• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Australia clean up Sinkie trashs from their PR population

†††††

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
1,746
Points
0
Fewer S'poreans getting Aussie PR
The list of eligible occupations has been cut from over 400 to 183
By Melissa Kok

SINGAPOREANS who want to move to Australia are finding it tougher to qualify for permanent residency (PR) due to recent changes to the country's immigration policies.

The group hit hardest by the immigration reforms are those who are applying independently as skilled immigrants.

Most Singaporeans seeking to emigrate to Australia - a popular destination for Singaporean immigrants - go through this route.

Immigration agents told The Straits Times that the number of Singaporeans now eligible for PR has dipped by between 20 per cent and 60 per cent since the changes kicked in.

In July this year, the Australian government introduced a new Skilled Occupations List (SOL) to meet skills shortages.

The move comes amid concerns in Australia that the country had been attracting too many hairdressers and cooks, and too few doctors and engineers.

The new list cut down the number of listed occupations - which covered managerial, professional, technical and trade jobs - from more than 400 in the old list to just 183 now.

Occupations that were axed included finance managers and IT-related professions such as project managers and administrators.

The move reduces the number of people who could be eligible for PR, as an applicant must have skills and qualifications for an occupation on the new list. They must also be aged between 18 and 45, and have good English language ability, among other requirements.

'Previously, we have had Singaporeans who can work as HR managers and office managers qualify for PR, but now those occupations have been taken off the list, so it is harder for them,' said Mr Pearce Cheng, a migration and relocation consultant at Aims Immigration Specialist.

Immigration agents say interest among Singaporeans in emigrating overseas has grown over the years.

Their main reasons for wanting to leave include the higher cost of living, lack of work-life balance and overcrowding in Singapore.

Those who want to make the move to Australia are usually working professionals in their 30s or 40s with young children.

However, the number of Singaporeans granted Australian PR has come down in the past few years: Last year, 2,073 Singaporeans were granted PR, down from 2,245 in 2008, 2,267 in 2007 and 3,538 in 2006.

The reasons for the dip in numbers are unclear, but the downward trend looks set to continue with the reforms.

Mr James Alan Hall, a registered migration agent for the Australia Migration Agency, noted that only 15 per cent to 20 per cent of his potential clients qualify for PR now, compared to 80 per cent last year.

For Aims, around 80 per cent of the potential clients were eligible for PR last year. Now, just 50 per cent to 60 per cent qualify.

However, Mr Cheng added that some Australian state and territory governments implemented state immigration plans this month which allow them to nominate skilled immigrants with occupations not on the SOL.

'So, if they (clients) don't have an occupation on the main list, but it is on one of the states' migration list like Victoria's, maybe they can apply for a state-sponsored permanent visa,' he said.

But the rules could get even more stringent next July as Australia is expected to roll out a new points test to assess independent skilled immigrants, which will emphasise the importance of English, work experience and high-level qualifications.

Other popular migration destinations among Singaporeans, such as Canada and Britain, have also begun tightening their migration policies.

On the other hand, the New Zealand government has been on a drive to attract skilled migrants from Singapore since the start of this year.

Among those considering a move to the South Pacific is a 34-year-old human resources manager who wanted to be known only as Ms Tan.

Ms Tan, who wants to emigrate to Australia for better education opportunities for her two young daughters, said she will consider New Zealand if her application is rejected.

She said: 'My children have special needs, so the education system in Singapore is not very ideal for them, it can be too stressful. I think I would still try for New Zealand, even though it will take a longer time.'

[email protected]
 
The Australian government listened to their people. The previous list of 400 was getting out of hand. Why do we need cooks and hairdresser? It actually got reduced to the same list when I first migrated. It has brought back some sanity to the system. If I were to apply again now, I would still be qualified.
 
The Australian government listened to their people. The previous list of 400 was getting out of hand. Why do we need cooks and hairdresser? It actually got reduced to the same list when I first migrated. It has brought back some sanity to the system. If I were to apply again now, I would still be qualified.

Good for you!!!!
 
I support The Ozzy governtment to protect its own citizens. They don't need so many professionals where their country has no lack of talent.

In Singapore, PAP recklessly brings in all sort of people to replace the citizens. Even prostitutes are given PR status as "talent". I would want the Ozzy Governtment to replace PAP anytime. Literally speaking, Australia has more space than our little dot, but PAP knows no limit and pushed the people to the sea - you die your business attitude.
 
With so many gov'ts tightening up their criteria for "new citizens", fewer Sporeans will have the luxury of escaping from Spore. They will probably have to vote opposition to ensure a better future for themselves & their children.

