- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
The MAS believe they can "protect" uninformed investors and prevent a repeat of the Lehman Brothers-linked Minibonds fiasco in 2008. When reached for comments, MAS said they "carefully considered the cost-benefit of the new requirements, and are of the view that the potential benefits in terms of enhanced protection to retail investors in the sale and advisory process for special investment products(SIPs) outweigh the costs, particularly in light of today's volatile market". (Good Lord, I thought MAS was the one pushing for plain Engrish in all financial institutions when talking to the public?)
If MAS truly cares about people getting duped, they should then impose similar ruling for stocks, which is even riskier than funds. Nobody knows the effects and effectiveness of this new practice. U-turn policies to correct a foreseeable fault only waste everyone's time. Perhaps MAS meant well for investors, but the test is more suitable for Ho Ching.
http://temasekrevealed.blogspot.com...paign=Feed:+blogspot/NnXGA+(Temasek+Revealed)
If MAS truly cares about people getting duped, they should then impose similar ruling for stocks, which is even riskier than funds. Nobody knows the effects and effectiveness of this new practice. U-turn policies to correct a foreseeable fault only waste everyone's time. Perhaps MAS meant well for investors, but the test is more suitable for Ho Ching.
http://temasekrevealed.blogspot.com...paign=Feed:+blogspot/NnXGA+(Temasek+Revealed)
