• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Don't be fooled by the Minister's salary issue.

rusty

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
2,668
Points
63
What they are doing now is just another wayang to appease the public.
We have arrived at this pathetic stage because there are simply not enough oppositions in parliament to stop the PAP from changing and amending policies at their whims and fancy. They have amended the constitiutions more than 300 times with less then 200 years history while US amended theirs less than 100 times in more than 300 years.
Remember the policy of minister's pay was debated and bulldozed through in parliament without any opposition.
In order to restore this unfavorable and unjustifiable situation to its default, we must have two third opposition in the parliament.
This salary review is just another wayang skillfully crafted to side track the people into thinking that they have changed.

My 2 balls worth.
 
Last edited:
What they are doing now is just another wayang to appease the public.

When the PAP appeases the public, you accuse them of "wayang".

When the PAP ignores public sentiment, they are accused of being "arrogant".

Nothing the govt does seems to make you twits happy.
 
When the PAP appeases the public, you accuse them of "wayang".

When the PAP ignores public sentiment, they are accused of being "arrogant".

Nothing the govt does seems to make you twits happy.


Perhaps you may have mis-interpreted my stance of their appeament out of context.

The wayang is neceassary for them to stay in power and continue to introduce policies at their whims and fancy not the pay itself.
 
The wayang is neceassary for them to stay in power and continue to introduce policies at their whims and fancy not the pay itself.

Policies have to be presented in a way that is acceptable. That's the art of politics.
 
Legalised corruption, Sir is a habit that grows. I am told it is like making love – it is always easier the second time! The first time there may be pangs of conscience, a sense of guilt. But once embarked on this course with constant repetition you get more and more brazen in the attack. All you have to do is to dissolve organizations and societies and banish and detain the key political workers in these societies. Then miraculously everything is tranquil on the surface. Then an intimidated press and the government-controlled radio together can regularly sing your praises, and slowly and steadily the people are made to forget the evil things that have already been done, or if these things are referred to again they’re conveniently distorted and distorted with impunity, because there will be no opposition to contradict.

 
It's called "spin".

Nope. That's not call spin. It's cheating. Period. In Mass Communication 101, "spin" means putting an event or an announcement etc in as much positive light as possible. The event or announcement etc is not a bad thing in itself. The "spin" is only for the purpose rendering it much more positive than what it actually is.

In this salary review, what the govt did is nothing to do with 'spinning". They had over the years been increasing rather substantially their salaries. And now they are offering a discount of their salaries with the end result that they are making sacrifices as if out there in the marketplace they would have been paid much more. We all know that is totally untrue. So that's lying. Simple as that. You see for a department store to mark up their prices and then give a discount during sales is an acceptable practice because that's business. But for a govt to do that, what else can it be but to be called cheating.

A side point. Rusty stated that PAP is appeasing the public with the salary cuts. It's more correct to say that the PAP is trying to appease the public by hoodwinking us. And that's why the citizens are still unhappy with what the PAP had done. Once again as is the case in recent times, the PAP had failed miserably. It's position is getting worser and worserest as my dear Lim Swee Say would say.
 
Nope. That's not call spin. It's cheating. Period. In Mass Communication 101, "spin" means putting an event or an announcement etc in as much positive light as possible. The event or announcement etc is not a bad thing in itself. The "spin" is only for the purpose rendering it much more positive than what it actually is.

In this salary review, what the govt did is nothing to do with 'spinning". They had over the years been increasing rather substantially their salaries. And now they are offering a discount of their salaries with the end result that they are making sacrifices as if out there in the marketplace they would have been paid much more. We all know that is totally untrue. So that's lying. Simple as that. You see for a department store to mark up their prices and then give a discount during sales is an acceptable practice because that's business. But for a govt to do that, what else can it be but to be called cheating.

A side point. Rusty stated that PAP is appeasing the public with the salary cuts. It's more correct to say that the PAP is trying to appease the public by hoodwinking us. And that's why the citizens are still unhappy with what the PAP had done. Once again as is the case in recent times, the PAP had failed miserably. It's position is getting worser and worserest as my dear Lim Swee Say would say.

Yes, Singaporeans must see through PAP's "market subsidy" approach. It shd be based on cost which is objective. If the price is higher than cost, it's profit..if it is lower, it's subsidy.

The pap must admit that if a plate of chicken rice costs $1 to produce and the pap sells it at $2, it makes a profit of $1. The pap cant argue that because another stall sells it at $4, the pap is giving a 50% subsidy. The right accounting term is that the pap has made a 100% profit and not gave a 50% subsidy
 
Yes, Singaporeans must see through PAP's "market subsidy" approach. It shd be based on cost which is objective. If the price is higher than cost, it's profit..if it is lower, it's subsidy.

The pap must admit that if a plate of chicken rice costs $1 to produce and the pap sells it at $2, it makes a profit of $1. The pap cant argue that because another stall sells it at $4, the pap is giving a 50% subsidy. The right accounting term is that the pap has made a 100% profit and not gave a 50% subsidy

Good analogy. And what's worse is that they sell the chicken rice at $2 saying it's the best chicken rice and so u must pay more for it than other stalls. But when u eat it, u find that it's not even as good as another stall selling it at $1.20.
 
Good analogy. And what's worse is that they sell the chicken rice at $2 saying it's the best chicken rice and so u must pay more for it than other stalls. But when u eat it, u find that it's not even as good as another stall selling it at $1.20.

that's true..that's why singaporeans who know the pap well dont trust what the pap says.
 
When the PAP appeases the public, you accuse them of "wayang".

When the PAP ignores public sentiment, they are accused of being "arrogant".

Nothing the govt does seems to make you twits happy.


Datz is politics! PAP plays it, so can forummers....Singtel Cunt Fucker!!
 
politicians thrown out by voters are brought back to golden car parks courtesy PAP.... eg Wong Kan seng: Temasek is using pple's money but why shud it be spent on WKS after he was rejected by pple? Mah Bow Tan too...
 
Why does not PAP use makeup pay option?
Same shud apply for pple entering who were earning much less like Yaacob as NUS lecturer before his quantum jump in pay.......... as a PhD in civil engrg what did he do to contain flooding other than attributing to once in 50 yrs freak... my god, how many 50 yrs have passed by so quickly!! LKY also asserted that NO amount of engrg can solve the flooding problem - who the fuck is he to talk about matters outside his domain?
 
Back
Top