• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Our Mass Rapid Transit - in light of recent chain of events

MacPherson

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
67
Points
0
Over the past few days, many Singaporeans have been affected by the MRT service disruptions. Even more have expressed concern that such a major and serious series of service failures could have occurred in Singapore. A friend of mine could not even get home till midnight last Thursday and was understandably very upset when she related her experience to me. Other friends and residents have also approached me, emailed me or FB-ed me to give their feedback on the matter. I did not think it would have been at all helpful for me to publicly add to the chorus of criticisms directed at SMRT, especially when the priority then was to solve the problems and get the trains running properly again. Now that the system seems to have stabilised, please allow me to make a few points on the matter.

This unfortunate episode has uncovered many faults – from the maintenance regime, crisis management to public communications. The Prime Minister has directed that a Committee of Inquiry be convened to undertake a full investigation. This is a decisive and important move, to find out what went wrong and to put things right. SMRT must take this in the right spirit. It is critical for SMRT to take an honest look at itself, and address not just the areas of failure, but the systemic issues as well. Apart from that, the Government should also examine what more it could have done in this episode, and update its policies to prevent any future recurrences. [As a side note, I thought it was an assuring move to have the Minister of Transport Lui Tuck Yew making personal visits to observe and ensure that crisis management was carried out properly.]

When the MRT was built in the 1980s, it was at that time one of the most modern mass transit systems in the world. I remember it felt pretty exciting during those days when we tried out the new MRT, and sometimes, we would take it to nowhere in particular just for the fun of it. But over the last 2 decades, technology has advanced rapidly, some infrastructure has become dated and the load on the system has multiplied manifold. Of course, this does not mean that we should therefore accept service lapses. Singaporeans expect and deserve the best possible mass transit system in the world, regardless of its age. This also places a heavier responsibility on SMRT to focus on maintenance, to keep standards of safety and service high. I can appreciate that some parts of the infrastructure will be hard to change, e.g. we cannot build larger train platforms, but the tracks, rolling stock, signalling equipment, etc. all can and should be regularly inspected, serviced and upgraded.

Just as importantly, we need good software. We need robust processes - on maintenance, crisis management and service recovery; the staff need to be well trained; and emergency procedures need to be regularly rehearsed. But more than these, SMRT officers must have the right attitude. They should not be working off templates (as some have pointed out…) but should instead be able to respond competently, confidently and in a timely manner to an evolving situation. They must have pride in the role that they play, no matter how small it may seem in the grand scheme of things, because major disasters are often the result of the smallest of lapses. After all, it seems that a set of small claws on the third rail was what caused the major problems. Above all, SMRT officers must possess a strong service culture, motivated to always do what is best for Singaporean commuters, and not just for achieving corporate goals. When one has the right “heart”, it will show and I think Singaporeans will appreciate that.

Finally, I know that the SMRT officers, especially its frontline staff, backroom operators and engineers, have gone through a lot these last few days. They are the people who work through weekends and public holidays to keep trains running. They will again be at their stations as many of the rest of us break for Christmas and the New Year. It is the season of giving, forgiveness and new hopes. I hope they will keep up their spirits, and not feel too dejected. Positive energy keeps us going (negativity drains our energy) and I wish SMRT the best as it goes about addressing the problems it faces. I hope the end of the year will also signal the end of problems for our MRT systems, and that the new year will bring pleasant journeys on our public transport for all!

- Tin Pei Ling
1988%20PAP%20A1.jpg
 
Finally, I know that the SMRT officers, especially its frontline staff, backroom operators and engineers, have gone through a lot these last few days. They are the people who work through weekends and public holidays to keep trains running.

What makes you think they have gone through a lot? I am drinking with a bunch of MRT personnels regulary and they are so glad such incidents happened. Their work and responsibilties are so well defined, they coudn't give a fuck about what happened so long as they fulfilled their duties. There were full of enthusiasm when they first joined SMRT. They provided a lot of constructive feedbacks and ideas to the management on how to improve the service but no one listen. Now they are laughing behind their backs.

