclaimed that you have two wives and were raped by them, are you tom cruise?? lmao.
ugly pple tend to have inferior complex.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 20,154
- Points
- 113
Please advise when I post I have 2wives and raped by them?
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,736
- Points
- 113
advise your head! lmao
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 20,154
- Points
- 113
U don't ah gua and start spouting nonsense .
When I post I got 2 wives.
Fucking useless wimy cunt asshole.
U are a piece of shit.
Useless.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,715
- Points
- 113
Similar threads
