• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The stark reality of SG: Roy will never be free

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
38,563
Points
113
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...m-ibrahim-released-after-international-outcry

Look it took "Hillary Clinton, Tony Blair, Jesse Jackson and Justin Welby, the archbishop of Canterbury" to get this Christian woman free from a Sudanese jail. But look at all those in SG from JBJ to Chee to Tang to Roy. Not one single international figure has called the PAP to stop harrassing, suing or jailing or bankrupting them. Look at the so-called Marxists conspirators, look at Chia Thye Poh. No world leader or international figure has called the PAP to end their abusive actions.

So that's how it will be in Sinkieland. The outsider world does not care. Even Malaysia's Awar is supported in the West. Which western leader will support Goh Meng Seng (haha), Chee, or even Low Thia Khiang?
 
Roy is being sued for something that he admitted to doing. There has been no injustice. There have been no false charges laid.
 
Ah expected you to come to your master's defence.

I'm simply stating the facts.

If someone accused me of stealing money when I have never done a dishonest thing in my life, I'd sue too.

If the person then apologised and admitted that his accusations were baseless and offered me compensation, I'd start proceedings to determine the appropriate amount.

Why anyone would view this as anything more than due process is beyond me.
 
if someone excuses me of fucking his wife ... but I did not do it
the heck I care ... it's not true wat!

if someone excuses me of fucking his wife ... and I did it
the heck I care ... it's true wat!

:o:o:D
 
I'm simply stating the facts.

If someone accused me of stealing money when I have never done a dishonest thing in my life, I'd sue too.

If the person then apologised and admitted that his accusations were baseless and offered me compensation, I'd start proceedings to determine the appropriate amount.

Why anyone would view this as anything more than due process is beyond me.

Truth hurts.
Hard truth hurts really hard.
If someone says I am a liar, a thief, a robber etc., but those are not truth, why should I get hurt?
I just ignore him.
 
if someone excuses me of fucking his wife ... but I did not do it
the heck I care ... it's not true wat!

if someone excuses me of fucking his wife ... and I did it
the heck I care ... it's true wat!

:o:o:D

If someone excuses you for fucking his wife, it's obvious that he couldn't care less who his wife sleeps with in the first place.

However, regardless of a husband's reaction, if you are accused of something that isn't true and it causes you to lose your job and your wife leaves you and your children want nothing to do with you anymore, I'd like to see you "heck care" in the face of these consequences. :rolleyes:
 
If someone says I am a liar, a thief, a robber etc., but those are not truth, why should I get hurt?
I just ignore him.

If someone says you're a thief and your boss gets to hear about it and believe that the accusation is true and fires you, would you still adopt the same cavalier attitude?

If you then try to get another job but because of the accusations, prospective new employers shy away from hiring you and you end up jobless for years, would you still not bother to try to clear your name?
 
If someone says you're a thief and your boss gets to hear about it and believe that the accusation is true and fires you, would you still adopt the same cavalier attitude?

If you then try to get another job but because of the accusations, prospective new employers shy away from hiring you and you end up jobless for years, would you still not bother to try to clear your name?

Very well said. Roy indeed admitted he defamed LHL. Case closed.

Anyone who wants to adopt the same cavalier attitude should study the sorry case of Brian Banks.
 
My point being no world leader bothers about the injustices in SG.
 
My point being no world leader bothers about the injustices in SG.

That's why we need to support politicians like LTK who are ever so careful to tread the line. Nobody is going to help us. I am hopeful that CSJ is working towards this direction as well. There is no time to be lost anymore.
 
he will never be free because the balless and coward sinkies will never march for him!!!!!

do u hear the people sing???

singing the song of angry men!!!!!

it is the music of a people that will not be slaves again!!!!!
 
Ha! I think pink wishes his wife left him :D

The problem in Sinkieland is that when a wife leaves, she takes along half or more of everything. Wives are replaceable and expendable. The money you lose is not.
 
