• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Opium and China Military threads

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Bagration was a mirage within a shadow within smokescreen after smokescreen.
Confused the hell out of the best of the German Generals.

Manstein was already kicked out by Hitler that time.
Manstein so fucking nearly won the battle of Kursk.
He wanted to launch early pincer attacks on Kursk after the battle at Kharkov that he won with his backhand blow, before the russians could get in their multilayered defenses but Hitler hold him back.
Allowed the Ruskies to build in layers upon layers upon layers of defenses.
Even so, FieldMarshall Manstein nearly won and could have won Kursk.
But Hitler withdrew 3 crucial armoured divisions , Manstein reserves at the crucial moment.
As Manstein took no shit from Hitler, Hitler sacked him.

But even with FieldMarshall Manstein in charge, Bagration still would have gotten through.
Russians cunning bastards and must have studied SunTze by heart too.
operation bagration was named after a russian general of georgian origin during the napoleonic era. the general and later marshal who commanded soviet armies in ww2 at the belorussian front was zhukov. for his role in the soviet victory, he was chosen by stalin and his peers to personally accept the german instrument of surrender and inspect the victory parade in moscow in 1945. in times of history-changing conflict, some cuntries are blessed with the rise and emergence of extraordinary military leaders: u.s. have george marshall, george patton; soviets have georgy zhukov. if you wish your son to be a future sinkie general extraordinaire that will save the cuntry from tiong invasion, ah neh rapes, and jiuhukia firecrackers, please name him georgie. :wink:
 

oneMdeeBee

Alfrescian
Loyal
operation bagration was named after a russian general of georgian origin during the napoleonic era. the general and later marshal who commanded soviet armies in ww2 at the belorussian front was zhukov. for his role in the soviet victory, he was chosen by stalin and his peers to personally accept the german instrument of surrender and inspect the victory parade in moscow in 1945. in times of history-changing conflict, some cuntries are blessed with the rise and emergence of extraordinary military leaders: u.s. have george marshall, george patton; soviets have georgy zhukov. if you wish your son to be a future sinkie general extraordinaire that will save the cuntry from tiong invasion, ah neh rapes, and jiuhukia firecrackers, please name him georgie. :wink:

Zhukov was one of the besterest military commander

Zhukov changed the entire nature of the War by the fucking japs. Zhukov whacked the cheebye Japs Kwantung Army so hard and so fucking bad at Khalkhin Gol in 1938 that the Japs shit bricks at fighting with Russians.
And Japs turned their attention to SEA and Pacific and did their Tora Tora Tora.

How he whacked the Japs become the model of how he whacked the Germans.
Bagration was his stroke of genius.

 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Zhukov was one of the besterest military commander

Zhukov changed the entire nature of the War by the fucking japs. Zhukov whacked the cheebye Japs Kwantung Army so hard and so fucking bad at Khalkhin Gol in 1938 that the Japs shit bricks at fighting with Russians.
And Japs turned their attention to SEA and Pacific and did their Tora Tora Tora.

How he whacked the Japs become the model of how he whacked the Germans.
Bagration was his stroke of genius.
many do not know that he fucked the japs again in 1945 at the manchurian front, more than 6.9 days before japs surrendered. it was not 100% that japs surrendered because of atomic bombs in hiroshima and nagasaki. the total destruction of the jap kwantung army in manchuria by the soviets in less than 2 weeks contributed to the jap surrender.
 

oneMdeeBee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Has US won any war on it's own?and against an enemy it's own size?that pussy country can only bully countries at least 10 times weaker than herself minimum.us can claim to have defeated Japan,but technology and firepower wise,Japan barely ranked above Italy against the European powers and were terribly afraid of engaging the Russians in wwii and assist their germanian allies preferring to stay as far away as possible.

The USA has not won any wars since WW2 (unless we consider Panama and Nicaragua) .

USA got chased south of the parallel in Korea by China even with firepower 100 times that of China and got booted out of Vietnam even with firepower 100 times that of the Vietnamese.

USA certainly did not win in Afghanistan or in Iraq. They got kicked out of Somalia by a gang of people with AK47s and RPGs.

With firepower 100 times that of Vietcon, USA was kicked out of Vietnam.

main-qimg-39d26ee935f1bc320574ba5c2fb6d113.webp

Despite 100 times more fire power in Korea and Vietnam

USA still fighting in Afghan, and in time will be kicked out, despite having 1000 times firepower of the tribesmen.

10 years to kill Osama, a leader of a rags and bone gang?

You won in Iraq?

USA won the Gulf War?

Because you won Saddam?

What a fucking joke of the year!

Dont pick the part that you like.

Hitler might as well say he won the war when the Germans carried out a flanking manoeuvre through the Ardennes region, the Wehrmacht rapidly advanced to the Channel and cut off the Allied forces in Belgium, trapping the bulk of the Allied armies in a cauldron on the Franco-Belgian border near Lille.

Tojo could also declare he won the war at the successful conclusion of Tora Tora Tora, the attack on Pearl Harbour.

Your picking a particular point in time and declaring you won? Like Your President Bush declaring he won ? ROTTFFLMFAO!

USA only won the end of the beginning of Iraq war. And enable the spread of terror bombings and death by trucks and cars into Europe. And the war in Iraq continued under Sadr.

THIS IS THE CURRENT REALITY IN IRAQ!

main-qimg-7d04e2f63fe243c123b117f7eb23a7d9

main-qimg-9a5324cbe934fb2f77722231d29a79e2

Didn’t USA fought him and lost to him and got booted out of Iraq by him? Despite having 1,000 times the fire power over Sadr and his rag tag team!

Who is Moqtada al-Sadr, Iraq's new hardline leader with an anti-US military past?

They got kicked out of Somalia by a gang of people with AK47s and RPGs.

Be satisfied you won in Panama and Nicaragua!

Be peaceful and be respectful to China.

Or There will be a lot of USA deaths. More than you can imagine.

Will that be worth it?

When China’s firepower becomes greater than that of the US, can USA win?

People say China has no experience.

But does the US have experience in fighting forces with the same firepower, or greater?

If not, don’t talk to me about USA fighting experiences in wars that they never won!

China military technology now is much greater than USA and with more assets than USA can dream of.

Much of USA Navy and other assets used will be shot down and taken out of action when the missiles and AShMs start to fly in ernest!

USA AEWCs taken out of the sky with their flying tankers by VLRAAMs.

China's Mach 6 Monster Air-to-Air Missile Could Make the U.S. Air Force Come in for a ‘Crash Landing’

Bases in Guam and Japan taken out in salvos of DFs in the first 15 minutes of the war with runways all cratered preventing planes from taking off. And cruise missiles by the thousands to take out rest of air assets on the ground in the next hour.

First Strike: China's Missile Threat to U.S. Bases in Asia

This is the real reality.

USA carriers will be targeted by satellite and underwater hearing devices (supposed to help hear the sound of whales and fishes) and their location known every second by the time they cross the 3rd Island Chain.

And taken out by DF26Bs before they reach the 2nd Island Chain. Way before they even crossed the 1st Island Chain and into the South China Sea.

Partial extract from Murphy Last's answer to Is the "carrier killer" Dong-Feng DF-21D a real threat to US aircraft carriers?

But make no mistake. DF-21Ds did not just strike at targets in the desert.​
main-qimg-d0f459d8aa0163a68895138dee80662c.webp

DF-21D struck a ship of 10,000 tons moving in Pacific Ocean. That ship was much smaller than a 90,000 tons carrier. Not only would that shot be equivalent to a head shot. It was a hitting the Medulla Oblongata.
Try to read the details here
Murphy Last's answer to Did the DF-21D missile reach out and touch a moving ship on the water?
China is now using the DF-26B.​
And never mind if DF21 or DFF 26B, this is what will happen to your carrier.

Murphy Last's answer to What if an aircraft carrier such as USS Nimitz is hit by a single Chinese carrier killer missile, how long will the carrier take to sink completely?

Murphy Last's answer to Will China's new "Anti-Carrier" missile be able to make the U.S. Navy carrier fleet obsolete or ineffective?

Forget the carriers for time being

. As even before the carriers get there, JSTAR planes got to go there.

And this is what going to happen first.

This is the new reality of life.

Get use to it!

From no less than USA Pentagon

https://www.realcleardefense.com...

Air Force secretary: China, Russia could shoot down new JSTARS on day one of a war
By: Stephen Losey   2 days ago​
main-qimg-ff8c154e8b0707a17974aea15e4fe533

An E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System from the 93rd Air Control Wing flies a refueling mission over the skies of Georgia. (Tech. Sgt. John Lasky/Air Force)
Even a new version of the Air Force’s JSTARS battlefield management and control aircraft would be vulnerable to being shot out of the sky during the opening salvo of a conflict with Russia or China, Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson told lawmakers Thursday.​
Chinese satellites know every second where the USA carriers are located once they cross the 3rd Island Chain.

