Savage rogue IRGC missiles STILL firing. Iranian Power Stations MUST be destroyed IMMEDIATELY, to bring peace and prosperity back to Humankind.

[Willamshakespear]

1. Although there are productive talks between USA and elements of powerless Iranian leadership, the rogue IRGC units cares NOTHING about such talks and continue their Order 66 - the evil Khamenei's last will - to destroy Humankind.


2. Many of the savage regime's missile stockpile is hidden underground. Despite USA Cencom's findings that 90% of the regime's missile bunkers had been destroyed, still 10% of missiles bunkers remain, meaning that there are still some hidden missile bunkers unfound and thus the continued used of missiles upon neighbors and shipping routes to hold Humankind HOSTAGE to the terrorists IRGC wet dreams.


3. As those missiles stocks are hidden DEEP underground, it would mean that they would NEED ELEVATORS/LIFTS to bring it up to the surface or just a few feet underground, in order for it to be TRANSPORTED to missile sites in the vast deserted lands of Iran, It equally means that such elevators/lifts would need ELECTRICAL POWER to bring up those missiles......


4. DENY the electrical support means to such missile bunkers and underground factories would mean NO MORE missiles or drones can be used or produced. When no more missiles can be used, the rogue IRGC elements will no more leverage upon Humankind, and would have to sue for peace, surrender or face annihilation from the long suffering Persians, USA troops and Humankind.


5. As the power stations support also civilian activities, but in the face of the dangers faced by the terrorists IRGC elements, destroying the power stations would mean a far quicker end to the war, a temporary measure as those destroyed power stations can be REBUILT again over time, time that the terrorists will NOT have.

Most of the civilian population had already moved to border towns. Supplies of small mobile fuel power generators can still be bought from there for their daily needs, so as to leave none behind.


6. PrezTrump had Kindly given those rogue IRGC units 10 days to consider carefully the terms of the deal, in good faith, to save all lives. In response, the terrorists IRGC had bombed a US military base in Saudi Arabia, causing casualties to American troops, as well as destruction of civilian infrastructure in neighboring Sunni nations with missiles.

Thus, it is BEST to destroy EVERY SINGLE POWER PLANT in IRAN NOW, before more harm is done to Humankind.....

 

[syed putra]

Go Iran, Go!

 

[syed putra]

US has nobody else to assassinate as iran refuse to negotiate.

 

[404]

There have been three deliberate attacks on the Bushehr nuclear power plant by Israel, and it cannot simply be attributed to luck that the nuclear site remains undamaged. Iranian officials and state media have explicitly described their missile strikes on Israel as direct "tit-for-tat" retaliation for attacks on their own nuclear and industrial infrastructure. As usual, Trump stated that the U.S. would not target the nuclear site or oil refinery, offering Iran an opportunity to reconsider. However, the attack was still carried out.

 

[syed putra]

There have been three deliberate attacks on the Bushehr nuclear power plant by Israel, and it cannot simply be attributed to luck that the nuclear site remains undamaged. Iranian officials and state media have explicitly described their missile strikes on Israel as direct "tit-for-tat" retaliation for attacks on their own nuclear and industrial infrastructure. As usual, Trump stated that the U.S. would not target the nuclear site or oil refinery, offering Iran an opportunity to reconsider. However, the attack was still carried out.

Its israel that calls the shots. Not trump. Hope iran has enough missiles to flatten israeli. Infrastructure and offices of palantir, Microsoft, intel, nvidia, google.

 

[Willamshakespear]

Sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction..... none, no one, believed that a plane would smash into the Twin Towers of New York,,,,,

Who is who in this video portrayed by actors, is up to oneself to determine......
.

 

[zhihau]

Its israel that calls the shots. Not trump. Hope iran has enough missiles to flatten israeli. Infrastructure and offices of palantir, Microsoft, intel, nvidia, google.

For a moment I thought Iranian already knew the sites of Israeli nuclear facilities. What are they waiting for?

 

[mojito]

U want world peace? Ask AI may be answer is human extinction.

 

[syed putra]

This guy will explain it to daft shakey.

 

[face the facts]

he missed out 'child fucker is called president'

 

[404]

For a moment I thought Iranian already knew the sites of Israeli nuclear facilities. What are they waiting for?