患乱出英雄

His son is facing the same wrath from God. 人算不如天算



There was one man who had stand up to the government and lead a unknown party to dethrone an empire. History will repeat itself.



“But we either believe in democracy or we not. If we do, then, we must say categorically, without qualification, that no restraint from the any democratic processes, other than by the ordinary law of the land, should be allowed… If you believe in democracy, you must believe in it unconditionally. If you believe that men should be free, then, they should have the right of free association, of free speech, of free publication. Then, no law should permit those democratic processes to be set at nought.”
- Lee Kuan Yew as an opposition leader, April 27, 1955


“If it is not totalitarian to arrest a man and detain him, when you cannot charge him with any offence against any written law – if that is not what we have always cried out against in Fascist states – then what is it?… If we are to survive as a free democracy, then we must be prepared, in principle, to concede to our enemies – even those who do not subscribe to our views – as much constitutional rights as you concede yourself.”
- Opposition leader Lee Kuan Yew, Legislative Assembly Debates, Sept 21, 1955

“If we say that we believe in democracy, if we say that the fabric of a democratic society is one which allows for the free play of idea…then, in the name of all the gods, give that free play a chance to work within the constitutional framework.”
- Opposition leader Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore Legislative Assembly, Oct 4, 1956





he will never be free because the balless and coward sinkies will never march for him!!!!!

do u hear the people sing???

singing the song of angry men!!!!!

it is the music of a people that will not be slaves again!!!!!
 
Last edited:
there was no empire,everything he said was hypocrisy and heresy.he tried to get the tunku and the british to scheme with him to get rid of the barisan socialist....finally he did it himself,having all them arrested on the pretext of communist conspiracy....his hands are stained with blood.

患乱出英雄

His son is facing the same wrath from God. 人算不如天算



There was one man who had stand up to the government and lead a unknown party to dethrone an empire. History will repeat itself.



“But we either believe in democracy or we not. If we do, then, we must say categorically, without qualification, that no restraint from the any democratic processes, other than by the ordinary law of the land, should be allowed… If you believe in democracy, you must believe in it unconditionally. If you believe that men should be free, then, they should have the right of free association, of free speech, of free publication. Then, no law should permit those democratic processes to be set at nought.”
- Lee Kuan Yew as an opposition leader, April 27, 1955


“If it is not totalitarian to arrest a man and detain him, when you cannot charge him with any offence against any written law – if that is not what we have always cried out against in Fascist states – then what is it?… If we are to survive as a free democracy, then we must be prepared, in principle, to concede to our enemies – even those who do not subscribe to our views – as much constitutional rights as you concede yourself.”
- Opposition leader Lee Kuan Yew, Legislative Assembly Debates, Sept 21, 1955

“If we say that we believe in democracy, if we say that the fabric of a democratic society is one which allows for the free play of idea…then, in the name of all the gods, give that free play a chance to work within the constitutional framework.”
- Opposition leader Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore Legislative Assembly, Oct 4, 1956
 
he will never be free because the balless and coward sinkies will never march for him!!!!!

do u hear the people sing???

singing the song of angry men!!!!!

it is the music of a people that will not be slaves again!!!!!


大智如愚
When even the taxi driver feels this way
It is far too late already
Should stay on to drive White Scums out
Those who had upgraded
Can assist by regularizing their voter status
Early and fly back to vote
Actual slaughtering of Dong Zhuo and cronies
Needs to be done by stayers


[video=youtube;wJVpihgwE18]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJVpihgwE18[/video]
 
Basically I looked at this issue simply as Sinkie being plain BAlless in approaching this CPF issue.

They know that changes will only be made if they vote OUT the PAP but are too BALLESS to do so and remain on the side lines, taking swipes at those they are dissatisfied with.

Real hopeless cunts, these Sinkie.
 
Roy is being sued for something that he admitted to doing. There has been no injustice. There have been no false charges laid.

It was done under duress.........under common laws it is inadmissable but in kangeroo keling courts, all hell will break loose
 
Back
Top