Husbands are rapist?

[BuiKia]

AWARE been trying to push for this to happen where the law allow wives to charge the husband for rape.

Ms Jolene Tan, Aware's senior manager for programmes and communications

The Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) said of the 136 calls and e-mails it got from victims of sexual crimes last year, the victims knew their attackers in 120 cases.

Ms Jolene Tan, Aware's senior manager for programmes and communications, said: "Perpetrators of sexual assaults could be friends, co-workers, boyfriends, husbands or business associates.

"While perpetrators may sexually assault women they know for a range of reasons, the fundamental problem is that they do not respect women's freedom over their bodies, and as a society we are too willing to excuse or justify their behaviour."

http://news.asiaone.com/news/diva/bunking-friend-he-insisted-we-share-bed-then-he-raped-me

 

[B Man]

AWARE been trying to push for this to happen where the law allow wives to charge the husband for rape.

Ms Jolene Tan, Aware's senior manager for programmes and communications

I guess she has listed ALL possible male roles that comes into contact with a woman. My take on her message to women is don't mix with men.

 

[spotter542]

She's still a Miss , that explains

 

[laksaboy]

I have told you all for a long time:

The feminazis are pushing forth to destroy the conjugal rights of husbands.


http://counterfem.blogspot.com/2007/11/marital-rape.html

Another point I would make regarding marital rape as a legal concept is, that it radically undermines the institution of marriage. Early feminist anti-rape activists effectively said "down with the idea of conjugal rights!" All right, fair enough. But if you enshrine that idea into law, then in theory you might as well throw marriage out the window. It becomes possible for spouse A to go on a permanent sex strike against spouse B. That leaves spouse B with three options: 1) Celibacy, 2) Extramarital satisfaction, or 3) Divorce. Nothing in the scenario I have painted bodes well for the future of marriage as an institution - at least in the form that we know it. I suppose that was part of somebody's agenda all along, but did they ask the rest of society if such a thing was wanted?

I will touch only briefly upon the possibility of false rape accusation within marriage. This, along with all the other possibilities for false accusation in marriage (which have come about with full feminist connivance if not active support), turns marriage into a poisonous trap that men would be wise to avoid.

Avoid marriage.

 

[krafty]

it should be avoid marriage with sinkie women...:o

I have told you all for a long time:

The feminazis are pushing forth to destroy the conjugal rights of husbands.


http://counterfem.blogspot.com/2007/11/marital-rape.html



Avoid marriage.

 

[B Man]

I guess its another divide and conquer.

What better way to divide your population by having men and women fight each another and not the ones-in-authority. Well used tactic in many governments except some use racism, religion, wealth etc.

 

[Sinkie]

Marry for what?

Of course marry for fuck lah.......

But nowsaday, can have all the sex without marrying, I really think marrying is for procreation only.

If woman can cry rape within marriage, can the husband cry 'withholding sex' as reason for criminal prosecution?

Crying rape is a very serious matter, AWARE is fucked irresponsible to even suggest that. If the woman does not want to
have sex, then don't go home if you think your husband is going to rape you and immediately file for divorce. That is the risk
all women have to take since they agree to marry their men.

In the woman's charter, if the wife incurs any debts, and cannot pay, the husband is responsible to pay on her behalf, in law but the converse is not true.

 

[Sinkie]

I guess its another divide and conquer.

What better way to divide your population by having men and women fight each another and not the ones-in-authority. Well used tactic in many governments except some use racism, religion, wealth etc.

You left out genes and intelligence.

 

[halsey02]

She's still a Miss , that explains

is She a VIRGIN?? cannot claim that $400 million, HA HA HA H....even without intercourse, using a dildo, not a VIRGIN on technicality...with so many rules & regulations, you want to F$#$$%$ her, she reads the rules to you...all men will tell her, to F$%^%## OFF..

 

[laksaboy]

Marry for what?

Of course marry for fuck lah.......

But nowsaday, can have all the sex without marrying, I really think marrying is for procreation only.

If woman can cry rape within marriage, can the husband cry 'withholding sex' as reason for criminal prosecution?

Crying rape is a very serious matter, AWARE is fucked irresponsible to even suggest that. If the woman does not want to
have sex, then don't go home if you think your husband is going to rape you and immediately file for divorce. That is the risk
all women have to take since they agree to marry their men.

In the woman's charter, if the wife incurs any debts, and cannot pay, the husband is responsible to pay on her behalf, in law but the converse is not true.

You can procreate without marriage. You can even hire a surrogate mother like what Michael Jackson did.

If you're hung up on doing your filial duty and extending the family bloodline, marriage is not the only option.

 

[halsey02]

You can procreate without marriage. You can even hire a surrogate mother like what Michael Jackson did.

If you're hung up on doing your filial duty and extending the family bloodline, marriage is not the only option.

If you do it like WACKO JACKO MICHAEL...then you should support the Gay cause...what is the difference? the point here is, AWARE is making SINGapore women.....barren..for nobody after reading the rules, want to f$#$$^% them anymore....

 

[Sinkie]

You can procreate without marriage. You can even hire a surrogate mother like what Michael Jackson did.

If you're hung up on doing your filial duty and extending the family bloodline, marriage is not the only option.

Your idea of procreation is very limited. It should also include upbringing the offspring in a normal family environment, with the full knowledge that the offspring is form your wife or husband.

In extreme modernist context, even a woman can get pregnant without a male involved and medically that is oredi possible......but we're not discussing about such ethics here......

 

[kaipoh]

Wah lau! see her I can not stand.

AWARE been trying to push for this to happen where the law allow wives to charge the husband for rape.

Ms Jolene Tan, Aware's senior manager for programmes and communications

 

[palden]

Ask her not to worry. No husband will rape her.

AWARE been trying to push for this to happen where the law allow wives to charge the husband for rape.

Ms Jolene Tan, Aware's senior manager for programmes and communications