Iran will return fire on the same type of target when their assets are attacked. In the latest attack on Iranian steel factories after their nuclear power plant, officials vowed a swift and proportional response over potential retaliatory strikes targeting industrial or strategic facilities linked not only to the aggressors but with the Gulf nations included as well.

 

[syed putra]

Iran will return fire on the same type of target when their assets are attacked. In the latest attack on Iranian steel factories after their nuclear power plant, officials vowed a swift and proportional response over potential retaliatory strikes targeting industrial or strategic facilities linked not only to the aggressors but with the Gulf nations included as well.

I think they follow "a eye for a eye".
(lex talionis) is an ancient principle of reciprocal justice, meaning punishment should fit the crime by inflicting equal harm on the offender, such as a tooth for a tooth. While often used to justify vengeance, it originally served as a restriction to limit retaliation to the value of the loss.

 

[superpower]

---

Andrew Sterling Ansley​

Next time someone says that Iran is dangerous and they need to be stopped…here’s some history to share.

1901: A British businessman secures exclusive rights to Iran’s oil. Iran gets almost nothing from its own resource.

1908: Oil is struck. Anglo-Iranian Oil Company is formed. It later becomes BP. The British Royal Navy converts from coal to oil, making Iranian petroleum a strategic military asset for the British Empire.

For the next 50 years, Iran’s oil is extracted by a foreign corporation. Iran receives a fraction of the profits. Saudi Arabia negotiates a 50-50 profit split with ARAMCO. Iran asks for the same terms. Britain refuses.

1951: Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, nationalizes Iran’s oil through a unanimous vote in parliament. Completely legal. Completely constitutional. His argument was simple: this is our oil.

Britain responds with an international blockade. No negotiation. No compromise. They want their oil back.

1953: The CIA (Operation Ajax) and MI6 (Operation Boot) overthrow Mossadegh. They bribe politicians, clerics, journalists, and military officers. They fund fake protests. They run disinformation campaigns through newspapers they secretly own. MI6 operatives kidnap and murder Iran’s chief of police and dump his body in public as a warning.
They reinstall the Shah — a monarch who serves Western oil interests. The CIA officially acknowledged its role in 2013.
After the coup, BP retains a 40% stake. American oil companies including Exxon and Mobil get significant shares. Iran’s democratic government is gone. Its oil is back under foreign control.

1953-1979: The Shah rules for 26 years as a Western-backed authoritarian. His secret police, SAVAK, is trained by the CIA and Mossad. SAVAK tortures and kills political dissidents systematically. Iran becomes one of the largest purchasers of American weapons. The Shah lives in extraordinary luxury while much of the population remains poor.
During this entire period, Israel and Iran are close allies. SAVAK and Mossad share intelligence. Israel sells weapons to Iran. Nobody in the West calls Iran a “terrorist state” because the dictator is their dictator.

1979: The Iranian people overthrow the Shah in a popular revolution. This is where your list begins — as if the revolution appeared out of nowhere, motivated by nothing but religious fanaticism.

Now let’s talk about the US embassy that was attacked.

The US news likes to paint the 1979 hostage crisis as an unprovoked attack on America. The revolutionaries seized the embassy because the last time there was a democratic movement in Iran, the CIA ran the coup to crush it from that same embassy. They weren’t being paranoid. They were being historically accurate.

Britannica’s own assessment: “It is generally agreed today that the 1953 coup sowed the seeds for the Islamic Revolution of 1979.”

That’s not a conspiracy theory. That’s the encyclopedia.

Now let’s ask a couple more questions.

Why are there U.S. military bases in Iraq? Because the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 on claims of weapons of mass destruction that turned out to be false. Over a million Iraqi civilians died. No American official was ever prosecuted.

Why is there conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon? Because Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 and occupied southern Lebanon for 18 years.

Why are Houthi rebels attacking ships? Because a U.S.-backed Saudi coalition bombed Yemen for years, creating what the UN called the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. Over 150,000 dead. Famine. Cholera outbreaks.

Why does Iran pursue nuclear capability? Possibly because Israel has an undeclared nuclear arsenal estimated at 80-400 warheads, has never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, faces zero international inspections, and has never been sanctioned for it. Iran signed the NPT. Iran agreed to inspections. Iran signed the nuclear deal in 2015. The U.S. pulled out of that deal in 2018.

Every single item on your list is framed as Iranian aggression against “the West.” But none of them exist without the West’s 70-year campaign of overthrowing Iran’s democracy, installing a dictator, extracting its oil, arming its neighbors, invading the countries on its borders, and maintaining military bases throughout the region.
Now trace who benefits.

The 1953 coup was about oil. BP and American oil companies got the oil.

The Shah’s 26-year reign was about strategic positioning. The U.S. and Israel got a compliant ally on the Soviet border and in the Middle East.

The post-1979 framing of Iran as a “terrorist state” serves a specific function: it justifies permanent U.S. military presence in the Middle East, billions in annual arms sales to Saudi Arabia and Gulf states, and unconditional U.S. support for Israel’s regional dominance.

Every “Iranian attack” on your list occurred in a country where the U.S. had no legal right to be in the first place — Iraq, Syria, Jordan. American troops are stationed across the Middle East not because those countries asked for protection from Iran, but because the U.S. positioned itself there to control the region’s resources and protect its strategic architecture.

When someone punches you for 70 years — overthrows your government, installs a dictator, trains his secret police to torture your people, extracts your oil, invades the countries on your borders, surrounds you with military bases, and sanctions your economy into the ground — and then you punch back, the question isn’t “why are you violent?”

The question is: who threw the first punch? And who’s been profiting from the fight ever since?

That’s not a defense of the Iranian regime. The theocracy that replaced the Shah has its own record of brutality against its own people, especially women. But that regime exists because the CIA destroyed Iran’s democracy in 1953. The West created the conditions for the very thing it now claims to oppose.

The history continues.

HAMAS (October 7, 2023)
“Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel’s creation,” said Avner Cohen, a former Israeli religious affairs official who worked in Gaza for more than two decades, to the Wall Street Journal in 2009.

Brigadier General Yitzhak Segev, who served as Israeli military governor in Gaza in the early 1980s, told the New York Times that he had helped finance the Palestinian Islamist movement as a “counterweight” to the PLO. “The Israeli government gave me a budget,” the retired brigadier general confessed, “and the military government gives to the mosques."

Initially, Hamas was discreetly supported by Israel, as a counter-balance to the secular Palestine Liberation Organization to prevent the creation of an independent Palestinian state.

And it didn’t stop in the 1980s. According to the New York Times, Israeli intelligence agents traveled into Gaza with a Qatari official carrying suitcases filled with cash to disperse money.

In 2015, Bezalel Smotrich, currently the finance minister in Netanyahu’s government, summed up the strategy: “The Palestinian Authority is a burden. Hamas is an asset.”

Netanyahu told journalist Dan Margalit that it was important to keep Hamas strong, as a counterweight to the Palestinian Authority. Having two strong rivals, including Hamas, would lessen pressure on him to negotiate toward a Palestinian state.

Netanyahu penned a letter to Qatar in 2018 asking the Qatari leadership to continue funding Hamas.

HEZBOLLAH (1983 Beirut bombings, kidnappings):

Hezbollah was formed in 1982 — the same year Israel invaded Lebanon. It didn’t exist before the invasion. Israel invaded Lebanon to destroy the PLO headquarters there. The invasion killed approximately 20,000 people, mostly civilians. Hezbollah was born as a direct resistance movement to that invasion.

The 1983 Marine barracks bombing on the commenter’s list killed 241 Americans. But why were U.S. Marines in Lebanon? Because the U.S. had intervened in the Lebanese Civil War, positioning itself as a participant in the conflict rather than a neutral peacekeeper. The Marines were shelling Druze and Shia positions from naval vessels before the bombing.

IRAN’S PROXY NETWORK (Houthis, Kataib Hezbollah, militias in Iraq and Syria):

Every proxy on that list operates in a country where the U.S. or its allies intervened first.

Iraq — the U.S. invaded in 2003 on false WMD claims. Iranian-backed militias formed to resist the occupation.

Syria — the CIA ran Operation Timber Sycamore, spending billions arming Syrian rebels, many of whom were jihadists. Iran backed Assad. Both sides were proxies in someone else’s war.

Yemen — the Houthis fight against a Saudi-led coalition that the U.S. armed and supported. The Saudi bombing campaign created what the UN called the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.
—-
The United States propaganda machine goes hard. The enemy is not a republican or a democrat.

For all of history people knew their governments were evil. Don’t forget that it’s true today. The enemy is not the one vilified by billionaire owned media dynasties.

