erection2015
Alfrescian (InfP) + C
- Joined
- May 20, 2011
- Messages
- 13,972
- Points
- 113
sometimes also got this - 打击手段的爱 ?
dont think is 375. i rmb i saw the advisory note stating is under woman charter.The whole picture is here, under s 375(4) of the Penal Code; and I believe it has nothing do with provisions in the Women's Charter:
bro it is the woman charter.I see your point.
I'm saying, in hindsight, how the hell did the guy end up being held to ransom by his own wife?
bro it is the woman charter.
irregardless watz wrong, the law will stand on the female side first juz like laksaboy is trying to convey.
ya lor.. maxi... i.mizz him so much.... i mean his botak head...![]()
it says..under Woman Charter..man must get the wife consent before having sex...if not you will charge as rape
so in marriage, you need the wife to say YES in everything before you advance.![]()
So pathetic to be a married man in sink... There again if you are still single... Your mother will be the one nagging at you!
tat could be the reason as woman wants a hen-pecked guy but he is not.Curious to know. This guy is those hen-pecked kind or he those bad boy kind went out taojiak so wife wanna take revenge on him?
once my mother asked me, i said to her, letz said the family members wants me to throw a banquet, the money involve, loan from bank issit? and then pay the instalment cum interest every mth for the 1 night dinner? LOLIt depends on your mother. Also, even if your mother nags, occasionally there is truth and reason behind the nagging.
It is up to you to filter off the noise. One ear in, one ear out.
tat could be the reason as woman wants a hen-pecked guy but he is not.
he is more to a reason person who will reason out with his wife.
he never went out taojiak.
as ppl will say money is not a factor of happy marriage but.......
Doesn't matter if it's written or verbal consent.
If she changes her mind later, it is rape. And you are the rapist.
The feminists now want to destroy a husband's conjugal rights, all in the name of 'protecting the women'.
http://counterfem.blogspot.com/2007/11/marital-rape.html
so in marriage, you need the wife to say YES in everything before you advance.![]()
It's failure for a man to ask a woman (whether wife or not) consent for sex. It's epic failure to force her. The correct way is to make her ask you for it. Epic success is when she begs you for it. But be forewarned, there may be epic trouble following epic success if you want to leave her later.
apa ini, which part did i mention is me?lianbeng asked u, "did she sign on the dotted line on ur marriage cert?"![]()
i second that so the guy will think again.The woman's charter should be a compulsory read at the Registry of Marriage,
If got written consent, then she has no case.
So, before doing it, get her to sign consent form. Must include date, time and venue. Preferrably find a neutral witness.
I support the Women's Charter. I've been through courtship and breakup, marriage and divorce as a man. My women didn't need Women's Charter protection. I did it fairly, amicably and acceptably to them. However, you fellow men, remember that you have woman relatives too. What if they're bullied or shortchanged by other men? This is not male chauvinism but facing reality and responsibility. Men and women are not born equal. To achieve equality, the law must be adjusted toward protecting women, so that men and women can be equalized in society and at law. An honorable man doesn't even need any women's charter to leave his woman honorably when the relationship couldn't work out. He'd do the honorable thing and compensate and settle with his woman honorably and satisfactorily that even his woman have nothing else to complain about. However, there're many dishonorable men around. Men, think about your sister, woman friends and cousins.