Angry singaporeans demand why no child pornography law in SIngapore? PAP napping?

[†††††]

EX-SCHOLAR CAUGHT WITH CHILD PORN
Legal loopholes?
By Vanessa Jalleh

WHEN asked for their views on the sentencing of Jonathan Wong - a Singaporean undergraduate found with child pornography videos in the UK - there was a range of opinions on the Straits Times Discussion Board and Facebook page.

We had asked readers earlier on Wednesday this poser: In Singapore, there are no specific laws against the possession of child pornography. Should there be? (Here, a person in a case like Wong's would have been charged with possessing obscene films under the Films Act)

Reader Alan Ma added: 'All I want to say is that there are loopholes in our legal system.'

A reader Just1more, responded by saying: 'I think we should accept the law of the land, be it fair or otherwise. As for Jonathan, he has paid for his mistakes and I do hope he can get on after it. I am not defending his crime but let us be compassionate. Let's give him another chance. After all, who can claim he has never committed a sin in his lifetime? We are human after all.'

David Neo, another reader, said: 'These people are in need of therapy and should be monitored for a period of time.' Reader dragonalive said: 'Those who condemned Jonathan Wong should do this every time they look at a mirror and ask themselves if they have, at one point or another, surfed undesirable websites. If so, then they are worse than him, and are hypocrites.'

Siti Nor'aini Abdul Samat added: ' Whatever it is, it is still pornography. To have such copies that include children is even worst. The thought of this makes me shiver.'

 

[wahlaneh]

wahlaneh...
coz they dun believe got such things in singapore one mah.

 

[saratogas]

Noporn Liu will say that the porn problem is never an issue, becos there is no legalized porn is Sinkapore.

 

[Char_Azn]

I think the child pornographic law in SG is just extra. We don't have as many Pedophilias as the Ang Mohs and almost 99% of the time they turn out to be Mat. U fine them, they probably cannot pay the fine and end up in Jail anyway

 

[Cruxx]

I think the child pornographic law in SG is just extra. We don't have as many Pedophilias as the Ang Mohs and almost 99% of the time they turn out to be Mat. U fine them, they probably cannot pay the fine and end up in Jail anyway

You must be a paedophile to object against the prohibition of child pornography in Sinkieland. I don't need proof to back my claim just as you had none when you asserted that 99% of paedophiles in Sinkieland are Mats. :oIo:

 

[cleareyes]

EX-SCHOLAR CAUGHT WITH CHILD PORN
Legal loopholes?
By Vanessa Jalleh

WHEN asked for their views on the sentencing of Jonathan Wong - a Singaporean undergraduate found with child pornography videos in the UK - there was a range of opinions on the Straits Times Discussion Board and Facebook page.

We had asked readers earlier on Wednesday this poser: In Singapore, there are no specific laws against the possession of child pornography. Should there be? (Here, a person in a case like Wong's would have been charged with possessing obscene films under the Films Act)

Reader Alan Ma added: 'All I want to say is that there are loopholes in our legal system.'

A reader Just1more, responded by saying: 'I think we should accept the law of the land, be it fair or otherwise. As for Jonathan, he has paid for his mistakes and I do hope he can get on after it. I am not defending his crime but let us be compassionate. Let's give him another chance. After all, who can claim he has never committed a sin in his lifetime? We are human after all.'

David Neo, another reader, said: 'These people are in need of therapy and should be monitored for a period of time.' Reader dragonalive said: 'Those who condemned Jonathan Wong should do this every time they look at a mirror and ask themselves if they have, at one point or another, surfed undesirable websites. If so, then they are worse than him, and are hypocrites.'

Siti Nor'aini Abdul Samat added: ' Whatever it is, it is still pornography. To have such copies that include children is even worst. The thought of this makes me shiver.'

Pronographic laws already in [place. anything else is just extras and reflect on the KS mentality that Singaporean already has.

 

[mscitw]

The regime will act swiftly if its interests are in danger.

When Siah Lan Seng was beaten and burnt by irate peasants, the regime immediately enact laws to protect their lackeys. This proves the regime has utter contempt for stupid peasants and will not do much for them.

 

[lolabunny]

Because not everyone can afford a plane ticket to "an exciting place like Rwanda where nine year old little girls are XXX".

 

[ivebert]

I think the child pornographic law in SG is just extra. We don't have as many Pedophilias as the Ang Mohs and almost 99% of the time they turn out to be Mat. U fine them, they probably cannot pay the fine and end up in Jail anyway

Mats or Chinks,

If you have a Singaporean Citizenship, your life sucks and you are most likely a peasant.

:oIo:

 

[Ramseth]

Because not everyone can afford a plane ticket to "an exciting place like Rwanda where nine year old little girls are XXX".

Rwanda minister speaking at rally : Don't think too much about watching 9-year-old girl getting raped. You ain't seen nothing yet. For real excitement, go to Singapore and watch MP being set on fire!