BEIJING follow singapore starts COE liao

†††††

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
1,746
Points
0
Beijing to set up car-quota system
By Ho Ai Li, China Correspondent
ST_IMAGES_P1BLURBS24.jpg

BEIJING: The Chinese capital will restrict new car registrations for the first time, in a bid to ease massive traffic jams which have clogged the city's roads.

A quota system - similar to Singapore's certificate of entitlement (COE) system - will be set up, with only 240,000 new licence plates to be issued next year, the Beijing municipal government announced yesterday.

The figure is a sharp dip from current numbers, representing only a third of the new cars found on Beijing's roads this year.

The Chinese capital is the second Chinese city after Shanghai to adopt drastic measures to control car ownership, with balloting used to determine the new licences and check the rapid rise of its vehicle population.

The number of cars has doubled to the current 4.7 million in just five years. In comparison, the Japanese capital of Tokyo saw its car population grow from two million to four million over 22 years, noted Mr Liu Xiaoming, who is in charge of traffic in Beijing.

'Which big city can withstand such a great jump in such a short time?' he said.

If nothing is done, experts warn, traffic on Beijing's roads, which slow to 24 kmh - cycling speed - during jams, may come to a complete stop when vehicle numbers hit seven million. If sales are not restricted, analysts expect that number to be reached by as early as 2012.

But the car quota is not the only measure to tackle Beijing's biggest scourge. The city will continue to ban cars from the streets one day a week, based on licence plate numbers.

And to stop people from getting around ownership curbs by getting licences outside of Beijing, like what happened in Shanghai, the flow of non-Beijing vehicles into the city centre would be restricted, the government said yesterday.

'The crux of the problem is that vehicle growth has been too fast. We must make sure that traffic in the city centre does not worsen,' said Mr Liu.

But many in the capital greeted news of the car quota coolly and said that this would hardly alleviate the current traffic conditions.

'This policy is too simple and doesn't solve the crux of the problem. It has simply shifted pressure and costs to the public,' said Ms Chen Qin, 38, a TV editor.

'Why do ordinary folk buy cars? It's because public transport can't meet their needs.'

On its part, the Beijing government said it would build more roads and park-and-ride stations to increase public transport usage to 50 per cent, from 41 per cent now, by 2015. It also plans to add five subway lines to the current nine.

Developing a dense subway network is likely to be the best way forward, going by the experience of major cities around the world, said automobile analyst Jia Xinguang.

One key problem, though, is that Beijing tries to be many things to many people, be it a centre of culture, finance or research, he said.

'Every one of these centres will attract more people and result in more problems,' he said of the capital, which already has 22 million people.

The quota move is likely to hit China's car industry, which pipped its American counterpart to become the No. 1 market in the world last year.

As many as 30,000 Beijingers have rushed to get their cars in the past few weeks before the expected clampdown, but car traders can say goodbye to growth rates of 30 to 50 per cent, fuelled by a rising middle class and government subsidies, observers say.

'Once Beijing moves, with the backing of the State Council, other cities will follow suit. Growth rates of car sales across China may drop 10 to 15 per cent,' said Mr Jia.

Meanwhile, Xinhua news agency reported that Mr Huang Wei, the vice-mayor of Beijing who had been in charge of transport since 2008, resigned yesterday. He was appointed to a vice-chairman post in northwestern Xinjiang region, it added.

The news came amid talk that Mr Huang, 49, quit over the traffic mess in Beijing.

Additional reporting by Lina Miao and Carol Feng


One key problem is that Beijing tries to be many things to many people, be it a centre of culture, finance or research, said automobile analyst Jia Xinguang. 'Every one of these centres will attract more people and result in more problems.'
 
In the past when Shanghai has the last number odd can drive on Mon, Wed, Fri and last number even can drive on Tue, Thu, Sat what happened? Many bought 2 cars.

So the Beijing government must be prepared to control cars registered elsewhere.
 
We should send our current and immediate ex Transport Ministers over to China to help. Raymond Lim and Mah Bow Tan are the bestest solvers of traffic problems.
 