 

[Leongsam]

Supporting Israel in the current Middle East conflicts is justified on multiple grounds, including its status as the region's only genuine liberal democracy. That said, the justification goes far deeper than a simple label—it's rooted in self-defense against existential threats, values alignment, and pragmatic realities of the region. Let's break it down clearly.

Israel as the Only Democracy in the Middle East​

This isn't empty rhetoric or propaganda. Independent assessments consistently rank Israel as the standout:

• Freedom House classifies Israel as "Free" (score around 73/100 in recent reports), with a competitive multiparty parliamentary system, independent judiciary (despite ongoing debates over reforms), free press, and robust civil liberties for its citizens. Arab Israelis (about 21% of the population) vote, serve in the Knesset, hold judicial positions, and enjoy higher living standards, life expectancy, and freedoms than in most neighboring states.
• Economist Intelligence Unit Democracy Index (latest available data into 2025) rates Israel as the region's only "flawed democracy" (score ~7.8/10). No other Middle Eastern/North African country qualifies as even "flawed"—most are "hybrid regimes" or "authoritarian" (e.g., Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria). Tunisia had a brief post-Arab Spring experiment but has regressed sharply under authoritarian measures. Lebanon is dysfunctional due to sectarian power-sharing and Hezbollah's dominance. Morocco and a few others score slightly better on some metrics but remain limited monarchies or hybrid systems without full liberal protections.
• Regular, competitive elections occur in Israel; governments change peacefully; courts check executive power; LGBTQ rights, women's rights, and free speech are protected at levels unmatched regionally. Critics (including some Israeli protesters) actively challenge policies without facing imprisonment or exile—something rare elsewhere.

Critics argue Israel isn't a "full" democracy because of the West Bank/Gaza situation (occupation since 1967, no voting rights for Palestinians there, settlement expansion). This is a fair point for debate on the occupation's long-term sustainability and democratic character of control over non-citizens. However, it doesn't erase Israel's internal democracy: every democracy has administered territories or made hard security choices (e.g., U.S. in post-WWII Germany/Japan, or allied occupations). The core issue is that Israel grants full citizenship and rights to Arabs inside its pre-1967 lines while facing rejectionist neighbors who never accepted its existence.


No other state in the region matches this. Authoritarian regimes dominate, often with rigged elections, suppressed dissent, corruption, and theocratic or military control.

Justification for Supporting Israel in the Wars​

Your support isn't just about "democracy" as a slogan—it's defensible on security, moral, and strategic grounds, especially post-October 7, 2023, and amid ongoing threats as of March 2026:

• Self-defense against genocidal intent: Hamas (Gaza), Hezbollah (Lebanon), Houthis (Yemen), and the Iranian regime explicitly call for Israel's destruction ("from the river to the sea" or "death to Israel"). October 7 involved mass murder, rape, and hostage-taking. Iran-backed proxies continue attacks (missiles, drones) even during shaky ceasefires. Israel faces existential risks that no other democracy does. Supporting its right to dismantle these threats (while minimizing civilian harm where possible) aligns with basic just war principles: proportionality in response to aggression, not pacifism in the face of eliminationism.
• Values and shared interests: Democracies tend to be better allies—more transparent, accountable, and aligned on human rights, innovation, and stability. Israel shares intelligence, tech (Iron Dome, cybersecurity), and counters Iran/terrorism, benefiting the West and the region (see Abraham Accords normalizing ties with UAE, Bahrain, etc.). Authoritarian neighbors often export instability, jihadism, or repression.
• Regional context: The Middle East has repeatedly shown that removing dictators (Iraq, Libya, Arab Spring attempts) doesn't automatically produce democracy—it often yields chaos, Islamists, or new strongmen. Palestinians under Hamas (Gaza) or the Palestinian Authority (West Bank) have seen corruption, no elections for years (in Gaza), incitement, and rejection of peace offers. Blaming Israel exclusively ignores Palestinian agency, rejectionism (e.g., multiple "no" to two-state deals), and use of aid for tunnels/weapons over civilian welfare.

Supporting Israel doesn't require endorsing every policy (e.g., settlement growth or specific military tactics draw legitimate criticism, including from Israelis). Democracies self-correct via elections and debate—Israel has vigorous internal opposition and has made territorial concessions historically (Sinai, Gaza withdrawal in 2005, which led to Hamas rule, not peace).

