- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 1,079
- Points
- 0
Outcome 1. The PAP entire operating model both as a party and a government requires a paradigm shift. Using state sources and tax payer funded government and semi- government organisations for party purposes is no longer tolerated. One cannot claim moral high ground on corruption and clean government whilst at the same time do the exact opposite when it comes to retain their seat.
Outcome 2. The door is now wide open for a third political party as WP alone cannot seize all the opportunities that the new dawn is offering. The PAP and WP and their respective brands of politics would not be able to cover the ideological needs of a nation. No other party other than this two have demonstrated the ability to reach out and engage the voters. SDP has been thoroughly discredited. There is no way this party can come back nor will it be able to retain its better qualified members. NSP has always had a question mark and is generally a part-time party that comes together after 5 years. Watch this space.
Outcome 3. 50 years of the yoke of fear and intimidation has been lifted. In a matter of months a number of law suits have been initiated by the PM, 2 cabinet ministers and one ex-PAP MP. One prominent blogger, civic activist and hugely respected Singaporean was threatened 3 times by 3 different cabinet ministers including the PM. The audacity of a first term and recently minted cabinet with less than 6 months on the job threatening lawsuits for legitimate questions for which the whole country is asking answers for was quite breathtaking. The climate of fear is no longer a solution for a party that is bankrupt of ideas. Either work with the people on equal terms or leave. In simple terms, please fuck off.
OK but:
The female sales trainer has been walking the ground. Desmond Lim has also been walking the ground. The other two have not. That should help to account for the lousy performance of KJ and Koh Poh Koon. The other thing is that social class has emerged as a very important part of the equation. KJ and Koh Poh Koon were punished at the polls for being members of the upper class. Worker's party is properly thought of as Working Class Party. It's not that KJ and KPK are complete idiots, but rather the things they excel in are not useful for anybody seeking to win elections.
A Michael Palmer with his trousers on is an above average PAP MP, and Koh Poh Koon couldn't measure up. Koh Poh Koon is a political novice, as we can see from his mistakes. The first impression he had on me was a good one, because he struck me as being humble and down to earth. It's possible that he really is, but he's only humble when compared to other members of his upper class, and that's not good enough. His dressing up and playing up of humble beginnings backfired because he couldn't get all the important details right. He's not a suave guy like Michael Palmer, not an experienced one who has already served one term.
Outcome 2: I definitely agree that there is room for a third party, but I wouldn't write off NSP and SDP. SDP has not been thoroughly discredited. They made a serious mistake that almost but didn't become a disaster. WP has also made mistakes in the past that didn't destroy it. Another party coming up to overtake those two would have a long way to go just to match what those two have already achieved. It doesn't take much for those two to get back on the right path - merely for the more capable ones inside that party to muscle aside the incompetents. But then again, it might not happen. There will be land vacated by RP and SDA in 2016 and who will fill in that void?
Outcome 3: all the advantages that the PAP have had, and all the dirty tricks from their playbook are being neutralised one by one.
1. Fear and intimidation
2. A compliant press to report mainly their side of the story and to control the narrative
3. GRC system as a barrier to entry
4. Town council as a barrier to entry
5. Gerrymandering (difficult in Singapore because the political landscape is fairly uniform).
6. A proven track record of good economic management
7. Appeal to the common man (these days working class party does this better)
8. Image of being clean and not corrupt. (Corruption cases are seen in some quarters as wayang)
9. Discrediting of alternate voices (lawsuits no longer working).
10. Ability to attract the best talent.
In addition, the PAP has to learn
1. How to appeal to the working class, how to be the working class. Hard because all their candidates don't come from the working class, but the "meritocratic" elite.
2. How to communicate that they have the welfare of the people at heart.
3. Point 2 is not possible without actually having the welfare of the people at heart, and forming policies that address the problems of income inequality and high cost of living. More of the last 20 years - pretending that what they're doing really has the welfare of the people at heart when it doesn't, pulling the wool over the eyes of the people while they continue rigging to the system to their advantage - is just going to carry on destroying everything that the first generation of PAP built. This fundamental rethink of what the PAP really stands for is most difficult of all and not one that I have much hope that they will pull off.