• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

does it make any difference whether sgp has or has not a president?

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
15,744
Points
83
obvious answer is NO!

the only difference without a president, the state saves million$. the PM should take over the obligatory post as the head of state. that should make the president a redundant post.

isn't singapore all for efficiency and riddance of deadwoods and saving resources?
 
But Singapore only has a pm, as ProxyMinister he does not know to carry himself as head of state.
 
But Singapore only has a pm, as ProxyMinister he does not know to carry himself as head of state.

sgp maybe small. we got a PM and 2 dpy PMs to aid him. b4 that, we got SM and MM and lucky they put a stop to all the Ms if not dunno how many money-draining Ms the pap's going to churn up. by the way, each M they conjure up cost the state million$. are they worth the money? your guess is as good as mine.
 
in USA, they only got a PRESIDENT and a vice-president who are both economically paid. our prataman is currently like drawing double salaries: 1 for his main course president job; another for the pension which this 80+ obessed mamak is entitled to. the total amount is estimated to be about $8M a yr. ($4M pay n pension on last drawn pay of another $4M).

one sg prataman is equal to at least 10 pairs of US president n his vp added up. and how big is sgp compare to USA? js a speck.

the money wasted by the state to upkeep such heavy duty figurehead, is it really worth it? for so many yrs, the state wasted away such good money which could have been better utilised to help the nation but it was just wasted away on just one cbl man.

what logic is this? with the million $ paid minitoots, how come no got the balls to voice this out and stop the wastage??
 
does malaysia need a president?

NO.

but malaysia has a bigger problem to deal with: 9 cbl sultans and their cronies to waste their state's finances :(
 
its just like, it makes no difference whether we have a soccer team or not. Bcos it is crap.
 
its just like, it makes no difference whether we have a soccer team or not. Bcos it is crap.

WRONG!

soccer is no longer a sports. it's a vehicle of gambling which shortie mah endorses and leegalises as now a state money churner. soccer makes tons of $ for pap while the president drains at least $4M yearly fr singaporeans.

see the great difference here?
 
Back
Top