• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Almost Free Energy Is Coming !

GOD IS MY DOG

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
12,319
Points
113
Andrea Rossi's cold fusion based E-Cat (Energy Catalyzer) technology allows vast amounts of energy to be produced in a device that fit on a table top. It's safe, cheap, environmentally friendly, and inexhaustible.
 
Andrea Rossi's cold fusion based E-Cat (Energy Catalyzer) technology allows vast amounts of energy to be produced in a device that fit on a table top. It's safe, cheap, environmentally friendly, and inexhaustible.

Post Fukushinma, this sounds like a solution to the planet's future. But I have doubts.

Cheers!
 
Post Fukushinma, this sounds like a solution to the planet's future. But I have doubts.

Cheers!

Directory:Andrea A. Rossi Cold Fusion Generator (E-Cat)
Andrea Rossi demonstrated the 10 kW heat generating device at an Italian press conference January 14, 2011.Photo by Daniele Passerini, the who reported the day's proceedings in his blog.
Andrea Rossi demonstrated the 10 kW heat generating device at an Italian press conference January 14, 2011.
Photo by Daniele Passerini, the who reported the day's proceedings in his blog.

Shortcut URL: http://RossiColdFusion.com
See also News:Rossi Cold Fusion

Also called the Rossi Energy Amplifier or the Rossi Catalyzer.


Compiled by Sterling D. Allan, with Hank Mills
Pure Energy Systems News
Commenced January 17, 2011


Eng. Andrea A. Rossi and Professor Sergio Focardi of the University of Bologna (one of the oldest universities in the world [1]), have announced to the world that they have a cold fusion device capable of producing more than 10 kilowatts of heat power, while only consuming a fraction of that. On January 14, 2011, they gave the Worlds' first public demonstration of a nickel-hydrogen fusion reactor capable of producing a few kilowatts of thermal energy. At its peak, it is capable of generating 15,000 watts with just 400 watts input required. In a following test the same output was achieved but with only 80 watts of continual input.

They don't always use the term "cold fusion" do describe the process, but often refer to it as an amplifier or catalyzer process.

Focardi states:

"Experimentally, we obtained copper; and we believe that its appearance is due to the fusion of atomic nuclei of nickel and hydrogen, the ingredients that feed our reactor. Since hydrogen and nickel 'weigh' with less, copper must have released a lot of energy, since 'nothing is created or destroyed.' Indeed, the 'Missing Mass' has been transformed into energy, which we have measured: it is in the order of a few kilowatts, two hundred times the energy that was the beginning of the reaction." [2]

They also claim to be going into production, with the first units expected to ship by the second half of October of this year, with mass production commencing by the end of 2011. The first units will be used to build a one megawatt plant in Greece. This one megawatt plant will power a factory that will produce 300,000 ten-kilowatt units a year.

This would become the world's first commercially-ready "cold fusion" device. Licensees are mentioned, with contracts in the USA and in Europe. Mass production should escalate in 2-3 years. Presently, Rossi says they are manufacturing a 1 megawatt plant composed of 125 modules. These modules should begin shipping by the end of October. On January 31st, 2011, Rossi wrote: "The cost to produce the catalyzer is 1 cent per MWh generated; the life expectancy is 20 years; the cost impact is between 1 and 1.5 cents per MWh." [3]

In describing the operation of the device, he said: "To start up the reactor you have just to turn on a switch. The reactor works with enormous margins of safety, so there is no need of a particular skill. Just follow the instructions. The refueling is every 6 months and will be made by our dealers."

According to Rossi, the demonstrated device shown on January 14, 2011 is their industrial product that is claimed to be reliable and safe. In normal operation it would produce 8 units of output for every unit of input. Higher levels of output are possible, but can be dangerous. They will soon start serial production of their modules. Combining the modules in series and parallel arrays it is possible to reach every limit of power. The modules are designed to be connected in series and parallels.

Rossi also says that they have had one reactor that has run continually for two years, providing heat for a factory. It reduced the electric bill by 90%. Also, the reactors can self sustain by turning off the input, but they prefer to have an input. The device will be scheduled for maintenance every six months. You control it "just as you turn on and off your television set."