Fleet of supersize stealth surveillance UAVs , Divine Eagles (Sheng Ying China Flies Its Largest Ever Drone: The Divine Eagle)

main-qimg-a3c1620be5a0fe526d2529ae38863f30

main-qimg-0f1d8ce9d66c9753803c742a112ed169

and Soaring Dragons (Xianglong China’s supersized ‘Xianglong’ surveillance drone gets ready to soar )

main-qimg-77abf7e221a9df7764ccc0c6297a4024

and flying at 25 km altitude will track USA air assets and carriers in conjunction with the satellites. And relay targetting infomation to the DFs and AShMs.

The carriers can run, but cannot hide.

And why worry about the DFs? Not many of them. Perhaps 300++ of the DongFangs.

There are thousands of Mach 3s AShMs and thousands of steath sub Mach missiles that then sprint to Mach3 within 30km of the carriers.

An answer by Shanlung spelled it out very clearly that in addition to the DFs, there are thousands of AShMs which might be even more deadly and BVRAAMs to take out the AEWCs and Flying Tankers .

Shan Lung ( 山 龍)'s answer to Which is better, the Chinese Navy or the US Navy?

And if you think USA B1s and B2s will turn the tide,

Murphy Last's answer to What military technology does China have that the USA does not?

And if you thinking of nukes, go educate yourself with this
Murphy Last's answer to Can U.S. nuke China?


Those still alive a year later will wish they had gone cleanly and quickly when the many suns started to fall to the ground.

If China so willed it, USA cannot even cross the fucking 3rd Island Chain and not to talk of that fucking pipe dream of USA invading China.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is exactly what I need, so I don't have to patronise hookers so often.
thanks to prc technology 696 million males in china can wank off at the comfort of their home. this is why the other half of china (699 million females) want to work as prostitutes outside of china. zero domestic demand.
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
PLA Navy today simultaneously launched 2 warships of type 055 king ace destroyers into sea. Each are 10,000 tons displacement grade. At least 3 more are in the yards under construction. These are #3 & #4 of the type 055 destroyers.

The real significant thing is PLA are ultra confident with their type 055 and executed full scale production of 8 identical type 055, COMPLETELY WITHOUT TESTING ANY!

The #1 launched in in June 2017 is still under outfitting at the harbor, and had not even done maiden sail. Normally a new design must at least verify 1 first ship at sea for some time of trial use, before producing any subsequent of same model. PLA does not want to do that. It means, they are fully confident with their design and will expect the performance of all 8 within designed specifications. They had obviously simulated it thoroughly using supercomputers.

#2 of type 055 was launched in April 2018, also still at out-fitting stage in the harbor.








http://news.sina.com.cn/c/nd/2018-07-03/doc-ihevauxi7042731.shtml


两艘055驱逐舰下水 与052D罕见同框(图)




两艘055驱逐舰下水 与052D罕见同框(图)



0






原标题:高清照片:两艘055驱逐舰下水 与052D罕见同框
7月3日,在大连造船厂两艘055型驱逐舰同时下水。这在中国海军和世界海军都创下了一个历史:两艘海军主力舰同时下水。而这个荣誉属于中国、属于中船重工、属于中国海军、也属于全体中国人民。
EeT0-hevauxi7041988.jpg
在拖轮的帮助下离开船坞的055驱逐舰
055型驱逐舰是是中国船舶重工集团701研究所设计、江南造船厂与大连造船厂共同承建的、装备新型有源相控阵雷达的新型舰队防空驱逐舰。本级舰首舰已于2017年6月28日在上海江南造船厂下水,二号舰也在2018年4月下水。此次下水的两艘055驱逐舰为03和04号舰,两舰在大连造船厂同时开工建设,同时下水。
DWlv-hevauxi7042066.jpg
055驱逐舰的舰艏
055驱逐舰的舰艏采用了一门H/PJ-38单管130毫米舰炮的改进型,舰桥前采用了一门H/PJ-11型11管30毫米近防炮系统,舰艏甲板上是64套垂直发射装置,与舰尾的48套垂直发射装置组成了055驱逐舰的主要防空、反潜、反舰、对地攻击等武器。可根据任务的不同容纳海红旗-9B远程防空导弹、鹰击-18A反舰导弹、反潜助飞鱼雷以及对陆攻击巡航导弹等。
D8aU-hevauxi7042140.jpg
与052D驱逐舰相比,055驱逐舰明显大了一圈
055的排水量接近万吨,根据以往根据排水量划分舰艇种类的方法看,055驱逐舰实际上应该是055型轻型巡洋舰。与边上052D驱逐舰相比明显大了一圈,而052D的排水量不到7000吨。而20-30年前中国海军的最强驱逐舰排水量仅为4000多吨,如今不光翻了一倍多还第一次拥有了巡洋舰级别的舰艇。
Ra-P-hevauxi7042379.jpg
055采用了一体化桅杆和有源相控阵雷达
目前世界上能与055相提并论的驱逐舰只有美国还在建造的伯克3型驱逐舰,而055的舰船整体的隐身处理要超过伯克3不少,相比055的一体化桅杆,伯克三的隐身性完全不是055的对手,而在导弹数量上96套发射装置和112套发射装置上,055依然完胜美国海军下一代主力驱逐舰。055服役之后,将是中国海军首次赶上世界海军的潮流,中国海军再次成为世界海上强国的日子指日可待。



Two 055 destroyers launched with the 052D rare frame (Figure)
Two 055 destroyers launched with the 052D rare frame (Figure)
0

Original title: HD Photo: Two 055 destroyers launched with 052D rare with the frame

On July 3, two Type 055 destroyers at the Dalian Shipyard were launched at the same time. This has set a history in both the Chinese navy and the world navy: two naval main ships are launched at the same time. This honor belongs to China, belongs to China Shipbuilding Heavy Industry, belongs to the Chinese Navy, and belongs to all Chinese people.
With the help of a tugboat, the 055 destroyer leaving the dock left the dock's 055 destroyer with the help of a tugboat

The Type 055 destroyer is a new type of fleet air defense destroyer designed by the China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation 701 Research Institute, Jiangnan Shipyard and Dalian Shipyard, equipped with a new active phased array radar. The ship of this class was launched at the Jiangnan Shipyard in Shanghai on June 28, 2017, and the second ship was launched in April 2018. The two 055 destroyers launched in the launch were the No. 03 and No. 04 ships. The two ships started construction at the same time as the Dalian Shipyard and were launched at the same time.
Ship of the 055 destroyer's ship 055 destroyer

The 055 destroyer's ship uses an improved H/PJ-38 single-tube 130mm gun. The H/PJ-11 11-tube 30mm near-anti-gun system is used in front of the bridge. It is 64 sets of vertical launchers, and 48 sets of vertical launchers with the stern constitute the main air defense, anti-submarine, anti-ship, ground attack and other weapons of the 055 destroyer. According to different missions, Haihongqi-9B long-range air defense missiles, eagle-strike -18A anti-ship missiles, anti-submarine-assisted torpedoes, and land-attack cruise missiles can be accommodated.
Compared with the 052D destroyer, the 055 destroyer is obviously bigger than the 052D destroyer. The 055 destroyer is obviously bigger.

