- Joined
- Jun 11, 2009
- Messages
- 409
- Points
- 0
Why budget hotels must be reined in
Letter from Lionel De Souza
05:55 AM May 03, 2010
I WAS flabbergasted after reading Mr Tang Li's letter "Hourly rates not only for vice" (April 30).
Mr Tang's point was that if one understands the dynamics of Singapore, one would realise that hourly rates at budget hotels do provide a necessary social service.
My understanding of necessary social service refers to organised efforts to advance human welfare; such as public assistance provided by a government for its disadvantaged citizens.
I regret that I must split hairs with Mr Tang on the contents of his letter, in that, Singapore has one of the best public transport systems in the world.
I cannot agree that people working the late shift, and those whose line of work entails them to drink heavily, need to check into budget hotels instead of going home. It is cheaper for anyone to take a taxi home to any part of Singapore, than pay the room charges at a budget hotel.
As for unmarried couples finding solace in the confines of a budget hotel room, that is their personal choice.
However, when budgets hotels start sprouting up in residential areas, the Government must take steps to close them down - to prevent moral corruption of the young by suppressing prostitution and other nefarious activities taking place on the door steps of residents whose properties happen to be within close proximity of budget hotels.
Other than being used for trysts and immoral purposes, rooms at budget hotels are also used by gambling syndicates to operate illegal "casinos", drug addicts to abuse drugs, fugitives of the law who dare not return home for fear of being arrested, etc.
I trust that my brief discourse will give an insight on why it is imperative for the relevant authorities to come down hard on budget hotels, as they have a tendency to be a thorn in the flesh to law-abiding people.
=============================================
Prevention is better than cure
Letter from Ronald Koh
05:55 AM May 06, 2010
I REFER to "Why budget hotels must be reined in" (May 3) from Mr Lionel De Souza, who said that "if budget hotels started sprouting up in residential areas, the Government must take measures to close them down ... ".
My question to him, then, is: Was it not the Government who approved those "budget hotels in residential areas" in the first place?
To this end, I would like to enlighten him and everyone, too, that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure".
Letter from Lionel De Souza
05:55 AM May 03, 2010
I WAS flabbergasted after reading Mr Tang Li's letter "Hourly rates not only for vice" (April 30).
Mr Tang's point was that if one understands the dynamics of Singapore, one would realise that hourly rates at budget hotels do provide a necessary social service.
My understanding of necessary social service refers to organised efforts to advance human welfare; such as public assistance provided by a government for its disadvantaged citizens.
I regret that I must split hairs with Mr Tang on the contents of his letter, in that, Singapore has one of the best public transport systems in the world.
I cannot agree that people working the late shift, and those whose line of work entails them to drink heavily, need to check into budget hotels instead of going home. It is cheaper for anyone to take a taxi home to any part of Singapore, than pay the room charges at a budget hotel.
As for unmarried couples finding solace in the confines of a budget hotel room, that is their personal choice.
However, when budgets hotels start sprouting up in residential areas, the Government must take steps to close them down - to prevent moral corruption of the young by suppressing prostitution and other nefarious activities taking place on the door steps of residents whose properties happen to be within close proximity of budget hotels.
Other than being used for trysts and immoral purposes, rooms at budget hotels are also used by gambling syndicates to operate illegal "casinos", drug addicts to abuse drugs, fugitives of the law who dare not return home for fear of being arrested, etc.
I trust that my brief discourse will give an insight on why it is imperative for the relevant authorities to come down hard on budget hotels, as they have a tendency to be a thorn in the flesh to law-abiding people.
=============================================
Prevention is better than cure
Letter from Ronald Koh
05:55 AM May 06, 2010
I REFER to "Why budget hotels must be reined in" (May 3) from Mr Lionel De Souza, who said that "if budget hotels started sprouting up in residential areas, the Government must take measures to close them down ... ".
My question to him, then, is: Was it not the Government who approved those "budget hotels in residential areas" in the first place?
To this end, I would like to enlighten him and everyone, too, that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure".