How USA will be finished by Russians 911 is small fry

[Loong_Bush]

 

[Ramseth]

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?t=55134

They couldn't even fly across Britain without getting detected and interceptor. How to reach or finish off USA?

 

[PEE_APE_PEE]

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?t=55134

They couldn't even fly across Britain without getting detected and interceptor. How to reach or finish off USA?

Interception will NEVER be 100%, 911 happened.

 

[Yoshitei]

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?t=55134

They couldn't even fly across Britain without getting detected and interceptor. How to reach or finish off USA?

They cold fly over the North pole.

Besides, Russian bombers have been flying into British airspace since the cold war. Nothing new.

 

[minibond]

Cruise missiles can be launched from thousands of miles away, very far from USA.

Even if they could detect bombers & to engage them, bombers can release cruise missiles (up to 8) before they are in trouble themselves. Cruise missiles are low flying and small targets, hard to track and defend against, they will fly by themselves into your heartland ranged thousands of miles from where they are launched. So even if you shot down bombers, you are still dead.

The function of bombers are just mobile launching platform in the air. They are not in the fixed place for you to surveillance & destroy. Once their payload missiles are launched, their missions are completed weather they can return safely to base or not it is not important.

In a nuclear war everyone have to be prepared to die and have no home to return to nor a grave to bury ourselves. The goal is to see that enemies are destroyed similarly.

 

[Rule of MOB]

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?t=55134

They couldn't even fly across Britain without getting detected and interceptor. How to reach or finish off USA?

If a mission of nuclear attack bombers will be heavily guarded by escort sorties, including electronic defense and fighters escorts. They will be able to survive even if detected. In the 1st place their electronic jammers can disable US radars, and blind the Pentagon.

When not on nuclear attack missions, they were just playing war games with the enemies, part of the game is to mislead the enemies and give them wrong impressions about their tactics and induce false strategies and false confidence within the enemies. When war comes, they will do only entirely different ways. These are all tricky games.

 

[Cestbon]

Nowday no need aircraft to deliver nuke bomb. The nuke rocket can travel half distance of the earth. After taking off and reach space nothing can stop it with current weapon.

 

[Ramseth]

Nowday no need aircraft to deliver nuke bomb. The nuke rocket can travel half distance of the earth. After taking off and reach space nothing can stop it with current weapon.

Exactly. Airborne nukes are outdated. Landbased missile silos are still in use in the east-west Europe context as it's a contiguous land mass of more than ten thousand miles from the English Channel (western end of France) to the Bering Straits (eastern end of Russia). Why send the nuke by air mail it can be sent by e-mail? For the rest of the world, US, Russia, UK and France can nuke anywhere they like with ballistic missile launched from submarines, and nobody knows where these submarines are lurking with 70% of the earth being ocean.

 

[cocobobo]

goodbye earthlings

 

[Ramseth]

Exactly, these test and run games have been going on on both sides for decades since the cold war. Both aerial and naval. But don't be too sure of Russian superiority (except numerically). The British have overcome forces larger and even technically superior. Russia (and China) have no such record. They survived (just survive, not even really win) on numerical superiority and vast land mass.

if they really want to start a war, they would probably be accompanied by state of the art 5th gen fighters...

do you know their bombers can shoot down those British slow tornadoes using BVR missiles? Each bombers got enough missiles to shoot down one squadron of fighter bombers.

<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/22fN4fVoFdY&hl=en_US&fs=1& width=480 height=385 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></EMBED>

 

[Loong_Bush]

Exactly. Airborne nukes are outdated. Landbased missile silos are still in use in the east-west Europe context as it's a contiguous land mass of more than ten thousand miles from the English Channel (western end of France) to the Bering Straits (eastern end of Russia). Why send the nuke by air mail it can be sent by e-mail? For the rest of the world, US, Russia, UK and France can nuke anywhere they like with ballistic missile launched from submarines, and nobody knows where these submarines are lurking with 70% of the earth being ocean.

During some stage of the war, the parties will start to search & destroy each other's nuclear arms. Therefore mobile launchers have better chance to survive and conceal in these phases, to remain alive and capable of counterstrike.

Mobile launchers includes land vehicles and submarines and these bombers. Bombers are the only ones that flies, that means speed.

Part of the game is tracking enemies' nuclear arsons. The idea is if you can manage to track them all, then your upper hand is to be able to destroy them all, to eliminate their counterstrike chance. Bombers are hardest to track & destroy in this game because of it's speed, vs land vehicles and subs. When there is alert of incoming attacks to destroy your nuclear arsons, bombers can evade the best, subs and land mobile launchers are slow to escape.

There is a standard procedure during impending nuclear strike alert, the strategic bombers are to take off to the air within a short time. Leave their bases basically to remain alive for counterstrike. Bases can be all gone once enemies warhead landed on them.