Dear
@sbfuncle,
many belated thanks again for your reply!
I'm willing to say that,
at most, it's
possible that Madam Gan
never made any of those police reports and, therefore, it's
possible that she was lying (when
she said she made them); but I'm afraid
I feel a strong need to
also say that it's
both possible and even
more probable that she
really did make those police reports (or
at least talked to the police both over the phone and even in person), so I hope
you won't mind me considering
your suspicion to be
less probable!
But, of course,
I'm aware of
her many lies; and so,
I certainly consider the
contents of her reports to be filled with
lies mixed with some
truths, because I believe she's a
very malicious/psychopathic/cunning hypocrite, who has a
very strong desire to
hurt innocent people (both male and female, especially if they are
weaker; or if they are
actually stronger, but
she mistakenly thinks that they are
"weaker" or thinks that
she is the one who is
"stronger", she would
still try to hurt them), in order to
feed her vanity/conceit/arrogance! 
In fact,
I dare say that there's at least a
69% chance that
if Sinkies were
allowed to
buy and use guns in
Singapore for "self-defence",
Madam Gan would have
bought at least one gun (or even two or more guns) many years ago and would have
already murdered at least
one innocent person (whether male or female) by now, while
falsely accusing that innocent person of "threatening" her "first"!
Anyway, here's
my reasoning (which is quite
long-winded, so
please bear with me! ):
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-3.pdf
parliament.gov.sg/sconlinefalsehoods
As you can see,
her full name is on
one of the webpages of the
Sinkie Parliament's website, which
proves that she not only
dared to report her lies to the
PAP government (back in early 2018, nearly 8 years ago), but she's
willing to
reveal her full name to the government and to anyone else who feels like reading that webpage, even though it was
not necessary for her to reveal it; for example, here are three "written representations" by "Anonymous":
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-20.pdf
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-111.pdf
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-168.pdf
and here's a "written representation" by "Erwin":
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-7.pdf
and finally, here's a "written representation" by "Valerie":
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-70.pdf
Also, the
PAP government
has always been, still is, and will always be, a
far-from-perfect government (simply because it's just
not possible for them, and
also any other political party/coalition in the
entire world, to be even
close to perfect), even if some people (both Sinkies and non-Sinkies) consider it to be the "best" government in the world.
Therefore, it's not only
possible, but even
highly probable, that the
PAP government and/or the
Sinkie police (who are
slaves of the PAP government)
have never, and will never, charge every single criminal who has
ever committed at least one crime in Singapore (especially if the crime is a
small one, such as what
Madam Gan has been doing many times, and it would
not even be necessary to
bribe the Sinkie police), even if the former have enough evidence to charge the latter; and
I believe/suspect that
Madam Gan is probably aware of this fact, especially since
Sinkie women have been:
1.
taught/trained, since they were
Primary schoolgirls, to
trust the Sinkie police, who will
also trust them back;
2. and even
encouraged to call them whenever they
feel the need to!
Furthermore,
unless I'm mistaken, during the
past couple of decades, the
vast majority of
Sinkie prisoners (i.e.
not foreigners, but Sinkie
citizens who have
committed crimes in Singapore and who have been convicted and imprisoned) have been living in:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Changi_Prison_Complex (CPC)
which has a capacity of only "11,000",
including
only about
a thousand female prisoners, who were moved from the old "Changi Women’s Prison" (at "10 Tanah Merah Besar Road, Singapore 498834") to CPC's "Cluster A and renamed to Institution A4" in 2017 (roughly 8 years ago):
sps.gov.sg/resource/media-releases/notice-relocation-of-changi-women-prison
And according to:
wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Singaporean_general_election
there were "2,758,846"
registered voters several months ago, so let's
round down that number to
2.69 million adult Sinkie citizens (including possibly, and probably, close to
half a million adult citizens who became "new citizens"
from the 1990s onwards, when Goh Chok Tong was the Prime Minister), who are
alive right now.
My point is that if just
0.69% of the 2.69 million adult Sinkie citizens were to
become prisoners right now, that's
18,561 prisoners and the PAP government would
not have enough prison cells for them; and the PAP would also
look bad if the
Sinkie police were to report a
significantly higher crime rate, right?
This is why, in
Madam Gan's case, the simple fact that she has
never been punished for
lying to the Sinkie Parliament (back in early 2018) probably
emboldened her to
continue lying to the
Sinkie police until this year!
By the way, I'm
beginning to suspect that many years ago (possibly
before she started working for Singapore Flying College in 2006 when she was roughly 35/36 years old), when she
successfully annulled her marriage, she (and probably also her ex-husband)
lied to their lawyer and the judge (obviously in order to
convince him/her to annul her marriage) and their lawyer and the judge
simply agreed with them, in order to
earn their money!
As for why she and her ex-husband
chose to annul rather than divorce,
one of their main reasons might be the fact that
an annulment is usually cheaper than a divorce:
google.com/search?q=is+it+cheaper+to+annul+or+divorce+in+singapore
In conclusion, I think it's
safe to say that the
chance of Madam Gan
really making those
malicious police reports (or
at least talked to the police either over the phone or in person) is
at least 69% (or even 96.9%),
but the
contents of her reports were obviously filled with
lies mixed with some
truths, similar to how she
mixes truth with lies in
many of her posts on her Facebook page:
facebook.com/siokbin.gan
and here at sammyboy.com; for example:
1. those posts in which she
falsely accused some men of
whistling AT HER (in order to "sexually harass" her), while
telling the truth that she
did indeed hear, and even
see, them
whistling!
2. and of course, those posts in which she mentioned
talking to the police or
making police reports, especially in her
Facebook posts, because they obviously
received much fewer views and her
main objective was to
complain to:
facebook.com/k.shanmugam.page
and
not to attract attention from anyone else,
unlike
whenever she spammed here at sammyboy.com, right?
Basically, Madam Gan is one of those
outstandingly vain/conceited/arrogant/domineering/overbearing, overconfident, complacent, cunning, hypocritical, shameless, malicious and psychopathic women who have
very strong desires to
hurt innocent people (both male and female, especially if they are
weaker; or if they are
actually stronger, but
she mistakenly thinks that they are
"weaker" or thinks that
she is the one who is
"stronger", she would
still try to hurt them)!

Therefore, I
strongly advise anyone (who has bothered to read this
long-winded post of mine!
) to
beware of her in real life and to
stay far away from her; and
just in case anyone is
not aware of how
her face looks like, here are
four photos of her
middle-aged Hokkien Chinese Sinkie face that
she herself posted on
her Facebook page a few months ago:
sammyboy.com/threads/fabulous-babe-madam-gan-颜-siok-bin-淑敏-seems-to-have-finally-changed-her-facebook-profile-picture-to-a-photo-of-her-beautiful-face.389500

By the way, I'm aware that
some people might consider her to be a "fabulous babe" with a "beautiful" face!

But
please do
not be deceived by
her/her face; and
always remember the following
saying/words of wisdom:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Never_judge_a_book_by_its_cover