- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,177
- Points
- 48
Police should punish such reckless habits
Published on Feb 1, 2012
I AM an American lawyer and Singapore permanent resident. My wife is a Singaporean and we have two young sons who were born here.
Last Friday night, I was playing with my four-year-old son at the void deck of Block 106, Simei Street 1 when a motorcyclist sped in, almost running over my son.
The motorcyclist stopped a short distance away, apparently to attend a football game. I confronted him over the incident and subsequently called the police, after he told me I did not belong here and to return to America.
The police interviewed the motorcyclist, who I understood to be 22 years of age. But he was only issued a summons for parking his motorcycle illegally in the void deck.
I was shocked by the penalty, bearing in mind that he almost ran over a child.
I was a criminal prosecutor in the United States and the motorcyclist's action in speeding into a void deck, almost striking a person, would have been regarded as a felony called 'criminal endangerment'.
One of the two police officers who answered my call told me he wanted to maintain peace in the neighbourhood. With due respect to the police, the first priority in this case should have been to protect people, especially children.
Instead, the police protected this motorcyclist far more than my four-year-old child.
John Huntley
Published on Feb 1, 2012
I AM an American lawyer and Singapore permanent resident. My wife is a Singaporean and we have two young sons who were born here.
Last Friday night, I was playing with my four-year-old son at the void deck of Block 106, Simei Street 1 when a motorcyclist sped in, almost running over my son.
The motorcyclist stopped a short distance away, apparently to attend a football game. I confronted him over the incident and subsequently called the police, after he told me I did not belong here and to return to America.
The police interviewed the motorcyclist, who I understood to be 22 years of age. But he was only issued a summons for parking his motorcycle illegally in the void deck.
I was shocked by the penalty, bearing in mind that he almost ran over a child.
I was a criminal prosecutor in the United States and the motorcyclist's action in speeding into a void deck, almost striking a person, would have been regarded as a felony called 'criminal endangerment'.
One of the two police officers who answered my call told me he wanted to maintain peace in the neighbourhood. With due respect to the police, the first priority in this case should have been to protect people, especially children.
Instead, the police protected this motorcyclist far more than my four-year-old child.
John Huntley