CPIB, PA and Election Department should be under PMO or President's Office?
- Thread starter duluxe
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2018
- Messages
- 17,449
- Points
- 113
Would that make any fucking difference?
Should be under the 97 MPs. Selected under MPs as a body. Top civil servant appointments such as police commissioner Chief Justice, Perm Sec......too
Not under a politicians but under all politicians. If president former PAP, can have no conflict of interest? Think.....Lol.
Not under a politicians but under all politicians. If president former PAP, can have no conflict of interest? Think.....Lol.
It does. But if no 33% or coalition government, everything reports to PAP only. No checks & balances.
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2023
- Messages
- 12,735
- Points
- 113
The CPIB, PA and ELD all report to the PM who reports to the SM. The President also reports to the PM and SM.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2023
- Messages
- 10,150
- Points
- 113
That's why I said eventually everything goes back to the SM aka the majesty.
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2023
- Messages
- 12,735
- Points
- 113
Who does the SM report to?
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2023
- Messages
- 10,150
- Points
- 113
CPIB should not be Leeporting back to the pap gov directly. It needs to be an independent party.Who does the SM report to?
Take hk icac for eg
Icac leeports to hksar which then leeports to prc central gov.
Since sg has different settings in its governance, CPIB should be Leeporting to another branch in another organisation out of sg. Eg asean.
A new law on this needs to be established.
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2023
- Messages
- 12,735
- Points
- 113
The CPIB operates with functional independence from the police and nominally from the govt, but its director reports to the Prime Minister. That is why the CPIB needed then PM Lee's permission to investigate Iswaran.
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2008
- Messages
- 5,818
- Points
- 113
All ownself check ownself
No need transparency and accountability
No need transparency and accountability
Emperor state in sg.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2014
- Messages
- 5,351
- Points
- 113
As per topic in the title.....
Neither. They should be completely independent, just like the judiciary. Only slight problem is..judges are appointed by the President on the Prime Minister’s advice, after consultation with the Chief Justice (Article 95). But that should not interfere too much with its impartiality in its operational decisions.
All three entities must therefore be allowed to operate autonomously. A direct reporting to the PM or any ministers in the PAP-Gov would definitely create a conflict of interest which 65% enjoys being arse-farked anyways, so there is nothing to complain about, LOL.
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2023
- Messages
- 12,735
- Points
- 113
POFMA allows the PAP ministers get to be judge, jury and executioner over what is fake and what is not. Under this law to supposedly fight fake news with imprisonment of up to 10 years, ministers are given broad powers to determine what is online falsehood, as well as to punish those who produced or spread them.
Last edited:
Wait long long as long as majority are ignorant & think ownself check ownself is the not a corrupt process.
Politicians has gone rogue....
No need get court warrant, no need police & all these organisations allow them to run wild.
- Joined
- May 16, 2023
- Messages
- 39,516
- Points
- 113
Ownself check Ownself is a virtue, u know?
- Joined
- May 16, 2023
- Messages
- 39,516
- Points
- 113
65% agreeed de woh
Ownself convince ownself self check is a virtue
Similar threads
