- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
Up wages? Simple. Up fares to cover costs. That's the million dollar answer from the million dollar salaried Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew. Now why do we keep paying ministers so high, only for them to utter words even a schoolboy could?
The SMRT strike incident is just a symptom of a larger problem. The strike itself is about pay dispute. On one hand, the company is trying to save on costs. But that means that this group of drivers had to be paid less. In view of the fact that other groups of drivers had more pay, the dispute took a turn for the worse.
But this symptom hides a bigger problem we have. The problem that was caused by the PAPpies themselves. The early policy of having high contribution CPF contribution for both employers and employees in the 1980s still has its effect today. It was because of this policy that puts Singapore workers' pay way above foreigners' pay, where the foreigners' wages are not subjected to the high CPF contributions. Isn't this the root cause that got SMRT (and many other companies) to hire cheap foreign labour? And in the case of SMRT, didn't these foreign workers compare their low wages to other groups that started the dispute?
Today, we do not have such a high contribution rate. But we can't reduce too much either. That's because if it is reduced too fast too soon, while it may help cut costs for employers and give employees more spending power, the CPF savings may not be enough for HDB dwellers to pay for the high cost of HDB flats. Ironically, the high cost of HDB flats is also due to yet other PAP's past policies!
Finally, as what was mentioned earlier, to have a million dollar salaried minister utter words a schoolboy could, makes nonsense about paying our ministers fat salaries. Lui is so simple minded, he can't see that the strike and pay dispute are symptoms and not the real problem itself. The real problem lies in the past (and present) policies of the PAP.
- http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.sg/2012/12/lui-tuck-yews-simple-mindedness.html
The SMRT strike incident is just a symptom of a larger problem. The strike itself is about pay dispute. On one hand, the company is trying to save on costs. But that means that this group of drivers had to be paid less. In view of the fact that other groups of drivers had more pay, the dispute took a turn for the worse.
But this symptom hides a bigger problem we have. The problem that was caused by the PAPpies themselves. The early policy of having high contribution CPF contribution for both employers and employees in the 1980s still has its effect today. It was because of this policy that puts Singapore workers' pay way above foreigners' pay, where the foreigners' wages are not subjected to the high CPF contributions. Isn't this the root cause that got SMRT (and many other companies) to hire cheap foreign labour? And in the case of SMRT, didn't these foreign workers compare their low wages to other groups that started the dispute?
Today, we do not have such a high contribution rate. But we can't reduce too much either. That's because if it is reduced too fast too soon, while it may help cut costs for employers and give employees more spending power, the CPF savings may not be enough for HDB dwellers to pay for the high cost of HDB flats. Ironically, the high cost of HDB flats is also due to yet other PAP's past policies!
Finally, as what was mentioned earlier, to have a million dollar salaried minister utter words a schoolboy could, makes nonsense about paying our ministers fat salaries. Lui is so simple minded, he can't see that the strike and pay dispute are symptoms and not the real problem itself. The real problem lies in the past (and present) policies of the PAP.
- http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.sg/2012/12/lui-tuck-yews-simple-mindedness.html
