• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP Spin - PMET job loss is due to structural unemployment

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
27,906
Points
113
Beware job-skill mismatch: Swee Say
Toh Yong Chuan
The Straits Times
Monday, Aug 05, 2013

SINGAPORE - Structural unemployment may rise in Singapore and requires the special attention of companies and workers, warned labour chief Lim Swee Say.

The mismatch between jobs created and the skills needed to do them is harder to fix than the seasonal job churn in the labour market, he said on Friday.

And a developed economy like Singapore faces a greater threat of it happening, said the secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress.

"Structural unemployment affects workers at all levels, including professionals, managers and executives (PMEs)," he added. "It doesn't matter whether you are young or old, rank and file or PMEs."

Mr Lim's comments came two days after the Manpower Ministry released data that showed unemployment rising in the second quarter of the year even as more jobs were created.

He noted that the mismatch between jobs and skills can happen in all sectors, and called on workers and employers to work together with unions and the Government to tackle it.

Workers should be adaptable and keep upgrading their skills, while firms can tap government schemes to raise their productivity to create better jobs, he said.

The labour movement sounded the alarm bells even as it kicked off a series of 23 National Day celebrations at the former Singapore Conference Hall.

In his written National Day message to unionists, Mr Lim pointed out that many countries face the problems of youth unemployment, inadequate pay rises for working adults and dwindling retirement funds for retirees - what he calls the problem of "three not enough".

Singapore is spared this triple whammy, with low unemployment, steady wage gains and a rising re-employment age.

But the country faces its own challenges, he noted.

"Besides countering the global threat of 'three not enough', we also have to tackle the issues of a widening income gap, an ageing workforce and the potential rise in structural unemployment."

He laid out some areas where Singapore must do better. One of them is transforming the economy to be more productive, even if it means slower growth.

It is better to grow at 3 per cent a year with productivity gains of 2 per cent, than at 4 per cent a year but with productivity gains of just 1 per cent, he said.

Companies facing labour shortages and rising business costs must become "leaner, greener and cleverer", he added.

But even as it looked forward, the NTUC retraced its history with a display of 48 old photographs at the former Singapore Conference Hall, where the union movement first started in 1961.

NTUC's youth chapter member Clarence Ngoh was one of the unionists who enjoyed looking at the old pictures.

Said the 20-year-old full-time national serviceman: "I am a nostalgic person, so old pictures remind me of how far the NTUC and Singapore have progressed."
 
Mr Siah Sway should go back and learn his economics.

Structural unemployment in sinkapore is caused by the PAP government. PMET jobs are taken by cheap foreigners, displacing the locals. Locals with the skills are no longer required ...that's the structural employment that Siah Sway talks about. Here's the solution, Mr Siah Sway - close the door to foreign PMET and deport all the current PMET. Walla, local PMET will get their jobs back.
 
Structural unemployment started way back in the 1980's when we went into a recession, since then , we have been hearing this excuse till now, together with productivity & next will be, don't demand for more salary, companies will move out from here song.

What is new from these people & this 'toothpicks collector' clown? tell us something, we do not know of & concrete solutions to solve the problems. One thing we know is, the PAP government have no structural unemployment...
 
Mr Siah Sway should go back and learn his economics.

Structural unemployment in sinkapore is caused by the PAP government. PMET jobs are taken by cheap foreigners, displacing the locals. Locals with the skills are no longer required ...that's the structural employment that Siah Sway talks about. Here's the solution, Mr Siah Sway - close the door to foreign PMET and deport all the current PMET. Walla, local PMET will get their jobs back.

If the foreign PMETs are deported, costs will go up and the companies that hire them will no longer find it profitable to operate in Singapore. They'll relocate to cheaper locations and the end result will be job losses on an even larger scale.
 
Agreed.
Having astronomical costs in land, office rent, utilities, cars, indirect taxes etc., the companies have no choice, but to hire cheaper and obedient staff.
 