This will put more pressure on the PAP to make Spore a better place for citizens :rolleyes:
 
With so many gov'ts tightening up their criteria for "new citizens", fewer Sporeans will have the luxury of escaping from Spore. They will probably have to vote opposition to ensure a better future for themselves & their children.

This will put more pressure on the PAP to make Spore a better place for citizens :rolleyes:

If they voted opposition, and if the opposition do what they say they going to do. What happens if the opposition continued the same policy ?
 
With so many gov'ts tightening up their criteria for "new citizens", fewer Sporeans will have the luxury of escaping from Spore. They will probably have to vote opposition to ensure a better future for themselves & their children.

This will put more pressure on the PAP to make Spore a better place for citizens :rolleyes:

pappy get kicked out of power? Seriously that's like expecting the sky to turn purple or cars to fly.
 
If they voted opposition, and if the opposition do what they say they going to do. What happens if the opposition continued the same policy ?

If opposition does that , they will probably be shown the door in subsequent elections.

I notice that Sporeans have higher expectations when it comes to the opposition, compared to the PAP :D
 
pappy get kicked out of power? Seriously that's like expecting the sky to turn purple or cars to fly.

Bet Suharto & Marcos are asking themselves how it could have happen to them:)

In Spore's case, changes will be aided by the last leaf falling. Older voters have traditionally supported the PAP, but with people loosing their jobs to foreigners, do you think these people will continue to support the PAP :confused:


There's also a new generation of Sporeans who are having problems finding decent paying jobs. In the past many would have left for greener pastures, but with other gov'ts closing their doors, these people have no where to go.
 
Only desperate or stupid people would consider Australia in 2010

The property cost is higher than New York or London, You need to make over S$150K to buy a small apartment there, tax is sky high, Racism is worst in world too.

Singaporeans returning from Australia and now headed to USA is the trend.
 
Wonder why Sinkie sheep so enamored with the white trash of Asia. :rolleyes:
 
With so many cuntries tightening immigration, its not easy to migrate these days. The only hope left 4 Sporeans is 2 vote wisely in the cuming elections.
 
Only desperate or stupid people would consider Australia in 2010

The property cost is higher than New York or London, You need to make over S$150K to buy a small apartment there, tax is sky high, Racism is worst in world too.

Singaporeans returning from Australia and now headed to USA is the trend.


Got many ways to profit from the strong Aussie economy, in Spore Citibank is offering 4.5% interest on term deposites for Aus$.

Got many friends & relatives in Australia, even know someone in his 50's still working in Aust. Don't know about the property market but if prices are high it usually reflects a good economy.

I don't invest in properties but know people who bought in when prices were low. More than one way to skin a cat, can invest in stocks, gold, etfs, forex,..... :)
 
The Australian government listened to their people. The previous list of 400 was getting out of hand. Why do we need cooks and hairdresser? It actually got reduced to the same list when I first migrated. It has brought back some sanity to the system. If I were to apply again now, I would still be qualified.

More likely they wised up after noticing that many of these "Singaporeans" are not real citizens born in Singapore but were from another country and using Singapore as a stepping stone to Australia.

I understand from a friend working in the AIS that of the 937 Singaporeans of Indian origin accepted for PR in 2009, more than 600 were born outside of Singapore!

And only 436 of the approved PRs were listed as born in Singapore.... that means there were another 700 foreigners using their "Singaporean" staus to move to Australia. :mad:
 
Ah... thanks for letting me know i have now been excluded from the desired immigrants pool... good thing i have changed my mind about emmigrating to AU a few years back.

It's a cycle. For those who are familiar with how the Australians work - they are shooting themselves in the foot... in some ways. At least i do know it is very hard to find a good white finance manager in AU. The better ones are mostly Asian. So when they find themselves short in some areas, Asians can go work there on expat terms :)
 
More likely they wised up after noticing that many of these "Singaporeans" are not real citizens born in Singapore but were from another country and using Singapore as a stepping stone to Australia.

I understand from a friend working in the AIS that of the 937 Singaporeans of Indian origin accepted for PR in 2009, more than 600 were born outside of Singapore!

And only 436 of the approved PRs were listed as born in Singapore.... that means there were another 700 foreigners using their "Singaporean" staus to move to Australia. :mad:

apparently, it's happening here in the u.s. more and more prcians and indians are showing up with sg passports. i can tell a true sinkie from one who just transmigrated from china and india by using sg as a stepping stone. it's a rampant phenomenon, but it's a legal way to bypass quotas.
 
Back
Top