Comparing Kee Chiu and Boy Scout Tan CJ

TCJ is definitely a better leader than CCS.
CCS no substance at all

Visually, TCJ is more pleasing to the eye and seem quite authoritative. Until he opens his mouth. He speaks quickly, nervously and can't wait to get his points across. In a speech at the developers' association, it was very obvious to the audience that he really did not understand the concept of the very speech he was reading - it must have been done by one of his underlings.

CCS is child-like, reminding one of the Monkey who went to the west. All he needs is a staff in his hand, standing on one leg and peering into the horizon, shielding his eyes with his hand. He's got the classic clown look.
 
Visually, TCJ is more pleasing to the eye and seem quite authoritative. Until he opens his mouth. He speaks quickly, nervously and can't wait to get his points across. In a speech at the developers' association, it was very obvious to the audience that he really did not understand the concept of the very speech he was reading - it must have been done by one of his underlings.

CCS is child-like, reminding one of the Monkey who went to the west. All he needs is a staff in his hand, standing on one leg and peering into the horizon, shielding his eyes with his hand. He's got the classic clown look.

TCJ has some confidence in his voice. CCS has no confidence at all. TCJ used to be a debater. CCS at best was just study good but I really wonder how he passed his Cambridge studies or life there.
 
Visually, TCJ is more pleasing to the eye and seem quite authoritative. Until he opens his mouth. He speaks quickly, nervously and can't wait to get his points across. In a speech at the developers' association, it was very obvious to the audience that he really did not understand the concept of the very speech he was reading - it must have been done by one of his underlings.

CCS is child-like, reminding one of the Monkey who went to the west. All he needs is a staff in his hand, standing on one leg and peering into the horizon, shielding his eyes with his hand. He's got the classic clown look.

TCJ has some confidence in his voice. CCS has no confidence at all. TCJ used to be a debater. CCS at best was just study good but I really wonder how he passed his Cambridge studies or life there.
 
TCJ has some confidence in his voice. CCS has no confidence at all. TCJ used to be a debater. CCS at best was just study good but I really wonder how he passed his Cambridge studies or life there.

TCJ too busy to write his own speeches? If he's a debater, all he needs are cue cards not fully written speeches.
 
The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him. - Niccolo Machiavelli

So how does Ruler Loong score on this very important test?

Lol. Abysmal
 
Visually, TCJ is more pleasing to the eye and seem quite authoritative. Until he opens his mouth. He speaks quickly, nervously and can't wait to get his points across. In a speech at the developers' association, it was very obvious to the audience that he really did not understand the concept of the very speech he was reading - it must have been done by one of his underlings.

CCS is child-like, reminding one of the Monkey who went to the west. All he needs is a staff in his hand, standing on one leg and peering into the horizon, shielding his eyes with his hand. He's got the classic clown look.

I thought that honour went to Lim Sway Sway? ...with one leg up, one hand peering into the distance & they make a musical of the "journey to wet"..singing " upturn the downturn"....ha ha ha ha
 
The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him. - Niccolo Machiavelli

So how does Ruler Loong score on this very important test?

Look at the long list of failed, purportedly "future leaders" and you will get the answer:

Vivian B. (Good foresight, supposedly. First public meeting, with the Malaysians and told their reporters to stop jumping around like Monkeys; got told off and apologised).
Ng Eng Hen (supposed to have charisma of LKY)
Raymond Lim - good for hairdo talk only
Teo Chee Hean - the perpetual bridesmaid of a DPM
etc etc

What do you think?
 
Debater so what? Ah Vivian also famous debater you know? :rolleyes:

TCJ has some confidence in his voice. CCS has no confidence at all. TCJ used to be a debater. CCS at best was just study good but I really wonder how he passed his Cambridge studies or life there.
 
You must be confused, Confuseous. Hairdo talk was Lim Hng Kiang, not Raymond Lim. :D

Look at the long list of failed, purportedly "future leaders" and you will get the answer:

Vivian B. (Good foresight, supposedly. First public meeting, with the Malaysians and told their reporters to stop jumping around like Monkeys; got told off and apologised).
Ng Eng Hen (supposed to have charisma of LKY)
Raymond Lim - good for hairdo talk only
Teo Chee Hean - the perpetual bridesmaid of a DPM
etc etc

What do you think?
 
TCJ is definitely a better leader than CCS.
CCS no substance at all

That's like saying shit is better than vomit. :rolleyes:

I'll tell you one thing that CCS is better than TCJ though: the former doesn't copy and paste Bible verses on his Facebook page.
 
Back
Top