The displacement of 055 is close to 10,000 tons. According to the method of dividing the type of ship according to the displacement, the 055 destroyer should actually be a Type 055 light cruiser. Compared with the 052D destroyer on the side, it is obviously larger than the 052D, while the 052D has a displacement of less than 7,000 tons. The 20-year-old Chinese navy's strongest destroyer had a displacement of just over 4,000 tons, and now it has more than doubled and has the first cruiser-class ship.
055 uses an integrated mast and active phased array radar 055 with integrated mast and active phased array radar

At present, the world's destroyers comparable to the 055 are only the Burke 3 destroyers that the United States is still building, and the overall stealth handling of the 055 ships is much more than that of the Burke 3, compared to the 055 integrated mast, Burke III. Stealth is not the opponent of 055 at all, and on the number of missiles 96 sets of launchers and 112 sets of launchers, 055 still wins the US Navy's next-generation main destroyer. After the 055 service, it will be the first time for the Chinese navy to catch up with the world navy. The days when the Chinese navy has once again become a world maritime power are just around the corner.


http://www.sohu.com/picture/239069749


两艘航母“带刀侍卫”在大连同时下水



899 351

e93e30250d3d4abe8dd6bd9ad534e501.jpeg






1/4

2018年7月3日,中国2艘055型万吨级驱逐舰在大连造船厂同时下水,这一罕见的壮举也宣告着首批4艘055型驱逐舰的订单全部完工。

两艘航母“带刀侍卫”在大连同时下水



b9456e96607e45c2b52d52971db2b9db.jpeg






2/4

东北特钢集团为这四艘055型驱逐舰提供大量的钛合金专用原材料,为保证合同交货期,接到订单后,第一时间调整当期生产计划,安排技术人员全过程跟踪生产,为航母“带刀护卫”建造打开绿色通道。

通的号2018-07-03 17:02:30


bdee73c074a3434399d87ef86dd6247c.jpeg



899 351

a2f593abdaf64290905e042553406010.jpeg






http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-07-03/doc-ihevauxi3962607.shtml


中国两艘055万吨大驱今日同时在大连下水(图)

2018年07月03日 09:58 观察者网



0




[观察者网综合报道]据微博网友@热武器时代的爱情故事7月3日发布的图文消息,3日早上7点左右,大连造船厂内的两艘055大驱所在船坞已经注水并打开坞门,这意味着该舰于今天正式下水。
VPe9-hevauxi3956725.jpg

下水中的055型导弹驱逐舰,照片左侧的烟雾是船厂庆祝的鞭炮 来源:@热武器时代的爱情故事
Xh-k-hevauxi3956827.jpg

055型导弹驱逐舰三号舰和四号舰同时下水,可见舰艏张开的彩带 来源:@热武器时代的爱情故
8FiK-hevauxi3956946.jpg

稍早前拍摄的055型导弹驱逐舰,可见此时船坞的坞门正在移开 来源:@热武器时代的爱情故事
055是我军新一代大型驱逐舰,排水量超过一万吨,采用全燃动力、346B相控阵雷达、综合射频系统,配备112单元通用垂直发射系统。 此前该舰一号舰和二号舰已经在江南造船厂下水,此次下水的为该级舰第三、四艘,也是大连造船厂首次下水055型驱逐舰。
qJ0W-fzrwiaz8130322.jpg

Kj7j-hevauxi3957143.jpg

更早之前拍摄的照片,此时坞内刚刚开始注水,坞门尚未移开 来源:@热武器时代的爱情故事



China's two large-scale pumps of 055 million tons are launched in Dalian today (Photos)
July 03, 2018 09:58 Observer Network
0

[Observer Network Comprehensive Report] According to the microblogging users @热武器时代 love story released on July 3rd, about 7 am on the 3rd, the two shipyards of the 055 drive in Dalian Shipyard have been filled with water and Opening the dock door means that the ship was officially launched today.

The 055 missile destroyer in the water, the smoke on the left side of the photo is the firecracker celebrated by the shipyard. Source: @热武器时代的爱情故事

The No.3 and No. 4 missiles of the 055 guided missile destroyer were launched at the same time, showing the ribbons opened by the ship. Source: @热武器的的爱情

The 055-type guided missile destroyer photographed earlier, it can be seen that the dock door of the dock is being removed. Source: @热武器的的爱情故事

055 is a new generation of large-scale destroyer of our army. It has a displacement of more than 10,000 tons. It uses full-burning power, 346B phased array radar, integrated RF system, and 112 unit universal vertical launch system. Previously, the ship No. 1 and No. 2 ship had been launched at the Jiangnan Shipyard. The third and fourth ships of this class were launched, and the Dalian Shipyard was the first to launch the Type 055 destroyer.

Photograph taken earlier, when the dock has just started to fill the water, the dock door has not been removed. Source: @热武器时代的爱情故事
 
Last edited:

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal

放炮庆祝!
ANG MOH OUT-GUN & OUT-NUMBERED in South China Sea! 1 against 16 PLA warships! Can just vice clamp and squeeze you to sink by physically crushing you!

PLA got 16 new and advanced warship surrounding 1 Old Lossy British gunboat!

Want to fuck around South China Sea? How many gun boats you got?

Chow Ang Moh! Fucking bankrupted beggars want to find humiliation?

Feed you to sharks and Chinese will eat more shark fins!





http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-07-03/doc-ihevauxi3364139.shtml


英媒:英国老旧军舰进南海 被16艘中国军舰“围观”

英媒:英国老旧军舰进南海 被16艘中国军舰“围观”



0

来源:环球时报



2aWl-fzrwiaz8124969.jpg

据英国“泰晤士报”7月1日报道,英国国防部长等高官正在计划争取皇室的支持,劝说英国首相特蕾莎-梅向英军提供更多的资金。该计划旨在游说查尔斯王子和哈里王子,以赢得英女王的“道德支持”,确保英国依然保持军事强国的地位。
ASVA-fzrwiaz8124972.jpg

据报道,英国军方希望能够劝说特蕾莎-梅首相每年增加至少25亿英镑的军费,他们认为这是维持当前军事力量所需的最低限度,此前英国首相曾质疑英军是否应当维持一支顶级军事力量,英国军方等部门认为,梅首相受到了不喜欢军队的官僚机构影响。英军认为,梅首相没有意识到军队在维持脱欧之后英国政治和经济影响力的重要性。
Iled-hevauxi3358908.jpg

报道称,英国国防部辩解称,英国军方在脱欧之后需要保护其主要海上贸易路线,尤其担心中国对南海的掌控,日前英国海军“萨瑟兰”号护卫舰在途经南海时,遭到了16艘中国军舰的跟踪。英国过方面坚持认为,军费不能像警察预算一样削减,必须维持足够的兵力和武器装备,以应对紧急事件。大约50名英国议员正在向唐宁街施压,要求向英军提供更多资金。
据报道,规模日益萎缩的英国海军正遭受越来越多的批评。此前号称全球最先进、总造价超过60亿英镑的6艘45型导弹驱逐舰极其罕见地全部停靠在朴次茅斯军港。这种原本应该在大洋上巡逻,随时准备击落来袭导弹的反导战舰,却因为各种原因不能出航长达一个月,导致英国海防出现严重空白。
此外,英国国防部表示,由于经费紧张,决定不在军舰上装备反舰导弹。按照计划,英国海军现役护卫舰和驱逐舰上搭载的美制“鱼叉”反舰导弹将在2018年退役。糟糕的是,目前英国海军受制于经费,在未来十年内可能都无法找到“鱼叉”的替换品。英国海军消息人士愤怒地说,这意味着在长达10年内,英国海军舰艇都只能靠127毫米主炮与配备有远程反舰导弹的对手进行海战。主炮的最大射程仅有17英里,而且远距离上的精度也不足,相比之下,“鱼叉”的最大射程超过80英里,还能追踪目标精确调整轨迹。“英国国防部的这一决定将使英国军舰无力与俄罗斯与中国舰艇抗衡。”(来源:环球时报军事)


British media: British old warships entered the South China Sea by 16 Chinese warships "onlookers"
British media: British old warships entered the South China Sea by 16 Chinese warships "onlookers"
0

Source: Global Times

According to the British "Times" reported on July 1, the British Defense Minister and other senior officials are planning to win the support of the royal family, persuading British Prime Minister Theresa May to provide more funds to the British army. The program aims to lobby Prince Charles and Prince Harry to win the "moral support" of the Queen, ensuring that the UK remains a military power.

According to reports, the British military hopes to persuade Prime Minister Theresa-Mei to increase military spending by at least 2.5 billion pounds a year. They believe that this is the minimum required to maintain the current military strength. The British Prime Minister had questioned whether the British army should maintain a The top military forces, the British military and other departments believe that the Prime Minister of Mei was affected by the bureaucracy that did not like the military. The British Army believes that Prime Minister Mei did not realize the importance of the British political and economic influence after the military was maintained.

The report said that the British Ministry of Defence argued that the British military needs to protect its main maritime trade route after leaving the European Union, especially worried about China's control over the South China Sea. Recently, the British Navy "Sutherland" frigate passed through the South China Sea. Tracking of Chinese warships. The British side insists that military spending cannot be reduced like the police budget, and that sufficient troops and weapons must be maintained to deal with emergencies. About 50 British lawmakers are putting pressure on Downing Street to demand more funding from the British.

According to reports, the increasingly shrinking British navy is suffering more and more criticism. The six 45-type guided missile destroyers, previously known as the world's most advanced, with a total cost of more than 6 billion pounds, are extremely rare to dock at the Portsmouth Military Port. This kind of anti-missile warship, which was supposed to be patrolling the ocean and ready to shoot down the incoming missiles, could not sail for up to a month for various reasons, resulting in a serious gap in the British coastal defense.