They are the people who work through weekends and public holidays to keep trains running. They will again be at their stations as many of the rest of us break for Christmas and the New Year.

And what makes you think they do not have breaks?



I hope the end of the year will also signal the end of problems for our MRT systems, and that the new year will bring pleasant journeys on our public transport for all!

You must be dreaming. This is only the begining of the MRT problems and the worse will follows.
 
Read this miss MacPherson,

http://forum.channelnewsasia.com/showthread.php?29475-ex-SMRT-staff-on-why-SMRT-breaks-down


Thread: ex-SMRT staff on why SMRT breaks down...

Yesterday 09:41 PM#1

yenyenpark


Senior Member
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join Date: Aug 2009Posts: 1,307




ex-SMRT staff on why SMRT breaks down...



The problem all started when the Sr staffs were retrenched, resigned, retired and asked to leave. When she took over how many senior staff with years of experience and trained by experts from Japan, England and Hong Kong that did not agreed with her was removed and replaced with young people with paper qualifications and have not the slightest idea of how to run a train system. There these young management staff tried to impress her by backstabbing each other, come out with hairbrain ideas or quick fix solutions that did not sound in the long run. Well guess what after 10 years of this type of sh.it from a well oiled and smooth running system she ran it to the ground. Mark my words as long as she is in the helm surrounded by her clueless dogs there will be no improvment.
That was the time I took a serious look at my retirement plan. Then came her waves of cost cutting measures, buying of cheap spares that looks good on paper but can't even last till the next round of preventive maintainance, reduce the manpower to all sections working at skeleton crew level. The last straw came when some of my junior staffs was not satisfied with the way they were graded and the amount they got compare to what their bosses got. They brough it up to the union and HR and they got the same reply " The door is always open". That was when I knew the sh.it has hit the ceiling and I took my earily retirment and joined my fellow former co-workers.
 
FORGIVENESS ? What A Farce !

my_dream_ger.jpg



MacPherson said:
Finally, I know that the SMRT officers, especially its frontline staff, backroom operators and engineers, have gone through a lot these last few days. They are the people who work through weekends and public holidays to keep trains running. They will again be at their stations as many of the rest of us break for Christmas and the New Year. It is the season of giving, forgiveness and new hopes. I hope they will keep up their spirits, and not feel too dejected. Positive energy keeps us going (negativity drains our energy) and I wish SMRT the best as it goes about addressing the problems it faces. I hope the end of the year will also signal the end of problems for our MRT systems, and that the new year will bring pleasant journeys on our public transport for all!

- Tin Pei Ling


They, PAP wants you to FORGET and to continue to loot the coffer and screw you people up for the NEXT five years again. Let's welcome this FASCIST statement with a 'GOODWILL' applause.
 
I'm not here to defend Miss Kate Spade. I dislike her as much as any forummer and in my view is not qualified to be an MP at all. But the last part of her blog posting was referring to those MRT staff who as a result of the train incidents really worked very very hard and under tremendous pressure, especially those who had to face commuters directly. The incidents arose through no fault of theirs are yet they are the ones who are truly doing all the dirty work to clean the mess, working very long hours without much rest. Criticise all we want against the real culprits, namely the PAP, LTA, Temasek, Saw Phaik Hwa and her cronies, but let's be fair to those who had no part in creating the chaos and yet are now bearing the full brunt of their mistakes made by their bosses. In fact, my concern now is some of them may be made scape goats in order that the top brass gets off scot-free as happened in the MAS Selamat case where the ones being punished were of the lowest denominator.
 
Fucking titless backdoor MP Tin Pei Ling. Fuck your cheebye face! Wait till one train crash into another and kill 20+ Sinkies, then let us see where you will open your cheebye mouth! Yah I know Saw off head bitch will not have to step down. Ho Ching will never allow the setting of a dangerous precedent. Lee Hsien Loong don't have the balls to have sex with someone in his office unlike his brother. So he 'll say yes Madam.
 
Last edited:
ex-SMRT staff on why SMRT breaks down...


