• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[BREAK] China & Russia send warships to Syria..

it will be fun to see if china and russia dare to shoot down attackers planes.
 
I think this is going to be bad
US and Obama have no choice but to strike
Russia and China and Middle East allies have to support
The whole place will go up in flames with the possibility of extending the battle field
Gear for more excitement and more breaking news!!! Pangzai!!!
 
China is sending ship in case they need to evacuate their citizens. This ship can launch its own helicopter/hovercraft and land on shore to pick up its own citizens. I am sure they will observe US military action (if they can even see much). But they likely have thousands of citizens working in Syria. In times of conflict, airport is closed and every man for themselves. With this ship, PLA can secure beach/harbor with small contingent of PLA troops and evacuate their citizens.
 
China is sending ship in case they need to evacuate their citizens. This ship can launch its own helicopter/hovercraft and land on shore to pick up its own citizens. I am sure they will observe US military action (if they can even see much). But they likely have thousands of citizens working in Syria. In times of conflict, airport is closed and every man for themselves. With this ship, PLA can secure beach/harbor with small contingent of PLA troops and evacuate their citizens.

Ah!!, wo man xi siong di!...will SAF help PRC in their evacuation of their citizens from Syria or help our Brother OBAMA in Syria?? Which Siong Di BIGGER??
 
Last edited:
I don't think PRC need our help lah. On the other hand, I think when they evacuate, they will likely offer spot for all Chinese (after their own citizens.) Anyway Chinese are not interested in war. Each war that US get into, weakens it. I think the last Iraq/Afghani war likely cost US 2 to 3 trillion by the time it is all done.
 
US will provoke China....but China has learnt how to tame the bald eagle
the dragon has awakened from its long slumber
China will try to avoid an open clash as far as possible....not worth it at all...
 
WoRld war III is emerging, better stock up your grain....
 
International politics and world order works on the same basis of local politics. We need other major powers to provide checks and balances against the dominance of USA.

The basis of such counter balance lies in military might and not UNSC. At present moment, Russia and China cannot match the military might of US to effectively counter their dominance.
 
WoRld war III is emerging, better stock up your grain....

hmm, i already stoked UP plenty Soursops, Pomelos & Kuew-Nis.

hmm,
"If you say I am a stupid fool who doesn't know what I'm talking about, and the Government comprises ministers who don't know what they're talking about and you criticise every policy of the Government, no one can sue you." - Law Minister K. Shanmugam.
 
time to test Red Storm Rising. Command and Conquer Red Alert for real.
 
Obama dare not attack that why he ask for US Congress approval.
USA just talk cock.
Talk cock about attacking N. Kore for few decade.
Talk cock of attacking Iran for nearly a decade.
Now talk cock about Syria.
 
Obama tied by Congress. If LKY wants to wage a war he consults only himself
 
Moscow’s calibrated response to developments in the West Asian country stems from the realisation that it stands to gain from whatever course the U.S. adopts

“In a race across a minefield it is wise to let other runners overtake you,” quipped a Russian Middle East expert explaining why Moscow adopted a low-key attitude to the rapidly escalating Syria crisis.

The comment pretty accurately captured Moscow’s stand. Russia has vehemently protested U.S. plans to attack Syria, but has also made it clear that it was not going to war with the West over the Middle East country.

Russia of course is no match for the erstwhile Soviet Union. But Moscow has rendered Syria crucial diplomatic and military support since the outbreak of civil strife in the country. It has vetoed all western resolutions in the U.N. Security Council condemning the Syrian government.

Russia, which has been the main source of weapons for Syria since 1973, has stepped up its supplies in the past two years.

“Russia has done all it could to arm Syria,” said Ruslan Pukhov, Director of the Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST) military analysis think tank.
 
In his interview to the Russian daily Izvestia last week, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad confirmed that Russia was honouring “all contracts” it had signed with Syria.

“Russia continues to supply Syria with what it requires to defend itself and its people,” the Syrian leader said.

At the same time, the Kremlin’s response to U.S. threats to attack Syria has been distinctly measured.

It took President Vladimir Putin 10 days to comment on the U.S. threat to punish Syria for the reported chemical attack near Damascus on August 21. He rubbished U.S. claims that the Syrian government was behind the attack and warned the U.S. not to jump the gun and commit another “mistake” by attacking Syria. But when asked what Russia would do if the U.S intervened, he just said that this would be “very sad.”

Stands to gain

Experts say that Moscow’s calibrated reaction largely stems from realisation that U.S. President Barack Obama has got trapped into his own rhetoric about “red lines,” and whatever he does now will play into Russia’s hands.

“Russia doesn’t have to do anything, just sit back and relax, and we’ll end up the winning side,” said Prof. Georgy Mirsky of the Moscow Institute of World Economy and International Relations.

Moscow stands to gain whatever course Mr. Obama takes, experts said.

“If Obama attacks Syria he will be seen fighting on the side of al-Qaeda, whose militants make up a third of the opposition forces, even according to U.S. military commanders,” said analyst Yulia Latynyna.

If the U.S. attack is “limited” and “narrow,” as Mr. Obama has declared, it may even strengthen President Assad who will be able to say he has stood up to the world’s most powerful nation.

Analysts, however, think the U.S. may well slide down the slippery path of broader intervention in Syria.

“Having started to take part in this campaign, the United States will be unable to get out of it without removing Bashar al-Assad. And considerations of prestige will outweigh all the doubts of those who fear chaos after a change of regime,” said Dr. Fyodor Lukyanov, chairman of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy.

At a recent press conference on Syria, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov lamented a lack of “strategic thinking” in U.S. foreign policy. In contrast, Russia has repeatedly demonstrated it has strategic vision, with the situation in Iraq, Libya and Syria proving it right.

Mr. Lavrov said Russia had “no plans to go to war” over Syria, but he did not say Russia would not react.
 
China factor

Russia will continue to block any anti-Syrian moves at the U.N. Security Council, expose the illegal nature of U.S. interference and the foolishness of siding with Islamist radicals in Syria.

Moscow will also cement its ties with Iran and China. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani placed a telephone call to Mr. Putin last week, with the two leaders calling for resolving the Syrian crisis “exclusively through political and diplomatic means.” The Russian and Iranian Presidents will have their first face-to-face meeting on the sidelines of a Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Kyrgyzstan in mid-September.

Also, last week, China’s Ambassador to Russia Li Hui called on Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov, Russia’s point man for the Middle East, to discuss “further Russian-Chinese political and diplomatic interaction in connection with a sharp aggravation of the situation around Syria.”

Last, but not least, Russia will continue to arm Syria.

“Russia and Iran have far more possibilities to help Assad than the other side can help rebels,” said Prof. Mirsky. “We can ship him as many weapons as he needs, while Iranians can send over its Islamic Revolution Guards in the guise of volunteers. America has no chance of winning this war.”

The one thing Russia will not do is stop the U.S. from running the minefield of being bogged down in Syria.
 
Back
Top