She can request for PTC no.1 to be acquitted and free from jail and fine.
19 yo Woman admits making false rape report because 43 yo man refused to pay her S$1,200 after sex
- Thread starter Sustanon
- Start date
The sequence is correct because @Sialoquent only interested in non-virgin
@Sialoquent is Confucius trained and he practises 孔融讓梨．
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,828
- Points
- 113
$500 already considered as spoil market for this fuck face. Seriously, I can get better quality ones for free.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2008
- Messages
- 61,743
- Points
- 113
may be she will break ptc record lumpar 69.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2015
- Messages
- 3,305
- Points
- 83
Or virgin?man tan tio...
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,828
- Points
- 113
I know it’s hard to believe. But she’s unlikely to be a virgin. Maybe anal.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2020
- Messages
- 14,676
- Points
- 113
The way to treat gen z is to have women free life.
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,828
- Points
- 113
This is probably the tip of the iceberg. How many of the women who falsely accuse of being raped were actually legitimate?
Easy. You should join Pinkdot every year to lend your support.
Those who eventually married the women they had sex before marriage were blackmailed into marriage.
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2021
- Messages
- 2,752
- Points
- 113
The law encourages the women to weaponize their CB...... the incentives are there. She can extort virtually any amount and if the guy refuse to give in, he can go to jail, canning and carry the rapist label for the rest of his life. Pretty sure alot of men here kena liao....
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2020
- Messages
- 14,676
- Points
- 113
I never join pink dot before and is never part of their group. Just because I can live a women free life, it does not mean I am a pinkdotter.
You can't live a peaceful and joyful women free life is not the fault of someone who can.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 20,491
- Points
- 113
How jiuhu come in study poly. Fug pappy
- Joined
- May 16, 2023
- Messages
- 41,176
- Points
- 113
Her IQ ish….really fucked up
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2017
- Messages
- 602
- Points
- 43
False rape accusation is not a small matter.
Charis Ling Min Rui willingly sold sex for money, did not receive the full sum she demanded, and in retaliation filed a false police report alleging rape.
This was not a spur-of-the-moment slip of judgment, but a deliberate attempt to weaponise one of the gravest criminal charges against a man. If her false claim had stuck, the accused would be staring at years in prison, a destroyed reputation, and a lifetime stigma he could never wash off, even after acquittal. The fact that he was fortunate enough to be cleared does not erase the damage of what she attempted.
When people argue that punishing false accusers “discourages real victims from coming forward,” they are deliberately twisting the issue. On the contrary, every false accusation makes it harder for genuine victims to be believed. Each fabricated case poisons the well, eroding public trust in real survivors.
Severe punishment of liars is not an attack on true victims, it is a protection for them. By treating this case with leniency, the authorities would send the message that filing a malicious report carries no real consequence, turning the legal system into a bargaining chip for personal grievances.
Probation in this context would be an absolute mockery of justice.
Probation is for youthful mistakes and petty offences; shoplifting, vandalism, or underage smoking. It is not for adults who file a false rape report with the intent of extorting money. This is extortion coupled with character assassination of the highest order. If an actual rapist deserves the full weight of the law, then someone who falsely accuses another of rape deserves no less.
The principle is simple: justice must cut both ways.
Allowing her to walk away with a light sentence would embolden others to treat the law as a tool of manipulation. If women believe they can cry “rape” as leverage in disputes, without consequence, then we are setting the stage for repeated abuse of the system.
This case should set the opposite precedent that Singapore will not tolerate the misuse of rape laws, that filing a false report is itself a serious crime, and that such behaviour will be met with firm, proportionate punishment.
Society cannot afford double standards. If we are serious about protecting women from real sexual crimes, then we must be equally serious about protecting men from fabricated ones. Anything less is hypocrisy.
Charis Ling Min Rui is not innocent, not naive, and certainly not deserving of any sympathy. She attempted to destroy a man’s life for money. For that, she deserves a proper sentence behind bars, not a gentle slap on the wrist.
Charis Ling Min Rui willingly sold sex for money, did not receive the full sum she demanded, and in retaliation filed a false police report alleging rape.
This was not a spur-of-the-moment slip of judgment, but a deliberate attempt to weaponise one of the gravest criminal charges against a man. If her false claim had stuck, the accused would be staring at years in prison, a destroyed reputation, and a lifetime stigma he could never wash off, even after acquittal. The fact that he was fortunate enough to be cleared does not erase the damage of what she attempted.
When people argue that punishing false accusers “discourages real victims from coming forward,” they are deliberately twisting the issue. On the contrary, every false accusation makes it harder for genuine victims to be believed. Each fabricated case poisons the well, eroding public trust in real survivors.
Severe punishment of liars is not an attack on true victims, it is a protection for them. By treating this case with leniency, the authorities would send the message that filing a malicious report carries no real consequence, turning the legal system into a bargaining chip for personal grievances.
Probation in this context would be an absolute mockery of justice.
Probation is for youthful mistakes and petty offences; shoplifting, vandalism, or underage smoking. It is not for adults who file a false rape report with the intent of extorting money. This is extortion coupled with character assassination of the highest order. If an actual rapist deserves the full weight of the law, then someone who falsely accuses another of rape deserves no less.
The principle is simple: justice must cut both ways.
Allowing her to walk away with a light sentence would embolden others to treat the law as a tool of manipulation. If women believe they can cry “rape” as leverage in disputes, without consequence, then we are setting the stage for repeated abuse of the system.
This case should set the opposite precedent that Singapore will not tolerate the misuse of rape laws, that filing a false report is itself a serious crime, and that such behaviour will be met with firm, proportionate punishment.
Society cannot afford double standards. If we are serious about protecting women from real sexual crimes, then we must be equally serious about protecting men from fabricated ones. Anything less is hypocrisy.
Charis Ling Min Rui is not innocent, not naive, and certainly not deserving of any sympathy. She attempted to destroy a man’s life for money. For that, she deserves a proper sentence behind bars, not a gentle slap on the wrist.
Similar threads