What about COE for biscycle ..there are too many bicycle rider in china as well .
 
Entirely Wrong!

PRC did not eat PAP's shit fortunately.

There is NO COE system in PRC, there is NO $ BID.


There is no SDP's system either.


It is a DRAW-LOT system like what ToTo used to be, luck-based, e.g. there is only 2000 license, there are 20,000 applicants, so lucky draw at the chance of 1:10. Not $$$ Bid.


That is the System Singapore should adopt. Don't enrich any govt for their incompetence to fulfill our transportation needs. We peasants face a crisis and why should they the this opportunity to rob us? SDP should propose a Money-Free system to replace COE entirely. Even a non-PAP govt should NOT be enriched by taking advantage of peasants' transportation pains.

Any govt should tax heavily on luxury life; e.go Private Properties; Condos; Golf; Business Class & First Class flights; Leisure Boats; Gambling; Vice; Smoke; Alcohol; Stocks & Share Trades; For-ex; Even Mahjongs.

Any of these opportunistic gains without productive works should be taxed more than 50%, and even if they lost they must still pay some tax.


Whereas they should make Education FOC, Transportation & Food & Housing & Health-care at 3rd world cost level. They can create a Luxury Class alternative with Huge Tax, e.g. Deluxe-Schools; Hospitals; Restaurants; Limousine; 5-star Hotels; Private Properties etc; tax them 500% and use the money to subsidize the general public.
;)

Our citizens should only benefit instead of being scarified to protect and hold asset bubble cost in the interest of FOREIGN INVESTORS, which the famiLEE LEEgime had ALWAYS PAMPERED at our cost. The reversed should be done. Rip these rich foreign people off to benefit our folks if they want to grow their money tree here. We should not be protecting them nor their trees, their fallen leaves should feed our poor. No VIP for them, if they like to go elsewhere show them the door.
If rich foreigner still choose to grow their money trees on our soil then we should prune their trees to feed our poor peasants. Instead of Bleeding Our Peasants To Water The Money Trees Of Rich Foreigners - like what famiLEE LEEgime is doing.
 
Last edited:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/auto/2010-12/24/c_12912946.htm

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="660"><tbody><tr><td class="txt18" align="center" height="66" width="644">北京治堵新政出炉 六大政策详细解读
</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" height="22"> 2010年12月24日 08:54:45  来源: 新华汽车 【字号 留言打印关闭 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#000000"> <td align="center">
blank.gif
</td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#ffffff"> <td align="center" height="2">
blank.gif
</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td height="18" width="100%">
</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <table id="myTable" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="650"> <tbody><tr> <td class="p1">
12912946_181n.jpg
[FONT=楷体_GB2312]北京交通改善措施新闻发布会现场[/FONT]​
昨日(12月23日),经过三个月的反复研究,北京市终于亮出治理交通拥堵的系列政策。北京市政府发布了缓解交通拥堵的意见。根据意见确定的框架,市政府 及多个部门同日发布了多个配套文件,包括小客车数量调控暂行规定及《实施细则》、“销售小客车手续”备案、非居住区停车价格调整和外地进京车辆管理措施。 传闻的摇号购车、限制外地车辆进京、拥堵地区单双号管理等强硬措施出现在政策中。我们今日从购车、用车、停车、配套公共交通等角度为市民详解北京治堵新 政。
■ 政策内容:北京市人民政府关于进一步推进首都交通科学发展加大力度缓解交通拥堵工作的意见》公布,明确北京将采取小客车数量调控措施,市政府副秘书长周正宇表示,明年北京小客车总量额度指标为24万辆,每月将通过公开摇号的方式无偿分配。​
■ 新政解读:
购车资格
有车市民无权参加摇号
五类可在京购车人员
1.本市户籍人员;
2.驻京部队现役军人和现役武警;
3.持有有效身份证件并在京居住一年以上的港澳台居民、华侨及外籍人员;
4.持有有效《北京市工作居住证》的非本市户籍人员;
5.持有本市有效暂住证且连续五年(含)以上在本市缴纳社会保险和个人所得税的非本市户籍人员。
申请程序:
申请 每月8日为申请截止日 详细>>>>
摇号 每月26日摇号结果公开 详细>>>>
上牌程序:
上牌 先摇号获指标才能买车 详细>>>>
车辆转入
从外省区市转入本市的在用小客车,2010年12月23日(含)以前已在外省区市车管所办结小客车转出手续,且车辆符合本市尾气排放标准的,可在临时行驶号牌有效期限内持车辆档案办理转入手续。详细>>>>
注销转移
2010年12月24日至2011年1月1日期间,需办理小客车注销和转移登记业务的,应在2011年1月3日后通过指标调控管理机构指定网站或对外办公窗口申请更新指标,取得更新指标确认通知书后,按照《暂行规定》和《实施细则》要求办理更新手续。详细>>>>
备注:遇有其他涉及车辆登记的问题,可到各车管所办公大厅服务台咨询,或直接拨打车管所对外服务电话87625155咨询。
公安部:临时行驶车号牌必须粘贴在风窗玻璃上
■ 释疑:内幕? 摇号过程进行公证 详细>>>>
市交通委主任刘小明昨天表示,摇号过程将是公开透明的,对获得有效资格的每一个人都是机会均等。​
限车依据城乡规划
市法制办主任王荣梅表示,首先,合理规划城市的道路交通发展是政府必须履行的责任,通过调控小汽车增长的数量,与经济增长和社会发展水平相适应,是实施交通规划交通组织一个非常重要的手段。