Counterpoints and Nuance​

• Not unconditional: Criticism of specific Israeli governments (e.g., Netanyahu's coalitions) or occupation policies is valid and happens inside Israel. Long-term peace likely requires a political horizon for Palestinians, but only if it includes demilitarization, recognition of Israel as Jewish state, and end to terror.
• Democracy isn't morality license: Being a democracy doesn't justify every action, but it does make Israel more restrained and accountable than the alternatives (Hamas embeds in civilians, uses human shields; Iran executes dissidents).
• "Only democracy" debates: Some left-leaning sources call Israel "apartheid" or undemocratic by including territories under military administration. This conflates citizenship rights with belligerent occupation in a defensive war. Comparative: No one calls the U.S. undemocratic for Guantanamo or past occupations.

Israel stands as a liberal democracy surrounded by autocracies and jihadist groups sworn to its annihilation. Support can mean backing its right to exist and defend itself, advocating for proportionate responses, and pushing for eventual negotiated peace when partners emerge who accept reality. The alternative—equating or abandoning it—often rewards the side that rejects coexistence.


The situation is tragic for civilians on all sides, but root causes include rejection of Jewish self-determination in the ancestral homeland and Iran's regional imperialism. If you have specific aspects of the conflict (e.g., Gaza operations, two-state viability, or U.S. aid), feel free to dive deeper.

 

[404]

The Iranian retaliatory DFFENSIVE strike on Dimona and its surrounding cities, including Arad, caused widespread chaos and panic. The devastation has left Israel deeply shaken, with many citizens now too terrified to trust the government's reassurances. The IDF is reportedly on the brink of collapse, as its reservists have been deployed across multiple fronts, including Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank, and possibly Iran.

 

[syed putra]

Supporting Israel in the current Middle East conflicts is justified on multiple grounds, including its status as the region's only genuine liberal democracy. That said, the justification goes far deeper than a simple label—it's rooted in self-defense against existential threats, values alignment, and pragmatic realities of the region. Let's break it down clearly.

Israel as the Only Democracy in the Middle East​

This isn't empty rhetoric or propaganda. Independent assessments consistently rank Israel as the standout:

• Freedom House classifies Israel as "Free" (score around 73/100 in recent reports), with a competitive multiparty parliamentary system, independent judiciary (despite ongoing debates over reforms), free press, and robust civil liberties for its citizens. Arab Israelis (about 21% of the population) vote, serve in the Knesset, hold judicial positions, and enjoy higher living standards, life expectancy, and freedoms than in most neighboring states.
• Economist Intelligence Unit Democracy Index (latest available data into 2025) rates Israel as the region's only "flawed democracy" (score ~7.8/10). No other Middle Eastern/North African country qualifies as even "flawed"—most are "hybrid regimes" or "authoritarian" (e.g., Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria). Tunisia had a brief post-Arab Spring experiment but has regressed sharply under authoritarian measures. Lebanon is dysfunctional due to sectarian power-sharing and Hezbollah's dominance. Morocco and a few others score slightly better on some metrics but remain limited monarchies or hybrid systems without full liberal protections.
• Regular, competitive elections occur in Israel; governments change peacefully; courts check executive power; LGBTQ rights, women's rights, and free speech are protected at levels unmatched regionally. Critics (including some Israeli protesters) actively challenge policies without facing imprisonment or exile—something rare elsewhere.

Critics argue Israel isn't a "full" democracy because of the West Bank/Gaza situation (occupation since 1967, no voting rights for Palestinians there, settlement expansion). This is a fair point for debate on the occupation's long-term sustainability and democratic character of control over non-citizens. However, it doesn't erase Israel's internal democracy: every democracy has administered territories or made hard security choices (e.g., U.S. in post-WWII Germany/Japan, or allied occupations). The core issue is that Israel grants full citizenship and rights to Arabs inside its pre-1967 lines while facing rejectionist neighbors who never accepted its existence.


No other state in the region matches this. Authoritarian regimes dominate, often with rigged elections, suppressed dissent, corruption, and theocratic or military control.