More than two thousand prototypes were built and destroyed in refining the design and learning how to control and scale up the reaction. [4]

Convinced they have already adequately proven this to the necessary parties, they are not in a hurry to give demonstrations to curious scientists. On January 21, 2011, Rossi wrote: "Yes there will be a Scientist talking about us, no demo anyway: no more demos before the start up of the 1 MW plant."
Contents
[hide]

1 Official Websites
1.1 Licensee Websites
2 How it Works
2.1 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
2.2 Rossi's Hints
3 Videos
3.1 January 16, 2011 Press Conference
3.1.1 Part 1 of 3
3.1.2 Part 2 of 3
3.1.3 Part 3 of 3
3.2 Low Energy Nuclear Revolution
4 Attributes
5 Costs
6 Advantages
7 Applications
8 Validations
9 Patents
9.1 Italian Patent 0001387256
9.2 Application: US2011/0005506A1
9.3 Application: WO/2009/125444
10 Profiles
10.1 Company: Eon srl
10.2 Journal of Nuclear Physics
10.3 Company: Ampenergo
10.4 Company: Leonardo Corp. and Defkalion
10.5 Inventor: Andrea A. Rossi
10.6 Pioneer: Sergio Focardi
11 Coverage
11.1 Reports
11.2 In the News
11.3 Historic Documents
11.4 Other Coverage
11.5 Forums
11.6 Humor
11.7 Comments
11.8 Contact
12 See also

Official Websites

http://leonardocorp1996.com

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/
JANUARY 15th FOCARDI AND ROSSI PRESS CONFERENCE -= Today, Saturday January 15th, at 10:00 AM Sergio Focardi and Andrea Rossi will be on-line for the press conference with Journal’s readers. [And thereafter they have been responding to comments as well, in a timely manner.]
Is the Rossi energy amplifier the first pico-chemical reactor? - The nuclear signatures that can be expected when contacting hydrogen with nickel, were derived from thermal results recently obtained (Rossi energy amplifier), using the type of reaction paths proposed as the explanation of the energy produced. The consequences of proton or neutron capture have been studied. (July 18th, 2010)

http://www.youtube.com/user/efagroup2010 YouTube channel

Licensee Websites

http://www.defkalion-energy.com

http://www.ampenergo.com

http://www.eonsrl.com – under construction

How it Works

The Energy Catalyzer works by placing nano to micro sized particles of nickel powder in a reactor along with pressurized hydrogen gas and special undisclosed (for proprietary reasons) catalysts. When the contents of the reactor is heated (using a series of resistors in the reactor) to approximately 400 to 500 degrees Celsius, nuclear reactions start taking place. The strength of the reaction can be changed by varying the pressure of the hydrogen in the reactor. The output energy can be up to 400 times the input energy.

No precious metals or radioactive substances is placed in the reactor. After the reactor is turned off the reactor can be opened and no radiation can be detected. The process transmutes nickel into copper and trace amounts of other elements such as zinc.


The nickel has also apparently gone through one or more special processes. A few of these special processes are speculated to be:

1) Baking and cleaning to remove oxidation that could "clog" up the reactive sites on the nickel particles.

2) Bathed in acid or another compound to make the particles more porous so they can absorb more hydrogen.

3) Embedded in a membrane or ceramic structure.

4) Loaded with hydrogen via electrolysis or some other method.

Doing a lot of digging into Rossi's Journal of Nuclear Physics blog shows that scientists are posting and linking speculation that "hydrinos" (of Blacklight Power fame) or shrunken hydrogen atoms may be involved in this cold fusion and process and their formation may be the source of most of the energy released.
 
From my opinion, I don't really think this kind of technology will catch on, as we are talking about building a REACTOR.

The power efficiency is out of this world, with 1 parts of energy inputted, you get back 400 parts of energy.

They are attempting to build one 1 Megawatt facility power station in Greece soon, so let's take a look at this.

From my analysis, if someone tries to introduce a power system using Hydrogen as fuel, (by harvesting Hydrogen via Electrolysis), there is no longer a need for petroleum.

I can only think of 2 GROUPS that will stop that from happening.

1. USA is having they Petroleum Recycling Dollars Concept, meaning to say, USD is kept afloat by the demand of petroleum usage.