The problem all started when the Sr staffs were retrenched, resigned, retired and asked to leave. When she took over how many senior staff with years of experience and trained by experts from Japan, England and Hong Kong that did not agreed with her was removed and replaced with young people with paper qualifications and have not the slightest idea of how to run a train system. There these young management staff tried to impress her by backstabbing each other, come out with hairbrain ideas or quick fix solutions that did not sound in the long run. Well guess what after 10 years of this type of sh.it from a well oiled and smooth running system she ran it to the ground. Mark my words as long as she is in the helm surrounded by her clueless dogs there will be no improvment.
That was the time I took a serious look at my retirement plan. Then came her waves of cost cutting measures, buying of cheap spares that looks good on paper but can't even last till the next round of preventive maintainance, reduce the manpower to all sections working at skeleton crew level. The last straw came when some of my junior staffs was not satisfied with the way they were graded and the amount they got compare to what their bosses got. They brough it up to the union and HR and they got the same reply " The door is always open". That was when I knew the sh.it has hit the ceiling and I took my earily retirment and joined my fellow former co-workers.

http://forum.channelnewsasia.com/showthread.php?29475-ex-SMRT-staff-on-why-SMRT-breaks-down...
 
Last edited:
why does every 1 think ish written by Ng How Yue?

she grad from Hwa CHong for gootness sake

The way a person writes is synonymous with the way he/she speaks. Listen to the way she answers an interview and you know she is not that smart. This definitely look likes it's been gone through at least 5 rounds of proof reading by someone other than herself.
 
The way a person writes is synonymous with the way he/she speaks. Listen to the way she answers an interview and you know she is not that smart. This definitely look likes it's been gone through at least 5 rounds of proof reading by someone other than herself.

I agree. TPL not only doesn't have the intelligence, IQ, to be an MP but she also doesn't have the EQ to be one. The PAP has shot itself in the thigh by bringing her into their fold. She can pretend all she likes but she is of poor stock! There are actually more PAP MPs just as bad. You will be surprised by the qualifications and experience of many PAP MPs once you exclude the doctors and lawyers. Even then, doctors are usually place in ministries that make the doctors newbies.
 
I agree. TPL not only doesn't have the intelligence, IQ, to be an MP but she also doesn't have the EQ to be one. The PAP has shot itself in the thigh by bringing her into their fold. She can pretend all she likes but she is of poor stock! There are actually more PAP MPs just as bad. You will be surprised by the qualifications and experience of many PAP MPs once you exclude the doctors and lawyers. Even then, doctors are usually place in ministries that make the doctors newbies.

In response to the widespread negative reactions to her nomination, the PM then defended her by stating that she was selected after her very impressive speech at the PAP convention (which is usually held close to the GE). You can't get any sillier than that. Of course it was impressive to the PAP because all she said were what the PAP was wishing to hear. It's such in-breeding that is leading to PAP downfall. Let's hope they continue doing so which can only mean good news to S'poreans.
 
The way a person writes is synonymous with the way he/she speaks. Listen to the way she answers an interview and you know she is not that smart. This definitely look likes it's been gone through at least 5 rounds of proof reading by someone other than herself.

I agree. TPL not only doesn't have the intelligence, IQ, to be an MP but she also doesn't have the EQ to be one. The PAP has shot itself in the thigh by bringing her into their fold. She can pretend all she likes but she is of poor stock! There are actually more PAP MPs just as bad. You will be surprised by the qualifications and experience of many PAP MPs once you exclude the doctors and lawyers. Even then, doctors are usually place in ministries that make the doctors newbies.

In response to the widespread negative reactions to her nomination, the PM then defended her by stating that she was selected after her very impressive speech at the PAP convention (which is usually held close to the GE). You can't get any sillier than that. Of course it was impressive to the PAP because all she said were what the PAP was wishing to hear. It's such in-breeding that is leading to PAP downfall. Let's hope they continue doing so which can only mean good news to S'poreans.

