[Straits Times] - Medical Doctor warns Singaporeans (like SBFuncle) from suka suka suing Doctors or they may regret it

UltimaOnline

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
25,812
Points
113


1752548984013.png

Suing doctors should never be a frivolous decision​

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/forum/forum-suing-doctors-should-never-be-a-frivolous-decision
 
If the sheeple learn true health, they can heal themselves. Suing the people who sells poison to you is redundant.

Understand true health: Birth, Age and Death
Don’t understand true health: Birth, Age, Sick and Death

Sick = the result of poisoning
 
To sue a doctor or hospital is extremely difficult.
Doctors side with Doctors.
U need very concrete evidence to fight your case. Which means another doctor expert opinion.
 
need some advice once moar people do autopsy with immunohistochemical staining for a certain spike protein then ish can start to SUE 9696 riao lololololo
 
He is right. Do not suka suka sue.
Justify it by cross checking with someone with good iq.
Make sure you have full proof, to protect yourself and also not to waste your effort.
Do not make accusations.
Just write down the sequence of events.
No assumptions can be included.

Then you are good to go.
 
He is right. Do not suka suka sue.
Justify it by cross checking with someone with good iq.
Make sure you have full proof, to protect yourself and also not to waste your effort.
Do not make accusations.
Just write down the sequence of events.
No assumptions can be included.

Then you are good to go.
When there are gaps Or doubts involved while you are collating evidences, you may want to terminate the process, if you are not mentally prepared to go bankrupt if the case is lost.

In this uncles case, is considered quite a complex case. I wouldn't want to 打没把卧的战

I would only leecommend suing a simple case. Eg the loctor failed to do this xxx action, and you clearly know is becos of laziness . Then there is no way you can lose a case. Becos at most is a draw match.
And the thing is, during the time when the loctor was lazy, he wouldn't think that you will sue them, that's why they behaved this way and brushed you aside, despite you pleading with them. And when you leeminded them you will leeport them, they will think that you only want to phua hung.

They need to be taught a lesson.
In short, you have to be of a 100% clear mind in placed before taking actions.
 
Last edited:
cannot sue lol..... infallible sibo? KNN with this kind of incentive, more innocent are going to die needlessly.....

71uXdcMmvNL._UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg


21944179.jpg
 
Hipster doctors always like to wear a bowtie. :biggrin:

I think this could be the reason
Doctors wear bow ties for a combination of reasons including practicality, hygiene, and a touch of style. Bow ties are less likely to come into contact with patients or get in the way during examinations, making them a more convenient and safer option than traditional neckties. Additionally, they can be a fun and approachable way for doctors to express their personality and connect with patients, particularly children.
 
I think this could be the reason
Doctors wear bow ties for a combination of reasons including practicality, hygiene, and a touch of style. Bow ties are less likely to come into contact with patients or get in the way during examinations, making them a more convenient and safer option than traditional neckties. Additionally, they can be a fun and approachable way for doctors to express their personality and connect with patients, particularly children.

If they want to be really fun, they should go all out.

81Q3xCH+AEL._UY1000_.jpg
 
AI will replace these doctor.
Most docs postulate that apart from offering them a 2nd opinion, AI must not have the final say concerning a patient’s treatment or medication. The human touch of clinicians, whom patients rely on for empathy, reassurance and counselling, is still as relevant today as when the practice of medicine became a profession.
 
Most docs postulate that apart from offering them a 2nd opinion, AI must not have the final say concerning a patient’s treatment or medication. The human touch of clinicians, whom patients rely on for empathy, reassurance and counselling, is still as relevant today as when the practice of medicine became a profession.

@sbfuncle

Research study concludes that AI not only beat doctors at diagnosing complex medical conditions in patients by themselves, but importantly. AI even beat doctors who used AI in reaching their diagnosis, why? Because when these doctors disagreed with the AI's diagnosis, they chose to trust themselves over the AI's diagnosis, and in almost all cases it turned out the AI was right and the doctors were wrong.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/health/chatgpt-ai-doctors-diagnosis.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-ai-diagnosed-accurate-doctors-medicine-study-2025-7#:~:text=45 PM PT-,Microsoft said its medical AI diagnosed cases four times as,about its place in medicine.

Note : the part about why AI even beat doctors who tried to use AI (ie. because they chose to trust themselves over the AI, perhaps out of ego) may not be fully covered in the articles above, but was included in a Straits Times article a month back, but I can't find it on the internet now. Anyone knows where please share the link in this thread, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top