My proposal is to pay them as much as they want until they are suffocated by the money and cry uncle for us to stop. This is a sure win method to prevent corruption.
Yesh. My suggestion is pay them at least $10 Million per annum til they call you Father. There are only about 20 ministers and plus the rest pegged to MR4 of $10 Million.
We will spend about maybe $300 Million a year. Youth Olympics already wasted $387Million, so this amount sup sup sui.
But we will expect them to do better, and think of solutions to remove irritant taxes such as COEs, ridiculous ARFs, land costs nonsense for HDBs, maid levies and find other innovative ways to increase revenue.
With $10 Million per year, there is absolutely no more excuse for them to underperform or be corrupt.
.
.
.
oh wait...
.
.
ChatGPT reply:
Q: Does increasing minister's salaries help to prevent corruption?
A: The relationship between increasing ministers' salaries and preventing corruption is a complex and debated topic. Different perspectives exist on this matter, and there is no definitive consensus. Here are some points to consider:
Competitive Salaries: Advocates argue that offering competitive salaries to government officials, including ministers, can attract and retain talented individuals. Higher salaries can help attract qualified candidates from both the public and private sectors, reducing the temptation for corruption driven by financial needs or incentives.
Reduced Financial Incentives for Corruption: By providing ministers with adequate salaries, it is argued that they are less likely to be motivated by financial gain through corrupt practices. Higher salaries can mitigate the temptation to engage in bribery or embezzlement.
Professionalism and Expertise: Offering higher salaries can promote professionalism and expertise within the government. Well-compensated ministers may feel valued and motivated to perform their duties with integrity and competence, reducing the risk of corruption.
Public Perception: If ministers' salaries are perceived to be too low compared to other sectors, there may be concerns about potential corruption or the influence of external interests. Increasing salaries can address public perception and promote transparency.
Contextual Factors: The effectiveness of increased salaries in preventing corruption depends on various factors such as the country's overall governance framework, rule of law, transparency and accountability mechanisms, and cultural context. It is important to consider these factors holistically rather than relying solely on salary adjustments.
However, there are counterarguments and challenges to the idea that increasing salaries alone can effectively prevent corruption:
Risk of Entitlement: Critics argue that excessively high salaries may create a sense of entitlement among ministers, leading to complacency, lack of accountability, or detachment from the needs of the population.
Ethical Considerations: Some believe that public service should be motivated by a sense of duty and commitment to the welfare of the nation rather than financial gain. Excessive focus on financial incentives may undermine the ethical principles and public trust in the government.
Comprehensive Anti-Corruption Measures: Addressing corruption requires a comprehensive approach that includes strong legal frameworks, independent oversight institutions, transparent governance structures, and effective enforcement of anti-corruption measures. Simply increasing salaries without addressing systemic issues may not be sufficient to prevent corruption.
It is important to note that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to preventing corruption. Countries implement a combination of strategies tailored to their specific contexts and challenges. Salary adjustments can be a part of a broader approach but should be accompanied by other measures to effectively combat corruption and promote good governance.
----------