In addition, the British Ministry of Defence said that due to financial constraints, it was decided not to equip the warships with anti-ship missiles. According to the plan, the US-made "Harpoon" anti-ship missiles carried on the British Navy's active frigates and destroyers will be retired in 2018. Worse, the British Navy is currently subject to funding and may not be able to find a replacement for the Harpoon in the next decade. The British Navy sources said angrily that this means that for up to 10 years, British naval vessels can only rely on 127mm main guns to engage in naval battles with opponents equipped with long-range anti-ship missiles. The main gun has a maximum range of only 17 miles and is not accurate enough over long distances. In contrast, the Harpoon has a maximum range of more than 80 miles and can track the target's precise trajectory. "This decision by the British Ministry of Defence will make the British warships unable to compete with Russian and Chinese ships." (Source: Global Times Military)
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
& WHAT?

Latest PLA Type 096 nuke sub is 50% faster max speed than the latest US Columbia Class nuke subs!?

Actually Type 096 is not the only sub that beats US top subs, Putin's Borei Class also on par with PLA @(over)30knots while US Ohio & Columbia Class top speeds are 20knots.

Alike the type 055 destroyers, the type 096 nuke subs are being build in large number without any being tested as prototype, and in comparison type 096 is much more complicated and expensive as well as strategically important. Because it is a strategic nuke sub with hundreds of nuke warheads and 2 dozens of SLMB on board, it's strike is world's doomday, nothing less.


PLA got own unique SHAFT-LESS water jet propulsion system, which is world most quiet machine in the water. US have no way to detect nor track them.


http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-07-03/doc-ihevauxi3491473.shtml

美称中国将建096型核潜艇 航速超30节大幅领先美潜艇

2018年07月03日 08:46 环球网



0




原标题:美媒:中国将开建096型核潜艇 一性能领先哥伦比亚级
[环球网军事综合报道]《今日美国报》网站6月30日报道称,全球三个海军强国都在开发下一代核潜艇舰队,从而加快了美国、中国和俄罗斯之间的水下军备竞赛。
分析人士表示,尽管美国的主要竞争对手疯狂地努力消除美国的优势,但美国迄今为止仍是最强大的潜艇力量,远远超过其他国家。每个国家看来都有不同的战略目标。美国一心要提高成本效益和作战效率,而中国和俄罗斯则专注于技术进步和增强隐形能力。
美海军战争学院战略学教授詹姆斯·R·霍姆斯警告说,美国很可能低估了其在太平洋地区所需的攻击型潜艇的数量。根据海军的建设计划,2019年至2023年间耗资1064亿美元的海军造船计划中,将近一半开支将用于开发弹道导弹核潜艇和攻击型潜艇。这份支出蓝图规定,329亿美元用于建造10艘攻击型潜艇,167亿美元用于开发一种新型弹道导弹核潜艇。
文章称,这些攻击型潜艇装备着为打击近距离的陆地和海上目标而设计的各种巡航导弹。其具体目的是攻击和击沉其他潜艇、水面战舰和商船。弹道导弹核潜艇配备着能够在世界上几乎任何地方实施报复性或先发制人打击的核武器。这两种类型的潜艇加在一起,对于海底战争的未来很可能产生举足轻重的影响。
此同时,俄罗斯预计到2025年将有4艘北风之神级II型潜艇竣工。中国将在几年内开始建造096型潜艇。这两种潜艇都将能够以超过30节的速度行驶,即比新的哥伦比亚级弹道导弹核潜艇快大约10节。因为美国最关注的是哥伦比亚级潜艇改进型核反应堆的终身维护成本,但对俄罗斯和中国的下一代弹道导弹核潜艇来说,速度和隐形是关键。
文章称,美国已经建造了13艘弗吉尼亚级攻击型核潜艇,到2018年底预计将超过15艘。中国和俄罗斯也在扩大其攻击型核潜艇舰队,尽管速度较慢。中国目前正在建造另外两艘095型核潜艇,并计划再增加5艘。而俄罗斯预计到2020年将再增加6艘亚森-M级潜艇。


http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-07-03/doc-ihevauxi3693767.shtml

美媒:中国正建两艘095型核潜艇 并计划再新建5艘

2018年07月03日 09:20 环球网



0

-9eh-hevauxi3677089.jpg

资料图:中国核潜艇



[环球网军事综合报道]《今日美国报》网站6月30日报道称,全球三个海军强国都在开发下一代核潜艇舰队,从而加快了美国、中国和俄罗斯之间的水下军备竞赛。
分析人士表示,尽管美国的主要竞争对手疯狂地努力消除美国的优势,但美国迄今为止仍是最强大的潜艇力量,远远超过其他国家。每个国家看来都有不同的战略目标。美国一心要提高成本效益和作战效率,而中国和俄罗斯则专注于技术进步和增强隐形能力。
美海军战争学院战略学教授詹姆斯·R·霍姆斯警告说,美国很可能低估了其在太平洋地区所需的攻击型潜艇的数量。根据海军的建设计划,2019年至2023年间耗资1064亿美元的海军造船计划中,将近一半开支将用于开发弹道导弹核潜艇和攻击型潜艇。这份支出蓝图规定,329亿美元用于建造10艘攻击型潜艇,167亿美元用于开发一种新型弹道导弹核潜艇。
文章称,这些攻击型潜艇装备着为打击近距离的陆地和海上目标而设计的各种巡航导弹。其具体目的是攻击和击沉其他潜艇、水面战舰和商船。弹道导弹核潜艇配备着能够在世界上几乎任何地方实施报复性或先发制人打击的核武器。这两种类型的潜艇加在一起,对于海底战争的未来很可能产生举足轻重的影响。
文章称,美国已经建造了13艘弗吉尼亚级攻击型核潜艇,到2018年底预计将超过15艘。中国和俄罗斯也在扩大其攻击型核潜艇舰队,尽管速度较慢。中国目前正在建造另外两艘095型核潜艇,并计划再增加5艘。而俄罗斯预计到2020年将再增加6艘亚森-M级潜艇。


The United States will build a Type 096 nuclear submarine with a speed of over 30 knots to significantly lead the US submarine.


July 03, 2018 08:46 Global Network



0






Original title: US media: China will open a 096 nuclear submarine

[Global Network Military Report] The USA Today website reported on June 30 that three global naval powers are developing the next generation nuclear submarine fleet, thus accelerating the underwater arms race between the United States, China and Russia.

Analysts say that although the main US competitors are frantically trying to eliminate the US's advantages, the United States is still the most powerful submarine force to date, far more than other countries. Each country seems to have different strategic objectives. The United States is bent on improving cost-effectiveness and operational efficiency, while China and Russia are focusing on technological advancement and enhancing invisibility.

James R. Holmes, a professor of strategy at the US Naval War College, warned that the United States is likely to underestimate the number of attack submarines it needs in the Pacific. According to the Navy's construction plan, nearly half of the $106.4 billion naval shipbuilding program between 2019 and 2023 will be used to develop ballistic missile submarines and attack submarines. The blueprint for spending is $32.9 billion for the construction of 10 attack submarines and $16.7 billion for the development of a new ballistic missile submarine.

According to the article, these attack submarines are equipped with various cruise missiles designed to combat close-range land and sea targets. Its specific purpose is to attack and sink other submarines, surface warships and merchant ships. Ballistic missile submarines are equipped with nuclear weapons capable of carrying retaliatory or pre-emptive strikes in almost anywhere in the world. The combination of these two types of submarines is likely to have a significant impact on the future of the Undersea War.

At the same time, Russia is expected to have four North Wind God II submarines completed by 2025. China will begin construction of the Type 096 submarine within a few years. Both submarines will be able to travel at more than 30 knots, about 10 knots faster than the new Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine. Because the United States is most concerned about the lifetime maintenance cost of a Columbia-class submarine-improved nuclear reactor, speed and invisibility are key to the next generation of ballistic missile submarines in Russia and China.

According to the article, the United States has built 13 Virginia-class attack-type nuclear submarines, and by the end of 2018 it is expected to exceed 15. China and Russia are also expanding their attack-type nuclear submarine fleets, albeit at a slower pace. China is currently building two other Type 095 nuclear submarines and plans to add another five. Russia is expected to add another six Yassen-M class submarines by 2020.



Http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-07-03/doc-ihevauxi3693767.shtml


US media: China is building two Type 095 nuclear submarines and plans to build another five


July 03, 2018 09:20 Global Network



0



Data Map: Chinese Nuclear Submarine




[Global Network Military Report] The USA Today website reported on June 30 that three global naval powers are developing the next generation nuclear submarine fleet, thus accelerating the underwater arms race between the United States, China and Russia.

