Yes. Its up to Roy to secure and show the evidence. And it also cannot be a fishing expedition.
Everyone has different agendas. All of them can be genuine and well intentioned by in this case, even if the Roy becomes the poster boy for many it will be him alone that will be the sole recipient of whatever penalties that befall.
Bear in mind the stakes increase and we are looking at aggravated damages as more defiant statements are made.
His best defence is exuberance of youth, the genuine need to serve the community etc. The case will still not be thrown out but the sympathetic judge might award a small amount.
Everyone has different agendas. All of them can be genuine and well intentioned by in this case, even if the Roy becomes the poster boy for many it will be him alone that will be the sole recipient of whatever penalties that befall.
Bear in mind the stakes increase and we are looking at aggravated damages as more defiant statements are made.
His best defence is exuberance of youth, the genuine need to serve the community etc. The case will still not be thrown out but the sympathetic judge might award a small amount.
While it sounds like a good dream, the judge is not within your order to secure evidence. The onus in securing evidence lies in the defendant, which would of course be impossible to get from CPF.