<center> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 下一页
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 下一页
</center>

</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
http://www.xinhuanet.com/auto/zt/nzbd1/index.htm

北京治堵新政出炉 六大政策详细解读

经过三个月的反复研究,北京市终于亮出治理交通拥堵的系列政策。北京市政府发布了缓解交通拥堵的意见。我们今日从购车、用车、停车、配套公共交通等角度为市民详解北京治堵新政。 [详细]

北京机动车昨日约增9000 半数经销商或将遭淘汰

北京市人民政府发布治理交通拥堵新措施,引发市民新一轮汽车抢购潮,昨天预计增加9000辆,总量将达到480万辆。专家预测约有半数经销商或将被淘汰。 [详细]





北京实时路况>>



北京实时路况查询




政策全文 >>




·北京市小客车数量调控暂行规定(全文)

·《北京市小客车数量调控暂行规定》细则

·关于进一步推进缓解首都交通拥堵工作意见








“北京交通改善措施”新闻发布会 图片实录 >>



<dl><dt> </dt><dd> 北京举行交通改善措施新闻发布会 </dd></dl> <dl><dt> </dt><dd> 北京交通改善措施新闻发布会开始 </dd></dl> <dl><dt> </dt><dd> 北京市政府副秘书长周正宇 </dd></dl> <dl><dt> </dt><dd> 北京市交通委主任刘小明回答记者提问 </dd></dl>


“北京交通改善措施”新闻发布会 文字实录 >>







更多>> 媒体评论 >>





·王惠:

  各位新闻界的朋友们下午好!欢迎大家出席北京市政府新闻办公室今天的新闻发布会,今天的新闻发布会主题是“北京出台缓解交通拥堵的综合措施”。
  我想 大家都知道,前些日子,为了缓解首都的交通拥堵状况,优化北京的发展环境,方便市民出行,北京市交通委公布北京市关于缓解交通拥堵的工作意见征求意见稿, 公布以后受到媒体和市民的极大关注,今天为了回应大家的关注,我们在这里召开新闻发布会,邀请到北京市政府、北京市交通委和相关部门的领导到这里,为媒体 朋友介绍北京市出台缓解交通拥堵的综合措施。之后我们还要回应各位关切的问题,今天的新闻发布会大约一个小时。(2010-12-23 15:01:50)

·王惠:

首先介绍一下出席发布会的有关领导:
北京市政府副秘书长 周正宇
北京市交通委主任 刘小明
北京市发改委副主任 赵磊
北京市法制办副主任 王荣梅
北京市交管局副局长 李少明
现在把时间交给北京市政府副秘书长周正宇先生,介绍北京市缓解交通拥堵的综合措施。(2010-12-23 15:02:13)