Justification for Supporting Israel in the Wars​

Your support isn't just about "democracy" as a slogan—it's defensible on security, moral, and strategic grounds, especially post-October 7, 2023, and amid ongoing threats as of March 2026:

• Self-defense against genocidal intent: Hamas (Gaza), Hezbollah (Lebanon), Houthis (Yemen), and the Iranian regime explicitly call for Israel's destruction ("from the river to the sea" or "death to Israel"). October 7 involved mass murder, rape, and hostage-taking. Iran-backed proxies continue attacks (missiles, drones) even during shaky ceasefires. Israel faces existential risks that no other democracy does. Supporting its right to dismantle these threats (while minimizing civilian harm where possible) aligns with basic just war principles: proportionality in response to aggression, not pacifism in the face of eliminationism.
• Values and shared interests: Democracies tend to be better allies—more transparent, accountable, and aligned on human rights, innovation, and stability. Israel shares intelligence, tech (Iron Dome, cybersecurity), and counters Iran/terrorism, benefiting the West and the region (see Abraham Accords normalizing ties with UAE, Bahrain, etc.). Authoritarian neighbors often export instability, jihadism, or repression.
• Regional context: The Middle East has repeatedly shown that removing dictators (Iraq, Libya, Arab Spring attempts) doesn't automatically produce democracy—it often yields chaos, Islamists, or new strongmen. Palestinians under Hamas (Gaza) or the Palestinian Authority (West Bank) have seen corruption, no elections for years (in Gaza), incitement, and rejection of peace offers. Blaming Israel exclusively ignores Palestinian agency, rejectionism (e.g., multiple "no" to two-state deals), and use of aid for tunnels/weapons over civilian welfare.

Supporting Israel doesn't require endorsing every policy (e.g., settlement growth or specific military tactics draw legitimate criticism, including from Israelis). Democracies self-correct via elections and debate—Israel has vigorous internal opposition and has made territorial concessions historically (Sinai, Gaza withdrawal in 2005, which led to Hamas rule, not peace).

Counterpoints and Nuance​

• Not unconditional: Criticism of specific Israeli governments (e.g., Netanyahu's coalitions) or occupation policies is valid and happens inside Israel. Long-term peace likely requires a political horizon for Palestinians, but only if it includes demilitarization, recognition of Israel as Jewish state, and end to terror.
• Democracy isn't morality license: Being a democracy doesn't justify every action, but it does make Israel more restrained and accountable than the alternatives (Hamas embeds in civilians, uses human shields; Iran executes dissidents).
• "Only democracy" debates: Some left-leaning sources call Israel "apartheid" or undemocratic by including territories under military administration. This conflates citizenship rights with belligerent occupation in a defensive war. Comparative: No one calls the U.S. undemocratic for Guantanamo or past occupations.

Israel stands as a liberal democracy surrounded by autocracies and jihadist groups sworn to its annihilation. Support can mean backing its right to exist and defend itself, advocating for proportionate responses, and pushing for eventual negotiated peace when partners emerge who accept reality. The alternative—equating or abandoning it—often rewards the side that rejects coexistence.


The situation is tragic for civilians on all sides, but root causes include rejection of Jewish self-determination in the ancestral homeland and Iran's regional imperialism. If you have specific aspects of the conflict (e.g., Gaza operations, two-state viability, or U.S. aid), feel free to dive deeper.

What hogwash.palestinian under israeli rule does not get to vote.that includes those in gaza and west bank. Either you give them those votes or give them freedom.

 

[zhihau]

Who overthrew the democratically elected PM Mohammad Mosaddegh and installed the Shah?

 

[Willamshakespear]

Who overthrew the democratically elected PM Mohammad Mosaddegh and installed the Shah?

Never look upon the past with current day lenses....as in the past, leaders and civilizations had to deal with pressing issues, with their presumed solutions for survival that are often not the same as today.

NO mortal can change the past, but We Humankind, DO have the COURAGEOUS POWER, using our 5 senses of REALITY, libtardly unblinkered, to change today and tomorrow for the BETTER, so that ALL may survive as it is still an unwritten page in the long history of Humankind....

 

[zhihau]

Never look upon the past with current day lenses....as in the past, leaders and civilizations had to deal with pressing issues, with their presumed solutions for survival that are often not the same as today.

NO mortal can change the past, but We Humankind, DO have the COURAGEOUS POWER, using our 5 senses of REALITY, libtardly unblinkered, to change today and tomorrow for the BETTER, so that ALL may survive as it is still an unwritten page in the long history of Humankind....

History is written by victors and the narratives can always be skewed. I choose to read through all lenses to discern for myself