Han culture we must be proud of...

[championplug]

Japan might have been a superpower if not for WWII.

This statement is so absurd and illogical. It is like saying 'I might have passed my exams if I had studied!'

 

[championplug]

Even the Korean national flag are design with our Chinese Ba Kua logo.

The Koreans have claimed Confucius, 屈原, taichi, sun yat sen, and even hanzi as theirs. They probably will claim they invented the Ba Kua.

 

[Liquigas]

Yes, China indeed has a long glorious history and a proud culture but to date the country has not made significant contribution to the world. The whites, on the other hand, are responsible for more than 90% of the progress made by mankind. The whites are staying ahead because of their creativity, visionary, planning & organizational skills. The Japanese, aka honoured whites in the past, are a close second.

 

[Ramseth]

The Koreans have claimed Confucius, 屈原, taichi, sun yat sen, and even hanzi as theirs. They probably will claim they invented the Ba Kua.

The proper name for Korea is 朝鲜，as retained by North Korea at the time of partition. South Korea then called themselves 韩国 after one the ancient Chinese warring states. At the time of Qin Shihuang sweeping eastwards to unite China, 赵国 and 韩国 were hit with the biggest numbers of casualties and refugees. Most of them terrified with certain defeat and certain death, exiled themselves as far north-east as possible out of the Great Wall. The Manchurians once called themselves 金赵 and Korea had heavy 韩 remnants. Korea was friendly and willing subordinate state to the Han Dynasty all the way Qing Dynasty. Koreans even named their capital city 汉城，only in recent years renamed 首尔 for political correctness.

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

Yes, China indeed has a long glorious history and a proud culture but to date the country has not made significant contribution to the world. The whites, on the other hand, are responsible for more than 90% of the progress made by mankind. The whites are staying ahead because of their creativity, visionary, planning & organizational skills. The Japanese, aka honoured whites in the past, are a close second.

well if you want to put things this way, since there are 0 innovators in china, then the rest of the non ang moh world is also responsible for all the fuck ups too. We have arabs, middle eastern, indians, south asians, east asians, central asians, all the africans, natives from oz, pacific islands and so on. All of them are worthless too and even more so compared to the chinese.

 

[KNNBCCB]

The Hans can modified an ipod touch into iphone !

We very damn proud !

 

[Sideswipe]

Yes, China indeed has a long glorious history and a proud culture but to date the country has not made significant contribution to the world. The whites, on the other hand, are responsible for more than 90% of the progress made by mankind. The whites are staying ahead because of their creativity, visionary, planning & organizational skills. The Japanese, aka honoured whites in the past, are a close second.

The whites are staying ahead now because of their trickery and treacherous geopolitical scheming that doomed China to communism in 1949.

Albert Wedemeyer memoirs mentioned, British ambassador and generals told him that "a strong unified China would be dangerous to the world and certainly would jeopardize white man's position immediately in Asia and ultimately throughout the world".

 

[Ramseth]

The Hans can modified an ipod touch into iphone !

We very damn proud !

There's no point claiming credit, but recognition where recognition is due at every generation in every civilisation. E.g. if not for Chinese invention of the moveable type and silkscreen printing, would the invention of cylindrindal printing press be much harder, come later or indeed never come at all? It did come and trying to make a personal mini press for texts led to the invention of the typewriter, later developed into electronic word processor and now completely replaced by the ubiquitous computer keyboard. Can someone just invent the computer out of scratch without what's already done in the past? I really doubt so.

 

[championplug]

Can someone just invent the computer out of scratch without what's already done in the past? I really doubt so.

This one statement I fully agree, all inventions are supported by the building blocks from the past. Without them can the present inventors do anything from scratch? Without someone inventing the wheel can cars be invented. So the guy who say the whites invented 90 percent of the things now, I would just say you are soooo ignorant.

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

This one statement I fully agree, all inventions are supported by the building blocks from the past. Without them can the present inventors do anything from scratch? Without someone inventing the wheel can cars be invented. So the guy who say the whites invented 90 percent of the things now, I would just say you are soooo ignorant.

you know one thing that pisses me off is when a non ang moh uses that sort of argument to put down china.


Take arab, middle eastern sam leong for eg. Claims that ang mohs are better than chinese, yeah but is he an ang moh? Nope therefore how can he boast for the ang mohs? It's like using someone else's backside skin on your own face.

Arabs have not contributed anything of late except for terrorism who are they to talk down to chinese?

 

[Ramseth]

Credit where credit is due, either the ancient Arabs or the Indians invented the number 0 in maths, not the ancient Chinese or Europeans, who used fractions for part of integers. We'd notice ancient Chinese and European maths and measures were mostly based on 12, not 10, because 12 was more easily divisable before the invention of 0 and decimalisation. The invention of 0 is monumental in maths because it led to decimalisation and precision infinitum. Both Arabs and Indians laid claim to this invention, it's still quite contentious as to who had it first.

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

Credit where credit is due, either the ancient Arabs or the Indians invented the number 0 in maths, not the ancient Chinese or Europeans, who used fractions for part of integers. We'd notice ancient Chinese and European maths and measures were mostly based on 12, not 10, because 12 was more easily divisable before the invention of 0 and decimalisation. The invention of 0 is monumental in maths because it led to decimalisation and precision infinitum. Both Arabs and Indians laid claim to this invention, it's still quite contentious as to who had it first.

eh we're talking about modern times now lah.


Ppl claim that ang mohs invented everything in the present but not the chinese. How about the other races? Also nothing.