The topic was ¡°How to face the future?¡± and this was just a short excerpt of the English speech by Ms Tin Pei Ling, third year NUS Psychology major during the 2005 Taipei City Cup Chinese-English Impromptu Speech Contest, organized by the Y17 Taipei Youth Activity Centre. This contest was the first of its kind with a total of 36 participants from Taipei, Taizhong, Gaoxiong, Beijing, Hong Kong and Singapore. All participants had to give a 2-minute Chinese and 2-minute English speech after choosing a topic on the spot (by way of drawing lots). There were 3 categories¡ªsecondary, pre-tertiary and tertiary, and each city/state were invited to send 2 representatives per category. Indeed, the competition was a tough one, having to compete against other participants with strong Chinese backgrounds and speech capabilities, and no prior knowledge of the topic until four minutes before going up on stage, but Pei Ling emerged with the top prize in the university students category.

Impromptu mean on the spot.... in case some moron dun understand

so she commit a few faux pas and gaffes mean she is an idiot ???even political veterans like JOe Biden, newt gingrich, John McCain, GCT, LKY, Seng Han THong, Lim Wee Kiat commeiot gaffes

commit gaffes mean she is sarah palin....??? the is symptomatic of the ageism and misogyny in you people .... I like to take an contrarian view.... she has the making of Lily Neo, Halimah Yaccob and Denise Phua.....

I think she is definitely more sincere than Nicole Seah .... tin has been doin grassroot for the past 7 year.....
where is Nicole Seah ??? smoking away like a chimmy....
 
Last edited:
so she commit a few faux pas and gaffes mean she is an idiot ???even political veterans like JOe Biden, newt gingrich, John McCain, GCT, LKY, Seng Han THong, Lim Wee Kiat commeiot gaffes

commit gaffes mean she is sarah palin....??? the is symptomatic of the ageism and misogyny in you people .... I like to take an contrarian view.... she has the making of Lily Neo, Halimah Yaccob and Denise Phua.....

QUOTE]
 
so she commit a few faux pas and gaffes mean she is an idiot ???even political veterans like JOe Biden, newt gingrich, John McCain, GCT, LKY, Seng Han THong, Lim Wee Kiat commeiot gaffes

commit gaffes mean she is sarah palin....??? the is symptomatic of the ageism and misogyny in you people .... I like to take an contrarian view.... she has the making of Lily Neo, Halimah Yaccob and Denise Phua.....

When TPL what was asked what was her biggest regret, she replied it was not bringing her parents to Universal Studios. That's neither a faux pas nor a gaffe. It's just plain idiotic. In other words, she's an idiot. Simple as that. But to be fair to her, she's not alone. For example, Lim Swee Say is an even bigger idiot. If he can be a MP, then I guess TPL can be one too.
 
When TPL what was asked what was her biggest regret, she replied it was not bringing her parents to Universal Studios.

It shows her love and devotion for her parents and a deep appreciation of what they have done for her. The fact that her off-the-cuff response centered around filial piety shows what a sincere, caring and outstanding person she is.

If her response had been "I regret buying a Samsung instead of an iPhone", (which is how the majority of sinkies her age would respond,) then I would agree with you.
 
It shows her love and devotion for her parents and a deep appreciation of what they have done for her. The fact that her off-the-cuff response centered around filial piety shows what a sincere, caring and outstanding person she is.

If her response had been "I regret buying a Samsung instead of an iPhone", (which is how the majority of sinkies her age would respond,) then I would agree with you.

Biggest regret refers to something that you wished you should have done but did not do at that time and there's forever no chance to go back and do so again. In other the circumstances had now change such that you can't go back to do what now u think u ought to have done, that's a biggest regret. In TPL, there are plenty of opportunities for her to bring her parents to Universal Studios because it did not close down after she went. Universal Studios is still standing at Sentosa welcoming her to bring her parents there anytime. What's there to regret?

At least in your example of regretting buying a Samsung and not iphone, it's plausible because if u only have so much money, once u spent it or another brand, u can't afford the brand u now wish to buy. That can still consider a regret, but definitely not a biggest regret.
 
Back
Top