Analysts say that although the main US competitors are frantically trying to eliminate the US's advantages, the United States is still the most powerful submarine force to date, far more than other countries. Each country seems to have different strategic objectives. The United States is bent on improving cost-effectiveness and operational efficiency, while China and Russia are focusing on technological advancement and enhancing invisibility.

James R. Holmes, a professor of strategy at the US Naval War College, warned that the United States is likely to underestimate the number of attack submarines it needs in the Pacific. According to the Navy's construction plan, nearly half of the $106.4 billion naval shipbuilding program between 2019 and 2023 will be used to develop ballistic missile submarines and attack submarines. The blueprint for spending is $32.9 billion for the construction of 10 attack submarines and $16.7 billion for the development of a new ballistic missile submarine.

According to the article, these attack submarines are equipped with various cruise missiles designed to combat close-range land and sea targets. Its specific purpose is to attack and sink other submarines, surface warships and merchant ships. Ballistic missile submarines are equipped with nuclear weapons capable of carrying retaliatory or pre-emptive strikes in almost anywhere in the world. The combination of these two types of submarines is likely to have a significant impact on the future of the Undersea War.

According to the article, the United States has built 13 Virginia-class attack-type nuclear submarines, and by the end of 2018 it is expected to exceed 15. China and Russia are also expanding their attack-type nuclear submarine fleets, albeit at a slower pace. China is currently building two other Type 095 nuclear submarines and plans to add another five. Russia is expected to add another six Yassen-M class submarines by 2020.




https://www.waonews.com/news/21766-...ed_exceeding_30_leading_the_US_submarine.html



It is known that China will build a 096 type nuclear submarine with a speed exceeding 30, leading the US submarine.
2018-07-02 20:48:00 category:Military click:615

Original title: US media: China will start building a 096 nuclear submarine with a leading performance in Columbia.
The United States, China and Russia have accelerated the underwater arms race between the United States, China and Russia by developing the next generation of nuclear submarines, the United States newspaper today reported on June 30th, the United States newspaper website reported that the three world naval powers were developing the next generation of nuclear submarine fleet.
Analysts say the United States is still the most powerful submarine force so far, far more than other countries, even though its major rivals are frantically trying to eliminate the United States' advantages. Every country seems to have a different strategic goal. The United States is dedicated to improving cost-effectiveness and operational efficiency, while China and Russia focus on technological progress and enhance stealth capability.
James R Holmes, a professor of strategic science at the US Naval War Institute, warned that the United States is likely to underestimate the number of attacking submarines they need in the Pacific. According to the Navy's construction plan, nearly half of the $106 billion 400 million naval shipbuilding plan between 2019 and 2023 will be spent on the development of ballistic missile nuclear and attack submarines. The spending plan stipulates that $32 billion 900 million will be used to build 10 attack submarines and $16 billion 700 million to develop a new type of ballistic missile nuclear submarine.
These attack submarines are equipped with various cruise missiles designed to combat close range land and sea targets, the article said. Its specific purpose is to attack and sink other submarines, surface warships and merchant ships. The ballistic missile submarines are equipped with nuclear weapons capable of retaliatory or preemptive strikes anywhere in the world. The combination of these two types of submarines is likely to have a significant impact on the future of the submarine war.
At the same time, Russia is expected to complete 4 North Wind God II submarines by 2025. China will begin to build type 096 submarines in a few years. These two kinds of submarines will be able to travel at speeds of over 30 knots, which is about 10 knots faster than the new Columbia class ballistic missile submarines. Because the United States is most concerned about the life-long maintenance costs of the Columbia class submarine improved nuclear reactors, speed and invisibility are the key to the next generation of Russian and China's next - generation ballistic missile nuclear submarines.
The article said that the United States has built 13 Virginia class attack submarines, and by the end of 2018, it is expected to exceed 15. China and Russia are also expanding their fleet of attack submarines, though at a slower pace. China is currently building two other 095 nuclear submarines, and plans to increase another 5. Russia is expected to increase another 6 sub Sen -M class submarines by 2020.











 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-07-03/doc-ihevauxi3617456.shtml

中国将量产激光步枪?可连射1000次毁伤800米外目标

中国将量产激光步枪?可连射1000次毁伤800米外目标



0




原标题:中国将量产连发远程激光枪?媒体炒作军事用途
FgiZ-hevauxi3610792.png

[环球网军事7月3日报道 环球时报特约记者 石留风 环球时报记者 马 俊]香港《南华早报》网站2日披露,中国研制出一种新型便携式激光步枪,可在将近一公里外毁伤目标。这一新闻迅速引起西方媒体的关注,“这意味着《星球大战》手持激光枪作战的科幻场景正在变成现实”,有媒体甚至联想到近日美国炒作的“中国激光眩目攻击”。但接受《环球时报》采访的专家表示,该报道混淆了军用武器装备和警用非致命装备的定义。
“可连发远程激光枪”
《南华早报》称,中国“国家军民融合公共服务平台网站”近日公开成都恒安警用装备制造公司生产的ZKZM-500型激光枪,它重约3公斤,接近AK-47步枪的重量,采用充电式锂电池组供电,具有良好的便携性和平台适应性,可安装在汽车、舰艇和飞机上。
报道对中美两国便携式激光武器进行了对比。2009年,美国试图研制手持式激光枪,但最终成品发射的激光能量不足,“连一件衬衫也烧不穿”。而中国ZKZM-500激光枪的性能非常出色,作用距离达到800米,每次发射时间持续2秒钟,可连续发射激光1000次,相当于发射数百发子弹。它发射的激光可以穿透窗户,让敌人的皮肤“瞬间碳化”。如果被攻击对象身着易燃布料,整个人可能都会被点燃。
ZKZM-500发射的激光不属于可视光波段,发射过程中不仅肉眼看不到,而且不产生任何声音。被攻击者很难察觉攻击来自哪里,即使被攻击,看上去也更像是意外。
有意炒作军事用途
澳大利亚新闻网7月2日刊文称,研究人员表示,ZKZM-500型激光枪单价为10万元人民币,目前已具备批量化生产装备能力。为了防止其遭到滥用,这种激光枪的设计和生产将受到严格管控。
报道猜测,第一批ZKZM-500型激光枪将列装中国军队和武警,广泛用于反恐、解救人质等领域。当发生人质劫持事件时,警察可用它透过窗户射击目标,灼伤绑匪致其暂时失能,方便其他人解救人质。“尽管中国把ZKZM-500激光枪归类于非致命武器,但它也可用于隐秘特种作战行动,利用激光波束点燃目标车辆油箱,或者远距离引爆机场油库。另外,如果长时间用激光照射目标,就会在被攻击者身体烧出一个洞,甚至像手术刀一样把人切开”。
《南华早报》还把中国激光枪与近来美军宣称的激光眩目攻击联系起来。在印度洋和南海执行任务的美军近日宣称,遭到来自中国军事基地或渔船的激光袭击。美国政府甚至公开指责中国吉布提海军基地发射“武器级激光”,导致美军两名飞行员视力受损。
混淆了激光武器概念
《环球时报》记者查询“国家军民融合公共服务平台网站”后发现,报道提及的ZKZM-500激光枪实际是一种新型国产单兵非致命激光武器,具有体积小、重量轻、使用灵活、性能稳定等特点。它发射的激光为准直光束,激光在不同距离上的光斑面积几乎相同,即能量密度相同,可在最大距离500米的范围内有效地造成灼伤效果,也可让微光和夜视仪等光电器材失效。
成都恒安警用装备制造公司相关人士2日接受《环球时报》记者采访时表示,ZKZM-500激光枪在攻击时具备“无色无味无声”的特性,主要通过让对手皮肤产生灼烧感等剧烈疼痛而失去活动能力,但并没有“使人体瞬间碳化”或“在人体开洞”的杀伤力。目前该激光枪的主要用户是警方而非军用,更突出非致命性打击效果,主要执行反劫持、打击犯罪、高空除障等任务。
专家认为,激光武器是利用定向发射的激光束直接毁伤目标或使之失效的定向能武器,主要分为反导反卫战略激光武器和战术强激光武器、激光致盲武器、光电对抗武器。其实激光武器有着无法克服的固有弱点,在地面或低空区域使用时,大气环境对激光武器的影响较大。目前战术致盲、干扰激光武器已经投入使用,但战略激光武器技术上还很不成熟。港媒所称的中国激光枪,其实是警用非致命性激光武器,这种武器早已投入使用,和真正意义上的军用激光枪,完全是两个概念。


关键字 : 激光枪激光武器中国

我要反馈


Will China produce laser rifles in volume? Can shoot 1,000 times and damage 800 meters away from the target
Will China produce laser rifles in volume? Can shoot 1,000 times and damage 800 meters away from the target
0

Original title: China will mass production of long-range laser guns? Media hype for military use

[Global Network military reported on July 3rd, Global Times special correspondent Shi Liufeng Global Times reporter Ma Jun] Hong Kong "South China Morning Post" website revealed on the 2nd that China has developed a new type of portable laser rifle that can damage the target nearly one kilometer away. . This news quickly caught the attention of Western media. "This means that the sci-fi scene of "Star Wars" with laser guns is becoming a reality." Some media even think of the "Chinese laser dazzling attack" that has been speculated by the United States recently. But experts interviewed by the Global Times said the report confuses the definition of military weapons and non-fatal equipment for police.