2. OPEC nations depend on the sales of their Petroleum for their countries revenues.

When you implement a technology that do not consume Petroleum, these 2 groups of people will send CIA, or any other covert groups to buy over the technology, and shelf it, or even assassinate the inventor.

Unless if the inventor is using petroleum... his technology is right now at a very shaky position.
 
I'm all for alternative fuels and have vouched for nuclear. But the "cheap and abundant" energy statement kind of, well I take that with a pinch of salt. To recover the gargantuan R&D costs alone is staggering.

Wind, tidal, geothermal, solar, blah blah, well, some places will have some of their E needs taken care of but for now fossil fuel will be the main staple. And yet, the amount of wastage makes our species look stupid. The night race by cars that don't have front headlamps is an example. Instead of buying hybrids, ppl who have influence opt for Maseratis and Ferraris instead.

This news of a workable "cold fusion" is really good news. But I'll wait until their 1 MW facility materializes before I'm convinced. Thanks.

Cheers!


......................................................................................................How it Works

The Energy Catalyzer works by placing nano to micro sized particles of nickel powder in a reactor along with pressurized hydrogen gas and special undisclosed (for proprietary reasons) catalysts. When the contents of the reactor is heated (using a series of resistors in the reactor) to approximately 400 to 500 degrees Celsius, nuclear reactions start taking place. The strength of the reaction can be changed by varying the pressure of the hydrogen in the reactor. The output energy can be up to 400 times the input energy.

No precious metals or radioactive substances is placed in the reactor. After the reactor is turned off the reactor can be opened and no radiation can be detected. The process transmutes nickel into copper and trace amounts of other elements such as zinc....................................................
 
sounds good, this is similar to what is happening inside the sun. i am surprised someone is able to control fusion technology in my time.HOWEVER.....

lets look at the fuel - Hydrogen. Energy is still required to produce it and this was not stated in the journal or article. Although this is one of the most abundant element in the universe, it is rarely found to exist in our atmosphere in natural form. currently the most promising method to store and produce it is to the decomposition of its hydride or other form of its inorganic compound. In fact the person who is able to find a catalyst to break up water into oxygen and hydrogen effectively and economically rate would surely win a nobel prize.

the other element is not an issue, nickel. it is easily available and is cheap.
 
Last edited:
I agree with Vamjok that whoever can design a circuitry / catalyst / system that allows Water to be broken into Hydrogen / Oxygen Gas at minimal energy, and gaining greater than energy parity will definitely win the nobel prize.

However, as there is economic concerns from USD, and OPEC nations, these sort of technology will be removed from the market upon its discovery.

It's about Politics versus Green Energy I would say. If lets say, Water Today can be broken into Hydrogen & Oxygen cheaply and effectively, and this process can be done wherever there are water... what this means is that energy cost, for electricity, heating, cooling, transportation, motion, energy... are approaching to 0 cost (not considering the cost of equipments & system cost, only taking the fuel running cost into consideration)

There will be a huge impact to the economic system of the world... and when USD is ruined... the whole world economy collapse... USD cannot fall, neither can it fail...

there should be another way implemented. Another way to prevent the economic system meltdown due to non-petroleum fuels are Carbon Credits / Tax etc... this essentially transfers the value of the Green Energy into Carbon Credits or Tax.

I wonder if there are any like minded people out here thinking the same?
 
Cold fusion has been a scientific dud for a while. I remember there was a big hoohah about it in the 80s. Let's hope they make a genuine breakthrough this time.
 
hahaha.....too good to be true.
the fact that they are going into prototype production in greece end of 2011 and there is so
little excitement in the scientific world points to something is missing.....
if true.....this discovery will smash all the fundamental principles in physics:
1. Energy cannot be created
2. in any chemical process, there will losses and you cannot have efficiency more than 1.0.

special undisclosed (for proprietary reasons) catalysts were mentioned....these could be the missing links that account for the so called energy creation.
 
The PAP makes alot of tax dollars on energy. So If they can't tax it, they'll ban it.
 
Johnny333 is right on!

in fact 80% of our power plants are powered by Natural Gas from Indonesia's Natuna Islands.

I don't recall that there is any Natural Gas Price Increase that justify a 12% Electricity Bill Increase?

The Green Energy Concept is highly correlated with Politics & Revenue Generation, if it do not make money for the country, most likely it'll be scrapped, anything that is free will have to be removed in current economic system.

this current economic system that man is functioning on is solely based on MONEY & GREED.
 
