TCJ is definitely a better leader than CCS.
CCS no substance at all
Visually, TCJ is more pleasing to the eye and seem quite authoritative. Until he opens his mouth. He speaks quickly, nervously and can't wait to get his points across. In a speech at the developers' association, it was very obvious to the audience that he really did not understand the concept of the very speech he was reading - it must have been done by one of his underlings.
CCS is child-like, reminding one of the Monkey who went to the west. All he needs is a staff in his hand, standing on one leg and peering into the horizon, shielding his eyes with his hand. He's got the classic clown look.
Visually, TCJ is more pleasing to the eye and seem quite authoritative. Until he opens his mouth. He speaks quickly, nervously and can't wait to get his points across. In a speech at the developers' association, it was very obvious to the audience that he really did not understand the concept of the very speech he was reading - it must have been done by one of his underlings.
CCS is child-like, reminding one of the Monkey who went to the west. All he needs is a staff in his hand, standing on one leg and peering into the horizon, shielding his eyes with his hand. He's got the classic clown look.
TCJ has some confidence in his voice. CCS has no confidence at all. TCJ used to be a debater. CCS at best was just study good but I really wonder how he passed his Cambridge studies or life there.
The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him. - Niccolo Machiavelli
So how does Ruler Loong score on this very important test?
Visually, TCJ is more pleasing to the eye and seem quite authoritative. Until he opens his mouth. He speaks quickly, nervously and can't wait to get his points across. In a speech at the developers' association, it was very obvious to the audience that he really did not understand the concept of the very speech he was reading - it must have been done by one of his underlings.
CCS is child-like, reminding one of the Monkey who went to the west. All he needs is a staff in his hand, standing on one leg and peering into the horizon, shielding his eyes with his hand. He's got the classic clown look.
TCJ is definitely a better leader than CCS.
CCS no substance at all
The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him. - Niccolo Machiavelli
So how does Ruler Loong score on this very important test?
TCJ has some confidence in his voice. CCS has no confidence at all. TCJ used to be a debater. CCS at best was just study good but I really wonder how he passed his Cambridge studies or life there.
Look at the long list of failed, purportedly "future leaders" and you will get the answer:
Vivian B. (Good foresight, supposedly. First public meeting, with the Malaysians and told their reporters to stop jumping around like Monkeys; got told off and apologised).
Ng Eng Hen (supposed to have charisma of LKY)
Raymond Lim - good for hairdo talk only
Teo Chee Hean - the perpetual bridesmaid of a DPM
etc etc
What do you think?
oso dun haf worstest among dem ... oni got worserer ...TCJ is worse than CCS. There's no good, better or best among them ...
TCJ is definitely a better leader than CCS.
CCS no substance at all
You must be confused, Confuseous. Hairdo talk was Lim Hng Kiang, not Raymond Lim.![]()
Debater so what? Ah Vivian also famous debater you know?![]()
TCJ too busy to write his own speeches? If he's a debater, all he needs are cue cards not fully written speeches.
Only those who become pappies.![]()
Who in the oppo were debaters?