• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Charles Chong Makes 22 Recommendations To Deal With Oppie Fake News! WP Turbanless Bayi Don't Dare To Disagree!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
hzselectcomm0920.jpg


SINGAPORE - A parliamentary Select Committee has called for new laws that will grant the Government powers to swiftly disrupt the spread of online falsehoods, as part of a broad suite of measures to counter the scourge of fake news.

The Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods made 22 recommendations in all, including enacting legislation, urging technology companies to take proactive steps to tackle fake content on their platforms and creating a national framework to guide public education on falsehoods.

It submitted a 176-page report to Parliament on Wednesday (Sept 19), about five months after it held public hearings over eight days in March to listen to oral representations from 65 individuals and organisations.

The 10-member committee, chaired by Deputy Speaker of Parliament Charles Chong, was appointed in January to examine the phenomenon of deliberate online falsehoods and study what measures Singapore should take to prevent and combat the problem.

Speaking at a press conference on Thursday (Sept 20), committee member and Senior Minister of State for Transport and Communications and Information Janil Puthucheary said deliberate online falsehoods are “a live and serious threat for Singapore that threatens our national security”.

"There is no one silver bullet to combat this complex problem, and a multi-pronged approach is necessary," the committee said in its report, which included its observations on the hearings..


On disrupting online falsehoods, the committee said the Government should have the powers to limit or block the spread of fake news, and discredit the sources of such falsehoods.

Legislation will be needed to effectively disrupt the spread and influence of fake news, it stressed.

In recommending new laws - a move that observers had expected following the hearings - the committee did not go into the specifics of what form the new laws would take. Rather, it set out the principles that any new legislation should follow.

For instance, the measures will need to be effective in a matter of hours, to achieve the aim of stopping the falsehoods going viral. These measures could including take-down powers, blocking access, and tagging corrections and notifications.

The committee also urged the Government to consider laws that could cut off digital advertising revenue to those who spread online falsehoods, and impose criminal sanctions in serious cases, for instance, when falsehoods cause public disorder or election interference.

In a nod to concerns about legislative over-reach and stifling free speech, the committee noted the new laws should be calibrated, taking into account the context and circumstances of each case.

"It is also important that they be accompanied by checks and balances," the committee said, adding that adequate safeguards need to be put in place to ensure due process and the proper exercise of power.

It acknowledged that legislation has its limitations and needs to be accompanied by other measures.

To bring about a more informed public, the committee recommended creating a framework to guide efforts to improve media literacy among Singaporeans, as well as expanding the curriculum in schools to include the topic of disinformation.

It suggested that media organisations and industry partners consider establishing a fact-checking coalition to swiftly debunk fake news, and gave several ideas on ways to ensure accurate journalism.

Meanwhile, technology companies need to be more transparent and accountable, the committee said.

It recommended several steps they can take, including closing accounts that are designed to amplify online falsehoods, and banning the placement of ads on sites that spread fake news.

They should also disclose when content is sponsored, and by whom, as well as undertake regular voluntary reporting and independent audits, the committee said.

It added that the Government should consider both legislation and other forms of regulation to get tech companies to comply.

"Legislation would be needed particularly for measures to be taken in response to an online falsehood, since Facebook, Google and Twitter have a policy of generally not acting against content on the basis that it is false," it said.

The committee, which received 170 written representations, devoted the first half of its report to outlining the serious harm of deliberate online falsehoods, which can and have wreaked havoc.

Such falsehoods are a "unique phenomenon of an unprecedented scale", and can damage the social fabric of a nation and violate national sovereignty, it added.

Deliberate online falsehoods are a real and serious problem for the world, and Singapore, it concluded.

Mr Chong said the report was unanimously agreed upon by all 10 members of the committee.