"Can send remote laser guns"

"South China Morning Post" said that China's "National Military-civilian Integration Public Service Platform Website" recently disclosed the ZKZM-500 laser gun produced by Chengdu Hengan Police Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd., which weighs about 3 kilograms, close to the weight of the AK-47 rifle, and is charged. Lithium battery packs are powered, have good portability and platform adaptability, and can be installed in cars, ships and airplanes.

The report compares portable laser weapons between China and the United States. In 2009, the United States tried to develop a handheld laser gun, but the laser energy emitted by the final product was insufficient. "Even a shirt can't be worn." The performance of the Chinese ZKZM-500 laser gun is very good, the working distance reaches 800 meters, each launch time lasts 2 seconds, and the laser can be continuously emitted 1000 times, which is equivalent to launching hundreds of bullets. The laser it emits can penetrate the window, allowing the enemy's skin to “instantaneously carbonize”. If the victim is wearing a flammable cloth, the whole person may be ignited.

The laser emitted by the ZKZM-500 is not in the visible light band, and it is not visible to the naked eye during the launching process, and does not produce any sound. It is difficult for an attacker to detect where the attack originated, even if it is attacked, it looks more like an accident.

Intentional speculation for military use

The Australian News Network reported on July 2 that the researchers said that the ZKZM-500 laser gun has a unit price of 100,000 yuan and is now equipped with mass production equipment. In order to prevent its abuse, the design and production of such laser guns will be strictly controlled.

The report speculated that the first batch of ZKZM-500 laser guns will be installed in the Chinese army and armed police, and are widely used in the fields of counter-terrorism and rescue of hostages. When a hostage-taking incident occurs, the police can use it to shoot the target through the window, burn the kidnappers to temporarily disable them, and facilitate others to save the hostages. “Although China classifies the ZKZM-500 laser gun as a non-lethal weapon, it can also be used for stealth special operations, using a laser beam to ignite a target vehicle fuel tank, or to detonate an airport oil depot from a distance. In addition, if the laser is used to illuminate the target for a long time It will burn a hole in the body of the attacker and even cut the person like a scalpel."

The South China Morning Post also linked Chinese laser guns to the recent laser dazzling attacks claimed by the US military. The US military, which is carrying out missions in the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea, recently announced that it was attacked by lasers from Chinese military bases or fishing boats. The US government even publicly accused China's Djibouti naval base of launching "weapon-grade lasers," resulting in damage to the visual forces of two US military pilots.

Confused with the concept of laser weapons

The Global Times reporter inquired about the "National Military-civilian Integration Public Service Platform Website" and found that the ZKZM-500 laser gun mentioned in the report is actually a new type of domestic non-fatal laser weapon with small size, light weight and flexible use. Features such as stable performance. The laser light emitted by it is a collimated beam. The spot area of the laser at different distances is almost the same, that is, the energy density is the same. It can effectively cause burns in the range of 500 meters in maximum distance, and can also make low-light and night vision devices. Photoelectric equipment failed.

A related person from Chengdu Hengan Police Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. said in an interview with the Global Times on the 2nd that the ZKZM-500 laser gun has the characteristics of “colorless, odorless and silent” when attacking, mainly by causing the burning skin of the opponent’s skin to be intense. Pain and loss of mobility, but there is no "killing the body instantly" or "opening holes in the body". At present, the main user of the laser gun is the police, not the military. It is more prominent in non-fatal combat effects, mainly performing anti-hijacking, cracking down on crimes, and removing obstacles at high altitude.

Experts believe that laser weapons are directed energy weapons that directly damage or invalidate targets by using directional laser beams. They are mainly classified into anti-missile and anti-defense strategic laser weapons and tactical strong laser weapons, laser blinding weapons, and photoelectric countermeasure weapons. In fact, laser weapons have inherent weaknesses that cannot be overcome. When used on the ground or in low-altitude areas, the atmospheric environment has a greater impact on laser weapons. At present, tactical blinding and interference laser weapons have been put into use, but the strategic laser weapon technology is still immature. The Chinese laser guns claimed by the Hong Kong media are actually police non-lethal laser weapons. These weapons have already been put into use, and the military laser guns in the true sense are completely two concepts.
Keywords : laser gun laser weapon China
I want feedback
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
Amphibious Assault ships type 075 displacement about 50,000tons are in mass production.

They are 5 time the size / weight of type 055 destroyers, and are larger than some aircraft carriers. They carry 30 combat and troop transport helicopters, as well as Giant Hoover Crafts, which carry tanks & troops for landing.







http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-07-03/doc-ihevauxi4078106.shtml


外媒:中国开始建造3艘075两栖攻击舰 7年内全部服役

外媒:中国开始建造3艘075两栖攻击舰 7年内全部服役



0




l7__-fzrwiaz8131398.jpg

网上流传的中国075型两栖攻击舰电脑设计图。(美国海军网站)
美媒称,2012年,第一艘航母“辽宁”号正式服役人民解放军海军,随后中国扩大航母舰队,又有3艘新舰目前正处于测试或建造阶段,引起亚洲和西方潜在对手忧虑不安。中国大量借鉴苏联20世纪80年代末雄心勃勃的“库兹涅佐夫海军元帅”号和“乌里扬诺夫斯克”号航空母舰计划,要在2025年之前建成多艘航母。
美国外交学者网站6月30日刊发了军事分析家、《军事观察杂志》创办人亚伯拉罕·艾特的文章。文章称,人民解放军海军舰队不仅数量多,而且在先进程度和规模大小方面也在与日俱增。作为“库兹涅佐夫海军元帅”号航母姊妹舰的“辽宁”号航母进行了现代化改装,装备更精良,虽然先进程度还有很大改进余地,但是它为未来航母研制的一流技术将极大提高自身能力。人民解放军海军的未来航母能够更加有力地与日本、美国及太平洋地区其他潜在对手投入使用的先进战舰一争高低。加上中国迅速扩大的驱逐舰舰队和致命的“055型”新型驱逐舰投入使用,中国的海上力量投射和争夺存有争议的战略要地南海和东海的能力看来迅猛增长。
艾特认为,对美国及其亚洲盟友而言,虽然人民解放军计划在2025年建成4艘航母舰队已经堪称可怕的前景,但是目前正在进行的低调防务计划极有可能看到这个数字升至7艘。在研制“001A型”、“002型”和“003型”等3艘航母的同时,中国造船厂还开始建造三艘两栖攻击舰——与法国航母“戴高乐”号差不多一样大的4万吨战舰。这些战舰与美国海军的“美利坚”级和“黄蜂”级两栖攻击舰非常相似,体积和外观几乎一样。透过美国战舰的样板,完全可以看出解放军对075型战舰的未来打算。
文章称,美国海军目前有20艘现役航母,其中11艘是10万吨级超级航母,9艘是两栖攻击舰——美国不把它归为航母,但它可部署固定翼战斗机。虽然没有发射常规舰载机所必需的跑道和制动装置,可是已经研制了可从这些攻击舰上部署的专业短距起飞和垂直降落飞机,实际上它们的功能相当于航母,而且是能力超强的航母。中国075型攻击舰将在2025年之前全部服役,届时也完全可以部署专业飞机,当作航母使用,因此将人民解放军海军航母舰队的规模扩大到7艘。
文章写道,正如中国对一大批20世纪90年代取消的苏联武器计划采取的行动,它很可能购买俄罗斯的“雅克”-141战机技术,从而非常迅速地研制本国的垂直起降或短距起飞垂直降落战斗机。结合解放军最近研发的一流军事航空技术,从隐形系统和有源电子扫描阵列雷达到世界一流的喷气机发动机和空对空导弹,中国从其3艘攻击舰(每艘可携带30架战机)部署的改装型“雅克”-141战机将成为人民解放军海军在南海和东海令人生畏的武器部署。随着大量报道暗示俄罗斯本身也在考虑重启“雅克”-141计划,鉴于解放军海军计划建造4艘两栖攻击舰,海军可以实施联合开发战机计划或是直接从俄罗斯购入。但是,注入中国的先进技术可大大提高飞机性能,对解放军海军来说也更为可取。
文章称,今天,随着美国海军在若干重要战线之间疲于应付,因此应对中国可能7年之内就能打造一支7艘航母舰队的挑战将是一件非常艰巨的任务。解放军海军将继续保持强大优势,因为它可以将先进装备集中在亚太地区,而美国的航母舰队虽然规模大几倍,但却面临全球义务,限制了它应对亚洲海上霸主地位面临的急速加剧的挑战。
文章认为,随着中国防务开支每年增长7%以上,解放军海军2025年之后还有可能建造更多航母入役。与此同时,美国海军的航母舰队却不太可能扩大,而匹敌中国在亚太迅速扩增的能力则意味着牺牲其他地区的义务。2025年很可能成为太平洋地区力量对比发生重大变化的转折点,给美国海军航母战斗群在亚洲的统治地位造成真正的挑战。


