Then you going in for sure liao, if you trust a 'N' level loser
Section 157(d) of the Evidence Act (and associated rules) bars defence counsel from asking a complainant about their sexual history or appearance without prior court permission. As you can see, it's not an absolute bar, and it only bars the defence counsel, not the accused who is defending himself.
The circumstances leading to the crime were highly unusual. In a nutshell, the victim was the initiator at every stage. To begin with, she initiated the meet-up.
She then had two clear opportunities to return home. First, after dinner, the pair left the flat, but instead of going home, she accompanied the man to buy more soju and returned to the flat, suggesting that she was comfortable with the companionship. Later, after they finished a second round of soju, she declined the opportunity to hail a PHV. She then went on to offer to sleep in the flat—in the same unit, the same room, and on the same mattress.
It is not only the victim who deserves justice; the accused, facing rules of evidence that may operate to his disadvantage, is also entitled to justice.