• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

My car is pricey, but a 10-hour daily school run would cost me more

DaoMa

Stupidman
Loyal
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
32,409
Points
113

My car is pricey, but a 10-hour daily school run would cost me more​

Cars are expensive in Singapore, but for Ms Kelly Ang, owning one is the best way to fit family, work and school life into 24 hours.
My car is pricey, but a 10-hour daily school run would cost me more

Ms Kelly Ang's five children in a photo taken in February 2026 with their family's trusty seven-seater MPV. The car had been with them for almost nine years. (Photo: Kelly Ang)

Kelly Ang
Kelly Ang
18 Jul 2026 09:30PM (Updated: 19 Jul 2026 08:58AM)

From 1.30pm to 6pm every day, I spend about 4.5 hours driving my five children to school, childcare, sporting activities and enrichment classes.

It sounds excessive but here is what I've calculated: without a car, those same trips by public transport would take close to 10 hours a day.

For my family, owning a car isn't about status or wealth. It is how we make family life, work and school fit into 24 hours.

Without a car, getting the kids to school would take me anywhere between 45 minutes and one hour each way by public transport.

Since my oldest can travel home independently and my two preschoolers attend the same school, I'd still need to make three separate trips a day.
Private-hire vehicles or taxis aren't feasible long-term alternatives either. With several children in tow. I'd have to book a six-seater, which is notoriously expensive and difficult to get.

A car is the only way I can juggle school runs, extracurricular classes and training sessions, and my part-time work schedule.

Based on the conversations I've had both online and offline, I'm certain that I'm not the only parent in Singapore who feels this way.

WHAT I'VE RECOUPED AFTER BUYING A CAR​

When I was a younger mum with fewer kids, I, too, believed that owning a car in Singapore was not a necessity.

Back when it was just two kids, we travelled everywhere on public transport after selling our first car.

We lasted six months before we bought a second car, when I found out I was pregnant again.

Speed-walking in the hot sun to catch buses and trains with two children, aged four and two then, was extremely challenging for a pregnant woman, to say the least.

Since then, we've been car owners.
children_family_car_kelly_ang_3.jpg
Undeniably, the monthly costs of running a car are high – we spend about S$1,000 on fuel, parking and road toll, excluding road tax and insurance.

But what we have gained are two things: time and energy. And it's impossible to put a price on them.

Instead of spending hours planning multiple bus and train trips with my kids, I have more time to start dinner promptly, help with homework and school preparations, and get everyone to bed earlier.

Our family car is also a safe space for the children to unwind every day after school as I drive around.

We have had meaningful conversations, shared laughter and car karaoke sessions. They have eaten packed lunches, taken power naps or used the time to do homework in between classes.

All this, put together, gives us just that bit more breathing space to enjoy the small pockets of time with each other in the midst of hectic work and school weeks.

A DIFFERENT REALITY FOR LARGE FAMILIES​

That said, I understand why car ownership in Singapore is scrutinised.

Certificate of Entitlement (COE) premiums – which are part of a car's price tag – help keep the car population in check, encouraging people to rely on public transport.

We're also often reminded that reducing reliance on private cars can help lower emissions and ease the urban heat island effect from built-up areas.

But, in practice, it just doesn't work for a family of seven like ours.
Mums like me who both work and manage the kids' schedules are already so time-pressed, so having a car buys back time, which is something far more precious than convenience.

To me, our car isn't a status symbol.

After outgrowing our previous seven-seater, we bought a budget-friendly second-hand vehicle that's spacious enough to seat eight, including three child car seats for my two preschoolers and a sixth child, now that I'm expecting again.

Owning a car is undoubtedly a luxury, even for us.

But it's one we've consciously chosen to prioritise.

After my third child, we've given up on holidaying in countries further away, with plans to move and live closer to the kids' schools to reduce fuel costs and switch from live-in help to part-time help to continue affording our car.

LOOKING BEYOND THE COSTS OF OWNING A CAR​

To be sure, I'm not asking everyone to own a car.

However, my lived reality makes me wish that cars were more affordable. The high COE premiums make it more challenging to raise children in a society that's already fraught with so many pressures.

For large families like mine, the conversation shouldn't be only about congestion and emissions – I'm usually driving my children around at off-peak hours anyway.

It should also acknowledge the hidden costs of raising children, when every hour spent commuting is every hour taken away from family life.