关键字 : 中国两栖攻击舰航母解放军


Foreign media: China began construction of three 075 amphibious assault ships, all in service within 7 years
Foreign media: China began construction of three 075 amphibious assault ships, all in service within 7 years
0

The computer design of the Chinese 075 amphibious assault ship circulated on the Internet. (US Navy website)

The US media said that in 2012, the first aircraft carrier "Liaoning" officially served in the People's Liberation Army Navy, followed by China's expansion of the aircraft carrier fleet, and three new ships are currently in the test or construction stage, causing anxiety in Asia and the West. China has borrowed heavily from the Soviet Union's ambitious "Kuznetsov Naval Marshal" and "Ulyanovsk" aircraft carrier program in the late 1980s, to build a number of aircraft carriers by 2025.

On June 30th, the US diplomatic scholars website published an article by military analyst and author of the Military Observer magazine, Abraham Aite. The article said that the PLA Navy fleet is not only a large number, but also in terms of advanced level and scale. As the aircraft carrier of the "Kuznetsov Naval Marshal" aircraft carrier, the "Liaoning" aircraft carrier has been modernized and modified, and the equipment is more sophisticated. Although there is still much room for improvement in advanced level, it will be the first-class technology developed for the future aircraft carrier. Greatly improve their own ability. The future aircraft carrier of the People's Liberation Army Navy can compete more forcefully with advanced warships put into use by other potential opponents in Japan, the United States and the Pacific. Coupled with China's rapidly expanding fleet of destroyers and the deadly "055" new destroyer, China's ability to project and compete for controversial strategic locations in the South China Sea and the East China Sea seems to have grown rapidly.

Aite believes that for the United States and its Asian allies, although the People’s Liberation Army plans to build four aircraft carrier fleets in 2025, it is a terrible prospect, but the ongoing low-profile defense plan is very likely to see this number rise to 7 Ship. At the same time as the development of three aircraft carriers such as "001A", "002" and "003", the Chinese shipyard also began to build three amphibious assault ships - nearly as large as 40,000 tons of the French aircraft carrier "Dao Gaile" Battleship. These warships are very similar to the US Navy's "American" and "Wasp" class amphibious assault ships, with almost the same size and appearance. Through the model of the US warship, it is entirely possible to see the PLA's future plans for the Type 075 warship.

According to the article, the US Navy currently has 20 active aircraft carriers, 11 of which are 100,000-ton super-aircraft carriers and 9 are amphibious assault ships. The United States does not classify it as an aircraft carrier, but it can deploy fixed-wing fighters. Although there are no runways and brakes necessary to launch conventional carrier aircraft, professional short-range take-off and vertical landing aircraft that can be deployed from these attack ships have been developed. In fact, they function as aircraft carriers and are capable of exceeding Strong aircraft carrier. The Chinese Type 075 attack ship will be fully operational by 2025. At that time, professional aircraft can be deployed as an aircraft carrier, thus expanding the size of the People's Liberation Army Naval Aircraft Carrier fleet to seven.

The article writes that, just as China’s actions against a large number of Soviet weapons programs cancelled in the 1990s, it is likely to purchase Russian “Jacques”-141 fighter technology, which will rapidly develop its own vertical takeoff or takeoff. Vertical landing fighter. Combining the first-class military aviation technology recently developed by the PLA, from stealth systems and active electronically scanned array radars to world-class jet engines and air-to-air missiles, China deploys from its three attack ships (each carrying 30 aircraft) The modified "Jacques"-141 fighter will become a daunting weapon deployment for the People's Liberation Army Navy in the South China Sea and the East China Sea. With a lot of reports suggesting that Russia itself is considering restarting the Jacques-141 program, the Navy can implement a joint development fighter program or buy directly from Russia, given that the PLA Navy plans to build four amphibious assault ships. However, the advanced technology injected into China can greatly improve the performance of the aircraft, and it is also preferable for the PLA Navy.

The article said that today, as the US Navy struggles between several important fronts, it will be a very difficult task to deal with the challenge of China building a fleet of seven aircraft carriers within seven years. The PLA Navy will continue to maintain its strong advantage because it can concentrate its advanced equipment in the Asia-Pacific region, while the US aircraft carrier fleet is several times larger, but it faces global obligations, limiting its rapid challenge to the Asian maritime hegemony. .

The article believes that with China's defense spending increasing by more than 7% per year, the PLA Navy may build more aircraft carriers into service after 2025. At the same time, the US Navy's aircraft carrier fleet is unlikely to expand, and rival China's ability to rapidly expand in the Asia-Pacific means sacrificing obligations in other regions. 2025 is likely to be a turning point in the major changes in the balance of power in the Pacific, posing a real challenge to the dominance of the US Navy aircraft carrier battle group in Asia.
Keywords : Chinese amphibious assault ship carrier, PLA


From the back hatch of type 075 amphibious assault ships, they will launch these Hoover-crafts for troops and tanks to do landing operations:

http://slide.mil.news.sina.com.cn/h/slide_8_203_65246.html#p=1

冲进淡水河口!我国产野牛登陆艇载老86步战抢滩登陆

支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看
2018.07.03 18:44:03

  • wLUU-hevauxi7553568.jpg


1 / 7
6月30日至7月1日,南部战区海军某登陆舰支队组织某新型气垫登陆艇开展登陆越障、装载航渡训练,检验装备综合作战能力。(中国军网英文版/刘健 摄影报道)




  • Vi74-hevauxi7553834.jpg



  • md2T-hevauxi7553847.jpg


  • flRL-fzrwiaz8164654.jpg



  • 0mp5-hevauxi7553843.jpg


  • 2N98-hevauxi7553857.jpg
 
Last edited:

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
How badly is USA afraid of China?

Here is how!

The USA is EXTREMELY FEARFUL OF CHINA!

They know that the Chinese will literally cannibalize them in whole and without spitting out the bone!

And there is nothing much they can do about it sadly!

Very hard to dodge and hide from their superior predator Ah Tiong!

美国患上最严重的中国恐惧症! 恐惧得犹如面对洪水猛兽!


https://www.ntia.doc.gov/press-rele...nt-china-mobile-s-section-214-application-fcc

NTIA Statement on China Mobile’s Section 214 Application to the FCC



Printer-friendly version

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 02, 2018
News Media Contact:

BACKGROUND: In 2011, China Mobile applied for a Section 214 license through the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to offer telecommunications services from within the United States. Per international licensing procedures, the FCC requested Executive Branch views on whether the application for the license was in the public interest of the United States.
The following statement is from David J. Redl, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, U.S. Department of Commerce:
“After significant engagement with China Mobile, concerns about increased risks to U.S. law enforcement and national security interests were unable to be resolved. Therefore, the Executive Branch of the U.S. government, through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration pursuant to its statutory responsibility to coordinate the presentation of views of the Executive Branch to the FCC, recommends that the FCC deny China Mobile’s Section 214 license request.”
NTIA’s filing can be found here: http://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws...ts?f_key=-233159&f_number=ITC2142011090100289
###
About NTIA
NTIA, part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, is the Executive Branch agency that advises the President on telecommunications and information policy issues. NTIA’s programs and policymaking focus largely on expanding broadband Internet access and adoption in America, expanding the use of spectrum by all users, advancing public safety communications, and ensuring that the Internet remains an engine for innovation and economic growth.




https://www.rcrwireless.com/2018070...deny-china-mobile-entry-to-u-s-telecom-market