·周正宇:
  
女 士们,先生们,新闻界的朋友们,大家下午好!很高兴能在这里向大家介绍北京市缓解交通拥堵综合措施的相关内容。北京市委市政府高度重视,并一直将交通工作 作为全市工作的重点,按照科学发展观要求,通过采取一系列措施,在机动车由2005年底258万辆增加到2010年12月的478万辆过程中,较好维持一 定水平的交通保障和服务能力。交通基本适应经济发展和出行需求快速增长的需要,圆满完成北京奥运会、残奥会和中华人民共和国成立60周年庆祝活动交通保障 任务。但随着城市化、现代化、机动化进程加快,北京市交通形势日益严峻,一些时段交通拥堵严重,人口高度集聚,机动车增长迅速,公共交通吸引力不够,交通 综合管理水平与机动车保有量过快增长势头不适应的问题,急需果断采取措施应对和解决,缓解交通拥堵,进一步优化发展环境,方便市民出 行。(2010-12-23 15:03:04)
 
This is a great move

Only a few countries can afford to do things like this
1) Communist countries
2) Small peesai countries

Try doing this in America and you have to step down tomorrow.
 
Entirely Wrong!

PRC did not eat PAP's shit fortunately.

There is NO COE system in PRC, there is NO $ BID.


There is no SDP's system either.


It is a DRAW-LOT system like what ToTo used to be, luck-based, e.g. there is only 2000 license, there are 20,000 applicants, so lucky draw at the chance of 1:10. Not $$$ Bid.


That is the System Singapore should adopt. Don't enrich any govt for their incompetence to fulfill our transportation needs. We peasants face a crisis and why should they the this opportunity to rob us? SDP should propose a Money-Free system to replace COE entirely. Even a non-PAP govt should NOT be enriched by taking advantage of peasants' transportation pains.

Any govt should tax heavily on luxury life; e.go Private Properties; Condos; Golf; Business Class & First Class flights; Leisure Boats; Gambling; Vice; Smoke; Alcohol; Stocks & Share Trades; For-ex; Even Mahjongs.

Any of these opportunistic gains without productive works should be taxed more than 50%, and even if they lost they must still pay some tax.


Whereas they should make Education FOC, Transportation & Food & Housing & Health-care at 3rd world cost level. They can create a Luxury Class alternative with Huge Tax, e.g. Deluxe-Schools; Hospitals; Restaurants; Limousine; 5-star Hotels; Private Properties etc; tax them 500% and use the money to subsidize the general public.
;)

Our citizens should only benefit instead of being scarified to protect and hold asset bubble cost in the interest of FOREIGN INVESTORS, which the famiLEE LEEgime had ALWAYS PAMPERED at our cost. The reversed should be done. Rip these rich foreign people off to benefit our folks if they want to grow their money tree here. We should not be protecting them nor their trees, their fallen leaves should feed our poor. No VIP for them, if they like to go elsewhere show them the door.
If rich foreigner still choose to grow their money trees on our soil then we should prune their trees to feed our poor peasants. Instead of Bleeding Our Peasants To Water The Money Trees Of Rich Foreigners - like what famiLEE LEEgime is doing.

My gawd... sounds so communist
 
I don't care how you want to call it. I am against any system that suck up to the rich & plunder from the poor.;)

I agree the policies in this country drive away middle income and below cos' quality of life gets so bad.

Given that at least half the population would fall under this group, PAP should moderate their policies a little to give its own people some breathing space and improved quality of life.
 
soon will be dubai's turn.
their erp gantry has implemented if im not wrong.
:D
 
Uncle yap. Well said.
This pappies govt has been ripping off his own preasants of their hard earn $$, exploiting their loyalty to the country, and making full use of them to shoulder the burden of all social and economics complications.
You can never explain why the COE can suka suka shoot up to more than 100% in a single month.
Maybe one day, your precious pigeon holes will suka suka drop to less than 10% overnight, and then suddenly shoot up to 200% the next month.
 
Back
Top