Besides Mr Chong and Dr Janil, the other eight members are: Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam, Minister for Social and Family Development Desmond Lee, Senior Minister of State for Law and Health Edwin Tong, Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Home Affairs and National Development Sun Xueling, Mr Seah Kian Peng, Ms Rahayu Mazam, Mr Pritam Singh from the Workers’ Party, and Nominated MP Chia Yong Yong.

The Government is expected to respond to the committee's recommendations soon.


It proposed a suite of short- and long-term measures, grouped in five broad areas, that would involve a range of parties, including technology companies, media organisations, community leaders and volunteers, as well as the Government.

Its recommendations are aimed at disrupting online falsehoods, nurturing an informed public, reinforcing social cohesion and trust, promoting fact checking and dealing with threats to national security and sovereignty.


https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ndations-unveiled-to-combat-online-falsehoods
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
PAP lite co-opted :biggrin:

Wishful thinking of the WP!

We have been briefed that we will take no prisoners. The WP oppies will be sent to jail for their financial shenanigans. Our grassroots leaders have been watching their town council activities very closely for crony behaviour.

There's no benefit to give 6 MP seats for oppies when they can be given to PAP cadres. The vote count for PAP is far higher than all the oppies combined. No need for any puppet leader to control the rest of the barbaric oppies.
 

AhMeng

Alfrescian (Inf- Comp)
Asset
Wishful thinking of the WP!

We have been briefed that we will take no prisoners. The WP oppies will be sent to jail for their financial shenanigans. Our grassroots leaders have been watching their town council activities very closely for crony behaviour.

There's no benefit to give 6 MP seats for oppies when they can be given to PAP cadres. The vote count for PAP is far higher than all the oppies combined. No need for any puppet leader to control the rest of the barbaric oppies.
Why so defensive for WP .. lol :biggrin:
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
hzselectcomm0920.jpg


SINGAPORE - A parliamentary Select Committee has called for new laws that will grant the Government powers to swiftly disrupt the spread of online falsehoods, as part of a broad suite of measures to counter the scourge of fake news.

The Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods made 22 recommendations in all, including enacting legislation, urging technology companies to take proactive steps to tackle fake content on their platforms and creating a national framework to guide public education on falsehoods.

It submitted a 176-page report to Parliament on Wednesday (Sept 19), about five months after it held public hearings over eight days in March to listen to oral representations from 65 individuals and organisations.

The 10-member committee, chaired by Deputy Speaker of Parliament Charles Chong, was appointed in January to examine the phenomenon of deliberate online falsehoods and study what measures Singapore should take to prevent and combat the problem.

Speaking at a press conference on Thursday (Sept 20), committee member and Senior Minister of State for Transport and Communications and Information Janil Puthucheary said deliberate online falsehoods are “a live and serious threat for Singapore that threatens our national security”.

"There is no one silver bullet to combat this complex problem, and a multi-pronged approach is necessary," the committee said in its report, which included its observations on the hearings..


On disrupting online falsehoods, the committee said the Government should have the powers to limit or block the spread of fake news, and discredit the sources of such falsehoods.

Legislation will be needed to effectively disrupt the spread and influence of fake news, it stressed.

In recommending new laws - a move that observers had expected following the hearings - the committee did not go into the specifics of what form the new laws would take. Rather, it set out the principles that any new legislation should follow.

For instance, the measures will need to be effective in a matter of hours, to achieve the aim of stopping the falsehoods going viral. These measures could including take-down powers, blocking access, and tagging corrections and notifications.

The committee also urged the Government to consider laws that could cut off digital advertising revenue to those who spread online falsehoods, and impose criminal sanctions in serious cases, for instance, when falsehoods cause public disorder or election interference.

In a nod to concerns about legislative over-reach and stifling free speech, the committee noted the new laws should be calibrated, taking into account the context and circumstances of each case.

"It is also important that they be accompanied by checks and balances," the committee said, adding that adequate safeguards need to be put in place to ensure due process and the proper exercise of power.

It acknowledged that legislation has its limitations and needs to be accompanied by other measures.