NTIA recommends that FCC deny China Mobile entry to U.S. telecom market

By Juan Pedro Tomás on July 3, 2018 Carriers, Policy

NTIA says that China Mobile’s 2011 application to serve U.S. telecom market should be denied
The Federal Communications Commission should deny China Mobile’s pending application to enter the U.S telecommunications market, submitted in 2011, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration said in a filing.
NTIA, part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, is the executive branch agency that advises the president on telecommunications and information policy issues.
In 2011, China Mobile applied for a Section 214 license through the FCC to offer telecommunications services from within the United States. At that time, the FCC requested executive branch views on whether the application for the license was in the public interest of the United States. NTIA noted that China Mobile intended to offer international voice traffic between the U.S. and foreign countries, and didn’t aim to offer mobile service within the U.S.
“After significant engagement with China Mobile, concerns about increased risks to U.S. law enforcement and national security interests were unable to be resolved. Therefore, the Executive Branch of the U.S. government, through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration pursuant to its statutory responsibility to coordinate the presentation of views of the Executive Branch to the FCC, recommends that the FCC deny China Mobile’s Section 214 license request,” said David Redl, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information at the U.S. Department of Commerce.
The American intelligence community and other officials found that China Mobile’s application “would pose unacceptable national security and law enforcement risks,” according to the NTIA filing.
The filing also highlighted that China Mobile is wholly owned by the People’s Republic of China. “Because China Mobile is subject to exploitation, influence, and control by the Chinese government, the Executive Branch believes that granting China Mobile’s application would produce substantial and unacceptable national security and law enforcement risks,” the agency said.
In related news, Chinese vendor ZTE has appointed a new chairman and a new board as part of a deal with the U.S government to lift a seven-year export ban.
ZTE’s shareholders voted in Li Zixue, the deputy director of the Xi’an Microelectronics Technology Institute, as chairman, according to a Shenzhen Stock Exchange filing. ZTE also said its former board of 14 resigned as it elected a new board of eight.
That seven-year ban had been imposed by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) in March, after the vendor allegedly did not live up to the terms of an agreement that had been worked out after it illegally shipped telecom equipment to Iran and North Korea. In early May, ZTE said it had ceased its major operating activities due to the export ban.
Last month, the U.S government reached an agreement with ZTE which would allow the firm to resume business. Under the current terms of the agreement, the Chinese company must replace the boards of directors of ZTE Corp. and ZTE Kangxun. Additionally, all members of the company’s leadership at or above the senior vice president level also must be terminated, as well as any executive or officer tied to the export violations which led to the U.S sanctions.
In a recent filing, the Chinese vendor said it will pay a $1 billion to the U.S. government as part of a settlement agreement, as well as an additional $400 million in escrow.
ZTE also said it would resume operating activities as soon as practicable after BIS terminates the Denial Order.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
operation bagration was named after a russian general of georgian origin during the napoleonic era. the general and later marshal who commanded soviet armies in ww2 at the belorussian front was zhukov. for his role in the soviet victory, he was chosen by stalin and his peers to personally accept the german instrument of surrender and inspect the victory parade in moscow in 1945. in times of history-changing conflict, some cuntries are blessed with the rise and emergence of extraordinary military leaders: u.s. have george marshall, george patton; soviets have georgy zhukov. if you wish your son to be a future sinkie general extraordinaire that will save the cuntry from tiong invasion, ah neh rapes, and jiuhukia firecrackers, please name him georgie. :wink:
And krautland had Rommel, manstein, guderain, galland, pommie land had no one worth mentioning for ww2 but long ago had Horatio Nelson, Singkieland had.....?
 

oneMdeeBee

Alfrescian
Loyal
And krautland had Rommel, manstein, guderain, galland, pommie land had no one worth mentioning for ww2 but long ago had Horatio Nelson, Singkieland had.....?


Make me want to cry!
Or laff!
Or go forget this shit and go bring colors of rainbow to a deserving woman (that exclude you ginfreely, so stop salivating!)
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
How badly is USA afraid of China?

Here is how!

The USA is EXTREMELY FEARFUL OF CHINA!

They know that the Chinese will literally cannibalize them in whole and without spitting out the bone!

And there is nothing much they can do about it sadly!

Very hard to dodge and hide from their superior predator Ah Tiong!

美国患上最严重的中国恐惧症! 恐惧得犹如面对洪水猛兽!


https://www.ntia.doc.gov/press-rele...nt-china-mobile-s-section-214-application-fcc

NTIA Statement on China Mobile’s Section 214 Application to the FCC



Printer-friendly version

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 02, 2018
News Media Contact:

BACKGROUND: In 2011, China Mobile applied for a Section 214 license through the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to offer telecommunications services from within the United States. Per international licensing procedures, the FCC requested Executive Branch views on whether the application for the license was in the public interest of the United States.
The following statement is from David J. Redl, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, U.S. Department of Commerce:
“After significant engagement with China Mobile, concerns about increased risks to U.S. law enforcement and national security interests were unable to be resolved. Therefore, the Executive Branch of the U.S. government, through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration pursuant to its statutory responsibility to coordinate the presentation of views of the Executive Branch to the FCC, recommends that the FCC deny China Mobile’s Section 214 license request.”
NTIA’s filing can be found here: http://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws...ts?f_key=-233159&f_number=ITC2142011090100289
###
About NTIA
NTIA, part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, is the Executive Branch agency that advises the President on telecommunications and information policy issues. NTIA’s programs and policymaking focus largely on expanding broadband Internet access and adoption in America, expanding the use of spectrum by all users, advancing public safety communications, and ensuring that the Internet remains an engine for innovation and economic growth.




https://www.rcrwireless.com/2018070...deny-china-mobile-entry-to-u-s-telecom-market


NTIA recommends that FCC deny China Mobile entry to U.S. telecom market

By Juan Pedro Tomás on July 3, 2018 Carriers, Policy

NTIA says that China Mobile’s 2011 application to serve U.S. telecom market should be denied
The Federal Communications Commission should deny China Mobile’s pending application to enter the U.S telecommunications market, submitted in 2011, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration said in a filing.
NTIA, part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, is the executive branch agency that advises the president on telecommunications and information policy issues.
In 2011, China Mobile applied for a Section 214 license through the FCC to offer telecommunications services from within the United States. At that time, the FCC requested executive branch views on whether the application for the license was in the public interest of the United States. NTIA noted that China Mobile intended to offer international voice traffic between the U.S. and foreign countries, and didn’t aim to offer mobile service within the U.S.
“After significant engagement with China Mobile, concerns about increased risks to U.S. law enforcement and national security interests were unable to be resolved. Therefore, the Executive Branch of the U.S. government, through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration pursuant to its statutory responsibility to coordinate the presentation of views of the Executive Branch to the FCC, recommends that the FCC deny China Mobile’s Section 214 license request,” said David Redl, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information at the U.S. Department of Commerce.
The American intelligence community and other officials found that China Mobile’s application “would pose unacceptable national security and law enforcement risks,” according to the NTIA filing.
The filing also highlighted that China Mobile is wholly owned by the People’s Republic of China. “Because China Mobile is subject to exploitation, influence, and control by the Chinese government, the Executive Branch believes that granting China Mobile’s application would produce substantial and unacceptable national security and law enforcement risks,” the agency said.
In related news, Chinese vendor ZTE has appointed a new chairman and a new board as part of a deal with the U.S government to lift a seven-year export ban.
ZTE’s shareholders voted in Li Zixue, the deputy director of the Xi’an Microelectronics Technology Institute, as chairman, according to a Shenzhen Stock Exchange filing. ZTE also said its former board of 14 resigned as it elected a new board of eight.
That seven-year ban had been imposed by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) in March, after the vendor allegedly did not live up to the terms of an agreement that had been worked out after it illegally shipped telecom equipment to Iran and North Korea. In early May, ZTE said it had ceased its major operating activities due to the export ban.
Last month, the U.S government reached an agreement with ZTE which would allow the firm to resume business. Under the current terms of the agreement, the Chinese company must replace the boards of directors of ZTE Corp. and ZTE Kangxun. Additionally, all members of the company’s leadership at or above the senior vice president level also must be terminated, as well as any executive or officer tied to the export violations which led to the U.S sanctions.
In a recent filing, the Chinese vendor said it will pay a $1 billion to the U.S. government as part of a settlement agreement, as well as an additional $400 million in escrow.
ZTE also said it would resume operating activities as soon as practicable after BIS terminates the Denial Order.
Ah tiong companies can invest in USA infrastructure and make profit. Can USA companies invest in the equivalent infrastructure projects in ah tiong land? With 100percent controller and no technology transfer etc. Can or not?
 
Top