For families with young children, we're willing to pay for many things: tuition classes to improve their academic grades, sports and music to give them an edge in getting into better schools, domestic workers for housekeeping and to look after our children when we're at work.

Naturally, cars are also high up on that list, because they are the reason we can spend more time being present for our children.

At the end of the day, a car helps us not just get to destinations, but to get to the moments that matter, when our children are still young enough to need us.
 
If no money…please donch fuck without condom. Maybe if the father studied a little bit harder and become an optometrist he could have save lots on eye care for his chewren.
 
If no money…please donch fuck without condom. Maybe if the father studied a little bit harder and become an optometrist he could have save lots on eye care for his chewren.
Nothing can stop couple bonking. Best is to bonk raw. Otherwise what is the point of marriage.
 
It is extremely difficult to put a price on comfort and convenience. I cannot imagine going to the office during those morning downpours like what we have been experiencing lately. When my children were very young, I never saw my car as a luxury when I sent them to my parents' home, childcare, kindergarten or primary school in stormy weather.
 
This looks to me like another garbage reporting.... what propaganda is this article trying to push??? It's ok to have even 5 kids and you see; they still so happy..... lol..... first, I have no way to verify if this article from ST is real or fake. Secondly even if it is true, what you are looking at is nothing more than survivorship bias....
 
Agree with her. Public transport may seem cheap and quick but the door to door time is a showstopper
 
Agree with her. Public transport may seem cheap and quick but the door to door time is a showstopper
I was a young parent a few decades ago, and know only too well that with children, stroller and maid in tow, a car felt more like a necessity, especially on the many days when there was a heavy downpour early in the morning.
 
Families should be exempted from COE if PAP is serious in promoting higher birth rates.
Don't believe entirely when the PAP tells you that they are pro-Singaporeans.
Their actions, such as car ownership for Sinkie families, reveal their true colours.
 
Don't believe entirely when the PAP tells you that they are pro-Singaporeans. Their actions, such as car ownership for Sinkie families, reveal their true colours.
The SG govt keeps telling us that nobody is stopping us from buying a car or 2 as long as we are able to afford to i.e. SG is a meritocracy.
 
Some people really like to fuck! Five kids is mad. And she should get an EV, it would cut the cost of running it to about 1/4 of the $1000 she currently spends.
Hi glockman, your allegation is unfair.
The government should reduce the cost of COE to $10,000 as it is valid for ten years.
 
The PAP government insists that Singaporeans aren’t having enough children, yet at the same time it drives up the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) to record-breaking levels. This makes car ownership practically unattainable for ordinary families. Parents who need cars to manage school runs, caregiving, and daily errands are priced out, while only the wealthy can afford them. In effect, cars have shifted from being a necessity for families to a luxury item for the rich, creating a contradiction between family-friendly rhetoric and actual policy.
 
The PAP government insists that Singaporeans aren’t having enough children, yet at the same time it drives up the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) to record-breaking levels. This makes car ownership practically unattainable for ordinary families. Parents who need cars to manage school runs, caregiving, and daily errands are priced out, while only the wealthy can afford them. In effect, cars have shifted from being a necessity for families to a luxury item for the rich, creating a contradiction between family-friendly rhetoric and actual policy.
Based on current prices, we have approached the day when only the top earners are able to possess a car. This makes car ownership even more attractive to those who can afford it. COE prices continue to climb, pricing out the average middle-class family. Owning a car is now an unrealistic dream for 90% of S'poreans. Unfortunately, with a population of 6.11 million, only 10% of residents here are able to afford a car.
 
Market based policies like COE that are without any qualifying conditions except demand become a race between who has deeper pockets.

So if people apply the same principle in evaluating Sinkieland as a cuntry, old news, quality of life isn’t so high as its vaulted passport.

Many other governments are doing competitive job administering like the Pappies, even CCP and just like how gulf states’ airlines are now more than a match for SIA. Sinkieland still relevant?
 
Market based policies like COE that are without any qualifying conditions except demand become a race between who has deeper pockets. So if people apply the same principle in evaluating Sinkieland as a cuntry, old news, quality of life isn’t so high as its vaulted passport. Many other governments are doing competitive job administering like the Pappies, even CCP and just like how gulf states’ airlines are now more than a match for SIA. Sinkieland still relevant?
The quality of life in S'pore is rather low. I look at my Malaysian co-workers and my relatives across the Causeway who live in landed homes and have at least 2 cars per household; they are just working in normal PMET or public sector jobs back home or in SG.
 
Back
Top