To bring about a more informed public, the committee recommended creating a framework to guide efforts to improve media literacy among Singaporeans, as well as expanding the curriculum in schools to include the topic of disinformation.

It suggested that media organisations and industry partners consider establishing a fact-checking coalition to swiftly debunk fake news, and gave several ideas on ways to ensure accurate journalism.

Meanwhile, technology companies need to be more transparent and accountable, the committee said.

It recommended several steps they can take, including closing accounts that are designed to amplify online falsehoods, and banning the placement of ads on sites that spread fake news.

They should also disclose when content is sponsored, and by whom, as well as undertake regular voluntary reporting and independent audits, the committee said.

It added that the Government should consider both legislation and other forms of regulation to get tech companies to comply.

"Legislation would be needed particularly for measures to be taken in response to an online falsehood, since Facebook, Google and Twitter have a policy of generally not acting against content on the basis that it is false," it said.

The committee, which received 170 written representations, devoted the first half of its report to outlining the serious harm of deliberate online falsehoods, which can and have wreaked havoc.

Such falsehoods are a "unique phenomenon of an unprecedented scale", and can damage the social fabric of a nation and violate national sovereignty, it added.

Deliberate online falsehoods are a real and serious problem for the world, and Singapore, it concluded.

Mr Chong said the report was unanimously agreed upon by all 10 members of the committee.

Besides Mr Chong and Dr Janil, the other eight members are: Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam, Minister for Social and Family Development Desmond Lee, Senior Minister of State for Law and Health Edwin Tong, Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Home Affairs and National Development Sun Xueling, Mr Seah Kian Peng, Ms Rahayu Mazam, Mr Pritam Singh from the Workers’ Party, and Nominated MP Chia Yong Yong.

The Government is expected to respond to the committee's recommendations soon.


It proposed a suite of short- and long-term measures, grouped in five broad areas, that would involve a range of parties, including technology companies, media organisations, community leaders and volunteers, as well as the Government.

Its recommendations are aimed at disrupting online falsehoods, nurturing an informed public, reinforcing social cohesion and trust, promoting fact checking and dealing with threats to national security and sovereignty.


https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ndations-unveiled-to-combat-online-falsehoods
No need so many recommendations. Just send all to jail for spreading online falsehoods or turning a blind eye to such crimes.
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
What the FUCK! Why the Scums in White have a select committee to discuss anti-fake news law, but no select committee for far more important changes like: establish GRCs to help PAP stay in power; elected President to control the reserves if Oppie comes to power but cannot control reserves if PAP in power; Indian President can be classified as Malay as long as she is former PAP, blah, blah, blah .........

70% Sinkies don’t understand which is more important, so fuck them, they get the kind of fake democracy that they deserve!
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
OK, if the pap wants to fight falsehood and fake news, they have the best weapon at their disposal. Truth. Just debunk them with verifiable facts and figures. Don't use draconian laws to muzzle people. It doen't serve anyone well in the long run.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
OK, if the pap wants to fight falsehood and fake news, they have the best weapon at their disposal. Truth. Just debunk them with verifiable facts and figures. Don't use draconian laws to muzzle people. It doen't serve anyone well in the long run.

the thing is they know truth is not on their side,so they have to label it as fake news first.
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Imho, from the outset, this Select Committee is already fake! The real Chairman is Ah Shan and not Charlie who looks lost and bewildered most of the time. It was Shan after all who locked horns with the IT titans' reps and it was he who grilled Thum for 6 hours. It was Shan who controlled and dominated the whole proceedings from start to finish! Why so fake then and not be named the Chairman from the outset? :roflmao:
 

LaoTze

Alfrescian
Loyal
lastsupper.jpeg


THE LAST SUPPER

and Purveyors of fake news.

Paid very very generously to laugh and laugh all the way to their banks with money stolen from all of us.

And passing laws to enshrine their laughing and laughing all the way to their fucking banks.
 
Top