Ah italian small dick claiming to have big salami bogus fraud deal. The typical lazy bum italian hot air deal since the roman days. It will not help Italy out from the debt crisis.
 
chey.... i thought we gonna have this......

diy-iron-man-arc-reactor.jpg


iron_man_arc.jpg
 
Don't forget the Bilderburgers the raptors.

From my opinion, I don't really think this kind of technology will catch on, as we are talking about building a REACTOR.

The power efficiency is out of this world, with 1 parts of energy inputted, you get back 400 parts of energy.

They are attempting to build one 1 Megawatt facility power station in Greece soon, so let's take a look at this.

From my analysis, if someone tries to introduce a power system using Hydrogen as fuel, (by harvesting Hydrogen via Electrolysis), there is no longer a need for petroleum.

I can only think of 2 GROUPS that will stop that from happening.

1. USA is having they Petroleum Recycling Dollars Concept, meaning to say, USD is kept afloat by the demand of petroleum usage.

2. OPEC nations depend on the sales of their Petroleum for their countries revenues.

When you implement a technology that do not consume Petroleum, these 2 groups of people will send CIA, or any other covert groups to buy over the technology, and shelf it, or even assassinate the inventor.

Unless if the inventor is using petroleum... his technology is right now at a very shaky position.
 
Don't forget the Bilderburgers the raptors.

Yes the Bilderburgers Group, by Rockerfella, Rothchild, and all biggest tycoon on earth, mainly of Jewish Descend.

Not forgetting the Illuminatis, with the Queen of England being a direct descendent from Egypt.

I believe that technology has always been around awaiting for it's discovery. Human Civilization are always using technologies that is at least 50 years behind what we already have...

the concept of unlimited energy, that doesn't consume fuel is already invented by Nikola Tesla, his unlimited energy module, that uses the magnetic flux of Earth to produce electricity... it was shelved.

Another brave soul, Mr. Stanley Myer was poisoned to death when he do not want to sell his WATER FUEL Engine (yes, Water Fuel), which uses Water as FUEL Source to power up an engine, it is combustion based.

If you look at the molecular structure of the following;

methane (CH4), the primary constituent of liquefied or compressed natural gas, and propane (C3H8), the primary constituent of liquified petroleum gas. Petroleum fuels are blends of lots of different chemical species; in general, the molecules of a liquid petroleum fuel are pretty big and complex. Here is Isooctane, C8H18 isooctane (C8H18), typical of the molecules found in gasoline (I had to spread out the structure a bit to get all the hydrogen atoms to fit in the picture--all of these molecules are, of course, three-dimensional, but some squish into a plane better than others!), and Cetane, C16H34 this monster is cetane, or n-hexadecane (C16H34), typical of diesel fuel.

In summary,

Diesel Fuel is mainly Cetane C16H34 (16 carbon atoms, 34 hydrogen atoms) ; liquid state
Petrol Fuel is mainly IsoOctane C8H18 (8 carbon atoms, 18 hydrogen atoms) ; liquid state
Propane Fuel is mainly Propane C3H8 ; gaseous state
Methane Fuel is mainly Methane CH4 ; gaseous state

and when you take a look at Water, it's H2O (2 Hydrogen Atoms, 1 Oxygen Atom) ; liquid state.

there are technologies that can harness H2O to give Hydrogen Fuel & Oxygen Fuel source... it is now being shelved, and protected, as this sort of technology when released is detrimental to the world economy.

let's have the following hypothesis, if Water Fuel Based Engine Technologies exist, this would mean that the demand of Petroleum Fuel based engines will be reduced drastically.

Water is covering earth 70% surface, so it is a hoax to say that there is not enough fresh water on earth. Bottled water is a scam to make more money from you.

If Petroleum Demand is suddenly reduced --> This means that the Petroleum Dollars Recycling Concept is not working... causing the value of Dollars to go into no value.

When USD goes into a no value situation --> 70% of the world trade will halt instantly... and there is panic.

World Market Crashes...

thus, USD cannot fall, nor fail, but it should remain strong. In order to prevent any technology from affecting the economy, the technology would either be bought or silenced...
 
Back
Top