If the foreign PMETs are deported, costs will go up and the companies that hire them will no longer find it profitable to operate in Singapore. They'll relocate to cheaper locations and the end result will be job losses on an even larger scale.

If we never had a import-cheap-labour policy, our industries would have adjusted decades ago. We could now be a high wage, high value added economy.
Thanks to cheap foreign labour, business here are not willing to invest in capital.
Cheap labour policy is an admission that the PAP think tank is intellectually bankrupt. And how long can that policy keep industries in sinkapore when there are so many countries joining that playing field?

Deporting the millions of cheap labour will have negligible impact on the local work force because the former are taking away jobs from locals. Jobs are created when you kick the foreigners out. Some business may relocate as a result of the abolition of cheap foreign labour, but these are business that should be in Vietnam or somewhere else where cheap labour is available. Most will adjust to the new cost environment by investing in capital and changing its product/service range.
 
Agreed.
Having astronomical costs in land, office rent, utilities, cars, indirect taxes etc., the companies have no choice, but to hire cheaper and obedient staff.

Huh? then should not astronomical costs in land, office rent, utilities, cars, indirect taxes be reduced so that locals can be hired? And such costs also be reduced for the people so they can take less pay and keep companies competitive? Sam has warped logic.
 
Last edited:
Having astronomical costs in land, office rent, utilities, cars, indirect taxes etc., the companies have no choice, but to hire cheaper and obedient staff.

Cost of land is largely controlled by the government. In the early days of industrialization, the government was making land so cheap for industries to be based here.
All those meteoric increase in cost can be largely attributed to government policies. You want to tackle the high cost ...take aim at the government.
 
Huh? then should not astronomical costs in land, office rent, utilities, cars, indirect taxes be reduced so that locals can be hired? And such costs also be reduced for the people so they can take less pay and keep companies competitive? Sam has warped logic.

Ha ha... You look at his avatar, it says thousand words.
 
Any structural unemployment for the Cabinet due to poor performance?
 
Cost of land is largely controlled by the government. In the early days of industrialization, the government was making land so cheap for industries to be based here.
All those meteoric increase in cost can be largely attributed to government policies. You want to tackle the high cost ...take aim at the government.

Exactly.
In land tender, if the lowest bid price is less than their minimum set price, they withdraw the land(s).
They never allow business owners to bid for less than their valuation, which is one step higher than the last transaction.
It caused escalation of the price war, and the citizens pay dearly at the end.
 
Last edited:
Any structural unemployment for the Cabinet due to poor performance?

Performance includes many things...
As leader, I think they should get back their moral leadership.
Without having the moral authority, no country can be progress.
 
Cost of land is largely controlled by the government. In the early days of industrialization, the government was making land so cheap for industries to be based here.
All those meteoric increase in cost can be largely attributed to government policies. You want to tackle the high cost ...take aim at the government.

Surprisingly, the major players in land, offices, shops, housing, etc. are linked to the Gov.
CapitaLand, Kepple, MapleTree, JTC...
 
Agreed.
Having astronomical costs in land, office rent, utilities, cars, indirect taxes etc., the companies have no choice, but to hire cheaper and obedient staff.

It is like all the fucking self service that force sinkies to be unpaid hawker assistance in waiting and delivering food that you paid for.
PAP charges sky high for little cubicles for hawkers who cannot pay for assistants and PAP then force sinkies to be hawker assistants
And now about to force sinkies to return plates and next will be sinkies to wash up for the hawkers while PAP maggots go laughing all the way to the banks and to their French and Italian restaurants
 
More structural employment will take place when AEC (Asean Economic Community) takes off, if ever. More Sinkie PMETs will lose their jobs.

Pinky has been pushing for AEC to become a reality in 2015. He says it will benefit all the participants. In actual fact the beneficiairies are Sinkie GLCs and big MNCs aligned with LEEgime. The average Sinkie should not hope to get even a morsel of the economic pie.
 
Back
Top