I will vote Tan Jee Say in the next election! Here's why

[zeroo]

The "chuckle" was as reported by CNA - ["And I'm only asking for S$60 billion -- not much, small change," he said with a chuckle.]

source: http://angrydr.blogspot.sg/2011_04_01_archive.html


At least he got the guts to tall voters he will be using our national reserves, Better than those snakes like WP who keep quiet but still plan to do it anyway.

 

[Equalisation]

Will he be a Harbour Master, if elected ?:o

 

[CoffeeAhSoh]

Will he be a Harbour Master, if elected ?:o

John might give it to his other bro Sunny Y

 

[jw5]

If he or his team are in a one-on-one contest against PAP, I will certainly vote for him.

 

[sochi2014]

60 billion is alot, where he get it from? suck from more poor Peasants?

 

[Equalisation]

Will he be a Harbour Master, if elected ?:o

All The Way ! Go Tan Go !:o

 

[yellowarse]

[TABLE="class: cms_table, width: 560"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_yiv2877877168the-post"][TABLE="class: cms_table, width: 560"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]SingFirst’s reply to CNA on PM Lee’s speech

by singfirst[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]


Press Release

Channel News Asia sought SingFirst's views regarding PM Lee's speech at the PAP party conference on 7 Dec 2014. He spoke about how the next GE will be a deadly serious fight, that it was about choosing the next government and not merely giving more seats to the opposition.

CNA's report on his speech here.

CNA: What is Sing First’s response to the speech?

SingFirst : The PM shows lack of confidence. He is flip-flopping. More than 20 years ago when town councils were introduced, PAP had said that election was about electing MPs to manage local housing estates, instilling fear in voters that their estates would be mismanaged by opposition MPs and would consequently drop in value. Now that opposition MPs have proven that they can manage housing estates, PAP is singing a different tune. By describing it as a national election now, PAP hopes to instill fear in voters that opposition cannot manage the country. We will prove the PAP wrong just as the opposition PAP themselves without experience in government proved the ruling party in 1959 wrong.

There is another revealing aspect. By downplaying the local dimension of a GE, the PM unwittingly shows his lack of confidence in his party local machinery which has been failing in recent years. He knows his local machinery will fail him again in the coming GE and it will not be a surprise if he is side-stepping them.

PM also implies that the nation does not need checkers. He is wrong. Every organisation needs checkers; for example, the accounts of companies need to be checked by auditors. Without checkers, the PAP government will be prosecutor, judge and jury, all in one. Isn't this scary? The PM is also wrong to say a checker will mean one doer or thinker less and hence a less effective government. The government does not need all MPs to be in government. it only needs a majority of MPs to form the government or 44 MPs in the current Parliament; not all MPs are members of the government with government posts. So even if all the 43 non-government MPs are opposition MPs, the government can still function effectively with all 43 opposition MPs as checkers.

The PM misled Singaporeans by saying opposition parties have no vision. If he goes to the website of opposition parties, he will notice they have a vision for the country. For example, SingFirst states its vision loud and clear on its website. Obviously PM does not know his competitors well. Has he forgotten what Sun Tze said, "Know yourself, know your enemy, a thousand battles, a thousand victories." With LHL as leader, PAP will not win a thousand victories and it will not achieve its stated goal of winning back all lost seats. Isn't it time for the PAP to change its Secretary General?

CNA: How would the party define the next GE?

SingFirst : We see the next GE as a last chance for Singaporeans to assert ourselves, our interests and well being in the face of PAP's relentless attempt to dilute the core of native Singaporeans by converting huge numbers of foreigners to citizenship. Yes the next GE is deadly serious for true blue Singaporeans.

CNA: How is the party gearing up for the next elections?

SingFirst: We are gearing up to contest as many constituencies as we can to provide an alternative to the PAP in cooperation with other opposition parties.
[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]

 

[CoffeeAhSoh]

All The Way ! Go Tan Go !:o

Pain

 

[laksaboy]

Another piece of propaganda from Jason Chua's Fabrications About The PAP.
These PAP IBs have been more... active after the PAP60 convention.


Image source:
https://www.facebook.com/Fabricatio...70599.213440582045291/763515857037758/?type=1

---

PAP IBs' favorite sites:

https://www.facebook.com/LabourMovementSingapore
https://www.facebook.com/FiveStarsAndAMoon
https://www.facebook.com/singaporeconscience
https://www.facebook.com/FabricationsAboutThePAP
https://www.facebook.com/fabflop
http://www.youtube.com/user/singaporeroar
http://www.fivestarsandamoon.com
https://www.facebook.com/shutdowntrs
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9PAYsa3wsdEaBkpYg1JlIA (Tiffany loves SG)
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOAg1wCuOqL8ZAtIlVcq7zw (Young NTUC)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4wQPDIJnCw24dEnHg-KJxQ (sgHardTruth)
http://sghardtruth.com
http://thesinkietimes.wordpress.com
https://www.facebook.com/contactsingapore
http://sgsilentmajority.blogspot.com
http://sggeneralelections2016.blogspot.com

Watch out for their shills who link to or post stuff from them.


Current shitlist
Isogallardo
Savingtheworld
MaxRiley
dodgeball
AtheneaCroft
Kenneth
pillowtalk
zeroo
ysy48
barbarachong
faithang

 

[mojito]

For this Jason Chua malaysian collaborator, I have a few meters of triple braided rope, rafia, masking tape and cable ties in my broom closet all packed up nicely and ready to go when the house of cards fall nobody will hear the screams.

 

[CoffeeAhSoh]

All The Way ! Go Tan Go !:o

Got Stirling News :*::*::*:

 

[frenchbriefs]

i would like to know where this idiot got his economics degree?school of Goh Meng Seng policy?

u want to give 1 million dollars each to assholes like Leong Sam so they can buy a yacht and retire to australia?

 

[GOD IS MY DOG]

60 billion is alot, where he get it from? suck from more poor Peasants?

he's a PAP mole...................his job is to present the Opposition people as having unrealistic, suicidal plans for S'pore...............

 

[Sideswipe]

who really cares about the opposition's proposed policies. I can't remember any of them. the opposition should make the "pie-in-the-sky" promises during election, get themselves elected first, how to achieve the promises can come later.

 

[Kuailan]

60 billion is alot, where he get it from? suck from more poor Peasants?

Take it back from Too Ma Sick ! where does Too ma sick got their money in the first place??

From CPF off course and it grew to few 100 billion after few years of scoundering!

 

[steffychun]

He's like the ABBA Song "I have a dream..."

 

[GoldenDragon]

who really cares about the opposition's proposed policies. I can't remember any of them. the opposition should make the "pie-in-the-sky" promises during election, get themselves elected first, how to achieve the promises can come later.

Promise to return CPF$ at 55 sure to get votes.

 

[shittypore]

Promise to return CPF$ at 55 sure to get votes.

If opposition dare not promise to return CPF at 55 it means they no better than PAP, use Sinkies hard earned cash for their own and their cronies to benefit.

 

[tonychat]

I only vote proper opposition like SDP...

this tan is a fucking PAP mole...

 

[yellowarse]

I only vote proper opposition like SDP...

this tan is a fucking PAP mole...

TJS is not a mole. I know the guy. He's sincere about fighting for change.

$60 bil is a lot to the common folk, but is a drop in the ocean compared to the money that the govt has squandered away in ill-advised investments, splurged on defence, or squirrelled away into overseas numbered accounts of the privileged and elite. Not to mention policies siphoning money away from the people, and not giving us back our dues, e.g. the CPF gives the world's lowest return on superannuation funds.